Abstract
This paper develops a utilitarian case for prison abolition grounded on utilitarianism’s commitment to the reduction of pain, challenging the traditional forward-looking utilitarian justifications of punishment, whose empirical foundations are increasingly contested. To construct the utilitarian abolitionist argument, traces of an abolitionist theory are identified in Bentham’s penal thought, especially in his neglected analysis of indirect legislation as a means of crime prevention. His theoretical analysis is integrated with contemporary debates on punishment, incarceration and restorative justice. The paper argues that a consistently utilitarian approach should prioritize harm reduction through social restructuring, transformative approaches, and restorative responses to wrongdoing, rather than relying on incarceration and deterrence-centred punishment.
References
Bell M. 2021. “Abolition: A New Paradigm for Reform,” Law & Social Inquiry 46(1):32–68. https://doi.org/10.1017/lsi.2020.21
Bentham J. 1962. “Principles of Penal Law,” in J. Bowring (Ed.), The Works of Jeremy Bentham (pp. 365–358). New York: Russell & Russell.
Bentham J. 1995. The Panopticon Writings. Edited by Miran Bozovic. London and New York: Verso.
Bentham J. 2015. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Edited by J. H. Burns and H. L. A. Hart. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bentham J. & Crompton L. 1978. “Offences Against One’s Self,” Journal of Homosexuality 3(4):389–406. https://doi.org/10.1300/J082v03n04_07
Beraha M. 2025. Ripensare la giustizia. Oltre il modello retributivo. Roma: Carocci.
Burns James H. & Hart H. L. A. 2015. “Introduction,” in H. L. A. Hart & J. H. Burns (Eds.), An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation (pp. xxxi–lxix). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ceretti A. 2015. “Per una convergenza di sguardi. I nostri tragitti e quelli della commissione per la verità e la riconciliazione sudafricana”, in G. Bertagna, A. Ceretti, & C. Mazzucato (Eds.), Il libro dell’incontro. Vittime e responsabili della lotta armata a confronto (pp. 219–250). Milano: Il Saggiatore.
Christie N. 1977. “Conflicts as Property,” The British Journal of Criminology 17(1):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjc.a046783
Davis A. Y. 2003. Are Prisons Obsolete? New York: Seven Stories Press.
Duff R. A. 2011. “Responsibility, Restoration, and Retribution,” in M. Tonry (Ed.), Retributivism Has a Past: Has it a Future? (pp. 64–85). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199798278.003.0004
Foucault M. 1995. Discipline and Punish. The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage Books.
Guyau J.-M. 1891. A Sketch of Morality Independent of Obligation and Sanction. London: Watts & Co.
Hart H. L. A. 2008. Punishment and Responsibility. Essays in the Philosophy of Law. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199534777.001.0001
Hulsman L. 1991. “The Abolitionist Case: Alternative Crime Policies,” Israel Law Review 25(3–4):681–709. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021223700010694
Law V. 2021. “Prisons Make Us Safer” And 20 Other Myths About Mass Incarceration. Boston: Beacon Press.
Lazari-Radek K. de & Singer P. 2010. “Secrecy in Consequentialism: A Defence of Esoteric Morality,” Ratio 23(1):34–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9329.2009.00449.x
Martinson R. 1974. “What Works? Questions and Answers about Prison Reform,” The Public Interest 35:22–54. URL: https://www.nationalaffairs.com/public_interest/detail/what-works-questions-and-answers-about-prison-reform (accessed on February 27, 2026).
Mazzucato C. 2015. “La giustizia dell’incontro. Il contributo della giustizia riparativa al dialogo tra responsabili e vittime della lotta armata”, in G. Bertagna, A. Ceretti & C. Mazzucato (Eds.), Il libro dell’incontro. Vittime e responsabili della lotta armata a confronto (pp. 251–304). Milano: Il Saggiatore.
McCloskey H. J. 1963. “A Note on Utilitarian Punishment,” Mind 72(288):599. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/LXXII.288.599
McLeod A. M. 2019. “Envisioning Abolition Democracy,” Harvard Law Review 132(6):1613–1649.
Morris H. 1968. “Persons and Punishment,” The Monist 52(4):475–501. https://doi.org/10.5840/monist196852436
Mosconi G. 2025. Decostruire la pena. Per una proposta abolizionista. Milano: Meltemi.
Narveson J. 2019. Morality and Utility. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Nocella A. J. II, Seis M., & Shantz J. 2020. Classic Writings in Anarchist Criminology: A Historical Dismantling of Punishment and Domination. Chico: AK Press.
Primoratz I. 1991. “Utilitarianism, Justice and Punishment: Comments on Smart and Flew,” Israel Law Review 25(3–4):388–397. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021223700010499
Ryberg J. 2011. “Punishment and Desert-Adjusted Utilitarianism,” in M. Tonry (Ed.), Retributivism Has a Past: Has It a Future? (pp. 86–100). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199798278.003.0005
Sandel M. 2009. Justice. What’s the Right Thing to Do? London: Penguin Books.
Schofield P. 2019. “«The First Steps Rightly Directed in the Track of Legislation»: Jeremy Bentham on Cesare Beccaria’s Essay on Crimes and Punishments,” Diciottesimo Secolo 4:65–74.
Sidgwick H. 1907. The Methods of Ethics. London: MacMillan.
Smart J. J. C. 1973. “An Outline of a System of Utilitarian Ethics,” in J. J. C. Smart & B. Williams, Utilitarianism. For and Against (pp. 1–74). Cambridge – New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840852.001
Smart R. N. 1958. “Negative Utilitarianism,” Mind 67(268):542–543. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/LXVII.268.542
Tyler T. 2006. Why People Obey the Law. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Wang L. 2023. “Punishment Beyond Prisons: Incarceration and Supervision by State,” Prison Policy Initiative, May 2023. URL: https://www.prisonpolicy.org/reports/correctionalcontrol2023.html (accessed on February 27, 2026).
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Marina Beraha
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.