Keywords
biodiversity-related indicators
group convergence method
Himalayas
How to Cite
Number of views: 38
Number of downloads: 6
Abstract
Assessing biodiversity through criteria and indicators has been suggested but rarely put into practice. Documenting and monitoring global biodiversity change is challenging due to limited or biased data and a lack of agreed obligations, but indicators play a key role in studying this problem. For the Western Himalayas we have developed the Forest Biodiversity Index (FBI), based on national forest inventory data. The FBI combines various indicators weighted by experts to assess overall forest biodiversity, including factors reflecting naturalness, vegetation structure, soil (erosion and depth), disturbance, and response. The weight of factors was determined using the group conversion method, considering experts’ opinions while giving justification for assigning a particular value. The sum of all weighted indicator values for 3549 forest inventory points gives us a map illustrating variation in biodiversity: from low to very high. Thus, the FBI is a comprehensive index, which can be used to communicate and provide a workable platform to detect and monitor any biodiversity change over a given period. The FBI in the Western Himalayas shows that more than 89% of the area is in high and very high biodiversity zones, with an accuracy of about 74.8% via validation.
References
Angermeier P. L. 2000. The natural imperative for biological conservation. Conserv Biol 14(2): 373-381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.98362.x
Austin M. P. 1999. The potential contribution of vegetation ecology to biodiversity research. Ecography 22: 465-484. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.1999.tb01276.x
Bahera M. D. & Roy P. S. 2019. Pattern of distribution of angiosperm plant richness along latitudinal and longitudinal gradients of India. Biodivers Conserva 28: 2035-2048. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-019-01772-1
Bahuguna V. K. & Upadhyay A. 2002. Forest fires in India: policy initiatives for community participation. Int For Rev 4(2): 122-127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1505/IFOR.4.2.122.17446
Bhatt D., Chandra Sekar K., Rawal R. S., Nandi S. K. & Dhyani P. P. 2016. Tree Diversity of Western Himalaya. G.B. Pant Institute of Himalayan Environment & Development, Almora, Uttarakhand, India.
Bhatta K. P. & Vetaas O. R. 2016. Does tree canopy closuremoderate the effect of climate warming on plant species composition of temperate Himalayan oak forest? J. Veg Sci 27: 948-957. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12423
Bilgrami K. S. 1997. Fungal wealth of India. Proc. Indian Natn. Sci. Acad. B63, 3: 269-280.
Branquart E. & Latham J. 2007. Selection criteria for protected forest areas dedicated to biodiversity conservation in Europe. In: G. Frank, J. Parviainen, K.
Vanderkerhove, J. Latham, A. Schuck & D. Little (eds.). Protected forest areas in Europe-Analysis and harmonization (PROFOR): Results, conclusions, and recommendations, Federal Research and Training Centre for Forests, Natural Hazards and Landscape (BFW), Vienna, Austria.
CBD 2014. India's fifth National report to the convention on biological diversity. Ministry of environment and forests Government of India.
Díaz S., Pascual U., Stenseke M., Martín-López B., Watson R., Molnár Z., Hill R., Chan K., Baste I., Brauman K. & Polasky S. 2018. Assessing nature's contributions to people. Science 359(6373): 270-272. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap8826
Dwyer L. M. & Merriam G. 1981. Influence of topographic heterogeneity on deciduous litter decomposition. Oikos 37: 228-237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3544470
EEA 2007. Halting the loss of biodiversity by 2010: proposal for a first set of indicators to monitor progress in Europe. Technical report. 11. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen.
Forman T. T. R. & Godron M. 1986. Landscape Ecology. Wiley and Sons, New York.
FSI 2002. Forest Survey of India Dehradun. The Manual of Instructions For Field Inventory. http://fsi.nic.in/documents/manualforest_inventory_2.pdf Access: 20.10.2015.
FSI. 2024. Forest Survey of India: India State of Forest Report 2023. 18 edition, 2023. Dehradun: FSI, Ministry of Environment and Forests. Government of India.
Geburek T., Milasowszky N., Frank G., Konrad H. & Schadauer K. 2010. The Austrian Forest biodiversity index: all in one. Ecol Indic 10(3): 753-761. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.10.003
Hagar J. C. 2007. Wildlife species associated with nonconiferous vegetation in Pacific Northwest conifer forests: A review. Forest Ecol Manag 246: 108-122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.03.054
Henle K., Bauch B., Auliya M., Külvik M., Pe‘Er G., Schmeller D. S. & Framstad E. 2013. Priorities for biodiversity monitoring in Europe: A review of supranational policies and a novel scheme for integrative prioritization. Ecol Indic 33: 5-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.03.028
Hodge S. J. & Peterken G. F. 1998. Deadwood in British forests: priorities and a strategy. Forestry 71: 99-112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/71.2.99
IPBES 2019. Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. S. Díaz, J. Settele, E. S. Brondízio, H. T. Ngo, M. Guèze, J. Agard, A. Arneth, P. Balvanera, K. A. Brauman, S. H. M. Butchart, K. M. A. Chan, L. A. Garibaldi, K. Ichii, J. Liu, S. M. Subramanian, G. F. Midgley, P. Miloslavich, Z. Molnár, D. Obura, A. Pfaff, S. Polasky, A. Purvis, J. Razzaque, B. Reyers, R. Roy Chowdhury, Y. J. Shin, I. J. Visseren-Hamakers, K. J. Willis & C. N. Zayas (eds.). IPBES secretariat, Bonn, Germany. 56 pp.
Ives D. J. & Masserli B. 1996. The Himalayan dilemma: Reconciling development and conservation. Routledge: The United Nations University.
Jules E. S., Carroll A. L., Garcia A. M., Steenbock C. M. & Kauffman M. J. 2014. Host heterogeneity influences the impact of a non-native disease invasion on populations of a foundation tree species. Ecosphere 5(9):1-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/ES14-00043.1
Khumbongmayum A. D., Khan M. L. & Tripathi R. S. 2005. Survival and growth of seedlings of a few tree species in the four sacred groves of Manipur, Northeast India. Current Science 88: 1781-1788.
Kumar R., Shamet G. S., Mehta H., Alam M., Tomar J. M. S., Chaturvedi O. P. & Khajuria N. 2014. Influence of gibberellic acid and temperature on seed germination in chilgoza pine (Pinus gerardianaWall.). Indian J. Plant Physiol 19(4): 363-367. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40502-014-0119-2
Kupfer J. A. 2006. National assessments of forest fragmentation in the US. Global Environ. Change 16: 73-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2005.10.003
Lambin E. F. & Meyfroidt P. 2011. Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108(9): 3465-3472. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1100480108
Liang J., Crowther T. W., Picard N., Wiser S. & Reich P., et al. Please add the remaining names 2016. Positive biodiversity-productivity relationship predominant in global forests. Science 354: aaf8957.
Mahar N., Joshi N., Pandey P. & Joshi P. C. 2012. Resource Utilization by the Local Communities Around a Protected Forest in Western Himalaya. In: G. C. S. Negi & P. P. Dhyani (eds.). Glimpses of Forestry Research in the Indian Himalayan Region, pp. 131-138. Published by: G.B. Pant Institute of Himalayan Environment and Development, Almora & M/s Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh, Dehradun.
Marchese C. 2015. Biodiversity hotspots: A shortcut for a more complicated concept. Global Ecology and Conservation 3: 297-309. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2014.12.008
McComb B. C. 2008. Wildlife Habitat Management: Concepts and Applications in Forestry CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420007633
Myers N., Mittermeier R. A., Mittermeier C. G., da Fonseca G. A. B. & Kent J. 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403(6772): 853-858. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/35002501
Nadkami N. M., Mewin M. C. & Niedert J. 2001. Encyclopedia of Biodiversity, Volume 3. Published by Academic Press.
Nagendra H. & Southworth J. 2008. From pattern to process: Landscape fragmentation and the analysis of biodiversity. Progress in Human Geography 32(4): 455-473.
Negi S. S. 1993. Biodiversity and its conservation in India. 343 pp. Indus Publishing company.
NMHS 2018-19. National Mission on Himalayan Studies (NMHS). Guidelines for Grant Facilities. (1st Call for proposals 2018-19). https://www.gbpihed.gov.in/PDF/NMHS%20Project%20Guildelines/NMHS_Guidelines%20and%20Templates%20final%202018-19. pdf Access: 14.06.2020.
NMSHE 2016. NMSHE Brochure March. downloaded from www. knowledgeportal-nmshe.in/NMSHE.aspx on 14 June 2020.
Odiwe A. I. & Muoghalu J. I. 2003. Litterfall dynamics and forest floor litter as influenced by fire in a secondary lowland rain forest in Nigeria. Trop. Ecol. 44: 241-248.
Peay K. G., Baraloto C. & Fine P. V. A. 2013. Strong coupling of plant and fungal community structure across western Amazonian rainforests. ISME Journal 7: 1852-1861. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2013.66
Pereira H. M., Ferrier S., Walters M., Geller G. N., Jongman R. H., Scholes R. J. & Bruford M. W. 2013. Essential Biodiversity Variables. Science 339(6117): 277-278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1229931
Pommerening A. 2002. Approaches to quantifying forest structures. Forestry-Oxford, Vol. 75, No. 3, pp. 305-324. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/75.3.305
Pragasan L. A. & Parthasarathy N. 2010. Landscape level tree diversity assessment in tropical forests of southern Eastern ghats, India. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15560/5.3.542
Rana B. S. & Chandra R. 2002. Physiography and Geology of the Western Himalayas. Mt Res Dev 22(4): 299-304.
Rajakaruna N. & Boyd R. S. 2008. Edaphic factor. In: S. E. Jorgensen & B. D. Fath (eds.). Encyclopedia of Ecology, pp. 1201-1207. Academic press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008045405-4.00484-5
Rawal R. S., Pandey B. & Dhar U. 2003. Himalayan forest database – Thinking beyond dominants. Current Science 84(8): 990-994.
Roy P. S., Kushwaha S. P. S., Murthy M. S. R., Roy A., Kushwaha D., Reddy C. S., Behera M. D., Mathur V. B., Padalia H., Saran S., Singh S., Jha C. S. & Porwal M. C. 2012. Biodiversity Characterisation at Landscape Level: National Assessment. Indian Institute of Remote Sensing, Dehradun, India. 140 pp.
Roy P. S. & Tomar S. 2000. Biodiversity characterization at landscape level using geospatial-modelling technique. Biol Conserv 95(1): 95-109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(99)00151-2
Stewart W., Powers R. F., Mcgown K., Chiono L. & Chuang T. 2011. Potential Positive and Negative Environmental Impacts of Increased Woody Biomass Use for California. California Energy Commission. Publication Number: CEC-500-2011-036.
Swanson F. J., Clayton J. L., MegahanW. F. & Bush G. 1989. Erosional processes and long-term site productivity. In: D. A. Perry, R. Meurisse, B. Thomas, R. Miller, J. Boyle, J. Means, C. R. Perry & R. F. Powers (eds.). Maintaining the Long-Term Productivity of Pacific Northwest Forest Ecosystems, pp. 67-82. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
Tewari V. P. & Kleinn C. 2015. Considerations on Capacity Building for National Forest Assessments in Developing Countries – With a Case Study of India. International Forestry Review 17(2): 244-254. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1505/146554815815500633
Thadani R. 1999. Disturbance, microclimate and competitive dynamics of tree seedlings in banj oak (Quercus leucotrichophora) forest of central Himalaya India (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Yale University, New Haven, CT.
Thakur A. K., Kumar R. & Verma R. K. 2018. Analysing India’s current national forest inventory for biodiversity information. Biodiv Conserv 27(12): 3049-3069. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-018-1587-x
Thakur R. S. & Rana S. 2006. Geomorphology and Tectonics of the Western Himalayas. Journal of Geophysical Research 111(B11), B11103.
Tittensor D. P., Walpole M., Hill S. L. L., Boyce D. G., Britten G. L., Burgess N. D., Butchart S. H. M., Leadley P. W., Regan E. C., Alkemade R., Baumung R., Bellard C., Bouwman L., Bowles-Newark N. J., Chenery A. M., Cheung W. W. L., Christensen V., Cooper H. D., Crowther A. R., Dixon M. J. R., Galli A., Gaveau V., Gregory R. D., Gutierrez N. L., Hirsch T. L., Hoft R., Januchowski-Hartley S. R., Karmann M., Krug C. B., Leverington F. J., Loh J., Lojenga R. K., Malsch K., Marques A., Morgan D. H. W., Mumby P. J., Newbold T., Noonan-Mooney K., Pagad S. N., Parks B. C., Pereira H. M., Robertson T., Rondinini C., Santini L., Scharlemann J. P. W., Schindler S., Sumaila U. R., The L. S. L., Van Kolck J., Visconti P. & Ye Y. 2014. A mid-term analysis of progress towards international biodiversity targets. Science 8(346): 24-244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1257484
UNDoB 2010-2020. United Nations Decade on Biodiversity. https://www.cbd.int/2010/welcome/ Access: 20.06.2016.
Vellend M. & Geber M. A. 2005. Connections between species diversity and genetic diversity. Ecological Letter 8: 767-781. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00775.x
Vilhar U., Rozenbergar D., Simoncic P. & Diaci J. 2015. Variation in irradiance, soil features and regeneration patterns in experimental forest canopy gaps. Annals of Forest Science 72: 253-266. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-014-0424-y
Winter S., Mcroberts R. E., Bertini R., Bastrup-Birk A., Sanchez C. & Chirici G. 2011. Essential Features of Forest Biodiversity for Assessment Purposes. In: G. Chirici, S. Winter & R. E. McRoberts (eds.). National Forest Inventories: Contributions to Forest Biodiversity Assessments, Managing Forest Ecosystems 20, Springer Science+Business Media B.V. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0482-4_2
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Arun Kumar Thakur, Rajesh Kumar, Raj Kumar Verma, Ranjeet Kumar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.