Visitor awareness of brown bear (Ursus arctos) human-food conditioning in Bieszczady and Tatra National Parks (Carpathians, Poland)
PDF

Keywords

Ursus arctos
public attitudes

How to Cite

Spalona, A. (2013). Visitor awareness of brown bear (Ursus arctos) human-food conditioning in Bieszczady and Tatra National Parks (Carpathians, Poland). Biological Letters, 49(2), 157–162. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10120-012-0017-0

Number of views: 66


Number of downloads: 32

Abstract

This paper investigates the awareness of visitors to Bieszczady National Park (BNP) and Tatra National Park (TNP) of human influence on brown bears (Ursus arctos Linnaeus, 1758), i.e. what causes human-habituated bears to become food-conditioned. In the parks studied, 928 questionnaires were collected in July and August 2007. The survey was supplemented with data on the amount of garbage collected in both parks by municipal services in 2007. Respondents in BPN displayed significantly greater knowledge about the causes of human-food conditioning of bears than respondents in TNP (64.2% and 52.7%, respectively, had more than the average of 3.54 correct answers per 5 questions in the questionnaire). As many as 60.1% of visitors in both parks incorrectly associated human-food conditioning with a lack of natural food and 34.4% withan excessive number of bears. Most respondents did not realise that to prevent human-bear conflict, decisive actions must be taken towards every food conditioned bear observed in the free-living population. Unlike in BNP, in TNP there is a large amount of rubbish left by visitors along trails. In 2007, municipal services collected in both parks a similar amount of garbageper 1000 visitors (0.39 m3 and 0.37 m3 in BNP and TNP, respectively) but the annual number of visitors is nearly 8‑fold lower inBNP than in TNP. In BNP, only visitors put rubbish in containers, while in TNP, additional 6 cleaning companies are employed to collect rubbish thrown by visitors along trails. In contrast to TNP, however, in BNP there are no bear-proof containers. Both parks need to prevent the access of bears to rubbish. It is also advisable to initiate an effective information campaign among visitors about prevention of human-food conditioning of bears.
https://doi.org/10.2478/v10120-012-0017-0
PDF

References

Antczak Ż. 2009. Przyczyny i skutki synantropizacji niedźwiedzia brunatnego Ursus arctos L. 1758 w Polsce [Causes and effects of food conditioning of the brown bear Ursus arctos L. 1758 in Poland]. Praca magisterska [MScthesis], Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy, Poznań, Poland (in Polish).

Czochański J. T. 2002. Ruch turystyczny w Tatrzańskim Parku Narodowym [Tourism in Tatra National Park]. In: Użytkowanie turystyczne parków narodowych. Ruch turystyczny - zagospo darowanie - konflikty - zagrożenia [Tourismuse of nationalparks. Tourism - development - conflicts - threats]. In: Ojcowski Park Narodowy (Partyka J., Ed.), pp. 385-403, Muza S.A., Ojców (in Polish).

Greenleaf S., Matthews S., Wright R., Beecham J., Leithead H. 2009. Food habits of American black bears as a metric for direct management of human-bear conflict in Yosemite Valley, Yosemite National Park, California. Ursus 20: 94-101.

Gus 2008. Ochrona środowiska 2008. Główny Urząd Statystyczny, Warszawa.

Jakubiec Z. 2001. Niedźwiedź brunatny Ursus arctos L. w polskiej części Karpat [The Brown Bear Ursus arctos L. in the Polish part of the Carpathians]. Stud. Naturae 47: 1-108 (in Polish).

Jerina K., Debeljak M., Deroski S., Kobler A., Adami M. 2003. Modeling the brown bear population in Slovenia: A tool in the conservation management of a threatened species. Ecol. Model. 170: 453-469.

Mazur R. 2010. Does aversive conditioning reduce human-black bear conflict? J. Wildlife Manage. 74: 48-54.

McArthur Jope K. L. 1983. Habituation of grizzly bears to people: a hypothesis. International Conf. Bear Res. and Manage. 5: 322-327.

Olliff T., Caslick J. 2003. Wildlife-human conflicts in Yellowstone. Yellowstone Sci. 11: 18-22.

Potaczała K. 2009a. Turyści karmią niedźwiedzie i ryzykują życie [Visitors feed bears and risk their lives]. Tygodnik regionalny [Regional weekly] „Nowiny” (May, 5th): 1 (in Polish). Available from www.nowiny24.pl/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090505/BIESZCZADY/568997064 Potaczała K. 2009b. Niedźwiedzia trzeba odstraszyć gumowymi pociskami [Bears should be deterred by rubber bullets]. Tygodnik regionalny [Regional weekly] „Nowiny” (May, 7th): 4 (in Polish). Available from www.nowiny24.pl/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090507/ BIESZCZADY/982432261

Rauer G., Kaczensky P., Knauer F. 2003. Experiences with aversive conditioning of habituated brown bears in Austria and other European countries. Ursus 14: 215-224.

Rigg R., Adamec M. 2007. Status, ecology and management of the brown bear (Ursus arctos) in Slovakia. SWS-Slovak Wildlife Society, Liptovský Hrádok, Slovakia.

Roever C., Boyce M., Stenhouse G. 2008. Grizzly bears and forestry: Grizzly bear habitat selection and conflicts with road placement. Forest Ecol. Manag. 256: 1262-1269.

SAS. 2004. SAS® 9.1.2. software. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.

Spencer R., Beausoleil R., Martorello D. 2007. How agencies respond to human-black bear conflicts: a survey of Wildlife Agencies in North America. Ursus 18: 217-229.

Wechselberger M., Rigg R., Betková S. 2005. An investigation of public opinion about the three species of large carnivores in Slovakia: brown bear (Ursus arctos), wolf (Canis lupus) and lynx (Lynx lynx). SWS-Slovak Wildlife Society, Liptovský Hrádok, Slovakia.

Zięba F., Zwijacz-Kozica T. 2005. ON, czyli prawie wszystko o tatrzańskim niedźwiedziu [HE - almost everything about Tatra bear] Wydawnictwo Tatrzańskiego Parku Narodowego [Tatra National Park Publishing], Zakopane (in Polish).