Keywords
parousia
subtraction
Bloch
Agamben
How to Cite
Abstract
During the last two decades, a sharp re-reading of St. Paul’s letters allowed several thinkers to embed a messianic element in their political philosophy. In these readings, the messianic refusal of the world and its laws is understood through the suspensive act of “subtraction” – a movement of withdrawal which nonetheless too often proved ineffective when translated into political practice. After analysing Agamben’s interpretation of subtraction in terms of “inoperativity”, this article focuses on the notion of Parousia as a key element to understanding his anti-utopian account of messianic time. In contrast to Agamben’s reading,
Bloch’s interpretation of the Pauline Parousia envisages the messianic event as infra-historical, but at the same time opened to ultimate (meta-historical) purposes. Bloch’s messianic call – I argue – takes the form of mediation, a correction of subtraction towards the direction of a more committed political engagement. I conclude by suggesting that the concrete implementations of this mediation perform their emancipatory function in so far as they assume the character of practical ethics, with the attention directed to the underprivileged and marginalised.
References
Agamben, Giorgio. 2000a. Il tempo che resta: un commento alla Lettera ai Romani. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri.
Agamben, Giorgio. 2000b. Means without End: Notes on Politics. Translated by Vincenzo Binetti and Cesare Casarino. Minneapolis, Minn.-London: University of Minnesota Press.
Agamben, Giorgio. 2003. The Coming Community. Translated by Michael Hardt. Minneapolis, Minn.-London: University of Minnesota Press.
Badiou, Alain. 2003. Saint Paul: The Foundation of Universalism. Transby Ray Brassier. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
Badiou, Alain. 2004. Theoretical Writings. Edited by Ray Brassier and Alberto Toscano. London: Continuum International Pub. Group.
Badiou, Alain. 2007. “Destruction, Negation, Subtraction – on Pier Paolo Pasolini”. Graduate Seminar Transcript, Art Center College of Design in Pasadena. https://www.lacan.com/badpas.htm.
Benjamin, Walter. 2007. “Theses on the Philosophy of History”. In Illuminations: Essays and Reflections, edited by Leon Wieseltier, translated by Harry Zohn, 9th ed., 253–64. New York: Schocken Books.
Benjamin, Walter. 1998. The origin of German tragic drama. Translated by John Osborne. London: Verso.
Benjamin, Walter. 1999. The Arcades Project. Translated by Howard Eiland & Kevin McLaughlin, Cambridge, Mass.-London: Belknap Press.
Bloch, Ernst. 1975. Experimentum mundi: Frage, Kategorien des Herausbringens, Praxis. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Bloch, Ernst. 1985. Philosophische Aufsätze zur objektiven Phantasie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Bloch, Ernst. 1986. Natural Law and Human Dignity. Translated by Dennis J. Schmidt. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Bloch, Ernst. 1996a. The Principle of Hope. Translated by Neville Plaice, Stephen Plaice, and Paul Knight. Vol. 3. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Bloch, Ernst. 1996b. The Principle of Hope. Translated by Neville Plaice, Stephen Plaice, and Paul Knight. Vol. 1. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Bloch, Ernst. 2009a. Atheism in Christianity: The Religion of the Exodus and the Kingdom. Translated by J. T Swann. London-New York: Verso.
Bloch, Ernst. 2009b. The Spirit of Utopia. Translated by Anthony A. Nassar. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
Borsò, Vittoria, Claas Morgenrooth, Karl Solibakke, and Bernd Witte, eds. 2010. Benjamin – Agamben: Politik, Messianismus, Kabbala. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.
Chattopadhyay, Arka. 2011. “Alain Badiou’s Truth-Ful Politics of Subtraction and Genericity”. In Avenel Companion to Modern Social Theorists. Burdwan: Avenel Press.
Cunico, Gerardo. 2003. “Logica utopica. Logos der Materie tra sistema e narrazione”. In Ereditare e sperare: un confronto con il pensiero di Ernst Bloch, edited Patrizia Cipolletta, 55–70. Milano: Mimesis.
De Martino, Ernesto. 2015. Magic: A Theory from the South. Edited by Dorothy Louise Zinn.
Deuber-Mankowsky, Astrid. 2008. “The Image of Happiness We Harbor: The Messianic Power of Weakness in Cohen, Benjamin, andPaul”. New German Critique, no. 105: 57–69.
Franchi, Stefano. 2004. “Passive Politics”. Contretemps: An Online Journal of Philosophy, no. 5: 30–41.
Frick, Peter, ed. 2013. Paul in the Grip of the Philosophers: The Apostleand Contemporary Continental Philosophy. Minneapolis, Minn.: Augsburg Fortress Publishers.
Georgi, Dieter. 1964. Die Gegner des Paulus im 2. Korintherbrief. Studien zur religiösen Propaganda in der Spätantike. Neukirchen-Vluyn: Neunkirchener Verlag.
Hallward, Peter. 2003. Badiou: A Subject to Truth. Minneapolis, Minn.-London: University of Minnesota Press.
Hamacher, Werner. 2001. “‘NOW’: Walter Benjamin on Historical Time”. In The Moment: Time and Rupture in Modern Thought, edited by Heidrun Friese, 161–96. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
Heiden, Gert-Jan van der, Geurt Hendrik van Kooten, and Antonio Cimino, eds. 2019. Saint Paul and Philosophy: The Consonance of Ancient and Modern Thought. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Hooker, Morna Dorothy. 2004. Paul: A Short Introduction. Oxford: Oneworld.
Horsley, Richard A. 1997. Paul and Empire: Religion and Power in Roman Imperial Society. Harrisburg, Pa.: Trinity Press International.
Hudson, Wayne. 1982. The Marxist Philosophy of Ernst Bloch. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kahl, Brigitte. 2010. Galatians Re-Imagined: Reading with the Eyes of the Vanquished. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.
Khatib, Sami. 2013. “The Messianic Without Messianism. Walter Benjamin’s Materialist Theology”. Anthropology & Materialism. A Journal of Social Research (Online), no. 1 (October). https://doi.org/10.4000/am.159.
Löwy, Michael. 1992. Redemption and Utopia: Jewish Libertarian Thought in Central Europe: A Study in Elective Affinity. Translated by Heaney Hope. London: Athlone.
Martel, James. 2011. “Taking Benjamin Seriously as a Political Thinker”. Philosophy & Rhetoric, no. 44 (4): 297–308. https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.44.4.0297.
Mendes-Flohr, Paul R. 1983. “‘To Brush History against the Grain’: The Eschatology of the Frankfurt School and Ernst Bloch”. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, no. 51 (4): 631–50.
Münster, Arno. 1982. Utopie, Messianismus und Apokalypse im Frühwerk von Ernst Bloch. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Prozorov, Sergei. 2014. Agamben and Politics: A Critical Introduction. Thinking Politics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Roberts, John. 2008a. “The ‘Returns to Religion’: Messianism, Christianity and the Revolutionary Tradition. Part I: ‘Wakefulness to the Future’”. Historical Materialism, no. 16 (2): 59–84.
Roberts, John. 2008b. “The ‘Returns to Religion’: Messianism, Christianity and the Revolutionary Tradition. Part II: The Pauline Tradition”. Historical Materialism, no. 16 (3): 77–103.
Salzani, Carlo. 2012. “Quodlibet: Giorgio Agamben’s Anti-Utopia”. Utopian Studies, no. 23 (1): 212–37.
Taubes, Jacob. 2004. The Political Theology of Paul. Translated by Dana Hollander. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
Taubes, Jacob. 2009. Occidental Eschatology. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
Tronti, Mario. 2019. Workers and Capital. London-New York: Verso.
Vatter, Miguel. 2017. “Community, Life and Subjectivity in Italian Biopolitics”. In The Routledge Handbook of Biopolitics, edited by Sergei Prozorov and Simona Rentea, 123–39. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate.
Walzer, Michael. 1985. Exodus and Revolution. New York: Basic.
Žižek, Slavoj. 2000. The Fragile Absolute, or, Why Is the Christian Legacy Worth Fighting For?. London: Verso.
License
“Theoretical Practice” seeks to put into practice the idea of open access to knowledge and broadening the domain of the commons. It serves the development of science, thinking and critical reflection. The journal is published in open-access mode under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license (detail available here: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/). Articles published in the journal may be freely distributed, stored, printed and utilized for academic and teaching purposes without restrictions.
They should not be, however, used for any commercial purposes or be reconstructed into derivative creations. Access to the journal may not be limited or offered for a fee by any third party.
Prospective authors are obliged to fill in, sign and send back the publishing contract compliant with the CC licencing. [PL.pdf, PL.doc, EN.pdf,EN.doc].
According to this contract, authors grant the journal a non-exclusive right to publish their work under the creative commons license (CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0) without any financial obligation on both sides of the contract.
Before submission authors should make sure that derivative materials they use are not protected by copyright preventing their non-commercial publication. Authors are responsible for any respective copyright violations.