Comparison of regenerative potential of petals, stamens and pistils of five Sedum species in vitro
No. 5-8 (2007), Articles
No. 5-8 (2007)

Comparison of regenerative potential of petals, stamens and pistils of five Sedum species in vitro

Articles
https://doi.org/10.14746/biorc.2007.5-8.11
Published 2024-05-16
Maria K. Wojciechowicz
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań image/svg+xml
Poland
PDF

Keywords

flower organ cultures
organogenesis
tissue culture
Sedum

How to Cite

Wojciechowicz, M. K. (2007). Comparison of regenerative potential of petals, stamens and pistils of five Sedum species in vitro. Biodiversity: Research and Conservation, (5-8), 87–94. https://doi.org/10.14746/biorc.2007.5-8.11
ACM ACS APA ABNT Chicago Harvard IEEE MLA Turabian Vancouver

Download Citation

Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Number of views: 39

Number of downloads: 22

Abstract

The regeneration potential of different explants from flower buds (petals, stamen and pistils) was studied in Sedum acre, S. aizoon, S. floriferum, S. gracile and S. spectabile. The effects of MS medium, supplemented with nine PGR combinations of 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP 1.0-3.0 mg l-1) and indole-3-butyric acid (IBA 0.1-1.5 mg l-1) on regeneration, were compared. Regenerated plants were obtained in cultures of petal, stamen and pistil in all studies species. Three-way analysis of variance allowed to assess the effect of medium composition, explant type and genotype on regeneration potential, expressed as the percentage of regenerating explants and the average number of shoots produced from the explants. All analysed factors significantly affected the regeneration process. PGR composition had the most significant effect on the average number of produced shoots. MS medium containing 3.0 mg/l BAP and 1.0 mg/l IBA proved to be optimal for plant regeneration in Sedum. Explant type had the most significant effect on the percentage of regenerating explants. For petals the percentage of regenerating explants (40%) was nearly twice as high as in other explant types. Genotype had the most significant effect on the average number of regenerated shoots. The highest number of regenerated shoots per explant (3.25) was recorded in S. floriferum.

https://doi.org/10.14746/biorc.2007.5-8.11
PDF

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ALMANNO L., BERTHOULY M. & MICHAUX-FERRIERE N. 1996. Histology of somaticembryogenesis from floral tissues of cocoa. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 46: 187-194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02307094

BENNICI A. 1974. Cytological analysis of roots, shoots and plants regenerated from suspension and solid in vitro cultures of haploid Pelargonium. Z. Pfl. Zuchtg. 72: 199-205.

BIAUTTI M., GIMELLI F., VENTURO R., BOGANI P. & PICCONI T. 1986. Interclonal variabilityinduced in vitro and in vivo propagation in vegetativly propagated plant, the carnation. In: S. SEMAL (ed.). Somaclonal Variations and Crop Improvement, pp. 251-256. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht (NL). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7733-5_27

BRANDAO I. & SALEMA R. 1977. Callus and plantlets development from cultured leaf explants of Sedum telephium L. Pflanzenphysiol. 85: 1-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-328X(77)80259-6

BUSH S. R., EALRE E. D. & LANGHANS L. W. 1976. Plantlets from petal segments, petal epidermis, and shoot tips of the periclinal chimera, Chrysanthemum morifolium <>. Am. J. Bot. 63: 729-737. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1976.tb11863.x

CARIMI F., PASQUALE F. & CRESTIMANNO F. G. 1999. Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from pistil thin layers of Citrus. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 54: 183-189.

CHOI P. S., MIN S. R., AHN M. M., SOH W. Y. & LIU J. R. 1998. Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration in immature zygotic embryo, ovule, and anther filament cultures of Chinese cabbage. Scientia Hort. 72: 151-155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4238(97)00131-3

FISHER M., ZIV M. & VAINSTEIN A. 1993. An efficient method for adventitious shoot regeneration from cultured carnation petals. Scientia Hort. 53: 231-237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4238(93)90071-W

FUJII Y. & SHIMIZU K. 1990. Regeneration of plants from achenes and petals of Chrysanthemum coccineum. Plant Cell Rep. 8: 625-627. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00270069

GIMELLI F., GINATTA G., VENTURO R., POSITIANO S. & BIAUTTI M. 1984. Plantlet regeneration from petals and floral induction in vitro in the mediterranean carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L.). Rev. Ortoflorofrutt It. 68: 107-121.

HEUSER C. W. & APPS D. A. 1976. In vitro plantlet formation from flower petal explants of Hemerocallis cv. Chipper Cherry. Can. J. Bot. 54: 616-618. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/b76-064

KAKEHI M. 1979. Studies on the tissue culture of carnation induction of redifferentiated plant from petal tissue. Biull. Hirosh. Ag. Col. 6: 159-166.

KARAM N. S. & AL-MATAHOUB M. 2000. In vitro regeneration from mature tissue of wild Cyclamen persicum Mill. Scientia Hort. 86: 323-333. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4238(00)00160-6

LOWE K. C., DAVEY M. R. & POWER J. B. 1996. Plant Tissue Culture: past, present and future. Plant Tiss. Cult. Biotechn. 2: 175-186.

MANDAL A. K. A. & DATTA S. K. 2005. Direct somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from ray florets of chrysanthemum. Biol. Plant. 49: (1) 29-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10535-005-0033-6

MILLER R. M., KAUL V., HUTCHINSON J. F., MAHESVARAN G. & RICHARDS D. 1991. Shoot regeneration from fragmented flower buds of carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus). Ann. Bot. 68: 563-568. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a088296

MURALI S., SREEDHAR D. & LOKESWARI T. S. 1996. Regeneration through somatic embryogenesis from petals-derived calli of Rosa hybrida L. cv Arizona (hybrid tea). Euphytica 91: 271-275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00033087

MURASHIGE T. & SKOOG F. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15: 473-479. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x

NORIEGA C. & SONDAHL M. 1991. Somatic embryogenesis in hybrid tea roses. Bio/Technology 9: 991-993. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1091-991

NUGENT G., WARDLEY-RICHARDSON T. & LU CH. 1991. Plant regeneration from stem and petal of carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L.). Plant Cell Rep. 10: 477-480. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00233819

SCHEPPER S., LEUS L., EECKHAUT T., DEBERGH P., BOCKSTAELE E. & LOOSE M. 2004.Somatic poliploid petals: regeneration offers new road for breeding Belgian pot azaleas. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 76: 183-188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:TICU.0000007284.43939.0f

SIMARD H., MICHAUX-FERRIERE N. & SILVY A. 1992. Variations of carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L.) obtained by organogenesis from irradiated petals. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 29: 37-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00036144

TORNE J. M., MOYSSET L., CLAPAROLOS I. & SIMON E. 1996. Photocontrol of somatic embryogenesis and polyamine content in Araujia sericifera petals. Physiol. Plant. 98: 413-418. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-3054.1996.980225.x

TORNE J. M., RODRIQUEZ P., MANICH A., CLAPAROLOS I. & SANTOS M. A. 1997. Embryogenesis induction in petals of Araujia sericifera. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 51: 95-102.

UHRING J. 1983. In vitro propagation of Sedum and Myrtus cultivars. Hortscience 18: 616.

VAZQUES A. M. & SHORT K. C. 1978. Morphogenesis in cultured floral parts of African violet. J. Exp. Bot. 29: 1265-1271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/29.5.1265

YOON E. S., JEONG J. H. & CHOI Y. E. 2002. Recovery of Bastaresistant Sedum eryhtrostichum via Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Plant Cell Rep. 21: 70-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-002-0485-5

License

Copyright © by Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland, Department of Plant Taxonomy, 2007OPEN ACCESS