Main Article Content

Anubhav Sengupta


In the last decade, India has witnessed a resurgence of Maoist movements. At the same time, the country’s polity has been rocked by various protests against displacement by local population. These protests have commonly been referred to as people’s movement. In some cases, both, Maoists and people’s movements have overlapped and thus raising the question about people’s agency and Maoists’ role in it. This essay posits the question: who is this people? The assumption is only by exploring the answer, questions pertaining to autonomy or agency can be answered. The essay takes the case of Lalgarh movement, West Bengal, where adivasis rose up against the state, police atrocities. Subsequently Maoists came into the picture. In exploring the debate, mentioned above in the context of Lalgarh, the essay studies a set of letters written to civil society, issued by an organization on behalf of adivasis. The essay finds that the issues of agency must be reconceptualised as subjectivity. Instead of finding a pure voice of adivasis, it is subjectivity as process that helps us to grasp politics of the people. The paper finally argues that the process of becoming people is congealing of adivasis as a political collective.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Sengupta, A. (2017). WHO IS THE PEOPLE? NOTES ON SUBJECTIVITY AND THE ADIVASI RESISTANCE IN LALGARH, WEST BENGAL, INDIA. Society Register, 1(1), 23-37. https://doi.org/10.14746/sr.2017.1.1.03


  1. Agamben, Giorgio. 1998. Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life, translated by Daniel Heller-Roazen. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
  2. – – – – –. 2005. The State of Exception, translated by Kevin Attell. London, UK: The University of Chicago Press.
  3. Althuuser, Louis (2005), “The ‘Piccolo Teatro’: Bertolazzi and Brecht”. Pp. 129-52 in For Marx. translated by Ben Brewster. New York, US: Verso.
  4. – – – – –. 2006. “Ideology and Ideological State Apparatus (Notes Towards an Investigation)”. Pp. 85-126 in Lenin and Philosophy and other essays, Delhi, India: Aakar Books.
  5. APDR and BMC, 2012. “Fact Finding Report on the Incidents of Violence at Nandigram during January, 2007” pp. 276-84. in Poschimbonge Rastriyo Santras: Kasipoor, Barahnagar theke Lalgarh via Singur-Nandigram, [State Terror in West Bengal: From Kasipoor, Barahnagar to Lalgarh, via Singur-Nandigram]. edited by Sukhdeb Chattopadhaya. Kolkata, India: Ubudash.
  6. Badiou, Alain. 2005. “Althusser: Subjectivity without a Subject”. pp. 58-67 in Metapolitics, translated by Jason Barker. New York, US: Verso.
  7. Bhattyacharya, Amit. 2010. “Is Lalgarh Showing the Way?”. Economic and Political Weekly 44 (26&27): 17-21.
  8. D’Souza, Radha (2009). “Sandwich Theory and Operation Green Hunt”, Sanhati. December 15 (4097 words). Retrieved July 31, 2017 (http://sanhati.com/excerpted/2003/).
  9. Gerth, H.H. and C. Wright Mills., ed. 1946. From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, New York, US: Oxford University Press.
  10. Giri, Saroj. 2009. “Lalgarh and the Radicalisation of Resistance: From 'Ordinary Civilians' to Political Subjects?”. MRZine. July 09 (3465 words).
  11. Retrieved July 31, 2017 (https://mronline.org/2009/07/09/lalgarh-and-the-radicalisation-of-resistance-from-ordinary-civilians-to-political-subjects/).
  12. – – – – – 2009a. “Maoists and the Poor: Against Democracy?”. Economic and Political Weekly XLIV (49): 17-21.
  13. Menon, Nivedita. 2009. “Radical Resistance and Political Violence Today”. Economic and Political Weekly. 44(15): 16-20.
  14. Nandini, Sundar, 2006. “Bastar, Maoism and Salwa Judum”. Economic and Political Weekly 41(29): 3187-3192
  15. Nigam, Aditya. 2009. “Democracy, State and Capital: The ‘Unthought’ of Twentieth Century Marxism, Economic and Political Weekly XLIV(51): 35-39.
  16. – – – – – 2010. “The Rumour of Maoism”. Seminar 607: 75-81.
  17. Sanhati 2013. Letters from Lalgarh. Kolkata, India: Setu Prakashani.
  18. Sarkar, Sumit and Tanika Sarkar. 2009, “Notes on a Dying People”. Economic and Political Weekly XLIV(26-27): 10-14.
  19. Shah, Alpa. 2009. “In search of certainty in revolutionary India”. Dialectical Anthropology 33(3/4): 271-86.
  20. Taussig, Michael. 1992. “Terror as Usual: Walter Benjamin’s Theory of History as State of Siege”, Pp. 11-36 in The Nervous System, Newtork: Routledge.
  21. White, Luise. 2000. Speaking with Vampires: Rumor and History in Colonial Africa. Berkeley, US: University of California Press.