Keywords
environmental jurisprudence
Indigenous storytelling
traditional ecological knowledge
rights-of-nature
sacred groves
How to Cite
Abstract
This research paper analyses Indigenous oral traditions as authoritative repositories of ecological wisdom with important implications for environmental law, ethics, and governance. It conceptualises storytelling not merely as cultural expression but as a form of environmental jurisprudence that encodes ecological knowledge, resource-management norms, moral obligations, and intergenerational responsibilities. Drawing on environmental law, anthropology, ethical theory, and Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK), the study demonstrates how Indigenous narratives articulate biocentric and ecocentric perspectives that challenge dominant anthropocentric legal paradigms. Focusing on Indian contexts—such as sacred groves, river personification narratives, and Adivasi ecological ethics—the paper illustrates how oral traditions sustain reciprocity, restraint, and accountability in human–nature relations. Comparative insights from Indigenous traditions across the globe reveal shared narrative strategies that frame non-human entities as moral subjects and emphasise relational ecological ethics. These traditions affirm storytelling as a universal medium of environmental governance, cultural continuity, and collective memory. The paper advocates legal and policy reforms, including recognition of oral histories within evidentiary frameworks, sui generis protections for TEK, integration of narrative-based knowledge into Environmental Impact Assessments, and support for community-controlled knowledge systems. Incorporating these measures would strengthen the cultural legitimacy of environmental governance and embed ethical responsibility within legal frameworks. By centring Indigenous narrative traditions, the study highlights their capacity to inform legal reasoning, shape environmental norms, and contribute meaningfully to sustainable futures grounded in relationality, reciprocity, and ecological balance.
References
Anaya, S. J. (2004). Indigenous peoples in international law (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Berkes, F. (2018). Sacred ecology (4th ed.). Routledge.
Biesele, M. (1993). Women like meat: The folklore and foraging ideology of the Kalahari Ju/’hoan. Witwatersrand University Press.
Boyd, D. R. (2017). The rights of nature: A legal revolution that could save the world. ECW Press.
Cajete, G. (2000). Native science: Natural laws of interdependence. Clear Light Publishers.
Coulthard, G. S. (2014). Red skin, white masks: Rejecting the colonial politics of recognition. University of Minnesota Press.
Descola, P. (2013). Beyond nature and culture (J. Lloyd, Trans.). University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 2005)
Gadgil, M., & Vartak, V. D. (1976). Sacred groves of India: A plea for continued conservation. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society, 72, 314–320.
Gadgil, M., Berkes, F., & Folke, C. (1993). Indigenous knowledge for biodiversity conservation. Ambio, 22(2–3), 151–156.
International Labour Organization. (1989). Convention concerning Indigenous and Tribal Peoples in Independent Countries (No. 169).
Johannes, R. E. (1981). Words of the lagoon: Fishing and marine lore in the Palau district of Micronesia. University of California Press.
Kimmerer, R. W. (2013). Braiding sweetgrass: Indigenous wisdom, scientific knowledge and the teachings of plants. Milkweed Editions.
Kothari, A. (2007). Traditional knowledge and environmental ethics: A perspective from India. Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge, 6(1), 5–12.
Lyver, P. O., Ruru, J., Scott, N., Tylianakis, J., Arnold, J., Malinen, S., & O’Blyver, V. (2019). Building biocultural approaches to biodiversity conservation. People and Nature, 1(1), 55–69.
Malhotra, K. C., Gokhale, Y., Chatterjee, S., & Srivastava, S. (2001). Cultural and ecological dimensions of sacred groves in India. Indira Gandhi Rashtriya Manav Sangrahalaya.
McGregor, D. (2004). Coming full circle: Indigenous knowledge, environment, and our future. American Indian Quarterly, 28(3–4), 385–410. p
Miller, R. J. (2011). Reservation ‘capitalism’: Economic development in Indian country. Praeger.
O’Donnell, E., & Talbot-Jones, J. (2018). Creating legal rights for rivers: Lessons from Australia, New Zealand, and India. Ecology and Society, 23(1), 7.
Rose, D. B. (1996). Nourishing terrains: Australian Aboriginal views of landscape and wilderness. Australian Heritage Commission.
Ruru, J. (2018). Listening to Papatūānuku: A call to reform water law. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 48(2–3), 215–224.
Smith, L. T. (2012). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and Indigenous peoples (2nd ed.). Zed Books.
Tiwari, B. K., Barik, S. K., & Tripathi, R. S. (2010). Sacred forests of Meghalaya: Biological and cultural significance. Journal of Biosciences, 35(5), 749–758.
UNESCO. (2003). Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
United Nations General Assembly. (2007). United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (A/RES/61/295).
United Nations. (1992). Convention on Biological Diversity. United Nations Treaty Series, 1760, 79.
Viveiros de Castro, E. (1998). Cosmological perspectivism in Amazonia and elsewhere. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 4(3), 469–488.
Watson, I. (2020). Aboriginal peoples, colonialism and international law: Raw law. Routledge.
Whyte, K. P. (2017). Indigenous climate change studies: Indigenizing futures, decolonizing the Anthropocene. English Language Notes, 55(1–2), 153–162.
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Veena Roshan Jose, Shivender Rahul
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
When submitting a paper the author agrees to the following publishing agreement and processing personal data.
PUBLICATION AGREEMENT, COPYRIGHT LICENSE, PERSONAL DATA PROCESSING CONSENT
This is a publication agreement and copyright license (“Agreement”) regarding a written manuscript currently submitted via Pressto platform
(“Article”) to be published in Comparative Legilinguistics International Journal for Legal Communication (“Journal”).
The parties to this Agreement are:
the Author or Authors of the submitted article (individually, or if more than one author, collectively, “Author”) and Comparative Legilinguistics International Journal for Legal Communication (“Publisher”), address al. Niepodległości 4, 61-874 Poznań, represented by its editor in chief Aleksandra Matulewska.
§1. LICENSE OF COPYRIGHT
a) The Author and the Publisher agree that the Author grants a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which is incorporated herein by reference and is further specified at Creative Commons — Attribution 4.0 International — CC BY 4.0 copyright license in the Article to the general public.
b) The Author grants to the Publisher a royalty-free, worldwide nonexclusive license to publish, reproduce, display, distribute, translate and use the Article in any form, either separately or as part of a collective work, including but not limited to a nonexclusive license to publish the Article in an issue of the Journal, copy and distribute individual reprints of the Article, authorize reproduction of the entire Article in another publication, and authorize reproduction and distribution of the Article or an abstract thereof by means of computerized retrieval systems (such as Westlaw, Lexis and SSRN). The Author retains ownership of all rights under copyright in the Article, and all rights not expressly granted in this Agreement.
c) The Author grants to the Publisher the power to assign, sublicense or otherwise transfer any and all licenses expressly granted to the Publisher under this Agreement.
d) Republication. The Author agrees to require that the Publisher be given credit as the original publisher in any republication of the Article authorized by the Author. If the Publisher authorizes any other party to republish the Article under the terms of paragraphs 1c and 1 of this Agreement, the Publisher shall require such party to ensure that the Author is credited as the Author.
§2. EDITING OF THE ARTICLE
a) The Author agrees that the Publisher may edit the Article as suitable for publication in the Journal. To the extent that the Publisher’s edits amount to copyrightable works of authorship, the Publisher hereby assigns all right, title, and interest in such edits to the Author.
§3. WARRANTIES
a) The Author represents and warrants that to the best of the Author’s knowledge the Article does not defame any person, does not invade the privacy of any person, and does not in any other manner infringe upon the rights of any person. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Publisher against all such claims.
b) The Author represents and warrants that the Author has full power and authority to enter into this Agreement and to grant the licenses granted in this Agreement.
c) The Author represents and warrants that the Article furnished to the Publisher has not been published previously. For purposes of this paragraph, making a copy of the Article accessible over the Internet, including, but not limited to, posting the Article to a database accessible over the Internet, does not constitute prior publication so long as the as such copy indicates that the Article is not in final form, such as by designating such copy to be a “draft,” a “working paper,” or “work-in-progress”. The Author agrees to hold harmless the Publisher, its licensees and distributees, from any claim, action, or proceeding alleging facts that constitute a breach of any warranty enumerated in this paragraph.
§4. TERM
a) The agreement was concluded for an unspecified time.
§5. PAYMENT
a) The Author agrees and acknowledges that the Author will receive no payment from the Publisher for use of the Article or the licenses granted in this Agreement.
b) The Publisher agrees and acknowledges that the Publisher will not receive any payment from the Author for publication by the Publisher.
§6. ENTIRE AGREEMENT
a) This Agreement supersedes any and all other agreements, either oral or in writing, between the Author and the Publisher with respect to the subject of this Agreement. This Agreement contains all of the warranties and agreements between the parties with respect to the Article, and each party acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises, or agreements have been made by or on behalf of any party except those warranties and agreements embodied in this Agreement.
b) In all cases not regulated by this Agreement, legal provisions of Polish Copyright Act and Polish Civil Code shall apply.
c) Any disputes arising from the enforcement of obligations connected with this Agreement shall be resolved by a court competent for the headquarters of the Publisher.
d) Any amendments or additions to the Agreement must be made in writing and signed by authorised representative of both parties, otherwise being ineffective.
e) This Agreement is signed electronically and the submission of the article via the PRESSto platform is considered as the conclusion of the Agreement by the Author and the Publisher.
f) Clause for consent to the processing of personal data - general
g) The Author shall give his or her consent to the processing of their personal data in accordance with the Act of 10 May 2018 on the protection of personal data and Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of persons physical in connection with the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46 / EC (General Data Protection Regulation) for the purpose and in connection with making publications available on the PRESSto scientific journals platform and DeGruyter platform, guaranteeing the security of services rendered, and improving them.
I HAVE READ AND AGREE FULLY WITH THE TERMS OF THIS AGREEMENT.
The Author The Publisher