Keywords
new institutional economics
managerialism
New Public Management
reform of higher education
How to Cite
Abstract
The article is devoted to analysis of higher education discourse in Poland.
Recent developments are interpreted from the perspective and compared to
New Public Management and new institutional economics, which can be viewed
as the most influential among narratives of public service reform. NPM narrative
and its presence in reform discourse are discussed in the first part of the article,
while the second is focused on potential dangers and positive effects related to
implementation of NPM in higher education.
References
Bleiklie, I. 2011. New Public Management, Network Governance and the University as a Changing Professional Organization. W The Ashgate Research Companion to New Public Management, ed. T. Christensen, P. Lægreid. Farnham: Ashgate.
Bleiklie, I., S. Michelsen. 2013. ,,Comparing higher education policies in Europe: Structures and reform outputs in eight countries”. Higher Education 651: 113–133.
Boston, J. 2011. Basic NPM Ideas and Their Development. W The Ashgate Research Companion to New Public Management, ed. T. Christensen, P. Lægreid. Farnham: Ashgate.
Broadbent, J., R. Laughlin. 2002. Public Service Professional and The New Public Managment: Control of the Professions in the Public Services. W New Public Management: New Trends and Future in Prospect, ed. S.P. Osborne, K. McLaughlin, E. Ferlie. London: Routledge.
Brown, P. 1995. ,,Cultural Capital and Social Exclusion: Some Observations on Recent Trends in Education, Employment and the Labour Market”. Work, Employment & Society 19: 29-51.
Czarnecki, K. 2011. Narracja Nowego Zarządzania Publicznego a reforma szkolnictwa wyższego w Polsce. Poznań: UAM.
Czarnecki, K. 2011. ,,Idee i praktyki Nowego Zarządzania Publicznego”. Zarządzanie publiczne 115: 5-21.
Czarniawska, B. G. Sevón. 2005. Global ideas: How ideas, objects and practices travel in a Global Economy. Malmö-Copenhagen: Liber & Copenhagen Business School Press.
Davidson, P. 2009. John Maynard Keynes. New York: Free Press.
Douma, S., H. Schreuder. 2008. Economic approaches to organizations. Harlow: Prentice Hall.
Enders, J., H. de Boer, E. Weyer 2013, ,,Regulatory Autonomy and Performance: the Reform of Higher Education Re-visited”. Higher Education 651: 5-24.
Enders, J., H.F. de Boer, U. Schimank 2007. On the Way towards New Public Management? The Governance of University Systems in England, the Netherlands, Austria, and Germany. W New Forms of Governance in Research Organizations: Disciplinary Approaches, Interfaces and Integration, ed. D. Jansen. Dordrecht: Springer.
Federowicz, M. 2004. Różnorodność kapitalizmu: instytucjonalizm i doświadczenie zmiany ustrojowej po komunizmie. Warszawa: IFiS PAN.
Ferlie, E., Ch. Musselin, G. Andresani. 2009. The Governance of Higher Education Systems: a Public Management Perspective. W University Governance: Western European Comparative Perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer.
Ferlie, E., Ch. Musselin, G. Andresani 2008. ,,The ‘Steering’ of Higher Education Systems: a Public Management Perspective”. Higher Education 563: 325-348.
Hensel, P. 2008. Transfer wzorców zarządzania: studium organizacji sektora publicznego. Warszawa: Dom Wydawniczy Elipsa.
Foucault, M. 1993. Nadzorować i karać: narodziny więzienia. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Fundacji Aletheia.
Gruszecki, T. 2002. Współczesne teorie przedsiębiorstwa. Warszawa: PWN.
Hausner, J. 2008. Zarządzanie publiczne. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
Johnstone, B., P. Teixeira, M.J. Rosa, H. Vossensteyn. 2006. Cost-sharing and Accessibility in Higher Education: a Fairer Deal? Dordrecht: Springer.
King, R. 2009. Governing Universities Globally: Organizations, Regulation and Rankings. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Kogan, M., M. Bauer, M. Henkel, I. Bleiklie. 2006. Transforming Higher Education: a Comparative Study. Dordrecht: Springer.
Martin, R. 2011. Under New Management: Universities, Administrative Labor, and the Professional Turn. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Mitchell, W. 1962. The American Polity: a Social and Cultural Interpretation. New York: Free Press.
Ouchi, W. 1980. ,,Markets, Bureaucracies, and Clans.” Administrative Science Quarterly 25: 129-141.
Paradeise, C., E. Reale, I. Bleiklie, E. Ferlie. 2009. University Governance: Western European Comparative Perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer.
Paulsen, M.B. 2001. The Economics of Human Capital and Investment in Higher Education. W The Finance of Higher Education: Theory, Research, Policy and Practice, ed. M.B. Paulsen, J.C. Smart, New York: Agathon Press.
Pollitt, C., G. Bouckaert 2004. Public Management Reform: a Comparative Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Power, M. 1997. The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rhoades, G. 1998. Managed Proffesionals: Unionized Faculty and Restructuring Academic Labor. New York: New York Press.
Williamson, O. E. 1975. Markets and Hierarchies, Analysis and Antitrust Implications: a Study in the Economics of Internal Organization. New York: Free Press.
License
“Theoretical Practice” seeks to put into practice the idea of open access to knowledge and broadening the domain of the commons. It serves the development of science, thinking and critical reflection. The journal is published in open-access mode under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license (detail available here: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/). Articles published in the journal may be freely distributed, stored, printed and utilized for academic and teaching purposes without restrictions.
They should not be, however, used for any commercial purposes or be reconstructed into derivative creations. Access to the journal may not be limited or offered for a fee by any third party.
Prospective authors are obliged to fill in, sign and send back the publishing contract compliant with the CC licencing. [PL.pdf, PL.doc, EN.pdf,EN.doc].
According to this contract, authors grant the journal a non-exclusive right to publish their work under the creative commons license (CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0) without any financial obligation on both sides of the contract.
Before submission authors should make sure that derivative materials they use are not protected by copyright preventing their non-commercial publication. Authors are responsible for any respective copyright violations.