Keywords
legal terminology
terminological transformation
semantic stabilization
responsibilty and liability
How to Cite
Abstract
This paper investigates how law transforms abstract ethical concepts into concrete legal norms, using examples from the Republic of Uzbekistan. Drawing on three key concepts — halollik (honesty/good faith), vijdoniylik (conscientiousness), and javobgarlik (legal responsibility) — the study examines how philosophical and moral ideas originating from ethical discourse are linguistically grounded, semantically stabilized, and institutionally embedded within Uzbekistan’s legislative framework. The analysis focuses on four branches of law: civil law, criminal law, civil procedural law, and administrative law. While ethical concepts are often perceived as vague or subjectively evaluated, our findings show that they acquire functional precision within legal discourse by serving as the basis for specific norm-forming operations such as conditional obligation, interpretive guidance, and enforceable consequence. The study employs a qualitative legal-linguistic methodology that integrates terminological analysis, discourse analysis, and functional-pragmatic approaches. This combined framework draws on established traditions in legal linguistics and discourse studies to examine the transformation of ethical concepts into legal norms. To achieve this aim, a corpus of 28 statutory provisions was purposively selected from the Civil Code, Criminal Code, and procedural legislation of Uzbekistan. Analysis of these provisions revealed how the target terms are embedded in conditional clauses, norm-generating structures, and consequence-triggering constructions, and identified the distinct functional patterns associated with each. The results demonstrate that the three terms perform functionally differentiated roles within Uzbek statutory discourse. Halollik functions both as an interpretive standard that modifies existing obligations and as a norm-generating principle that fills legislative gaps. Vijdoniylik operates as an auxiliary evaluative criterion supporting judicial assessment of conduct without independently creating legal obligations. Javobgarlik serves as the mechanism of enforceable legal consequence, converting the interpretive work of the preceding terms into irrevocable institutional outcomes. This article contributes to ongoing theoretical discussions on the role of language in connecting philosophical abstraction and legal normativity.
References
Aalto-Heinilä, M. (2016). Fairness in statutory interpretation: Text, purpose or intention?. International Journal of Legal Discourse, 1(1), 193-211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ijld-2016-0004
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.
Bhatia, V. K., Candlin, C. N., & Engberg, J. (Eds.). (2008). Legal discourse across cultures and systems. Hong Kong University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5790/hongkong/9789622098510.001.0001
Biel, Ł. (2014). Lost in the Eurofog: The textual fit of translated law. Peter Lang. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-03986-3
Butler, W. E. (2009). Russian law (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/russian-law-9780199562220 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199562220.003.0001
Cabré, M. T. (1999). Terminology: Theory, methods and applications. John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/tlrp.1
Cao, D. (2007). Translating law. Multilingual Matters. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853599552
Civil Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan (1996, amended 1998). National Database of Legislation of the Republic of Uzbekistan (lex.uz). https://lex.uz/docs/-180552
Civil Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan (2018). National Database of Legislation of the Republic of Uzbekistan (lex.uz). https://lex.uz/docs/-3527353
Civil Procedural Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan (2018). National Database of Legislation of the Republic of Uzbekistan (lex.uz). https://lex.uz/docs/-3517337
Code of Administrative Responsibility of the Republic of Uzbekistan (1994). National Database of Legislation of the Republic of Uzbekistan (lex.uz). https://lex.uz/docs/-97664
Criminal Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan (1995). National Database of Legislation of the Republic of Uzbekistan (lex.uz). https://lex.uz/docs/-111453
Du, G. (2020). Pragmatic functions of vague expressions in legal texts and its translation techniques. Learning & Education, 9(2), 103–105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18282/l-e.v9i2.1415
Duff, R. A. (2007). Answering for crime: Responsibility and liability in the criminal law. Hart Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199542895.003.0006
Dworkin, R. (1977). Taking rights seriously. Harvard University Press.
Gaudin, F. (2003). Socioterminologie: Une approche sociolinguistique de la terminologie. De Boeck. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/dbu.gaudi.2003.01
Gibbons, J. (2003). Forensic linguistics: An introduction to language in the justice system. Blackwell Publishing. https://www.wiley.com/enus/Forensic+Linguistics%3A+An+Introduction+to+Language+in+the+Justice+System-p-9780631212478
Glogar, O. (2023). The concept of legal language: What makes legal language ‘legal’?. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 36, 1081–1107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-023-10010-5
Goodrich, P. (1987). Legal discourse: Studies in linguistics, rhetoric and legal analysis. Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-11283-8
Greimas, A. J. (1987). On meaning: Selected writings in semiotic theory. University of Minnesota Press.
Hart, H. L. A. (1961). The concept of law. Oxford University Press. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-concept-of-law-9780198761228
Hart, H. L. A. (2008). Punishment and responsibility: Essays in the philosophy of law (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/punishment-and-responsibility-9780199534777
Jackson, B. S. (1988). Law, fact and narrative coherence. Deborah Charles Publications.
Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813313
Luhmann, N. (2004). Law as a social system (K. A. Ziegert, Trans.). Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1993). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198262381.001.0001
Mouritsen, J. (2017). Corpus linguistics in legal interpretation: An evolving interpretative framework. International Journal of Language & Law, 6, 67–89.
Nguyen Thai, S. (2021). Statutory interpretation: How legal reasoning and linguistics interact. VNU Journal of Science: Legal Studies, 37(4), 60–67. h DOI: https://doi.org/10.25073/2588-1167/vnuls.4397
Roemling, D. (2025). Statutory interpretation and corpus evidence: Tensions between linguistic reality and legal meaning. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-025-10336-2
Šarčević, S. (1997). New approach to legal translation. Kluwer Law International.
Smolka, J. (2022). Argumentation in the interpretation of statutory law and international law: Not ejusdem generis. Languages, 7(2), 132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7020132
Solan, L. M., & Tiersma, P. M. (2012). Speaking of crime: The language of criminal justice. University of Chicago Press. https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/S/bo3533846.html
Teubner, G. (1998). Legal irritants: Good faith in British law or how unifying law ends up in new divergences. Modern Law Review, 61(1), 11–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.00125
Tiersma, P. M. (1999). Legal language. University of Chicago Press. https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/L/bo3627935.html DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226854809.001.0001
Trochev, A. (2009). Judging Russia: Constitutional court in Russian politics, 1990–2006. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511511226
Wüster, E. (1979). Einführung in die allgemeine Terminologielehre und terminologische Lexikographie. Springer.
Zimmermann, R., & Whittaker, S. (Eds.). (2000). Good faith in European contract law. Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/us/universitypress/subjects/law/european-law/good-faith-european-contract-law
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Islom Boynazarov, Bekpo‘lat Umurqulov
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
When submitting a paper the author agrees to the following publishing agreement and processing personal data.
PUBLICATION AGREEMENT, COPYRIGHT LICENSE, PERSONAL DATA PROCESSING CONSENT
This is a publication agreement and copyright license (“Agreement”) regarding a written manuscript currently submitted via Pressto platform
(“Article”) to be published in Comparative Legilinguistics International Journal for Legal Communication (“Journal”).
The parties to this Agreement are:
the Author or Authors of the submitted article (individually, or if more than one author, collectively, “Author”) and Comparative Legilinguistics International Journal for Legal Communication (“Publisher”), address al. Niepodległości 4, 61-874 Poznań, represented by its editor in chief Aleksandra Matulewska.
§1. LICENSE OF COPYRIGHT
a) The Author and the Publisher agree that the Author grants a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which is incorporated herein by reference and is further specified at Creative Commons — Attribution 4.0 International — CC BY 4.0 copyright license in the Article to the general public.
b) The Author grants to the Publisher a royalty-free, worldwide nonexclusive license to publish, reproduce, display, distribute, translate and use the Article in any form, either separately or as part of a collective work, including but not limited to a nonexclusive license to publish the Article in an issue of the Journal, copy and distribute individual reprints of the Article, authorize reproduction of the entire Article in another publication, and authorize reproduction and distribution of the Article or an abstract thereof by means of computerized retrieval systems (such as Westlaw, Lexis and SSRN). The Author retains ownership of all rights under copyright in the Article, and all rights not expressly granted in this Agreement.
c) The Author grants to the Publisher the power to assign, sublicense or otherwise transfer any and all licenses expressly granted to the Publisher under this Agreement.
d) Republication. The Author agrees to require that the Publisher be given credit as the original publisher in any republication of the Article authorized by the Author. If the Publisher authorizes any other party to republish the Article under the terms of paragraphs 1c and 1 of this Agreement, the Publisher shall require such party to ensure that the Author is credited as the Author.
§2. EDITING OF THE ARTICLE
a) The Author agrees that the Publisher may edit the Article as suitable for publication in the Journal. To the extent that the Publisher’s edits amount to copyrightable works of authorship, the Publisher hereby assigns all right, title, and interest in such edits to the Author.
§3. WARRANTIES
a) The Author represents and warrants that to the best of the Author’s knowledge the Article does not defame any person, does not invade the privacy of any person, and does not in any other manner infringe upon the rights of any person. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Publisher against all such claims.
b) The Author represents and warrants that the Author has full power and authority to enter into this Agreement and to grant the licenses granted in this Agreement.
c) The Author represents and warrants that the Article furnished to the Publisher has not been published previously. For purposes of this paragraph, making a copy of the Article accessible over the Internet, including, but not limited to, posting the Article to a database accessible over the Internet, does not constitute prior publication so long as the as such copy indicates that the Article is not in final form, such as by designating such copy to be a “draft,” a “working paper,” or “work-in-progress”. The Author agrees to hold harmless the Publisher, its licensees and distributees, from any claim, action, or proceeding alleging facts that constitute a breach of any warranty enumerated in this paragraph.
§4. TERM
a) The agreement was concluded for an unspecified time.
§5. PAYMENT
a) The Author agrees and acknowledges that the Author will receive no payment from the Publisher for use of the Article or the licenses granted in this Agreement.
b) The Publisher agrees and acknowledges that the Publisher will not receive any payment from the Author for publication by the Publisher.
§6. ENTIRE AGREEMENT
a) This Agreement supersedes any and all other agreements, either oral or in writing, between the Author and the Publisher with respect to the subject of this Agreement. This Agreement contains all of the warranties and agreements between the parties with respect to the Article, and each party acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises, or agreements have been made by or on behalf of any party except those warranties and agreements embodied in this Agreement.
b) In all cases not regulated by this Agreement, legal provisions of Polish Copyright Act and Polish Civil Code shall apply.
c) Any disputes arising from the enforcement of obligations connected with this Agreement shall be resolved by a court competent for the headquarters of the Publisher.
d) Any amendments or additions to the Agreement must be made in writing and signed by authorised representative of both parties, otherwise being ineffective.
e) This Agreement is signed electronically and the submission of the article via the PRESSto platform is considered as the conclusion of the Agreement by the Author and the Publisher.
f) Clause for consent to the processing of personal data - general
g) The Author shall give his or her consent to the processing of their personal data in accordance with the Act of 10 May 2018 on the protection of personal data and Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of persons physical in connection with the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46 / EC (General Data Protection Regulation) for the purpose and in connection with making publications available on the PRESSto scientific journals platform and DeGruyter platform, guaranteeing the security of services rendered, and improving them.
I HAVE READ AND AGREE FULLY WITH THE TERMS OF THIS AGREEMENT.
The Author The Publisher