A dynamical-systems approach to the evolution of morphonotactic and lexical consonant clusters in English and Polish

Main Article Content

Andreas Baumann
Kamil Kaźmierski


Consonant clusters appear either lexically within morphemes or morphonotactically across morpheme boundaries. According to extant theories, their diachronic dynamics are suggested to be determined by analogical effects on the one hand as well as by their morphological signaling function on the other hand. This paper presents a mathematical model which allows for an investigation of the interaction of these two forces and the resulting diachronic dynamics. The model is tested against synchronic and diachronic language data. It is shown that the evolutionary dynamics of the cluster inventory crucially depend on how the signaling function of morphonotactic clusters is compromised by the presence of lexical items containing their morpheme internal counterparts.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Baumann, A., & Kaźmierski, K. (2016). A dynamical-systems approach to the evolution of morphonotactic and lexical consonant clusters in English and Polish. Yearbook of the Poznań Linguistic Meeting, 2(1), 115-139. https://doi.org/10.1515/yplm-2016-0006


  1. Baumann, A., C. Prömer and N. Ritt. 2015. “Diachronic reflexes of frequency effects among word final (mor)phonotactic consonant clusters in Middle and Early Modern English”. Paper presented at the 3rd International Workshop on Phonotactics and Phonotactic Modeling.
  2. Blythe, R.A. and W. Croft. 2012. “S-curves and the mechanism of propagation in language change”. Language 88(2). 269–304.
  3. Croft, W. 2000. Explaining language change. An evolutionary approach. Harlow, New York: Longman.
  4. Denison, D. 2003. “Log(ist)ic and simplistic S-curves”. In: Hickey, R. (ed.), Motives for language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 54–70.
  5. Donohue, M., R. Hetherington, J. McElvenny and V. Dawson. 2013. “World phonotactics database”. Department of Linguistics, The Australian National University. <http://phonotactics.anu.edu.au>. Last accessed: 16 Sep 2015.
  6. Dressler, W.U. 2007. “Early development of nominal and verbal morphology from a typological perspective”. In: Laaha, S. and S. Gillis (eds.), Typological perspectives on the acquisition of noun and verb morphology. (Antwerp Papers in Linguistics 112.). 3–9.
  7. Dressler, W.U., K. Dziubalska-Kołaczyk and L. Pestal. 2010. “Change and variation in morphonotactics”. Folia Linguistica Historica 31. 51–67.
  8. Dressler, W.U. and K. Dziubalska-Kołaczyk. 2006. “Proposing morphonotactics”. Wiener Linguistische Gazette 73. 1–19.
  9. Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, K. and P. Zydorowicz. 2014. “The production of high-frequency clusters by native and non-native users of Polish”. Concordia Working Papers in Applied Linguistics 5. 130–144.
  10. Geritz, S.A.H., E. Kisdi, G. Meszéna and J.A.J. Metz. 1998. “Evolutionarily singular strategies and the adaptive growth and branching of the evolutionary tree”. Evolutionary Ecology 12. 35–57.
  11. Geritz, S.A.H., M. Gyllenberg, F.J. Jacobs and K. Parvinen. 2002. “Invasion dynamics and attractor inheritance”. Journal of Mathematical Biology 44. 548–560.
  12. Heesterbeek, J. 2005. “The law of mass-action in epidemiology: A historical perspective”. In: Cuddington, K. and B. Beisner (eds.), Ecological paradigms lost: Routes of theory change. Amsterdam: Academic Press. 81–104.
  13. Hockema, S.A. 2006. “Finding words in speech: An investigation of American English”. Language Learning and Development 2(2). 119–146.
  14. Hofbauer, J. and K. Sigmund. 1998. Evolutionary games and population dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  15. Hogg, R. and C.B. McCully. 1987. Metrical Phonology: A course book. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  16. Horn, R. and C. Johnson. 1985. Matrix analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  17. Hoyle, A. and R.G. Bowers. 2008. “Can possible evolutionary outcomes be determined directly from the population dynamics?” Theoretical Population Biology 74. 311–323.
  18. Jarosz, G., S. Calamaro and J. Zentz. Submitted. “Input frequency and the acquisition of syllable structure in Polish”. Language Acquisition. <http://people.umass.edu/jarosz/jarosz_etal_submitted.pdf>
  19. Kaźmierski, K. 2015. “Consonant clusters in casual speech in Polish: Testing the predictions of NAD and Beats-and-Binding phonology”. Paper presented at the 23rd Manchester Phonology Meeting.
  20. Kroch, A. 1989. “Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change”. Language Variation and Change 1. 199–244.
  21. Kroch, A. and A. Taylor. 2000. “Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Middle English”. <http://www.ling.upenn.edu/hist-corpora/>.
  22. Kroch, A., B. Santorini and L. Delfs.2004. “Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Early Modern English”. <http://www.ling.upenn.edu/hist-corpora/>.
  23. Laaha, S. and S. Gillis (eds.). 2007. Typological perspectives on the acquisition of noun and verb morphology. (Antwerp Papers in Linguistics 112.)
  24. Madelska, L 2005. Słownik wariantywności fonetycznej współczesnej polszczyzny [A dictionary of phonetic variability in contemporary Polish]. Kraków: Collegium Co­lum­binum.
  25. Martin, A. 2007. The evolving lexicon. (PhD dissertation, UCLA, Los Angeles.)
  26. Metz, J.A.J., S.D. Mylius and O. Diekmann. 2008. “When does evolution optimize?” Evolutionary Ecology Research 10. 629–654.
  27. Nowak, M.A. 2000. “The basic reproductive ratio of a word, the maximum size of a lexicon”. Journal of Theoretical Biology 204 (2). 179–189.
  28. Otto, S. and T. Day. 2007. A biologist’s guide to mathematical modeling in ecology and evolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  29. Peters, A.M. 1997. “Language typology, prosody and the acquisition of grammatical morphemes”. In: Slobin, D.I. (ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition (vol. 5). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 136–197.
  30. Pierrehumbert, J. 2001: “Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition, and contrast”. In: Bybee, J. and P.J. Hopper (eds.), Frequency effects and the emergence of lexical structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 137–157.
  31. Rueffler, C., T. Van Dooren and J.A.J. Metz. 2004. “Adaptive walks on changing landscapes: Levins’ approach extended”. Theoretical Population Biology 65. 165–178.
  32. Sadeniemi, M., K. Kettunen, T. Lindh-Knuutila and T. Honkela. 2008. “Complexity of European Union languages: A comparative approach”. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 15(2). 185–211.
  33. Shockey, L. 2003. Sound patterns of spoken English. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  34. Solé, R. 2011. Phase transitions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  35. Szmrecsanyi, B. 2012. “Analyticity and syntheticity in the history of English”. In: Nevalainen, T. and E. Closs Traugott (eds.), The Oxford handbook of the history of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 654–665.
  36. Wedel, A. 2006. “Exemplar models, evolution and language change”. The Linguistic Review 23. 247–274.
  37. Yang, C. 2000. “Internal and external forces in language change”. Language Variation and Change 12. 231–250.
  38. Zydorowicz, P., P. Orzechowska, M. Jankowski, K. Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, P. Wierzchoń and D. Pietrala. Forthcoming. Phonotactics and morphonotactics of Polish and English. Theory, decription, tools and applications.