Keywords
anthropology
households
globalization
agribusiness
migration
reproduction
How to Cite
Abstract
The paper builds on the author’s intimate knowledge of Eastern European village life over four decades. Before, during, and after socialism, villagers (“peasants” ) have always been incorporated into wider structures, while at the same time challenging standard social science theories. Their greater ability to reproduce themselves “outside the market” is the basis of their distinctiveness; this corresponds to a persisting distinction between town and countryside and has implications for political mobilization. The paper develops binary comparisons at two levels: first, between capitalist and socialist paths of rural development; second, within the latter, between the productive symbiosis accomplished in socialist Hungary and the stagnation of non-collectivized Poland. Some of these latter contrasts have persisted in new forms in the era of EU membership. Finally, the author expresses some personal nostalgia for the days when rural community studies constituted the bedrock of ethnographic writing about this region.
References
Andorka T. Kolosi, G. Vukovich. 1992. Társadalmi riport. Budapest: TARKI.
Arndt, A.A. 2012. Rote Bürger. Eine Milieu- und Beziehungsgeschichte linker Dissidenz in Polen 1956-1976. Doctoral Dissertation, Freie Universität. Berlin.
Buchowski, M. 2009. ,,Property relations, class, and labour in rural Poland.” in Postsocialist Europe. Anthropological Perspectives from Home. L Kürti, and P. Skalnik, eds. New York: Berghahn.
Buzalka, J. 2007. Nation and Religion. The politics of commemoration in South-East Poland. Berlin: LIT.
Chayanov, A. 1986. The Theory of Peasant Economy. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Creed, G. R., ed. 2006. The Seductions of Community. Emancipations, Oppressions, Quandaries. Santa Fe: SAR Press.
Franklin, S. H. 1969. The European Peasantry. The final phase. London.
Gałeski, B. 1972. Basic Concepts of Rural Sociology. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Halamska, M. 2011. ,,The Polish Countryside in the Process of Transformation, 1989-2009.” Polish Sociological Review 1/173.
Hann, C. 1980. ,,Rural social change in Hungary and Poland”. Cambridge Anthropology 6/1-2.
Hann, C 1980. Tázlár: a village in Hungary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hann, C. 1985. A Village Without Solidarity. Polish Peasants in Years of Crisis. New Haven.
Harcsa, I. I. Kovách 1996 . ,,Farmerek es mezőgazdasági vállalkozók”.
Kearney, M. 1996. Reconceptualizing the Peasantry. Anthropology in global perspective. Boulder, Col.: Westview.
Kolankiewicz, G. 1980. “The New “Awkward Class”: The Peasant-Worker in Poland”. Sociologia Ruralis 20/1-2.
Központi Statisztikai Hivatal 2005. Népszámlálás, vol. 28. A mezőgazdasági tevékenység jelentősége a foglalkoztatásban. Budapest: KSH.
Kürti, L. and P. Skalnik. 2009. Postsocialist Europe. Anthropological Perspectives from Home. New York: Berghahn.
Shanin, T. 1972. The Awkward Class: Political Sociology of Peasantry in a Developing Society: Russia 1910-1925. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Stephen Gudeman and Chris Hann. 2006. Oikos and Market: Explorations of Self-Sufficiency after Socialism. New York: Berghahn.
Swain, N. 1985. Collective Farms Which Work? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swain, N. 2013. Green Barons, Force-of-Circumstance Entrepreneurs, Impotent Mayors.
Rural Change in the Early Years of Post-Socialist Capitalist Democracy. Budapest: Central European University Press.
Szelenyi, I. 1983. Urban Inequalities under State Socialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Szőke, A. 2012. Rescaling States – Rescaling Insecurities. Rural citizenship at the edge of the Hungarian state. Doctoral Dissertation, Central European University, Budapest.
Thomas, W.I., F.W. Znaniecki. 1918-19. The Polish Peasant in Europe and America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
License
“Theoretical Practice” seeks to put into practice the idea of open access to knowledge and broadening the domain of the commons. It serves the development of science, thinking and critical reflection. The journal is published in open-access mode under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license (detail available here: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/). Articles published in the journal may be freely distributed, stored, printed and utilized for academic and teaching purposes without restrictions.
They should not be, however, used for any commercial purposes or be reconstructed into derivative creations. Access to the journal may not be limited or offered for a fee by any third party.
Prospective authors are obliged to fill in, sign and send back the publishing contract compliant with the CC licencing. [PL.pdf, PL.doc, EN.pdf,EN.doc].
According to this contract, authors grant the journal a non-exclusive right to publish their work under the creative commons license (CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0) without any financial obligation on both sides of the contract.
Before submission authors should make sure that derivative materials they use are not protected by copyright preventing their non-commercial publication. Authors are responsible for any respective copyright violations.