Keywords
Bardili
tending
the concept of Trieb
teleology
realism
How to Cite
Number of views: 1023
Number of downloads: 68
Abstract
The paper traces some stages in the process of the speculative emancipation of the Trieb in Post-Kantian philosophy with the aim of reconstructing the context that allows explaining the outcomes of the treatment given to it by Hegel in the Science of Logic. Initially, some elements that underlie the speculative assimilation of the concept of Trieb in the course of the development of post-Kantian philosophy are presented, and in a second step, the position of an author central to the development of Hegel’s Logic, namely Christoph Gottfried Bardili, is discussed. The theory of the drive developed by Bardili in Grundriss der ersten Logik makes possible a clearer understanding of the different levels at which Hegel makes use of the notion of Trieb in the doctrine of the concept and particularly in the understanding of teleology developed in Wissenschaft der Logik. The overall purpose is to show how the debate on Trieb does not take the form of the evolution of a purely anthropological interpretation, oriented toward a supposed critique of ‘subjectivity’, but rather is the result of its integration in a speculative sense.
References
Barone F. 1999. Logica Formale e Trascendentale, Vol. 1. Napoli: Unicopoli.
Bardili G. 1795. Allgemeine Praktische Philosophie. Stuttgart: Löflund.
Bardili G. 1796. Ueber den Ursprung des Begriffes der Willensfreiheit. Stuttgart: Löflund.
Bardili G. 1800. Grundriss der Ersten Logik. Stuttgart: Löflund (= GEL).
Beiser F. 2008. German Idealism: The Struggle against Subjectivism, 1781–1801. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjghtq5
Bertoletti S. F. 1990. Impulso, Formazione e Organismo: Per una Storia del Concetto di Bildungstrieb nella Cultura Tedesca. Firenze: L. S. Olschki.
Bondeli M. 2018. “On the Concept of Thinking in Reinhold’s System of Rational Realism,” Revista de Filosofia Aurora 30(51):669–684. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7213/1980-5934.30.051.DS06
Bonito Oliva R. 2002. “La Traduction Spirituelle du Trieb dans la Philosophie Hégélienne de l’Esprit,” Revue germanique internationale 18:187–199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/rgi.922
Buchenau S. 2002. “Trieb, Antrieb, Triebfeder dans la Philosophie Morale Prékantienne,” Revue germanique internationale 17:11–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/rgi.903
Cesa C. 1993. “Der Begriff Trieb in den Frühschriften von J. G. Fichte (1792–1794),” in C. Cesa & N. Hinske (Eds.), Kant und sein Jahrhundert. Gedenkschrift für G. Tonelli (pp. 165–185). Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.
Cesa C. 2002. “Sensibilité et Conscience: Remarques sur la Théorie des Triebes chez Fichte,” Revue germanique internationale 18:121–132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/rgi.913
Drouet P. 1972. “L’«Anstoss» fichtéen: Essai d’Élucidation d’Une Métaphore,” Revue philosophique de Louvain 70(96):384–392. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/phlou.1972.5682
Ferraguto F. 2018. “McDowell, 1801,” Revista Eletrónica de estudos heglianos 15(25):39–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.70244/reh.v15i25.306
Fabbianelli F. 2011. Coscienza e realtà: Saggio su Reinhold. Pisa: Edizioni della Normale.
Fichte J. G. 1962–2013. Gesamtausgabe der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann Holzboog (= GA).
Franks P. 2006. All or Nothing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Frege G. 1918–1919. “Der Gedanke. Eine Logische Untersuchung,” Beiträge zur Philosophie des Deutschen Idealismus 2:58–77.
Gambarotto A. 2018. Vital Forces, Teleology and Organization: Philosophy of Nature and the Rise of Biology in Germany. Cham: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65415-7
Hartmann N. 1972. La Filosofia dell’Idealismo Tedesco. Milano: Mursia.
Hegel G. W. F. 1968. “Differenz des Fichteschen und Schellingschen Systems der Philosophie,” in G. W. F. Hegel, Gesammelte Werke (Vol. 4, Jenaer Kritische Schriften, pp. 1–116). Hamburg: Felix Meiner.
Hegel G. W. F. 1970. Wissenschaft der Logik II, in G. W. F. Hegel, Werke in 20 Bänden (Vol. 6). Frankfurt: Suhrkamp (= WL).
Kant I. 1902–. Kants gesammelte Schriften, hrsg. von der königlich preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter (= AK).
Karsch F. 1925. “Christoph Gottfried Bardilis Logischer Realismus,” Kant-Studien 1–2:437–452. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/kant.1925.30.1-2.437
Kisner M. & Noller J. (Eds.) 2022. The Concept of Drive in Classical German Philosophy: Between Biology, Anthropology, and Metaphysics. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84160-7
Klemme H. 2016. The Dictionary of Eighteenth-Century German Philosophers. London: Bloomsbury.
Kunio K. 1988. “Das Bedürfnis der Philosophie,” Hegel-Studien 30:1–277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28937/978-3-7873-2960-1
Lorini G. 2015. “Rethinking the Absolute: Recent Enquiries into German Idealism,” Alvearium 8:89–117.
Michelini F. 2008. “Thinking Life: Hegel’s Conceptualization of Living Being as an Autopoietic Theory of Organized Systems,” in L. Illetterati & F. Michelini (Eds.), Purposiveness: Teleology between Nature and Mind (pp. 75–96). Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Books. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110321241.75
Nuzzo A. 2022. “The Trieb of Dialectic: Systematic and Thematic Extension of the Concept of Trieb in Hegel,” in M. Kisner & J. Noller (Eds.), The Concept of Drive in Classical German Philosophy: Between Biology, Anthropology, and Metaphysics (pp. 281–288). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84160-7_14
Onnasch E. O. 2006. “Gegen das ‚unphilosophische Unwesen‘,” Kritisches Jahrbuch der Philosophie 7:185–196.
Paimann R. 2009. Das Denken als Denken: Die Philosophie des Christoph Gottfried Bardili. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog.
Perl M. 1969. “Physics and Metaphysics in Newton, Leibniz, and Clarke,” Journal of the History of Ideas 30(4):507–556. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2708608
Reinhold K.L. 1789. Versuch einer Neuen Theorie des Menschlichen Vorstellungsvermögens. Prag – Jena: Widtmann und Mauke.
Reinhold K. & Bardili G. 1804. Briefwechsel über das Wesen der Philosophie. Hamburg: Perthes (= BW).
Schäfer M. E. 2020. “Considerações Introdutórias sobre os Conceitos de Desejo, Impulso e Carência na Filosofia de Hegel,” Poliética 8(2):428–461.
Selling M. (ed.) 1938. Studien zur Geschichte der Transzendentalphilosophie: Karl Leonhard Reinholds Elementarphilosophie in ihrem Philosophiegeschichtlichen Zusammenhang. Uppsala: Magnus Selling.
Tarli S. 2022. Principio e Fine del Sapere: Fichte e il Realismo Razionale di Reinhold (1799-1805). Unpublished doctoral dissertation at Università La Sapienza di Roma and Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena.
Theilke P. 2013. “Recent Work on Early German Idealism (1781–1801),” Journal of the History of Philosophy 51:149–192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/hph.2013.0039
Tognini G. 1987. “Tradizione e Nuova Filosofia nel Realismo Logico di Bardili,” Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa. Classe di Lettere e Filosofia 20:771–826.
Valenza P. 1994. Reinhold e Hegel. Padova: CEDAM.
Wittmann D. 2006. “Le Concept de Trieb: Entre Logique et Sciences Concrètes,” in J.-M. Buée, E. Renault, & D. Wittmann (Eds.), Logique et Sciences Concrètes (Nature et Esprit) dans le Système Hégélien (pp. 171–203). Paris: L’Harmattan.
Zahn M. 1965. “Fichte, Schelling und Hegels Ausesinandersetzung mit dem ‘Logischen Realismus’ Christoph Gottfried Bardilis,” Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 19:201–223; 464–471.
Zammito J. H. 2022. “Between Reimarus and Kant: Blumenbach’s Concept of Trieb,” in M. Kisner & J. Noller (Eds.), The Concept of Drive in Classical German Philosophy: Between Biology, Anthropology, and Metaphysics (pp. 39–60). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84160-7_3
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Federico Ferraguto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.