Keywords
mation hazard
political ideology
misconduct
publication ethics
How to Cite
Number of views: 559
Number of downloads: 169
Abstract
A prevailing lay understanding of retraction in the scientific literature is to correct for misconduct and honest errors. Nonetheless, though historically rare, retractions to limit the spread of results deemed socially harmful (i.e., information hazards), have gained increasing traction and become increasingly common. This study sought primarily to determine the extent to which information hazard-based retraction is supported in the scientific community and as a secondary goal whether individual difference variables moderate receptivity. We tasked a diverse sample of researchers across various disciplines who use social media to evaluate scenarios in which a paper was retracted for misconduct, honest errors, and information hazards. Overall, support for retraction on the basis of information hazards was low, suggesting that researchers overwhelmingly support academic freedom as a concept. Nonetheless, left-leaning ideologies predicted slightly greater defensibility of the practice among individuals early in their careers. We provide training suggestions to mitigate reactance toward controversial scientific findings.
References
Anderssen N., Amlie C., & Ytterøy E. A. 2002. “Outcomes for Children with Lesbian or Gay Parents. A Review of Studies from 1978 to 2000,” Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 43:335-351. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9450.00302
Armstrong J., Friesdorf R., & Conway P. 2019. “Clarifying Gender Differences in Moral Dilemma Judgments: The Complementary Roles of Harm Aversion and Action Aversion,” Social Psychological and Personality Science 10:353-363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550618755873
Asch S. E. 1956. “Studies of Independence and Conformity: A Minority of One Against a Unanimous Majority,” Psychological Monographs 70:1-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093718
Atske S. 2022. Americans and ‘Cancel Culture’: Where Some See Calls for Accountability, Others See Censorship, Punishment. Pew Research Center. Available online at: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2021/05/19/americans-and-cancel-culture-where-some-see-calls-for-accountability-others-see-censorship-punishment/
Bailey J. M. 2019. “How to Ruin Sex Research,” Archives of Sexual Behavior 48:1007-1011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-1420-y
Berkowitz L. 1972. “Social Norms, Feelings, and Other Factors Affecting Helping and Altruism,” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 6:63-108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60025-8
Bostrom N. 2011. “Information Hazards: A Typology of Potential Harms from Knowledge,” Review of Contemporary Philosophy 10:44-79. http://lynx.lib.usm.edu/scholarly-journals/information-hazards-typology-potential-harms/docview/920893069/se-2
Bruton S. V., Medlin M., Brown M., & Sacco D. F. 2020. “Personal Motivations and Systemic Incentives: Scientists on Questionable Research Practices,” Science and Engineering Ethics 26:1531-1547. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-020-00182-9
Clark C. J., Graso M., Redstone I., & Tetlock P. E. 2023. “Harm Hypervigilance in Public Reactions to Scientific Evidence,” Psychological Science 34(7):834-848. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976231168777
Cokol M., Ozbay F., & Rodriguez‐Esteban R. 2008. “Retraction Rates are on the Rise,” EMBO Reports 9:2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.embor.7401143
Contessa G. 2022. “It Takes a Village to Trust Ccience: Towards a (Thoroughly) Social Approach to Public Trust in Science,” Erkenntnis 88:2942-2966. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-021-00485-8
Duarte J. L., Crawford J. T., Stern C., Haidt J., Jussim L., & Tetlock P. E. 2015. “Political Diversity Will Improve Social Psychological Science,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 38, e130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X15000035
Eckel C. C. & Grossman P. J. 2008. “Men, Women and Risk Aversion: Experimental Evidence,” Handbook of Experimental Economics Results 1:1061-1073. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0722(07)00113-8
Editorial 2020. “Regarding Mentorship,” Nature Communications 11:6447. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20618-x
Ekins E. E. 2017. “The State of Free Speech and Tolerance in America; Attitudes about Free Speech, Campus Speech, Religious Liberty, and Tolerance of Political Expression,” Findings from the Cato Institute. Available online at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3821028 (accessed September 25, 2023).
Fang F. C. & Casadevall A. 2011. “Retracted Science and the Retraction Index,” Infection and Immunity 79:3855-3859. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.05661-11
Fang F. C., Steen R. G., & Casadevall A. 2012. “Misconduct Accounts for the Majority of Retracted Scientific Publications,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109:17028-17033. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1212247109
Fessler D. M., Tiokhin L. B., Holbrook C., Gervais M. M., & Snyder J. K. 2014. “Foundations of the Crazy Bastard Hypothesis: Nonviolent Physical Risk-Taking Enhances Conceptualized Formidability,” Evolution and Human Behavior 35:26-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.09.003
Geher G. & Gambacorta D. 2010. “Evolution is Not Relevant to Sex Differences in Humans Because I Want It That Way! Evidence for the Politicization of Human Evolutionary Psychology,” EvoS Journal: The Journal of the Evolutionary Studies Consortium 2:32-47. https://evostudies.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/GeherVol2Iss1.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.59077/BFWV5169
Gelman A. 2020. “Retraction of Racial Essentialist Article that Appeared in Psychological Science,” Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science. Available online at: https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2020/06/22/retraction-of-racial-essentialist-article-that-appeared-in-psychological-science/
German K. & Stevens S. T. 2022. “Scholars under Fire: 2021 Year in Review.” Available online at: https://www.thefire.org/research/publications/miscellaneous-publications/scholars-under-fire/scholars-under-fire-2021-year-in-review-full-text/
Gopalakrishna G., Ter Riet G., Vink G., Stoop I., Wicherts J. M., & Bouter L. M. 2022. “Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices, Research Misconduct and Their Potential Explanatory Factors: A Survey Among Academic Researchers in the Netherlands,” PLoS One 17, e0263023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263023
Graham L. R. 2004. Science in Russia and the Soviet Union. A Short History. Series: Cambridge Studies in the History of Science. Cambridge University Press.
Grieneisen M. L., & Zhang M. 2012. “A Comprehensive Survey of Retracted Articles from the Scholarly Literature,” PLoS One 7, e44118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0044118
Haidt J. & Graham J. 2007. “When Morality Opposes Justice: Conservatives Have Moral Intuitions That Liberals May Not Recognize,” Social Justice Research 20:98-116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-007-0034-z
Haselton M. G. & Nettle D. 2006. “The Paranoid Optimist: An Integrative Evolutionary Model of Cognitive Biases,” Personality and Social Psychology Review 10:47-66. http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/comm/haselton/webdocs/HaseltonNettle.pdf?q=paranoid DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1001_3
Honeycutt N. & Freberg L. 2017. “The Liberal and Conservative Experience Across Academic Disciplines: An Extension of Inbar and Lammers,” Social Psychological and Personality Science 8:115-123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616667617
Honeycutt N. & Jussim L. 2022. “On the Connection Between Bias and Censorship in Academia,” PsyArxiv. Preprint available online at: a DOI: https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/4f9va
Honeycutt N. & Jussim L. 2020. “A Model of Political Bias in Social Science Research,” Psychological Inquiry 31:73-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2020.1722600
Inbar Y. & Lammers J. 2012. “Political Diversity in Social and Personality Psychology,” Perspectives on Psychological Science 7:496-503. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612448792
Jussim L. 2022. “~1400 Academics Denounced Me as Racist for Using a Quote from Fiddler on the Roof,” Unsafe Science. Available online at: https://unsafescience.substack.com/p/1200-academics-denounced-me-as-racist (accessed September 20, 2023).
Jussim L., Crawford J. T., Anglin S. M., Stevens S. T., & Duarte J. L. 2016. “Interpretations and Methods: Towards a More Effectively Self-Correcting Social Psychology,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 66:116-133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.10.003
Kaufmann E. 2021. “Academic Freedom in Crisis: Punishment, Political Discrimination, and Self-Censorship,” Center for the Study of Partisanship and Ideology 2:1-195. Available online at: https://www.cspicenter.com/p/academic-freedom-in-crisis-punishment?utm_source=%2Fsearch%2FAcademic%2520Freedom%2520in%2520Crisis%253A%2520Punishment%252C%2520Political%2520Discrimination%252C%2520and%2520Self-Censorship&utm_medium=reader2 (accessed September 30, 2023).
Kennedy B., Tyson A., & Funk C. 2022. “Americans’ Trust in Scientists, Other Groups Declines,” Pew Research Center. Available online at: https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2022/02/15/americans-trust-in-scientists-other-groups-declines/ (accessed September 10, 2023).
Knight Foundation 2022. “College Student Views on Free Expression and Campus Speech 2022.” Available online at: https://knightfoundation.org/reports/college-student-views-on-free-expression-and-campus-speech-2022/ (accessed September 10, 2023).
Kubin E., Gray K. J., & von Sikorski C. 2022. “Reducing Political Dehumanization by Pairing Facts with Personal Experiences,” Political Psychology 44:1119-1140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12875
Lee J. 2022. “Don’t Even Go There: The National Institutes of Health now Blocks Access to an Important Database If It Thinks a Scientist’s Research May Enter ‘Forbidden’ Territory.” Available online at: https://www.city-journal.org/nih-blocks-access-to-genetics-database
LeResche L. 2011. “Defining Gender Disparities in Pain Management,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 469:1871-1877. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1759-9
Lukianoff G. 2014. Freedom from Speech. New York: Encounter Books.
Martin S. 1999. “APA Defends Stance Against the Sexual Abuse of Children,” APA Monitor Online 30(7). https://web.archive.org/web/20081007013210/http://www.apa.org/monitor/julaug99/as4.html DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/e380132004-046
Nadeem R. 2022. “Americans’ Trust in Scientists, Other Groups Declines,” Pew Research Center Science & Society. Available online at: https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2022/02/15/americans-trust-in-scientists-other-groups-declines/ (accessed July 20, 2023).
Nosek B. A., Hardwicke T. E., Moshontz H., Allard A., Corker K. S., Dreber A., Fidler F., Hilgard J., Struhl M. K., Nuijten M. B., Rohrer J. M., Romero F., Scheel A. M., Scherer L. D., Schönbrodt F. D., & Vazire S. 2022. “Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science,” Annual Review of Psychology 73:719-748. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-020821-114157
Nuijten M. B., Hartgerink C. H., Van Assen M. A., Epskamp S., & Wicherts J. M. 2016. “The Prevalence of Statistical Reporting Errors in Psychology (1985-2013),” Behavior Research Methods 48:1205-1226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0664-2
OECD 2022. “Integrity and Security in the Global Research Ecosystem,” OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, 130, OECD Publishing, Paris. Available online at: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/1c416f43-en?expires=1696452682&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=A1248978C452C91D22557B55EAFD14EE (accessed September 8, 2023).
Piller C. 2022. “Blots on a Field? A Neuroscience Image Sleuth Finds Signs of Fabrication in Scores of Alzheimer’s Articles, Threatening a Reigning Theory of the Disease,” Science 377(6604):358-363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.add9993
Redding R. E. 2001. “Sociopolitical Diversity in Psychology: The Case for Pluralism,” American Psychologist 56(3):205-215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.205
Resnik D. B. & Stewart Jr. C. N. 2012. “Misconduct Versus Honest Error and Scientific Disagreement,” Accountability in Research 19:56-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2012.650948
Retraction Watch. 2020. “Journal Calls 2012 Paper ‘Deeply Offensive to Particular Minorities’.” Available online at: https://retractionwatch.com/2020/06/29/journal-calls-2012-paper-deeply-offensive-to-particular-minorities/ (accessed September 14, 2023).
Retraction Watch 2020. “Springer Nature Retracts Paper That Hundreds Called ‘Overtly Racist’.” Available online at: https://retractionwatch.com/2020/07/31/springer-nature-retracts-paper-that-hundreds-called-overtly-racist/ (accessed September 14, 2023).
Sacco D. F., Bruton S. V., & Brown M. 2018. “In Defense of the Questionable: Defining the Basis of Research Scientists’ Engagement in Questionable Research Practices,” Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 13:101-110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264617743834
Sacco D. F., Bruton S. V., Brown M., & Medlin M. M. 2020. “Skin in the Game: Personal Accountability and Journal Peer Review,” Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 15:330-338. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264620922651
Sacco D. F., Namuth A., Macchione A., & Brown M. (under review, 2023). “Differences in Support for Retractions Based on Information Hazards Among Undergraduates and Federally Funded Scientists,” Journal of Academic Ethics.
Segerstråle U. C. O., & Segerstrale U. 2013. Nature’s Oracle: The Life and Work of WD Hamilton. Oxford University Press.
Tetlock P. E. 1994. “Political Psychology or Politicized Psychology: Is the Road to Scientific Hell Paved with Good Moral Intentions?” Political Psychology 15(3):509-529. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3791569
Vogels E., Auxier B. & Anderson M. 2021. “Partisan Differences in Social Media Use Show up for Some Platforms, but not Facebook,” Pew Research Center Science & Society. Available online at: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/04/07/partisan-differences-in-social-media-use-show-up-for-some-platforms-but-not-facebook/ (accessed September 5, 2023).
Vuong Q. H. 2020. “Reform Retractions to Make Them More Transparent,” Nature 582(7811):149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-01694-x
Wager E. & Williams P. 2011. “Why and How do Journals Retract Articles? An Analysis of Medline Retractions 1988-2008,” Journal of Medical Ethics 37:567-570. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2010.040964
Yeo-The N. S. L. & Tang B. L. 2020. “An Alarming Retraction Rate for Scientific Publications on Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19),” Accountability in Research 28:47-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2020.1782203
License
Copyright (c) 2023 August Namuth, Mitch Brown, Alicia Macchione, Donald Sacco
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.