Keywords
philosophy of action
practical philosophy
deflationary Hegelianism
the concept of purpose
mediation
How to Cite
Number of views: 1375
Number of downloads: 131
Abstract
The research in this paper attempts to outline the connection between Hegel’s concept of action and the contemporary philosophy of action. Hegel’s concept of action has some features in common with the ideas of analytical philosophers, and might open unexpected integration of these different philosophical traditions, which would contribute to the development of both of them. A brief overview of ways to comprehend Hegel’s concept of action (from Taylor to Brandom) shows that the cause of ambiguous understandings of this concept lies in the complexity of Hegel’s approach. The following article highlights the tension between “deflationary” interpretations and the complexity of Hegel´s original approach. Further, by revisiting the Section “Teleology” in Hegel’s Science of Logic, the article illustrates how deflationary interpretations of human action can be improved, so that they are topical for both contemporary practical philosophy and the philosophy of action, beyond the unnecessary split between analytical vs. continental philosophy. Such concepts as “purpose” and “mediation” become crucial, as they have sociological and normative extensions in Hegel’s Philosophy of Right, as discussed in the last Section of this article.References
Anscombe G. E. M. 1957. Intention. Oxford: Blackwell.
Apel K.-O. 2004. “Kant, Hegel, and the Contemporary Question Concerning the Normative Foundations of Morality and Right,” in R. Pippin & O. Höffe (Eds.), Hegel on Ethics and Politics, trans. N. Walker (pp. 49–78). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Arndt A. 2021. ”Philosophie der Tat. ‘Praxis’ bei Hegel und in nachhegelschen Diskursen,” Ethics in Progress 12(2):112–123. DOI:10.14746/eip.2021.2.8 (retrieved on 30 April 2022).
Berger M. 2012. Arbeit, Selbstbewusstsein und Selbstbestimmung bei Hegel. Zum Wechselverhältnis von Theorie und Praxis. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
Brandom R. B. 2019. A Spirit of Trust: A Reading of Hegel’s Phenomenology. Cambridge, Mass.: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Davidson D. 2001a. “Actions, Reasons and Causes,” in idem, Essays on Actions and Events (pp. 12–25). New York: Oxford University Press Inc.
Davidson D. 2001b. “Intending,” in idem, Essays on Actions and Events (pp. 75–90). New York: Oxford University Press Inc.
Fichte J. G. 1964–. Grundlage der gesamten Wissenschaftslehre (1794). GA I,2. Stuttgart – Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog.
Hegel G. W. F. 1892. The Logic of Hegel, translated from The Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences, trans. W. Wallace. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hegel G. W. F. 1976. System of Ethical Life and First Philosophy of Spirit, trans by H. S. Harris & T. M. Knox. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Hegel G. W. F. 1986a. Enzyklopädie der philosophischen Wissenschaften im Grundrisse 1830. Dritter Teil. Die Philosophie des Geistes. Mit den mündlichen Zusätzen. Werke in 20 Bänden, Vol. X. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
Hegel G. W. F. 1986b. Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts. Werke in 20 Bänden, Vol. VII. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
Hegel G. W. F. 1986c. Phänomenologie des Geistes. Werke in 20 Bänden, Vol. III. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
Hegel G. W. F. 1986d. Wissenschaft der Logik I. Werke in 20 Bänden, Vol. V. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
Hegel G. W. F. 1986e. Wissenschaft der Logik II. Werke in 20 Bänden, Vol. VI. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
Hegel G. W. F. 1991a. The Encyclopaedia Logic (with the Zusätze), trans. and introduced by T. F. Geraets, W. A. Suchting & H. S. Harris. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.
Hegel G. W. F. 1991b. Elements of the Philosophy of Right, trans. H. B. Nisbet, ed. by A. W. Wood. Cambridge, NY – Melbourne – Madrid – Cape Town – Singapore – São Paulo – Delhi – Mexico City: Cambridge University Press.
Hegel G. W. F. 2002. System der Sittlichkeit [Critik des Fichteschen Naturrechts], ed. by H. D. Brandt, with Introduction by K. R. Meist. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.
Hegel G. W. F. 2010. The Science of Logic, trans. G. Di Giovanni. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hegel G. W. F. 2018. The Phenomenology of Spirit, trans. and ed. by T. Pinkard. Cambridge, NY – Melbourne – Madrid – Cape Town – Singapore – São Paulo – Delhi – Mexico City: Cambridge University Press.
Juchniewicz N. 2018. “Dialectical Technology – Hegel on Means, Tools and the Machine,” Filozofia 73(10):818–830.
Knowles D. 2010. “Hegel on Actions, Reasons, and Causes,” in A. Laitinen & C. Sandis (Eds.), Hegel on Action (pp. 42–58). Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
Lau Ch.-F. 2016. “A Deflationary Approach to Hegel’s Metaphysics,” in A. de Laurentis (Ed.), Hegel and Metaphysics: On Logic and Ontology in the System (pp. 27–42). Berlin – Boston: De Gruyter.
Pinkard T. 1994. Hegel’s Phenomenology. The Sociality of Reason. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Quante M. 2004. Hegel’s Concept of Action (Modern European Philosophy), trans. D. Moyar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sellars W. F. 1956. “Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind,” in H. Feigl & M. Scrivens (Eds.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. I (pp. 253–329). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Taylor C. 1975. Hegel. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Taylor C. 1979. Hegel and Modern Society. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Taylor C. 2010 (orig. 1983). “Hegel and the Philosophy of Action,” in A. Laitinen & C. Sandis (Eds.), Hegel on Action (pp. 22–41). Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
Teichmann R. 2008. The Philosophy of Elizabeth Anscombe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wood A. W. 2010. “Hegel on Responsibility for Actions and Consequences,” in A. Laitinen & C. Sandis (Eds.), Hegel on Action (pp. 119–136). Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Yuliia Tereshchenko
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.