Abstract
During the notorious collective experience of COVID-19 pandemic, the prospect of a better future was featured in public interventions in the light of the recent painful circumstance. The theories of the post-pandemic world were prominent in this debate. This article attempts to examine some of them in order to investigate how broader social theories integrate the gender perspective. From the approximately forty English-language monographs by important scholars and thinkers which have characterised the relevant body of work, only ten of them have been found to contain explicit gendered references. Those were the selected sample of an analysis which was conducted from a social constructionist point of view articulated with a (neuro)feminist perspective. Despite the epistemological and methodological advances in the study of gender relations, the long dominant approach of binary sex constituted the basic framework of the analyses in the examined post-pandemic theories. This is a choice that does not advance the public debate on gender relations, since it de facto ignores and silences the multiplicity of gender identities and intersectional premises.
References
Angouri J. 2021. “Introduction: Language, Gender, and Sexuality: Sketching Out the Field,” in J. Angouri & J. Baxter (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Language, Gender, and Sexuality (pp. 1–21). New York: Routledge.
Barnett A. 2022. Taking Control! Humanity and America after Trump and the Pandemic. London: Repeater Books.
Bluhm R., Jacobson A. J., & Maibom H. L. (Eds.) 2012. Neurofeminism: Issues at the Intersection of Feminist Theory and Cognitive Science. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Braun V. & Wilkinson S. 2005. “Vagina Equals Woman? On Genitals and Gendered Identity,” Women’s Studies International Forum 28(6):509–522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2005.09.007
Butler J. 1988. “Performative Acts and Gender Constitution: An Essay in Phenomenology and Feminist Theory,” Theatre Journal 40(4):519–531. https://doi.org/10.2307/3207893
Campbell-Kibler K. & Miles-Hercules D. 2021. “Perception of Gender and Sexuality,” in J. Angouri & J. Baxter (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Language, Gender, and Sexuality (pp. 52–68). New York: Routledge.
Capano G., Howlett M., Jarvis D. S. L., & Ramesh M. 2022. “Long-Term Policy Impacts of the Coronavirus: Normalization, Adaptation, and Acceleration in the Post-COVID State,” Policy and Society 41(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1093/polsoc/puab018
Christakis N. A. 2020. Apollo’s Arrow: The Profound and Enduring Impact of Coronavirus on the Way We Live. New York: Little, Brown Spark.
Crenshaw K. 1991. “Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence Against Women of Color,” Stanford Law Review 43(6):1241–1299. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039
Dea S. 2016. Beyond the Binary: Thinking about Sex and Gender. Ontario: Broadview Press.
Del Giudice M. 2022. “Measuring Sex Differences and Similarities,” in D. P. VanderLaan & W. I. Wong (Eds.), Gender and Sexuality Development: Contemporary Theory and Research (pp. 1–38). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Demertzis N. & Eyerman R. 2020. “COVID-19 as Cultural Trauma,” American Journal of Cultural Sociology 8(3):428–450. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41290-020-00112-z
Digby T. 2014. Love and War: How Militarism Shapes Sexuality and Romance. New York: Columbia University Press.
Dodgen-Magee D. 2021. Restart: Designing a Healthy Post-Pandemic Life. London: Rowman & Littlefield.
DuBois L. Z. & Shattuck-Heidorn H. 2021. “Challenging the Binary: Gender/Sex and the Bio-logics of Normalcy,” American Journal of Human Biology 33(5):e23623. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.23623
Echegaray F., Brachya V., Vergragt P. J., & Zhang L. 2021. Sustainable Lifestyles after COVID-19. New York: Routledge.
Engeli I. 2020. “Gender and Sexuality Research in the Age of Populism: Lessons for Political Science,” European Political Science 19(2):226–235. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-019-00223-3
Fausto-Sterling A. 2019. “Gender/Sex, Sexual Orientation, and Identity Are in the Body: How Did They Get There?” The Journal of Sex Research 56(4-5):529–555. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2019.1581883
Fausto-Sterling A. 2020. Sexing the Body: Gender Politics and the Construction of Sexuality. 2nd Edition. New York: Basic Books.
Foley M. & Cooper R. 2021. “Workplace Gender Equality in the Post-Pandemic Era: Where to Next?” Journal of Industrial Relations 63(4):463–476. https://doi.org/10.1177/00221856211035173
Friedrichs K. & Kellmeyer P. 2022. “Neurofeminism: Feminist Critiques of Research on Sex/Gender Differences in the Neurosciences,” European Journal of Neuroscience 56(11):5987–6002. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.15834
Galloway S. 2020. Post Corona: From Crisis to Opportunity. New York: Portfolio/Penguin.
Gerbaudo P. 2021. The Great Recoil: Politics after Populism and Pandemic. London: Verso.
Harvey R. 2021. The Ignored Pandemic: The Dual Crises of Gender-Based Violence and COVID-19. Oxfam International. http://dx.doi.org/10.21201/2021.8366
Holden R. & Dixon R. 2022. From Free to Fair Markets: Liberalism after Covid-19. New York: Oxford University Press.
Joel D. 2012. “Genetic-Gonadal-Genitals Sex (3G-Sex) and the Misconception of Brain and Gender, or Why 3G-Males and 3G-Females Have Intersex Brain and Intersex Gender,” Biology of Sex Differences 3(1):27. https://doi.org/10.1186/2042-6410-3-27
Kampouri N. 2022. The Impact of COVID-19 on the Gender Gap in Greece. Athens: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.
Kahl C. & Wright T. 2021. Aftershocks: Pandemic Politics and the End of the Old International Order. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Kiesling S. F. 2019. Language, Gender, and Sexuality: An Introduction. New York: Routledge.
Kołodko G. W. 2020. “After the Calamity: Economics and Politics in the Post-Pandemic World,” Polish Sociological Review 210(2):137–156. https://doi.org/10.26412/psr210.01
Laqueur T. 1990. Making Sex: Body and Gender from the Greeks to Freud. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Mayer L. S. & McHugh P. R. 2016. “Special Report. Sexuality and Gender: Findings from the Biological, Psychological, and Social Sciences,” The New Atlantis. A Journal of Technology and Society 50:4–143.
McAuley J. & Nesbitt-Larking W. P. W. 2022. “Imagining the Post-COVID-19 Polity: Narratives of Possible Futures,” Social Sciences 11(8):346. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11080346
Mohan B. 2022. Rediscovery of Society: A Post-pandemic Reality. New York: Nova Science Publishers.
Morgenroth T. et al. 2021. “Defending the Sex/Gender Binary: The Role of Gender Identification and Need for Closure,” Social Psychological and Personality Science 12(5):731–740. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620937188
Pantelidou-Malouta M. 1996. “Feminist Movement, Feminist Theory and Citizenship,” Greek Political Science Review 8:154–180. https://doi.org/10.12681/hpsa.15243
Pantelidou-Malouta M. 2013. “From the Point of View of Gender: Aspects of the Existing Crisis,” Greek Political Science Review 41:9–34. https://doi.org/10.12681/hpsa.14534
Papagiannopoulou M. & Moshovakou N. 2022. “We Are Not All Waiting for the Pandemic to ‘End’: Feminist Articulations on Gender Violence in Latin America,” Journal of Social Policy 16:94–112.
Paasonen S. 2006. “Email from Nancy Nutsucker: Representation and Gendered Address in Online Pornography,” European Journal of Cultural Studies 9(4):403–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549406069065
Power K. 2020. “The COVID-19 Pandemic Has Increased the Care Burden of Women and Families,” Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy 16(1):67–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2020.1776561
Rickards J. 2021. The New Great Depression: Winners and Losers in a Post-Pandemic World. New York: Portfolio/Penguin.
Schwab K. & Malleret T. 2020. COVID-19: The Great Reset. Zürich: ISBN Agentur Schweiz.
Schmitz S. & Höppner G. 2014. “Neurofeminism and Feminist Neurosciences: A Critical Review of Contemporary Brain Research,” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8:546. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00546
Soh D. 2020. The End of Gender: Debunking the Myths about Sex and Identity in Our Society. New York: Threshold Editions.
Standish K. & Weil S. 2021. “Gendered Pandemics: Suicide, Femicide and COVID-19,” Journal of Gender Studies 30(7):807–818. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2021.1880883
Stoesz D. 2021. Welfare State 3.0: Social Policy after the Pandemic. New York: Routledge.
Timm A. F. & J. A. Sanborn. 2016. Gender, Sex and the Shaping of Modern Europe: A History from the French Revolution to the Present Day, 2nd Ed. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Ullah AKM A. & J. Ferdous. 2022. The Post-Pandemic World and Global Politics. Singapore: Springer.
van Anders S. M. 2015. “Beyond Sexual Orientation: Integrating Gender/Sex and Diverse Sexualities via Sexual Configurations Theory,” Archives of Sexual Behavior 44(5):1177–1213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-015-0490-8
Zissi A. & Chtouris S. 2020. “The COVID-19 Pandemic: Accelerator of Inequalities and Installer of New Forms of Inequalities,” The Greek Review of Social Research 154:65–73. https://doi.org/10.12681/grsr.23229
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Vangelis Liotzis

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
