Keywords
Marx
Althusser
Feuerbach
Materialism
Left Hegelianism
Aleatory Materialism
How to Cite
Abstract
Although Ernst Bloch is often understood as an abstract, aesthetic philosopher of hope, his doctrine of concrete utopia is underpinned by an idiosyncratic, vital materialist ontology. Against many of Bloch’s critics, this article explains and defends his materialism as compatible with Marx’s project. It first situates the early Marx’s materialism in the generally Left Hegelian and more specifically Feuerbachian context of articulating a concrete account of human agency and social emancipation within a naturalistic framework. Two subsequent sections offer Bloch’s “Left Aristotelian” approach to matter and the later Louis Althusser’s “aleatory” materialism, respectively, as radical and tactically different variations on this theme.
References
Adorno, Theodor and Max Horkheimer. 1994. Briefe und Briefwechsel I, 1928-1940. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Althusser, Louis. 1995. The Future Lasts Forever: A Memoir, translated by Richard Veasey. New York: The New Press.
_____. 1999. Machiavelli and Us, translated by Gregory Elliott. London: Verso.
_____. 2005. For Marx, translated by Ben Brewster. London: Verso.
_____. 2006. “The Underground Current of the Materialism of the Encounter”. In Philosophy of the Encounter: Later Writings, 1978-1987, edited by Francois Matheron and Oliver Corpet, translated by G. M. Goshgarian, 163–207. London: Verso.
Aristotle. 1984. Metaphysics, translated by W. D. Ross. In The Complete Works of Aristotle, 2 vols. edited by Jonathan Barnes, 1552–1728. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Beiser, Frederick. 2014. After Hegel. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Bloch, Ernst. 1977. Gesamtausgabe, 16 vols. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Vol. 5: Das Prinzip Hoffnung.
Vol. 7: Das Materialismusproblem, seine Geschichte und Substanz.
Vol. 8: Subjekt-Objekt: Erläuterungen zu Hegel.
Vol. 10: Philosophische Aufsätze zur objektiven Phantasie.
Vol. 13: Tübinger Einleitung in die Philosophie.
Vol. 15: Experimentum Mundi: Frage, Kategorien des Herausbringens, Praxis.
_____. 1985. Tendenz, Latenz, Utopie. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
_____. 1986. The Principle of Hope, 3 vols, translated by Neville Plaice, Stephen Plaice and Paul Knight. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
_____. 1988. “Something’s Missing”. In Ernst Bloch, The Utopian Function of Art and Literature: Selected Essays, edited by and translated by
Jack Zipes and Frank Mecklenberg, 1–17. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
_____. 2018. On Karl Marx. London: Verso.
_____. 2019. Avicenna and the Aristotelian Left, translated by Loren Goldman and Peter Thompson. New York: Columbia University Press.
Bouretz, Pierre. 2010. Witnesses for the Future. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Breckman, Warren. 1999. Marx, The Young Hegelians, and the Origins of Radical Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
_____. 2019. “The Young Hegelians”. In The Cambridge History of Modern European Thought, vol. 1: The Nineteenth Century, edited by Peter Gordon and Warren Breckman, 88–110. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chen, Chung-Hwan. 1956. “Different Meanings of the Term Energeia in the Philosophy of Aristotle”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 17(1): 56–65.
Dietschy, Beat, Doris Zeilinger, and Rainer E. Zimmermann, Ed. 2012.
Bloch-Wörterbuch. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Diogenes Laertius. 1925. Lives of the Eminent Philosophers, vol. II. Cambridge, MA: Loeb Classical Library.
Engels, Friedrich. 1969. Anti-Dühring. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
_____. 1974. Ludwig Feuerbach and the Outcome of Classical German Philosophy. New York: International Publishers.
_____. 1977. Socialism, Utopian and Scientific. In The Marx-Engels Reader, edited by Robert Tucker, 683–717. New York: Norton.
_____. 1990. Dialektik der Natur. In Marx-Engels Werke, vol. 20, 307–568. Berlin: Dietz Verlag.
Feuerbach, Ludwig. 2012a. “Introduction to The Essence of Christianity”. In The Fiery Brook: Selected Writings, edited by and translated by Zawar Hanfi, 97–134. New York: Verso.
_____. 2012b. “Preliminary Theses on the Reform of Philosophy”. In The Fiery Brook, edited by and translated by Zawar Hanfi, 153–174. New York: Verso.
Goldman, Loren. 2019. “Introduction”. In Ernst Bloch. Avicenna and the Aristotelian Left, translated by Loren Goldman and Peter Thompson, xi–xxvi. New York: Columbia University Press.
Goshgarian, G. M. 2006. “Translator’s Introduction”. In Louis Althusser. Philosophy of the Encounter: Later Writings, 1978-1987, edited by Francois Matheron and Oliver Corpet, translated by G. M. Goshgarian, xiii–l. London: Verso.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1983. “Ernst Bloch—A Marxist Schelling”. In Philosophical- Political Profiles, translated by Frederick G. Lawrence, 61–78. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Hegel, Georg Friedrich Wilhelm. 1975. Lectures on the Philosophy of World History: Introduction, translated by H. B. Nisbet. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Holz, Hans Heinz. 2012. “Spekulativer Materialismus”. In Bloch-Wörterbuch, edited by Beat Dietschy, Doris Zeilinger, and Rainer E. Zimmermann, 483–508. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Jung, Werner. 2012. “Vor-Schein”. In Bloch-Wörterbuch, edited by Beat Dietschy, Doris Zeilinger, and Rainer E. Zimmermann, 664–672. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Lenin, V. I. 1972. Materialism and Empirio-Criticism. In Lenin: Collected Works, vol. 14. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
Lucretius. 2007. The Nature of Things, translated by Alicia Stallings. New York: Penguin Classics.
Machiavelli, Niccolo. 1996. Discourses on Livy, translated by Harvey Mansfield and Nathan Tarcov. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
_____. 1998. The Prince, translated by Harvey Mansfield. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Marx, Karl. 1990. Capital, vol. 1, translated by Ben Fowkes. New York: Penguin Classics.
_____. 2000. “Preface to A Critique of Political Economy”. In Karl Marx: Selected Writings, edited by David McLellan, 424–428. Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
_____. 2006. Difference between the Democritean and the Epicurean Philosophy of Nature. In The First Writings of Karl Marx, edited by Paul M. Schafer, 84–184. Brooklyn: Ig Press.
Marx, Karl and Friedrich Engels. 2000. The Communist Manifesto. In Karl Marx: Selected Writings, 2nd edition. edited by David McLellan, 245–272. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mazzini, Sylvia. 2012. “Kältestrom—Wärmestrom”. In Bloch-Wörter buch, edited by Beat Dietschy, Doris Zeilinger, and Rainer E. Zimmermann, 224–231. Berlin: de Gruyter.
McLellan, David. 1972. Marx before Marxism. Middlesex, UK: Pelican.
McManus, Susan. 2003. “Fabricating the Future: Becoming Bloch’s Utopians”. Utopian Studies 14(2): 1–22.
Moir, Cat. 2013. “The Education of Hope: On the Dialectical Potential of Speculative Materialism”. In The Privatization of Hope, edited by Peter Thompson and Slavoj Zizek, 121–143. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
_____. 2019. “In Defense of Speculative Materialism”. Historical Materialism 27(2): 123–155.
Ricoeur, Paul. 1970. “Hope and the Structure of Philosophical Systems”. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 44: 55–69.
Schmidt, Alfredited. 1973. Emanzipatorische Sinnlichkeit: Ludwig Feuerbachs anthropologischer Materialismus. München: C. Hanser.
_____. 2014. The Concept of Nature in Marx, translated by Ben Fowkes. London: Verso.
Seneca. 1917. “Epistle 12”. In Seneca, Volume IV: Epistles 1-65/, translated by Richard Mott Gummere. Cambridge, MA: Loeb Classical Library.
Siebers, Johan. 2012. “Novum” In Bloch-Wörterbuch, edited by Beat Dietschy, Doris Zeilinger, and Rainer E. Zimmermann, 412–416. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Shaw, William. 1991. “Historical Materialism”. In A Dictionary of Marxist Thought, 2nd edition, edited by Tom Bottomore, 234-239. Oxford: Blackwell.
Stirner, Max. 1995. The Ego and Its Own, edited by and translated by David Leopold. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Wiggershaus, Rolf. 1994. The Frankfurt School. Cambridge. MA: MIT Press.
Zimmermann, Rainer. 2012. “Naturallianz, Allianztechnik”. In Bloch-Wörterbuch, edited by Beat Dietschy, Doris Zeilinger, and Rainer E. Zimmermann, 349–360. Berlin: de Gruyter.
License
“Theoretical Practice” seeks to put into practice the idea of open access to knowledge and broadening the domain of the commons. It serves the development of science, thinking and critical reflection. The journal is published in open-access mode under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license (detail available here: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/). Articles published in the journal may be freely distributed, stored, printed and utilized for academic and teaching purposes without restrictions.
They should not be, however, used for any commercial purposes or be reconstructed into derivative creations. Access to the journal may not be limited or offered for a fee by any third party.
Prospective authors are obliged to fill in, sign and send back the publishing contract compliant with the CC licencing. [PL.pdf, PL.doc, EN.pdf,EN.doc].
According to this contract, authors grant the journal a non-exclusive right to publish their work under the creative commons license (CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0) without any financial obligation on both sides of the contract.
Before submission authors should make sure that derivative materials they use are not protected by copyright preventing their non-commercial publication. Authors are responsible for any respective copyright violations.