Abstract
In this paper we discuss the alienability splits in two Mainland Scandinavian languages, Swedish and Danish, in a diachronic context. Although it is not universally acknowledged that such splits exist in modern Scandinavian languages, many nouns typically included in inalienable structures such as kinship terms, body part nouns and nouns describing culturally important items show different behaviour from those considered alienable. The differences involve the use of (reflexive) possessive pronouns vs. the definite article, which differentiates the Scandinavian languages from e.g. English. As the definite article is a relatively new arrival in the Scandinavian languages, we look at when the modern pattern could have evolved by a close examination of possessive structures with potential inalienables in Old Swedish and Old Danish. Our results reveal that to begin with, inalienables are usually bare nouns and come to be marked with the definite article in the course of its grammaticalization.
References
Bally, Ch. (1996) [1926]. The expression of concepts of the personal domain and indivisibility in Indo-European languages (translated by Christine Béal and Hilary Chappell). In: H. Chappell, W. McGregor (eds.), The grammar of inalienability: A typological perspective on body-part terms and the part-whole relation (pp. 31–61). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Dahl, Ö., Koptjevskaja-Tamm, M. (2001). Kinship in grammar. In: I. Baron, M. Herslund, F. Sørensen (eds.), Dimensions of possession (pp. 201-226). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Delsing, L.-O. (2014). Stora katastrofen – med för- och efterskalv. In: M. Bylin, C. Falk, T. Riad (eds.), Svenska språkets historia 12. Variation och förändring (pp. 27-47). Stockholms universitet.
De Mulder, W. and A. Carlier. (2011). The grammaticalization of definite articles. In: H. Narrog, B. Heine (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization (pp. 522-534). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dixon, R.M.W. (2010). Basic linguistic theory. Volume 2: Grammatical topics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Haiman, J. 1983. Iconic and economic motivation. Language 59, 781-819.
Haspelmath, M. (2008). Alienable vs Inalienable Possessive Constructions. Leipzig Spring School on Linguistic Diversity.
Heine, Bernd. (2002). On the role of context in grammaticalization. In: I. Wischer, G. Diewald (eds), New Reflections on Grammaticalization (pp. 83-101). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Löbner, S. (1985). Definites. Journal of Semantics 4, 279-326.
Lødrup, H. (1999). Inalienables in Norwegian and binding theory. Linguistics 37 (3), 365-388.
Lødrup, H. (2009). External and internal possessors with body part nouns: the case of Norwegian. SKY Journal of Linguistics 22, 221-250.
Lødrup, H. (2010). Implicit possessives and reflexive binding in Norwegian. Transactions of the Philological Society 108 (2), 89-109.
Lødrup, H. (2014). Split possession and the syntax of kinship nouns in Norwegian. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 17, 35-57.
Maciejewski, W. (1996). O przestrzeni w języku. Studium typologiczne z językiem polskim w centrum. Poznań: Wydawnictwo naukowe UAM.
Nichols, J. (1988). On alienable and inalienable possession. In: Shipley, W. (ed.), In Honour of Mary Haas (pp. 557-610). Berlin/New York/Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter.
Nichols, J., Bickel B. (2011). Possessive classification. In: Dryer, M., Haspelmath, M. (eds.),
The world atlas of language structures online, chapter 59. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library. Available online at http://wals.info/chapter/59.
Norde, M. (1997). The history of the genitive in Swedish. Case-study in degrammaticalization.
PhD Dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
Ringgaard, K. (1986). Flektionssystemets forenkling og middelnedertysk. Arkiv för nordisk filologi 101, 173-183.
Seiler, H. (1983). Possession as an operational dimension of language. Tübingen: Narr.
Skrzypek, D. (2005). The Decline of the Nominal Inflection in Swedish. Loss of the Dative Case. Nordlund. Lund: University of Lund.
Skrzypek, D. (2012). Grammaticalization of (in)definiteness in Swedish. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.
Stolz, Th., Kettler, S., Stroh, C., Urdze, A. (2008). Split possession: An areal-linguistic study of the alienability correlation and related phenomena in the languages of Europe. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.