Słowa kluczowe
neuroetyka
płeć społeczno-kulturowa (gender)
stereotypy
Jak cytować
Abstrakt
W poniższym artykule przedstawiam dane na poparcie twierdzenia o wpływie naukowych opisów grup społecznych na same te grupy oraz na badane zjawiska mentalne. Zarówno w nauce, jak i w popularnym przekazie medialnym powszechna jest kontrowersyjna hipoteza o istnieniu głęboko zakorzenionych różnic między mózgami mężczyzn i kobiet, które przyczyniają się do powstawania różnic w zachowaniach typowych dla danej płci. Przedstawiam dowody na to, że takie stwierdzenia, niezależnie od ich zasadności naukowej, mogą podtrzymywać istnienie różnic płciowych, które mają wyjaśniać. Przekonuję, że choć potrzeba dalszych badań, powyższe twierdzenia mogą stać się samospełniającą się przepowiednią, oddziałując na odbiór społeczny, zachowania oraz nastawienie. Rzeczywisty wpływ efektów badań naukowych na nasze umysły i społeczeństwo oraz to, że wszystkie hipotezy naukowe podlegają dyskusji i podważaniu, wskazuje na potrzebę rozważenia przez naukowców etycznych implikacji ich pracy.Bibliografia
Bargh, J.A. i E. L. Williams. 2006. „The automaticity of social life”. Current Directions in Psychological Science 15 (1): 1–4.
Baron-Cohen, S. 2003. The essential difference: Men, women and the extreme male brain. London: Allen Lane.
Baron-Cohen, S. 2009. „Autism test »could hit maths skills«”. BBC News: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/7736196.stm. Dostęp 2 lutego 2009.
Baron-Cohen, S. 2010. „Delusions of gender—»neurosexism«, biology and politics”. The Psychologist. 23(11): 904–905.
Baron-Cohen, S., R. C. Knickmeyer i M.K. Belmonte. 2005. „Sex differences in the brain: Implications for explaining autism”. Science 310: 819–823.
Bastian, B. i N. Haslam. 2006. „Psychological essentialism and stereotype endorsement”. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 42(2): 228–235.
Bem, S. L. 1983. „Gender schema theory and its implications for child development: Raising gender-aschematic children in a gender-schematic society”. SIGNS: Journal of Women in Culture & Society 8(4): 598–616.
Bem, S. L. 1993. The lenses of gender: Transforming the debate on sexual inequality. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Biernat, M. i D. Kobrynowicz. 1997. „Gender- and race-based standards of competence: Lower minimum standards but higher ability standards for devalued groups”. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 72 (3): 544–557.
Bowles, R.P., L. Babcock i L. Lai. 2007. „Social incentives for gender differences in the propensity to initiate negotiations: Sometimes it does hurt to ask”. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 103(1): 84–103.
Brescoll, V. i M. LaFrance. 2004. „The correlates and consequences of newspaper reports of research on sex differences”. Psychological Science 15(8): 515–520.
Brizendine, L. 2007. The female brain. London: Bantam Press. [wyd. pol. 2006. Mózg kobiety. Tłum. P.J. Szwajcer, A. E. Eichler, Gdańsk: VM Media Group].
Chatard, A., S. Guimond i L. Selimbegovic. 2007. „»How good are you in math?« The effect of gender stereotypes on students' recollection of their school marks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 43(6): 1017–1024.
Choudhury, S., S.K. Nagel i J. Slaby. 2009. „Critical neuroscience: Linking neuroscience and society through critical practice”. BioSocieties 4: 61–77.
Clearfield, M.W. i N.M. Nelson. 2006. „Sex differences in mothers’ speech and play behavior with 6-, 9-, and 14- month-old infants”. Sex Roles 54(1/2): 127–137.
Coleman, J.M. i Y.-Y. Hong. 2008. „Beyond nature and nurture: The influence of lay gender theories on self stereotyping”. Self and Identity 7(1): 34–53.
Correll, S.J. 2004. „Constraints into preferences: Gender, status, and emerging career aspirations”. American Sociological Review 69(1): 93–113.
Correll, S.J., S. Benard i I. Paik. 2007. „Getting a job: Is there a motherhood penalty?” American Journal of Sociology 112(5): 1297–1338.
Dambrun, M., R. Kamiejski, N. Haddadi i S. Duarte. 2009. „Why does social dominance orientation decrease with university exposure to the social sciences? The impact of institutional socialization and the mediating role of »geneticism«”. European Journal of Social Psychology 39(1): 88–100.
Dar-Nimrod, I. i S.J. Heine. 2006. „Exposure to scientific theories affects women's math performance”. Science 314: 435.
Davies, P.G., S.J. Spencer i C.M. Steele. 2005. „Clearing the air: Identity safety moderates the effects of stereotype threat on women’s leadership aspirations”. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 88(2): 276–287.
Davies, P.G., S.J. Spencer, D.M. Quinn i R. Gerhardstein. 2002. „Consuming images: How television commercials that elicit stereotype threat can restrain women academically and professionally”. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin 28(12): 1615–1628.
Davison, H.K. i M.J. Burke. 2000. „Sex discrimination in simulated employment contexts: A meta-analytic investigation”. Journal of Vocational Behavior 56(2): 225–248.
Delk, J.L., R.B. Madden, M. Livingston i T.T. Ryan. 1986. „Adult perceptions of the infant as a function of gender labeling and observer gender”. Sex Roles 15(9/10): 527–534.
Dweck, C.S. 2007. „Is math a gift? Beliefs that put females at risk”. W Why aren't more women in science? Top researchers debate the evidence, red. S.J. Ceci and W.M. Williams. Washington D.C.: American Psychological Association.
Eagly, A.H., M.G. Makhijani i B.G. Klonsky. 1992. „Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis”. Psychological Bulletin 111(1): 3–22.
Fausto-Sterling, A. 1992. Myths of gender: Biological theories about women and men. New York: Basic Books.
Fine, C. 2010a. „Seductive arguments”. The Psychologist 23 (12): 948–949.
Fine, C. 2010b. Delusions of gender: How our minds, society, and neurosexism create difference. New York: Norton.
Fine, C. 2010c. „From scanner to sound bite: Issues in interpreting and reporting sex differences in the brain”. Current Directions in Psychological Science 19(5): 280–283.
Fuegen, K. 2010. „The effects of gender stereotypes on judgments and decisions in organizations”. W Social psychology of gender (Advances in group processes, volume 24), red. S.J. Correll. Emerald Group Publishing.
Fuegen, K., M. Biernat, E. Haines i K. Deaux. 2004. „Mothers and fathers in the workplace: How gender and parental status influence judgments of job-related competence”. Journal of Social Issues 60(4): 737–754.
Gaunt, R. 2006. „Biological essentialism, gender ideologies, and role attitudes: What determines parents’ involvement in child care”. Sex Roles 55(7/8): 523–533.
Good, C., J. Aronson i M. Inzlicht. 2003. „Improving adolescents’ standardized test peformance: An intervention to reduce the effects of stereotype threat”. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 24(6): 645–662.
Good, J.J., J.A. Woodzicka i L.C. Wingfield. 2010. „The effects of gender stereotypic and counter-stereotypic textbook images on science performance”. Journal of Social Psychology 150(2): 132–147.
Graham, T. i W. Ickes. 1997. „When women’s intuition isn’t greater than men’s”. W Empathic accuracy, red. W. Ickes. New York: Guilford.
Grossi, G i C. Fine 2012. „The role of fetal testosterone in the development of »the essential difference« between the sexes: Some essential issues. In: Neurofeminism: Issues at the intersection of feminist theory and cognitive neuroscience, pod red. R. Bluhm, A.J. Jacobson i H.L. Maibom. 73–105. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Grossi, G. 2008. „Science or belief? Bias in sex differences research”. W Under-representation of women in science and technology, red. S. Badaloni, C.A. Drace, O. Gia, C. Levorato i F. Vidotto, 93–106. Padova: Cleup.
Gur, R.C. i R.E. Gur. 2007. „Neural substrates for sex differences in cognition”. W Why aren’t more women in science? Top researchers debate the evidence, red. S.J. Ceci, and W.M. Williams, 189–198. Washington D.C.: American Psychological Association.
Gurian, M i K. Stevens. 2004. „With boys and girls in mind”. Educational Leadership 62(3): 21–26.
Gurian, M. i B. Annis. 2008. Leadership and the sexes: Using gender science to create success in business. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Hacking, I. 1995. „The looping effects of human kinds”. W Causal cognition: a multidisciplinary debate, red. D. Sperber, D. Premack i A.J. Premack. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Halpern, D.F., C.P. Benbow, D.C. Geary, R.C. Gur, J.S. Hyde i M.A. Gernsbacher. 2007. „The science of sex differences in science and mathematics”. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 8(1): 1–51.
Haslam, N. 2011. „Genetic essentialism, neuro-essentialism, and stigma: Comment on Dar-Nimrod & Heine”. Psychological Bulletin 137 (5): 819-824.
Haslam, N., L. Rothschild i D. Ernst. 2000. „Essentialist beliefs about social categories”. British Journal of Social Psychology 39(1): 113–127.
Heilman, M.E. i E.J. Parks-Stamm. 2010. „Gender stereotypes in the workplace: obstacles to women’s career progress”. W Social psychology of gender (Advances in group processes, volume 24), red. S.J. Correll. Emerald Group Publishing.
Heilman, M.E. i T.G. Okimoto. 2008. „Motherhood: A potential source of bias in employment decisions”. Journal of Applied Psychology 93(1): 189–198.
Heilman, M.E., A.S. Wallen, D. Fuchs i M.M. Tamkins. 2004. „Penalties for success: Reactions to women who succeed at male gender-typed tasks”. Journal of Applied Psychology 89(3): 416–427.
Herschel, A J. 1965. Who is man?. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Hines, M. 2010. „Sex-related variation in human behaviour and the brain”. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 14(10): 448– 456.
Horgan, T.G. i J.L. Smith. 2006. „Interpersonal reasons for interpersonal perceptions: Gender-incongruent purpose goals and nonverbal judgment accuracy”. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 30(3): 127–140.
Ickes, W. 2003. Everyday mind reading: Understanding what other people think and feel. Amherst: Prometheus Books.
Ickes, W., P.R. Gesn i T. Graham. 2000. „Gender differences in empathic accuracy: Differential ability or differential motivation?”. Personal Relationships 7(1): 95–109.
Isaac, C., B. Lee i M. Carnes. 2009. „Interventions that affect gender bias in hiring: A systematic review”. Academic Medicine 84(10): 1440–1446.
Jordan-Young, R.M. 2010. Brain storm: The flaws in the science of sex differences. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Kaiser, A., S. Haller, S. Schmitz i C. Nitsch. 2009. „On sex/gender related similarities and differences in fMRI language research”. Brain Research Reviews 61(2): 49–59.
Keller, J. 2005. „In genes we trust: The biological component of psychological essentialism and its relationship to mechanisms of motivated social cognition”. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 88(4): 686–702.
Kimura, D. 2005. „Hysteria trumps academic freedom”. Vancouver Sun, s. A13.
Kitayama, S. i D. Cohen. 2007. „Preface”. W Handbook of cultural psychology, red. S. Kitayama I D. Cohen. New York: Guilford.
Klein, K.J.K. i S.D. Hodges. 2001. „Gender differences, motivation, and empathic accuracy: When it pays to understand”. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 27(6): 720–730.
Koenig, A.M. i A.H. Eagly. 2005. „Stereotype threat in men on a test of social sensitivity”. Sex Roles 52(7/8): 489–496.
Kunda, Z. i S.J. Spencer. 2003. „When do stereotypes come to mind and when do they color judgment? A goal-based theoretical framework for stereotype activation and application”. Psychological Bulletin 129 (4): 522–544.
Lewis, K.L., J.L. Smith i K.E. Hawkinson. 2011. „Tuning out in order to fit in: The effects of gender role expectations and affiliation motives on men’s interpersonal sensitivity”. W Managing Interpersonal Sensitivity: Knowing when – and when not – to understand others, red. J. L. Smith, W. Ickes i S.D. Hodges. Hauppauge: Nova Science Publishers.
Leyens, J.-P., M. Désert i J.-C. Croizet. 2000. „Stereotype threat: are lower status and history of stigmatization preconditions of stereotype threat?”. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin 26(10): 1189–1199.
Martin, A. 2010. „Beyond understanding”. From New York Times online: http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/11/21/beyond-understanding/. Dostęp 27 maja 2011.
Martin, C.L. i S. Parker. 1995. „Folk theories about sex and race differences”. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin 21(1): 45–57.
McCabe, D.P. i A.D. Castel. 2008. „Seeing is believing: The effect of brain images on judgments of scientific reasoning”. Cognition 107(1): 343–352.
Miller, C.F., H.M. Trautner i D.N. Ruble. 2006. „The role of gender stereotypes in children's preferences and behaviour”. W Child psychology: A handbook of contemporary issues, red. L Balter i CS Tamis-LeMonda. New York: Psychology Press.
Mondschein, E.R., K.E. Adolph i C.S. Tamis- LeMonda. 2000. „Gender bias in mothers’ expectations about infant crawling”. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 77: 304–316.
Morton, T.A., S.A. Haslam i M.J. Hornsey. 2009. „Theorizing gender in the face of social change: Is there anything essential about essentialism?”. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 96(3): 653–664.
Nelson, T.E., M.R. Biernat i M. Manis. 1990. „Everyday base rates (sex stereotypes): Potent and resilient”. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 59(4): 664–675.
Nguyen, H.D. i A.M. Ryan. 2008. „Does stereotype threat affect test performance of minorities and women? A meta-analysis of experimental evidence”. Journal of Applied Psychology 93(6): 1314–1334.
Norton, M.I., J.A. Vandello i J.M. Darley. 2004. „Casuistry and social category bias”. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 87(6): 817–831.
Nosek, B.A., F.L. Smyth, N. Sriram, N.M. Lindner, T. Devos, A. Ayala, Y. Bar-Anan, et al. 2009. „National differences in gender-science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement”. PNAS 106(26): 10593–10597.
Okimoto, T.G. i V.L. Brescoll. 2010. „The price of power: Power seeking and backlash against female politicians”. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin 36 (7): 923–936.
Phelan, J.E., C.A. Moss-Racusin i L.A. Rudman. 2008. „Competent yet out in the cold: Shifting criteria for hiring reflect backlash toward agentic women”. Psychology of Women Quarterly 32(4): 406–413.
Prentice, D.A. i E. Carranza. 2002. „What women and men should be, shouldn't be, are allowed to be, and don't have to be: The contents of prescriptive gender stereotypes”. Psychology of Women Quarterly 26(4): 269–281.
Racine, E., S. Waldman, J. Rosenberg i J. Illes. 2010. „Contemporary neuroscience in the media”. Social Science & Medicine 71(4): 725–733.
Ridgeway, C.L. i S.J. Correll. 2004. „Unpacking the gender system: A theoretical perspective on gender beliefs and social relations”. Gender & Society 18(4): 510–531.
Rudman, L.A. 1998. „Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: The costs and benefits of counterstereotypical impression management”. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 74(3): 629–645.
Rudman, L.A. i P. Glick. 1999. „Feminized management and backlash toward agentic women: the hidden costs to women of a kinder, gentler image of middle managers”. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 77 (5): 1004–1010.
Rudman, L.A. i P. Glick. 2001. „Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women”. Journal of Social Issues 57(4): 743–762.
Russett, C.E. 1989. Sexual science: the Victorian construction of womanhood. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Rydell, R.J., M.T. Rydell i K.L. Boucher. 2010. „The effect of negative performance stereotypes on learning”. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology. 99(6): 883–896.
Sax, L. 2006. Why gender matters: What parents and teachers need to know about the emerging science of sex differences. New York: Broadway Books.
Schmader, T., M. Johns i C. Forbes. 2008. „An integrated process model of stereotype threat effects on performance”. Psychological Review 115(2): 336– 356.
Schwartz, B. 1997. „Psychology, idea technology, and ideology”. Psychological Science 8(1): 21–27.
Shields, S. 1975. „Functionalism, darwinism, and the psychology of women”. American Psychologist 30: 739–754.
Sidorowicz, L.S. i G.S. Lunney. 1980. „Baby X revisited”. Sex Roles 6(1): 67–73.
Sinclair, S. i J. Lun. 2006. „Significant other representations activate stereotypic self-views among women”. Self and Identity 5(2): 196–207.
Sinclair, S., C.D. Hardin i B.S. Lowery. 2006. „Selfstereotyping in the context of multiple social identities”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 90(4): 529–542.
Sinclair, S., J. Huntsinger, J. Skorinko i C.D. Hardin. 2005. „Social tuning of the self: Consequences for the selfevaluations of stereotype targets. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 89(2): 160–175.
Smith, E.R. i J. DeCoster. 2000. „Dual-process models in social and cognitive psychology: Conceptual integration and links to underlying memory systems”. Personality & Social Psychology Review 4(2): 108–131.
Smith, J.L. i K.L. Lewis. 2009. „Men’s interpersonal (mis)perception: fitting in with gender norms following social rejection. Sex Roles 61(3/4): 252–264.
Steele, C.M. 1997. „A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and Performance”. American Psychologist 52(6): 613–629.
Steele, J.R. i N. Ambady. 2006. „»Math is hard!« The effect of gender priming on women's attitudes”. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 42(4): 428–436.
Thoman, D.B., P.H. White, N. Yamawaki i H. Koishi. 2008. „Variations of gender-math stereotype content affect women's vulnerability to stereotype threat”. Sex Roles 58(9/10): 702–712.
Thomas, G. i G.R. Maio. 2008. „Man, I feel like a woman: When and how gender-role motivation helps mind-reading”. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 95(5): 1165–1179.
Tosh, J. 2010. „The »extreme male brain« theory of why men are better suited to IT: CyComp 2010 conference report”. Psychology of Women Section Review 12(2): 29–32.
Uhlmann, E.L. i G.L. Cohen. 2005. „Constructed criteria: Redefining merit to justify discrimination”. Psychological Science 16(6): 474–480.
Valian, V. 1998. Why so slow? The advancement of women. Cambridge: MIT.
Walton, G.M. i S.J. Spencer. 2009. „Latent ability: Grades and test scores systematically underestimate the intellectual ability of negatively stereotyped students”. Psychological Science 20(9): 1132–1139.
Weisberg, D.S., F.C. Keil, J. Goodstein, E. Rawson i J. R. Gray. 2008. „The seductive allure of neuroscience explanations”. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 20(3):470–477.
Yzerbyt, V., S. Rocher i G. Schadron. 1997. „Stereotypes as explanations: A subjective essentialist view of group perception”. W The social psychology of stereotyping and group life, red. R. Spears, P.J. Oakes, N. Ellemers i S.A. Haslam, 20–50. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
Licencja
Autorzy:
„Praktyka Teoretyczna” jest pismem, które chce realizować idee wolnego dostępu do wiedzy i poszerzania domeny dobra wspólnego. Ma służyć rozwojowi nauki i krytycznej refleksji w Polsce i na świecie w imię idei wolnego dostępu do wiedzy (Open Access). Całe pismo jest udostępniane za darmo w Internecie na warunkach licencji CC-BY-NC-SA (Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Na tych samych warunkach 4.0 Międzynarodowe) w wersji 4.0 (szczegółowe warunki: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/). Artykuły w nim zamieszczone mogą być dowolnie przechowywane, kopiowane, drukowane, rozpowszechniane i wykorzystywane do celów naukowo-dydaktycznych przy zachowaniu warunków licencji. Apelujemy tylko o uznanie autorstwa i podanie źródła w myśl przyjętych w środowisku naukowym standardów.
Nie ma natomiast możliwości komercyjnego wykorzystania zgromadzonych zasobów bez pisemnej zgody wydawcy. Dostęp do czasopisma nie może być dystrybuowany za opłatą czy w jakikolwiek inny sposób limitowany przez inne podmioty.
Autorzy tekstów przyjętych do publikacji w czasopiśmie „Praktyka Teoretyczna” są zobowiązani do wypełnienia, podpisania i odesłania na adres redakcji umowy o udzielenie nieodpłatnej licencji do utworów, z zobowiązaniem do udzielania sublicencji CC [PL.pdf, PL.doc, EN.pdf, EN.doc].
Zgodnie z umową, autorzy tekstów opublikowanych w czasopiśmie „Praktyka Teoretyczna” udzielają wydawcy czasopisma niewyłącznej i nieodpłatnej licencji oraz zezwalają na użycie sublicencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Na tych samych warunkach 4.0 Międzynarodowe (CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0).
Autorzy zachowują prawa do dalszego, swobodnego rozporządzania utworem.
Autorzy nadsyłanych artykułów powinni upewnić się, czy wykorzystywane przez nich materiały nie są chronione prawami autorskimi na rzecz innych osób i ponoszą odpowiedzialność za ewentualne uchybienia w tym względzie.