Keywords
checklist
Kuno National Park
IUCN status
How to Cite
Number of views: 21
Number of downloads: 6
Abstract
The presented checklist provides up-to-date information on the angiosperm diversity of Kuno National Park. A total of 359 angiosperm species of 260 genera and 72 families were recorded during our study. Dicotyledons are represented by 63 families, 219 genera, and 299 species while monocotyledons by 9 families, 41 genera and 60 species. Information on the family, plant habits, phenology, collection numbers, and IUCN status of the documented species are also given.
References
Barik S. K., Rao B. R. P., Haridasan K., Adhikari D., Singh P. P. & Tiwary R. 2018. Classifying Threatened Species of India Using IUCN Criteria. Current Science 114(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v114/i03/588-595
Bridson D. & Foman L. (eds.) 1999. The herbarium handbook. Revised Edition, 334 pp. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK.
Brummitt N. & Bachman S. 2010. Plants under pressure to conduct a global assessment. The first report of the IUCN Sampled Red List Index for Plants, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK.
Champion H. G. & Seth S. K. 1968. A Revised Survey of Forest Types of India, Govt. of India Press, New Delhi, p. 404.
Heywood V. H. 2019.Conserving plants within and beyond protected areas – still problematic and future uncertain. Plant Diversity 41(2): 36-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pld.2018.10.001
Hooker J. D. 1872-1897. The Flora of British India. Vol.I-VII. L. Reeve & Co., London.
IUCN 2025. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2025-2. https://www.iucnredlist.org Accessed on [02.12.2025].
Jiménez J. E., Juárez P. & Díaz A. 2016. Checklist of the vascular flora of Reserva Biológica San Luis, Costa Rica. Check List 12(2): 1-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15560/12.2.1859
Khanna K. K, Kumar A., Dixit R. D. & Singh N. P. 2001. Supplement to the Flora of Madhya Pradesh. Botanical Survey of India, Calcutta.
Maxted N. & Kell S. 2009. Ex situ conservation of plant genetic resources in the Convention on Biological Diversity. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 98(4): 719-735.
Mudgal V., Khanna K. K. & Hazara P. K. 1997. Flora of Madhya Pradesh, Primulaceae to eratophyllaceae. Vol. 2. Botanical Survey of India, Calcutta.
Perrino E. V. & Wagensommer R. P. 2022. Crop Wild Relatives (CWRs) Threatened and Endemic to Italy: Urgent Actions for Protection and Use. Biology (Basel) 26;11(2): 193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11020193
Sikarwar R. L. S. & Kaushik J. P. 1995. Flora of Murena District, Madhya Pradesh. Journal of Economic Taxonomy and Botany 1: 75-111.
Singh N. P., Khanna K. K. & Dixit R. D. 2001. Flora of Madhya Pradesh, Hydrocharitaceae to Poaceae. Vol. 3. Botanical Survey of India, Calcutta.
Verma D. M, Balakrishnan N. P. & Dixit R. D. 1993. Flora of Madhya Pradesh, Ranunculaceae to Plumbaginaceae. Vol. I. Botanical Survey of India, Calcutta.
Wagensommer R. P. 2023. Floristic Studies in the Light of Biodiversity Knowledge and Conservation. Plants 12: 2973. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12162973
Wood J. J. 1906. Plants of Chotanagpur, including Jaspur and Sirguja. Records of Botanical Survey of India 2: 1-170
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ashutosh Kumar Verma, Bayyavarapu Lakshmanudu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.