Moral Scens from Urban Life: Moral Perception of Modernity in Imperial Brazil

Article Sidebar

PDF
Opublikowane: mar 15, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/prt.2017.1.10
Słowa kluczowe:
Imperial Brazil, modernity, morals, processes of education, urbanity

Main Article Content

Felipe Ziotti Narita
Postgraduate Program in Public Policy Analysis – School of Humanities and Social Sciences – São Paulo State University (Unesp) 900 Eufrásia Monteiro Petraglia Avenue Franca, SP, 14409-160, Brazil Phone: 55 (16) 3706-8700

Abstrakt

In this article, I analyze moral perceptions of modernity in Rio de Janeiro between the 1850s and 1860s. Against a long theoretical tradition in the Latin American social sciences that emphasizes nineteenth-century modernity in the region as an opaque process (a mere attempt at imitating the Western European “pure” model), I would like to follow another theoretical path; that is, my analysis focuses on tangible experiences of modernity during the apogee of the Brazilian Empire. This research looks to newspapers, schoolbooks, books, and speeches delivered by the cultural elite in the public sphere. I analyze how moral perceptions of urban life in nineteenth-century Rio de Janeiro can be articulated into a structure based on processes of education. In other words, beyond the materiality in urban space (public street lighting, oil and gas companies, urban cleanliness, public gardens, etc.), there is an implicit relationship between the inner problems (political turbulence, poverty, and moral management of the urban population) and the moral content of modernity (which can be understood in terms of structural prescriptions). These processes of education, instead of an institution-centered practice concentrated only on schools, elaborate a diffuse set of prescriptions whose nexus is constituted by the content of morality. The paper reflects on the conditions of production and reproduction of modernity in a peripheral area (former colonial space) in the nineteenth century.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Jak cytować
Narita, F. Z. (2017). Moral Scens from Urban Life: Moral Perception of Modernity in Imperial Brazil. Praktyka Teoretyczna, 23(1), 269-302. https://doi.org/10.14746/prt.2017.1.10
Numer
Tom 23 Nr 1 (2017): WYPARTE HISTORIE XIX WIEKU
Dział
ALTERNOWOCZESNOŚĆ
Creative Commons License

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Na tych samych warunkach 4.0 Międzynarodowe.

Autorzy:
„Praktyka Teoretyczna” jest pismem, które chce realizować idee wolnego dostępu do wiedzy i poszerzania domeny dobra wspólnego. Ma służyć rozwojowi nauki i krytycznej refleksji w Polsce i na świecie w imię idei wolnego dostępu do wiedzy (Open Access). Całe pismo jest udostępniane za darmo w Internecie na warunkach licencji CC-BY-NC-SA (Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Na tych samych warunkach 4.0 Międzynarodowe) w wersji 4.0 (szczegółowe warunki: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/). Artykuły w nim zamieszczone mogą być dowolnie przechowywane, kopiowane, drukowane, rozpowszechniane i wykorzystywane do celów naukowo-dydaktycznych przy zachowaniu warunków licencji. Apelujemy tylko o uznanie autorstwa i podanie źródła w myśl przyjętych w środowisku naukowym standardów.

Nie ma natomiast możliwości komercyjnego wykorzystania zgromadzonych zasobów bez pisemnej zgody wydawcy. Dostęp do czasopisma nie może być dystrybuowany za opłatą czy w jakikolwiek inny sposób limitowany przez inne podmioty.

Autorzy tekstów przyjętych do publikacji w czasopiśmie „Praktyka Teoretyczna” są zobowiązani do wypełnienia, podpisania i odesłania na adres redakcji umowy o udzielenie nieodpłatnej licencji do utworów, z zobowiązaniem do udzielania sublicencji CC [PL.pdf, PL.doc, EN.pdf, EN.doc].
Zgodnie z umową, autorzy tekstów opublikowanych w czasopiśmie „Praktyka Teoretyczna” udzielają wydawcy czasopisma niewyłącznej i nieodpłatnej licencji oraz zezwalają na użycie sublicencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Na tych samych warunkach 4.0 Międzynarodowe (CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0).

Autorzy zachowują prawa do dalszego, swobodnego rozporządzania utworem.
Autorzy nadsyłanych artykułów powinni upewnić się, czy wykorzystywane przez nich materiały nie są chronione prawami autorskimi na rzecz innych osób i ponoszą odpowiedzialność za ewentualne uchybienia w tym względzie.

Biogram autora

Felipe Ziotti Narita, Postgraduate Program in Public Policy Analysis – School of Humanities and Social Sciences – São Paulo State University (Unesp) 900 Eufrásia Monteiro Petraglia Avenue Franca, SP, 14409-160, Brazil Phone: 55 (16) 3706-8700

Felipe Ziotti Narita - received his Ph.D. in History from São Paulo State University (Unesp), SP, Brazil. He is a researcher linked to the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP, 2008−2012), National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq, 2007−2008), and the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES, 2013−2016), and a member of “Historiar: identity narratives, concepts, languages” (research group linked to CNPq). He is a professor at the Postgraduate Program in Public Policy Analysis of Unesp. He is the author of “O século e o Império” (2014) and coauthor of “Educação em perspectiva histórica” (2015). He is a habitual referee of academic journals covering the social sciences in Brazil and Denmark. His current research focuses on the problem of theorizing modernity in peripheral zones (former colonial areas).

Bibliografia

  1. “A instrucção publica”. 1868. O Cidadão, vol. 22, July 19.
  2. Agamben, Giorgio. 2009. The signature of all things: on method. Cambridge: MIT Press. (Trans. Luca D’Isanto and Kevin Attell)
  3. Agamben, Giorgio. 2011. O reino e a glória: uma genealogia teológica da economia e do governo. São Paulo: Boitempo. (Trans. Selvino Assmann)
  4. Albuquerque, Pedro Autran da Matta. 1844. Elementos de economia política. Pernambuco: Typographia de Santos & Companhia.
  5. Almeida, José Bernardino Pereira de. 1823. Reflexões histórico-políticas. Rio de Janeiro: Typ. de Silva Porto.
  6. Anderson, Perry. 1984. “Modernity and revolution”. New Left Review, 144: 96-113.
  7. Azevedo, Manuel Duarte Moreira de. 1873. “Os tiros no theatro: motim popular no Rio de Janeiro”. Revista trimensal do Instituto Historico, Geographico e Ethnographico do Brasil, 36(2): 349-358.
  8. Barbosa, Maria Benedita de Oliveira. 1853. Zaira Americana: mostra as immensas vantagens que a sociedade inteira obtem da illustração, virtudes e perfeita educação da mulher como mãi e esposa do homem. Rio de Janeiro: Typ. de Paula Brito.
  9. Barman, Roderick. 2012. The enigma of liberalism in Imperial Brazil, 1822 to 1889. Presentation at the Institute of Latin American Studies – School of Advanced Study (University of London).
  10. Basile, Marcello. 2007. “Revolta e cidadania na Corte regencial”. Tempo, (22)2: 31-57.
  11. Beaumont, Matthew. 2015. Nightwalking: a nocturnal history of London. New York: Verso.
  12. Beaurepaire-Rohan, Henrique. 1967. “Relatório apresentado a Ilma. Câmara Municipal do Rio de Janeiro”. Revista do IHGB, 275(2): 201-232. (first published in 1843)
  13. Beauzée, Nicolas. 1846. “Civilité, politesse”. In: Dictionnaire universel des synonymes de la langue française. Paris: Eugène Penaud. (vol. 1)
  14. Beauzée, Nicolas. 1850. “Civilidade-Polidez”. A Marmota na Corte, vol. 88, August 30.
  15. Bellegarde, Guilherme. 1862. “O ensino ás classes operarias”. O Futuro, October 1.
  16. Benjamin, Walter. 1974. Baudelaire: ein Lyriker im Zeitalter des Hochkapitalismus. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
  17. Bentivoglio, Julio. 2002. O Império das circunstâncias: o Código Comercial e a política econômica brasileira (1840-1860). Thesis (PhD in History) – University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  18. Berman, Marshall. 1999. Adventures in Marxism. New York: Verso.
  19. Berman, Marshall. 1988. All that is solid melts into air: the experience of modernity. New York: Penguin.
  20. Berman, Marshall. 2011. “Tearing away the veils: The Communist Manifesto”. Dissent, May 6.
  21. Blackburn, Robin. 2016. “Por que segunda escravidão?”. In: Marquese, Rafael; Salles, Ricardo (Ed.). Escravidão e capitalismo históricos no século XIX: Cuba, Brasil e Estados Unidos. Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira.
  22. Blanchard, Pierre. 1851. Thesouro de meninos. Lisboa: Typographia de Antonio José da Rocha.
  23. Bocaiuva, Quintino. 1863. “A morte moral”. Bibliotheca Brasileira.
  24. Brown, Alexandra. 2000. “‘A black mark on our legislation’: slavery, punishment, and the politics of death in nineteenth-century Brazil”. Luso-Brazilian Review, 37(2): 95-121.
  25. Buck-Morss, Susan. 1989. The dialectics of seeing: Walter Benjamin and the Arcades project. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  26. C. Junior. 1851. “A nossa educação”. A Marmota da Corte, vol. 145, Apil 4.
  27. C. Sergipense. 1852. “Deveres da mãi de família”. Periódicos dos Pobres, vol. 30, March 18.
  28. Camara, Eusébio de Queirós Coutinho Mattoso. 1859. Inspectoria geral de instrucção primaria e secundaria do municipio da Corte. Rio de Janeiro: Typographia de Laemmert.
  29. Camara, Eusébio de Queirós Coutinho Mattoso. 1856. “Relatorio do estado da instrucção primaria e secundaria”. In: Ferraz, Luiz Pedreira Couto. Relatorio apresentado á Assembléa Geral Legislativa. Rio de Janeiro: Typ. Nacional.
  30. Campbell, James. 2015. At “war agains our institutions”: policing and punishment in the slave cities of the United States and Brazil. In: Miller, Vivien; Campbell, James. Transnational penal cultures: new perspctives on discipline, punishment and desistance. London: Routledge. p. 51-65.
  31. Candido, Francisco de Paula. 1859. Relatorio do presidente da Junta Central de Hygiene Publica. In: Macedo, Sergio Teixeira. Relatorio apresentado á Assemblea Geral Legislativa na terceira sessão da decima legislatura. Rio de Janeiro: Typ. Laemmert.
  32. Carlos. 1860. “Chronica da Quinzena”. Revista Popular, vol. 8.
  33. Chalhoub, Sidney. 2012. A força da escravidão. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras.
  34. Chalhoub, Sidney. 1996. Cidade febril: cortiços e epidemias na Corte imperial. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras.
  35. Channing, William. 1839. Self-culture. Boston: James Munroe & Co.
  36. Chernilo, Daniel. 2011. La pretensión universalista de la teoría social. Santiago: LOM Ediciones.
  37. Costa, João Cruz. 1956. Contribuição à história das idéias no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: José Olympio.
  38. Costa, Salustiano Orlando de Araújo. 1878. Codigo Commercial do Imperio do Brazil. Rio de Janeiro: Eduardo & Henrique Laemmert.
  39. Couty, Louis. 1881. L’esclavage au Brésil. Paris: Librairie de Guillaumin.
  40. Crary, Jonathan. 2001. Suspensions of perception: attention, spectacle, and modern culture. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  41. Crary, Jonathan. 1992. Techniques of the observer: on vision and modernity in the nineteenth century. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  42. Cunha, Luiz Antônio. 2005. O ensino de ofícios artesanais e manufatureiros no Brasil escravocrata. São Paulo: Editora Unesp.
  43. “Declaração: sobre as minhas ideias da emancipação moral da mulher”. 1852. Jornal das Senhoras, 1(4): 26-29, January 25.
  44. Dennis, Richard. 2008. Cities in modernity: representations and productions of metropolitan space, 1840-1930. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  45. Devés-Valdés, Eduardo. 2014. Pensamiento periférico. Buenos Aires: CLACSO.
  46. Domingues, José Maurício. 2009. A América Latina e a modernidade contemporânea. Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG.
  47. Duarte, Nestor. 1939. A ordem privada e a organização política nacional: contribuição à sociologia política brasileira. São Paulo: Companhia Editora Nacional.
  48. “Economia política: da instrucção considerada do ponto de vista econômico”. 1860. Revista Brasileira, vol. 3.
  49. Eisenstadt, Shmuel. 2000. “Multiple modernities”. Daedalus, 129(1): 1-29.
  50. Engels, Friedrich. 1962. Die Lage der arbeitenden Klasse in England. In: Marx/Engels Werke. Berlin: Dietz. (MEW, 2)
  51. Eugênio, Alisson. 2008. Reforma dos costumes no Brasil do século XIX. Thesis (PhD in History) – University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  52. “Exposição de Paris”. 1855. Correio Mercantil, August 15, vol. 225.
  53. “Extinção da mendicidade”. 1859. Revista Popular, vol. 2.
  54. Ferraz, Luiz Pedreira Couto. 1854. “Decreto 1331A – 17 de fevereiro de 1854”. In: Collecção das leis do Império do Brazil. Rio de Janeiro: Typ. Nacional. (vol. 17, first part)
  55. Ferraz, Luiz Pedreira Couto. 1870. Imperial Instituto Fluminense de Agricultura. Rio de Janeiro: Typographia de João Ignacio da Silva.
  56. Fernandes, Florestan. 2009. A revolução burguesa no Brasil. São Paulo: Editora Globo. (first published in 1975)
  57. Fernandes, Florestan. 2010. Circuito fechado. São Paulo: Editora Globo, 2010. (first published in 1976)
  58. Fernandes, Florestan. 2008. Sociedade de classes e subdesenvolvimento. São Paulo: Global. (first publishd in 1968)
  59. Foucault, Michel. 2004. Sécurité, territoire, population. Paris: Gallimard, Seuil.
  60. Franco, Maria Sylvia de Carvalho. 1976. “As idéias estão no lugar”. Caderno de Debates, 1: 61-64.
  61. Frehse, Fraya. Ô da rua! O transeunte e o advento da modernidade em São Paulo. São Paulo: EDUSP, 2011.
  62. Freyre, Gilberto. 2012. Sobrados e mucambos. São Paulo: Global. (first published in 1936/1951)
  63. Furtado, Celso. 2007. Formação econômica do Brasil. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras. (first published in 1959)
  64. Gabaglia, Giacomo Raja. 1859. “Relatório sobre a Exposição Universal da Industria de 1855”. Revista Brasileira, vol. 4.
  65. Geppert, Alexander. 2013. Fleeting cities: imperial expositions in fin-du-siècle Europe. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  66. Germani, Gino. 1969. “Stages of modernization in Latin America”. Studies in Comparative International Development, 5(8): 155-174.
  67. Gondra, José Gonçalves; Schueler, Alessandra. 2008. Educação, poder e sociedade no Império brasileiro. São Paulo: Cortez.
  68. Hahner, June. Pobreza e política: os pobres urbanos no Brasil (1870-1920). Brasília: Editora UnB, 1993. (Trans. Cecy Ramires Maduro)
  69. Halperin-Donghi, Tulio. 1982. “Dependency theory and Latin American historiography”. Latin American Research Review, 17(1): 115-130.
  70. Hardman, Francisco Foot. 2005. Trem-fantasma: a ferrovia Madeira-Mamoré e a modernidade na selva. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras. (2nd edition)
  71. Hardt, Michael; Negri, Antonio. 2009. Commonwealth. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  72. Hardt, Michael; Negri, Antonio. 2004. Multitude. New York: Penguin.
  73. Hartog, François. 2012. Régimes d’historicité: présentisme et expériences du temps. Paris: Seuil.
  74. Hobsbawm, Eric. 1996. The age of capital: 1848-1875. New York: Vintage.
  75. Holanda, Sérgio Buarque de. 2010. Capítulos de história do Império. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras.
  76. Holloway, Thomas. 1993. Policing Rio de Janeiro: repression and resistance in a 19th-century city. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
  77. Holston, James. 1989. The modernist city. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
  78. Imbert, Jean Baptiste Alban. 1843. Guia médico das mães de familia. Rio de Janeiro: Typographia Franceza.
  79. Ince, Onur Ulas. [forthcoming]. Colonial capitalism and dilemmas of liberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  80. Jaguaribe, Hélio. 1962. Desenvolvimento econômico e desenvolvimento político. Rio de Janeiro: Fundo de Cultura.
  81. Joyce, Patrick. 2003. The rule of freedom: liberalism and the modern city. New York: Verso.
  82. Karatani, Kojin. 2003. Transcritique: on Kant and Marx. Cambridge: MIT Press. (Trans. Sabu Kohso)
  83. Knöbl, Wolfgang. 2001. Spielräume der Modernisierung: das Ende der Eindeutigkeit. Weilerswist: Velbrück.
  84. Koselleck, Reinhart. 1979. Vergangene Zukunft: zur Semantik geschichtlicher Zeiten. Fankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
  85. L. 1863. “Politica e literatura”. A Actualidade, vol. 401, April 24.
  86. Lago, Luiz Aranha Corrêa. 2014. Da escravidão ao trabalho livre. São Paulo: Companhias das Letras.
  87. Larkin, Brian. 2013. “The politics and poetics of infrastructure”. Annual Review of Anthropology, 42: 327-434.
  88. Larraín, Jorge. 1997. “La trayectoria latinoamericana a la modernidad”. Estudios Publicos, 66(1): 313-333.
  89. Lavina, Javier; Zeuske, Michael. 2014. The second slavery: mass slavery and modernity in the Americas and in the Atlantic Basin. Zürich: LIT Verlarg.
  90. Leme, Marisa Saenz. 2017. “Uma interpretação de Brasil em tempos da constituinte de 1823”. Resgate, 25(1). [forthcoming]
  91. Levin, Miriam. 2010. Dynamic triad: city, exposition, and museum in industrial society. In: Levin, Miriam; Forgan, Sophie; Hessler, Martina; Kargon, Robert; Low, Morris. Urban modernity: cultural innovation in the second industrial revolution. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  92. Lynch, Christian Edward Cyril. 2013. “Por que pensamento e não teoria? A imaginação político-social brasileira e o fantasma da condição periférica (1880-1970)”. Dados, 56(4): 727-767.
  93. Macedo, Joaquim Manoel de. 1878. Memorias da rua do Ouvidor. Rio de Janeiro: Garnier.
  94. Macedo, Joaquim Manoel. 2005. Um passeio pela cidade do Rio de Janeiro. Brasília: Edições do Senado Federal. (first published in 1863)
  95. Marquese, Rafael de Bivar. 2013. “As desventuras de um conceito: capitalismo histórico e a historiografia sobre a escravidão brasileira”. Revista de História, 169: 223-253.
  96. Marson, Izabel; Oliveira, Cecília Helena de Salles. 2013. Liberalismo, monarquia e negócios: laços de origem. In: Marson, Izabel; Oliveira, Cecília Helena de Salles (Eds.). Monarquia, liberalismo e negócios no Brasil: 1780-1860. São Paulo: EDUSP.
  97. Martí, José. 2010. Escritos sobre América, discursos y crónicas norteamericanas. Buenos Aires: Capital Intelectual.
  98. Marx, Karl. 1968. Auszüge aus James Mills Buch “Élémens d’économie politique”. In: Marx/Engels Werke. Berlin: Dietz. (MEW, 40 / 1)
  99. Marx, Karl. 1966. Brief: Marx and Nikolai Franzewitsch Danielson (10 April 1879). In: Marx/Engels Werke. Berlin: Dietz. 370-375 (MEW, 34)
  100. Marx, Karl. 2008. Das Kapital: der Produktionsprozess des Kapitals. Berlin: Dietz. (Vol.1)
  101. Marx, Karl; Engels, Friedrich. 1977. Manifest der Kommunistischen Partei. In: Marx/Engels Werke. Berlin: Dietz. (MEW, 4)
  102. Mattos, Ilmar Rohloff. 2011. O tempo saquarema: a formação do Estado imperial. São Paulo: Hucitec.
  103. Mies, Maria. 1998. Patriarchy and accumulation on a world scale. New York: Zed Books.
  104. Morse, Richard. 1978. “Latin American intellectuals and the city, 1860-1940”. Journal of Latin American Studies, 10(2): 219-238.
  105. Morse, Richard. 1975. “The development of urban systems in the Americas in the nineteenth century”. Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs, 17(1): 4-26.
  106. Narita, Felipe Ziotti. 2017a. A educação da sociedade imperial: moral, religião e forma social na modernidade oitocentista. Curitiba: Prismas.
  107. Narita, Felipe Ziotti. 2017b. Moral e religião na formação do Império brasileiro: o problema da elaboração da sociedade nacional. Lecture at the Institute for Social and Political Studies – Rio de Janeiro State University (IESP-UERJ), Rio de Janeiro, March 31, 2017. 34 pages.
  108. Narita, Felipe Ziotti. 2008. “Educação e tranquilidade pública no Império”. Revista Ensaios de História, 13(1): 107-116.
  109. Narita, Felipe Ziotti. 2014. O século e o Império: tempo, história e religião no Segundo Reinado. Curitiba: Prismas.
  110. Naxara, Marcia Regina Capelari. 2004. Cientificismo e sensibilidade Romântica: em busca de um sentido explicativo para o Brasil no século XIX. Brasília: Editora UnB.
  111. “O bom cidadão”. 1850. A Marmota da Corte, vol. 75, June 18.
  112. “O christianismo”. 1856. A Patria, vol. 36, March 26.
  113. Ortiz, Renato. 2000. “From incomplete modernity to world modernity”. Daedalus, 129(1): 249-260.
  114. Otter, Chris. 2007. “Making liberal objects: British techno-social relations, 1800–1900”. Cultural Studies, 21(4/5): 570-590.
  115. Otter, Chris. 2008. The Victorian eye: a political history of light and vision in Britain, 1800-1910. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
  116. Pagden, Anthony. 2013. The Enlightenment and why it still matters. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  117. Pimenta, Tânia Salgado. 2003. O exercício das artes de curar no Rio de Janeiro (1828-1855). Thesis (PhD in History) – State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
  118. Prado Junior, Caio. 2012. História econômica do Brasil. São Paulo: Brasiliense. (first published in 1945)
  119. “Preceitos de educação (II)”. 1850. A Marmota na Corte, vol. 92, September 13.
  120. “Preceitos de educação (III)”. 1850. A Marmota na Corte, vol. 93, September 17.
  121. Rancière, Jacques. 2013. Aisthesis: scenes from the aesthetic regime of art. New York: Verso. (Trans. Zakir Paul)
  122. Rancière, Jacques. 1989. The nights of labor: the worker’s dream in nineteenth-century France. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. (Trans. John Drury)
  123. Read, Ian. 2012. The hierarchies of slavery in Santos, 1822-1888. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
  124. Ridings, Eugene. 1994. Business interest groups in nineteenth-century Brazil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  125. Romero, José Luis. 2010. Latinoamérica: las ciudades y las ideas. Buenos Aires: Siglo Veintiuno Editores. (firts published in 1976)
  126. Romero, José Luis. 1999. Teoría de la mentalidad burguesa. In: Romero, José Luis. Estudio de la mentalidad burguesa. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
  127. Romero, Silvio. 1906. Discurso de recepção de Euclides da Cunha. Rio de Janeiro: Academia Brasileira de Letras.
  128. Saffioti, Heleieth. 2013. A mulher na sociedade de classes. São Paulo: Expressão Popular.
  129. Schivelbusch, Wolfgang. 2014. The railway journey: the industrialization of time and space in the nineteenth century. Los Angeles: University of California Press. (Trans. Anselm Hollo)
  130. Scholz, Roswitha. 1992. “Der Wert ist der Mann”. Krisis, 12: 19-52.
  131. Senate (June 21, 1854). 1978. In: Anais do Senado do Imperio do Brasil. Brasília: Senado Federal. (Vol. 2)
  132. Serres, Henri. 1860. “Extinção da mendicidade”. Revista Popular, vol. 3.
  133. Sloterdijk, Peter. 2013. In the world interior of capital: for a philosophical theory of globalization. Cambridge: Polity Press. (Trans. Wieland Hoban)
  134. Starobinski, Jean. 1993. Blessings in disguise; or, the morality of evil. Cambridge: Polity Press. (Trans. Arthur Goldhammer)
  135. Sodré, Nelson Werneck. 1942. “Novos aspectos da circulação social no Brasil”. Cultura Política, (2)12: 65-70.
  136. Souza, Joaquim de Paula. 1869. “Discurso”. Opinião Liberal, vol. 57, July 31.
  137. Therborn, Göran. 2003. “Entangled modernities”. European Journal of Social Theory, 6(3): 293-305.
  138. Therborn, Göran. 1995. “Routes to/through modernity”. In: Featherstone, Mike; Lash, Scott; Robertson, Roland. (Ed.) Global modernities. London: SAGE.
  139. Tönnies, Ferdinand. 1909. Die Sitte. Frankfurt am Main: Rütten & Loening. (“Die Gesellschaft” Series – dir. Martin Buber)
  140. Tönnies, Ferdinand. 1922. Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft: Grundbegriffe der reinen Soziologie. Berlin: Karl Curtius. (5th edition)
  141. Torres, Alberto. 1914. A organização nacional. Rio de Janeiro: Imprensa Nacional.
  142. Tomich, Dale (Ed.). 2016. The politics of the second slavery. New York: SUNY Press.
  143. Tomich, Dale. 2004. Through the prism of slavery: labor, capital, and world economy. New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
  144. Wallerstein, Immanuel. 2011. The modern world-system: centrist liberalism triumphant, 1789-1914. Berkeley: University of California Press. (vol. 4)
  145. Williams, Raymond. 2011. O campo e a cidade. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras. (Trans. Paulo Henriques Brito)