How EUR-lex parallel corpora improve the translation of general legal formulae in LELF
Journal cover Comparative Legilinguistics, volume 67, year 2026
PDF

Keywords

Legal English as a Lingua Franca
legal translation
corpus-based translation
Eur-Lex
European legal English
legal formulae

How to Cite

Giampieri, P. (2026). How EUR-lex parallel corpora improve the translation of general legal formulae in LELF. Comparative Legilinguistics, 67, 383–409. https://doi.org/10.14746/cl.2026.67.9

Abstract

Legal formulae are fixed expressions that can pose several translation challenges in view of system-related peculiarities, especially in international and multicultural settings such as the European Union. General bilingual dictionaries are often used by students and translators to cope with legilinguistic hurdles, although such tools do not always account for system-bound specificities. This may give rise to translation infelicities and/or partial translations. This paper addresses legal translation research and examines the usefulness of the EUR-Lex parallel corpora via the Sketch Engine platform to translate general legal formulae. More precisely, it focuses on neutral legal multi-words and compares corpus-driven data against entries obtained from three online general dictionaries (i.e., Cambridge, Collins, and WordReference). It assesses the translation of seven general legal formulae from Legal English as a Lingua Franca (LELF) into French and Italian. By comparing corpus-sourced equivalents with standard dictionary outputs, the study reveals that institutional parallel corpora generally outperform generic lexicographical tools. The findings also indicate that traditional dictionaries suggest decontextualised terms, whereas specialised parallel corpora offer contextually relevant terminology. Therefore, this investigation provides useful insights for the integration of corpus-driven data into professional legal translation practice and translator-training programmes.

 

https://doi.org/10.14746/cl.2026.67.9
PDF

References

Abate, S. C. (1998). Il documento legale anglosassone. Hoepli.

Anesa, P. (2019). Towards a conceptualization of Legal English as a Lingua Franca? International Journal Of English Linguistics, 9(6), 14-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v9n6p14

Aston, G. (2001). Learning with corpora. Athelstan.

Bhatia, V. K. (2010). Textbook on legal language and legal writing. Universal law publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd.

Bhatia, V. K., Langton, N. M, & Lung, J. (2004). Legal discourse: opportunities and threats for corpus linguistics. In U. Connor & T. A. Upton (Eds), Discourse in the professions. perspectives from corpus linguistics (pp. 203-231). John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.16.09bha

Biel, Ł. (2008). Legal terminology in translation practice: Dictionaries, googling or discussion forums. Skase Journal of Translation and Interpretation, 3(1), 22-38.

Biel, Ł. (2017). Enhancing the communicative dimension of legal translation: comparable corpora in the research-informed classroom. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer, 11(4), 316-336. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1750399X.2017.1359761

Bowker, L., & Pearson, J. (2002). Working with specialized language: s practical guide to using corpora. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203469255

Campos-Pardillos, M. Á. (2010). Going beyond the obvious in English for legal purposes: a few remarks on international legal English as a lingua franca in Europe. In Á. L. López & R. Crespo Jiménez (Eds.), Professional English in the European context: the EHEA challenge (pp. 175-194). Peter Lang.

Civil Justice Council. 2013. A guide to bringing and defending a small claim. https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/JCO/Documents/CJC/Publications/Other+papers/Small+Claims+Guide+for+web+FINAL.pdf [Accessed on 14/09/2026]

Coulthard, M., & Johnson, A. (2010). The Routledge handbook of forensic linguistics. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203855607

De Groot, G. R., & Van Laer, C. J. P. (2008). The quality of legal dictionaries: an assessment. University of Maastricht. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1287603

Engberg, J. (2020). Comparative law for legal translation: through multiple perspectives to multidimensional knowledge. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique, 33(2), 263-282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-020-09706-9

Fantinuoli, C, & Zanettin, F. (2015). Creating and using multilingual corpora in translation studies. In C. Fantinuoli & F. Zanettin (Eds.), New directions in corpus-based translation studies (pp. 1-10). Language Science Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26530/OAPEN_559833

Farr, F., & O’Keeffe, A. (2019). Using corpora to analyse language. In S. Walsh & S. Mann (Eds.), Routledge handbook of English language teacher education (pp. 268-282). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315659824-22

Garner, B. A. (1995). A dictionary of modern legal usage. Oxford University Press.

Garzone, G. (2007). Osservazioni sulla didattica della traduzione giuridica. In P. Mazzotta & L. Salmon (Eds.), Tradurre le microlingue scientifico professionali. Riflessioni teoriche e proposte didattiche (pp. 194-238). UTET.

Giampieri, P. (2021). Legal English and contract law – contrattualistica comparata. Giuffrè-Lefebvre.

Giampieri, P. (2024). Corpus-based translation of private legal documents. John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/nlp.15

Giampieri, P. (2025). Legal formulae. Exploring legal multi-words in English, Italian and French. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-82548-4

Gotti, M. (2012). Text and genre. In P. Tiersma & L. M. Solan (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language and law (pp. 52-66). Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199572120.013.0005

Jacometti, V., & Pozzo, B. (2018). Traduttologia e linguaggio giuridico. Wolters Kluwer.

Kilgarriff, A., Rychlý, P., Smrž, P., & Tugwell, D. (2004). Itri-04-08 the sketch engine. Information Technology. http://www.sketchengine.eu

Priya, M., Nesi, H., & Benet, V. (2018). Corpus from scratch: collecting and processing a sizeable EAP corpus in a (relatively) resource-poor context. Proceedings of the 2017 BALEAP Conference, 10, 93-102.

O’Keeffe, A., McCarthy, M., & Carter, R. (2007). From corpus to classroom. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511497650

Orts Llopis, M. Á. (2009). Legal genres in English and Spanish: some attempts of analysis. Ibérica, 18, 109–130.

Prieto Ramos, F. (2020). The use of resources for legal terminological decision-making: patterns and profile variations among institutional translators. Perspectives, 29(2), 278-310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2020.1803376

Rossini Favretti, R., Tamburini, F., & Martelli, E. (2007). Words from Bononia legal corpus. In W. Tuebert (Ed.), Text corpora and multilingual lexicography (pp. 5-30). John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.8.03ros

Šarčević, S. (1997). New approach to legal translation. Kluwer Law International.

Stein, D. (2009). Introduction: forensic translation — practical issues and their theoretical underpinnings. In O. Frances, L. Alexander & St. Dieter (Eds.), Translation issues in language and law (pp. 1-4). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230233744_1

Tiersma, P. (1999). Legal language. The University of Chicago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226854809.001.0001

Tiersma, P., & Solan, L. (2012). The Oxford handbook of language and law. Oxford University Press.

Vigier Moreno, F. J., & Sánchez Ramos, M. M. (2017). Using parallel corpora to study the translation of legal system-bound terms: the case of names of English and Spanish courts. In R. Mitkov (Ed.), Computational and corpus-based phraseology EUROPHRAS 2017, lecture notes in computer science, 10596 (pp. 206-273). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69805-2_19

Williams, C. (2004). Legal English and plain language: an introduction. ESP Across Culture, 1, 51-124.

Williams, C. (2005). Vagueness in legal texts: is there a future for shall? In M. Gotti, V. Bhatia, J. Engberg & D. Heller (Eds.), Vagueness in Normative Texts (pp. 201-204), Peter Lang.

Zanettin, F. (2002). DIY corpora: the WWW and the translator. In B. Maia, J. Haller & M. Ulrych (Eds.), Training the language services provider for the new millennium (pp. 239-248). Universidade do Porto.

Zanettin, F. (2014). Corpora in translation. In J. House (Ed.), Translation: a multidisciplinary approach (pp. 178-199). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137025487_10

Cambridge Dictionary: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/

Collins Dictionary: https://www.collinsdictionary.com/

Digital Library of the United Nations: https://www.digitallibrary.un.org

EUR-Lex: https://EUR-Lex.europa.eu/

The Casemine: https://www.casemine.com

The BoLC: https://corpora.ficlit.unibo.it/BOLCCorpQuery.html

The LawInsider: https://www.lawinsider.com

The Legifrance: https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/

The Sketch Engine platform: https://app.sketchengine.eu

WordReference Dictionary: https://www.WordReference.com/