How can a reliable Esperanto dictionary be created?
PDF (Esperanto) (Język Polski)

How to Cite

Cramer, M. (2019). How can a reliable Esperanto dictionary be created?. Język. Komunikacja. Informacja, (13), 81–100. https://doi.org/10.14746/jki.2018.13.6

Abstract

Many of the linguistically most competent Esperanto speakers believe that neither of the two dominant dictionaries PIV and ReVo is fully trustworthy, and that advanced learners should use these dictionaries with care. At the same time learners now often look for advice in Internet forums such as Lingva Konsultejo on Facebook or the bilingual (English/Esperanto) forum Esperanto Language StackExchange. There linguistically competent Esperanto speakers give recommendations about language usage which are often more useful than the information that can be found in the dominant dictionaries. In this paper I propose Forumo-Vortaro, an Internet platform that aims at developing the content of PIV and/or ReVo with a wiki-like system which would include a forum for discussing specific linguitic questions, and which would systematicall give more weight to the opinions and proposals for revision coming from linguistically competent contributors in comparison with those from linguistically less competent contributors.

https://doi.org/10.14746/jki.2018.13.6
PDF (Esperanto) (Język Polski)

References

Chen, Y., Gupta, M. R. 2010: EM Demystified: An Expectation-Maximization Tutorial. UWEE Technical Report, Number UWEETR-2010-0002. University of Washington.

Dong, X. L., Gabrilovich, E., Murphy, K., Dang, V., Horn, W., Lugaresi, C., Sun, S., Zhang, W. 2015: Knowledge-based trust: Estimating the trustworthiness of web sources. In: Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 8(9): 938–949.

Grosjean-Maupin, É. (red.) 1934: Plena Vortaro de Esperanto. Parizo: Sennacieca Asocio Tutmonda.

Kramer, M. 2018: Ĉu tamen eblas pri-Esperanta lingvoscienco? “Esenco kaj Estonteco”: Lingvoscienco, Tradukado kaj Komunumo – Aktoj de la 37a Esperantologia Konferenco en la 99a Universala Kongreso de Esperanto, Bonaero 2014. Rotterdam: Universala Esperanto-Asocio. 6–14.

Miner, K. 2011: The impossibility of an Esperanto linguistics / La neebleco de priesperanta lingvoscienco. InKoj. Philosophy & Artificial Languages 2(1): 26–51.

Mukherjee, S., Weikum, G., & Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, C. 2014: People on drugs: credibility of user statements in health communities. In: Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM. 65–74.

Pasternack, J., Roth, D. 2010: Knowing what to believe (when you already know something). In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics. Association for Computational Linguistics. 877–885.

Popat, K., Mukherjee, S., Strötgen, J., Weikum, G. 2016. Credibility assessment of textual claims on the web. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. ACM. 2173–2178.

Wang, D., Kaplan, L. kaj Abdelzaher, T. F. 2014: Maximum Likelihood Analysis of Conflicting Observations in Social Sensing. ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks 10(2). 30:1–30:27.

Waringhien, G. (red.) 1970: Plena Ilustrita Vortaro de Esperanto. Parizo: Sennacieca Asocio Tutmonda.

Waringhien, G. (red.), Duc Goninaz, M. (red.) 2005: Plena Ilustrita Vortaro de Esperanto 2005. Parizo: Sennacieca Asocio Tutmonda.

Wennergren, B. 2005: Plena Manlibro de Esperanta Gramatiko. El Cerrito: Esperanto-Ligo por Norda Ameriko.

Yu, D. & Huang, H. & Cassidy, T. & Ji, H. & Wang, C. & Zhi, S. & Han, J. & Voss, C. & Magdon-Ismail, M. 2014: The wisdom of minority: Unsupervised slot filling validation based on multi-dimensional truth-finding. In: Proceedings of COLING 2014, the 25th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Technical Papers. 1567–1578).