Keywords
court documents
genre analysis
legal euphemism
power in discours
Vietnamese legal linguistics
How to Cite
Abstract
This article examines the linguistic features of Vietnamese legal texts. The analysis draws on a corpus of 150 court documents issued between 2020 and 2025 (533,912 word tokens): criminal verdicts, civil judgments, administrative rulings, and decisions of the Supreme People’s Court’s Judicial Council. Previous Vietnamese studies focused mainly on lexical errors in court verdicts (2011) or on legal terminology in normative texts. This study instead treats court documents as an independent genre and analyzes them along three dimensions. The first is vocabulary: Sino-Vietnamese terminology, internal register-switching, and formulaic language. The second is genre structure: an eight-move obligatory schema, identified here for the first time in Vietnamese court documents through Swales and Bhatia’s genre theory. The third is pragmatics: performative speech acts, subject anonymization as a power strategy, gradience of epistemic modality, and a four-group system of legal euphemism serving distinct legal principles. Together, these features form what can be called the “legal tone” of Vietnamese court documents. The findings contribute to Vietnamese legal linguistics and carry practical implications for legal education, public legal communication, and legal translation.
References
Allan, K., & Burridge, K. (2006). Forbidden words: Taboo and the censoring of language. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511617881
Anthony, L. (2022). AntConc (Version 4.2) [Computer software]. Waseda University. https://www.laurenceanthony.net/software
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.
Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings. Longman.
Bhatia, V. K. (2017). Critical genre analysis: Investigating interdiscursive performance in professional practice. Routledge.
Đinh, T. L., & Nguyễn, T. H. (1993). Vietnamese stylistics [in Vietnamese]. Giáo Dục Publishing House.
Do, H. H., Gillespie, J., & Tran, H. T. Q. (2025). Legal reasoning and the rise of judicial authority in Vietnam. Law & Social Inquiry, 51, 536–566. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/lsi.2025.10121
Đỗ, V. H. (2015). Some issues in the use of language and style in state administrative documents [in Vietnamese]. Journal of Science and Technology Development, 18, 64–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32508/stdj.v18i1.1012
Dương, T. H. (2008). Analysis of legal-document language through the US Constitution and the Vietnamese Constitution [Unpublished doctoral dissertation, in Vietnamese]. Vietnam National University, Hanoi.
Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman.
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203697078
Gibbons, J. (2003). Forensic linguistics: An introduction to language in the justice system. Blackwell.
Goźdź-Roszkowski, S. (2011). Patterns of linguistic variation in American legal English: A corpus-based study. Peter Lang. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-00659-9
Lê, H. T. (1999). Some features of Vietnamese legal-document language [Unpublished doctoral dissertation, in Vietnamese]. Vietnam National University, Hanoi.
Li, Z. (2016). Legal linguistics [in Chinese]. Peking University Press.
Liu, H. (2003). Research on judicial document language [in Chinese]. Law Press China.
Marmor, A. (2014). The language of law. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198714538.001.0001
Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. R. (2005). The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. Palgrave Macmillan.
Mattila, H. E. S. (2013). Comparative legal linguistics: Language of law, Latin and modern lingua francas (2nd ed.). Ashgate. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5235/2049677X.2.1.143
Mellinkoff, D. (1963). The language of the law. Little, Brown.
Nguyễn, T. H. (2010). A discourse-analytic study of the linguistic functions of state administrative texts [Unpublished doctoral dissertation, in Vietnamese]. Vietnam National University, Hanoi.
Nguyễn, T. L. (2011). The current state of word usage in Vietnamese court judgments [in Vietnamese]. Ho Chi Minh City University of Education Journal of Science, 32, 1–12.
Nguyễn, T. L. N. (2019). Legal language in the constitutions of Vietnam [Unpublished doctoral dissertation, in Vietnamese]. Graduate Academy of Social Sciences.
Nguyễn, V. K. (2014). Language policy and language legislation in Vietnam [in Vietnamese]. Social Sciences Publishing House.
Phan, T. L. (2024). Appraisal theory in discourse analysis: An exploratory study of Vietnamese indictments [in Vietnamese]. Journal of Language and Culture Studies, 9(1), 18–34.
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173438
Supreme People’s Court of Vietnam. (2020–2025). System for the publication of judgments and decisions. congbobanan.toaan.gov.vn
Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.
Tiersma, P. M. (1999). Legal language. University of Chicago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226854809.001.0001
van Dijk, T. A. (1997). Discourse as social interaction. Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004484535_011
Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (Eds.). (2016). Methods of critical discourse studies (3rd ed.). Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781036235192
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Lâm Phương Đỗ
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
When submitting a paper the author agrees to the following publishing agreement and processing personal data.
PUBLICATION AGREEMENT, COPYRIGHT LICENSE, PERSONAL DATA PROCESSING CONSENT
This is a publication agreement and copyright license (“Agreement”) regarding a written manuscript currently submitted via Pressto platform
(“Article”) to be published in Comparative Legilinguistics International Journal for Legal Communication (“Journal”).
The parties to this Agreement are:
the Author or Authors of the submitted article (individually, or if more than one author, collectively, “Author”) and Comparative Legilinguistics International Journal for Legal Communication (“Publisher”), address al. Niepodległości 4, 61-874 Poznań, represented by its editor in chief Aleksandra Matulewska.
§1. LICENSE OF COPYRIGHT
a) The Author and the Publisher agree that the Author grants a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which is incorporated herein by reference and is further specified at Creative Commons — Attribution 4.0 International — CC BY 4.0 copyright license in the Article to the general public.
b) The Author grants to the Publisher a royalty-free, worldwide nonexclusive license to publish, reproduce, display, distribute, translate and use the Article in any form, either separately or as part of a collective work, including but not limited to a nonexclusive license to publish the Article in an issue of the Journal, copy and distribute individual reprints of the Article, authorize reproduction of the entire Article in another publication, and authorize reproduction and distribution of the Article or an abstract thereof by means of computerized retrieval systems (such as Westlaw, Lexis and SSRN). The Author retains ownership of all rights under copyright in the Article, and all rights not expressly granted in this Agreement.
c) The Author grants to the Publisher the power to assign, sublicense or otherwise transfer any and all licenses expressly granted to the Publisher under this Agreement.
d) Republication. The Author agrees to require that the Publisher be given credit as the original publisher in any republication of the Article authorized by the Author. If the Publisher authorizes any other party to republish the Article under the terms of paragraphs 1c and 1 of this Agreement, the Publisher shall require such party to ensure that the Author is credited as the Author.
§2. EDITING OF THE ARTICLE
a) The Author agrees that the Publisher may edit the Article as suitable for publication in the Journal. To the extent that the Publisher’s edits amount to copyrightable works of authorship, the Publisher hereby assigns all right, title, and interest in such edits to the Author.
§3. WARRANTIES
a) The Author represents and warrants that to the best of the Author’s knowledge the Article does not defame any person, does not invade the privacy of any person, and does not in any other manner infringe upon the rights of any person. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Publisher against all such claims.
b) The Author represents and warrants that the Author has full power and authority to enter into this Agreement and to grant the licenses granted in this Agreement.
c) The Author represents and warrants that the Article furnished to the Publisher has not been published previously. For purposes of this paragraph, making a copy of the Article accessible over the Internet, including, but not limited to, posting the Article to a database accessible over the Internet, does not constitute prior publication so long as the as such copy indicates that the Article is not in final form, such as by designating such copy to be a “draft,” a “working paper,” or “work-in-progress”. The Author agrees to hold harmless the Publisher, its licensees and distributees, from any claim, action, or proceeding alleging facts that constitute a breach of any warranty enumerated in this paragraph.
§4. TERM
a) The agreement was concluded for an unspecified time.
§5. PAYMENT
a) The Author agrees and acknowledges that the Author will receive no payment from the Publisher for use of the Article or the licenses granted in this Agreement.
b) The Publisher agrees and acknowledges that the Publisher will not receive any payment from the Author for publication by the Publisher.
§6. ENTIRE AGREEMENT
a) This Agreement supersedes any and all other agreements, either oral or in writing, between the Author and the Publisher with respect to the subject of this Agreement. This Agreement contains all of the warranties and agreements between the parties with respect to the Article, and each party acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises, or agreements have been made by or on behalf of any party except those warranties and agreements embodied in this Agreement.
b) In all cases not regulated by this Agreement, legal provisions of Polish Copyright Act and Polish Civil Code shall apply.
c) Any disputes arising from the enforcement of obligations connected with this Agreement shall be resolved by a court competent for the headquarters of the Publisher.
d) Any amendments or additions to the Agreement must be made in writing and signed by authorised representative of both parties, otherwise being ineffective.
e) This Agreement is signed electronically and the submission of the article via the PRESSto platform is considered as the conclusion of the Agreement by the Author and the Publisher.
f) Clause for consent to the processing of personal data - general
g) The Author shall give his or her consent to the processing of their personal data in accordance with the Act of 10 May 2018 on the protection of personal data and Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of persons physical in connection with the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46 / EC (General Data Protection Regulation) for the purpose and in connection with making publications available on the PRESSto scientific journals platform and DeGruyter platform, guaranteeing the security of services rendered, and improving them.
I HAVE READ AND AGREE FULLY WITH THE TERMS OF THIS AGREEMENT.
The Author The Publisher