Abstract
Drawing on recent developments in virology and the work of Chicana queer-feminist Gloria Anzaldúa, this article explores the possibility of shifting from anthropocentric epistemologies (including feminist standpoint theories) into more expansive, decentralized modes of knowledge production which are neither entirely human-centered nor fully post-human. We explore this shift through several parts: (1) A brief overview of recent critiques of anthropocentrism and the limitations in mainstream feminist standpoint theory’s ability to overcome this anthropocentrism; (2) an exploration of recent developments in virology’s promising alternatives to anthropocentrism’s narrow definition of the human; and (3) an analysis of Anzaldúa’s innovative nepantlera subjectivity and onto-epistemology as seen in her theory of conocimiento. Because scholars have yet to examine the post-anthropocentric (and posthumanist) dimensions of Anzaldúa’s thought, but instead generally categorize her epistemology as an ethnic-specific feminist standpoint theory, her work offers a unique point of entry into these investigations.
References
Acampora, R. 2005. ,,Zoos and Eyes: Contesting Captivity and Seeking Successor Practices.” Society and Animals 1: 69–88.
Ackermann, H. W. 2003. ,,Bacteriophage Observations and Evolution.” Research in Microbiology 4: 245–251.
Anzaldúa, G. 1983. ,,La prieta.” in This Bridge Called My Back: Writings by Radical Women of Color, ed. Ch. Moraga, G. Anzaldúa. New York.
Anzaldúa, G. 2000. Interviews/Entrevistas, ed. A. Keating. New York.
Anzaldúa, G. 2008. Borderlands/La Frontera: The New Mestiza. Aunt Lute.
Anzaldúa, G. 2009. ,,Speaking across the Divide.” in The Gloria Anzaldúa Reader. Durham, N.C.
Anzaldúa, G. 2009. ,,The Coming of el Mundo Surdo.” in The Gloria Anzaldúa Reader, ed. A. Keating. Durham.
Anzaldúa, G.E., A. Keating, ed. 2002. This bridge we call home: Radical Visions for Transformation. New York.
Bamford, D. H. 2003. ,,Do Viruses Form Lineages across Different Domains of Life?” Research in Microbiology 4: 231–236.
Barad, K. 2012. „Matter feels, converses, suffers, desires, yearns and remembers.” in New Materialisms: Interviews and Cartographies, ed. R. Dolphijn, I. van der Tuin. London.
Bennett, J. 2010. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham–London.
Best, S. 2009. ,,Minding the Animals: Ethology and the Obsolescence of Left Humanism.” The International Journal of Inclusive Democracy, 5 February.
Burnside, J. 2012. ,,Humans Don’t Make the World Go ‘Round.” New Statesman, 29 November.
Braidotti H. 2007. ,,Feminist Epistemology after Postmodernism: Critiquing Science, Technology and Globalisation.” Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 1.
Braidotti, R. 2013. The Posthuman. Cambridge.
Conner, R. 2010. ,,Santa Nepantla: A Borderlands Sutra Plenary Speech.” in El Mundo Zurdo: Selected Works from the Meetings of the Society for the Study of Gloria Anzaldúa 2007 & 2009, ed. N.E. Cantú et al. San Francisco.
Esnault, C., et al. 2013. ,,Differential Evolutionary Fate of an Ancestral Primate Endogenous Retrovirus Envelope Gene, the EnvV Syncytin, Captured for a Function in Placentation.” Plos Genetics 9.
Hayward, E. 2008. ,,More Lessons from a Starfish: Prefixial Flesh and Transspeciated Selves.” Women's Studies Quarterly 3–4: 64–85.
Gaard, G. 2011. ,,Ecofeminism Revisited: Rejecting Essentialism and Re-Placing Species in a Material Feminist Environmentalism” Feminist Formations 2: 26–53.
Giffney, N., M.J. Hird 2008. Introduction: Queering the Non/Human, Theorising the Non/Human. Burlington.
Harding, S. 1998. ,,Borderland Epistemologies.” in Is Science Multicultural? Postcolonialisms, Feminisms, and Epistemologies. Bloomington.
Harding, S., ed. 2003. The Feminist Standpoint Theory Reader. New York.
Harding, S. 2008. Sciences from Below: Feminisms, Postcolonialities, and Modernities. Durham.
Hird, M.J. 2009. ,,Feminist Engagements with Matter.” Feminist Studies 2: 329–346.
Hird, M.J., C. Roberts 2011. ,,Feminism Theorises the Nonhuman” Feminist Theory 2: 109–117.
Hodder, I. 2012. Entangled: An Archaeology of the Relationships between Humans and Things. Hoboken.
Keating, A. 2012. ,,Speculative Realism, Visionary Pragmatism, and Poet-Shamanic Aesthetics in Gloria Anzaldúa–and Beyond.” Women’s Studies Quarterly 3: 51-69.
Latour, B. 1993. We Have Never Been Modern. Trans. C. Porter. Cambridge.
Levine, A. 2005. ,,Champion of the Spirit: Anzaldúa’s Critique of Rationalist Epistemology.” in EntreMundos/AmongWorlds: New Perspectives on Gloria Anzaldúa, ed. A. Keating. New York.
Lugones, M. 2010. ,,Toward a Decolonial Feminism.” Hypatia 4: 743.
Magiorkinis, G., et. al. 2012. Env-Less Endogenous Retroviruses Are Genomic Superspreaders. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 109:7385-90.
Martine, T.A. 2005. ,,Making Oppositional Culture, Making Standpoint: A Journey into Gloria Anzaldúa’s Borderlands.” Sociological Spectrum 5: 539–570.
Meacher, M. 2003. End of the World Nigh: It's Official, lecture delivered at Newcastle University, 14 February.
Merchant, C. 1983. The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology, and the Scientific Revolution. New York.
Ohmer, S. 2010. ,,Gloria E. Anzaldúa’s Decolonising Ritual de Conocimiento.” Confluencia 1: 141–153.
Rice, G. 2007. Are Viruses Alive? Microbial Life – Educational Resources. Montana State University.
Ryan, F. 2010. ,,Virus: Why You're Only Half Human.” Science and Technology, 29 January.
Sagan, D. 2013. Cosmic Apprentice: Dispatches from the Edges of Science. Minneapolis.
Twine, R. 2010. ,,Genomic Natures Read through Posthumanisms.” The Sociological Review 58: 175–195.
Zaytoun, K. 2006. ,,Theorizing at the Borders: Considering Social Location in Rethinking Self and Psychological Development.” NWSA Journal 2: 52–72.
Zimmer, C. 2011. A Planet of Viruses. Chicago.
Zimmer, C. 2012. ,,Mammals Made By Viruses.” Discover Magazine, 14 February.
License
“Theoretical Practice” seeks to put into practice the idea of open access to knowledge and broadening the domain of the commons. It serves the development of science, thinking and critical reflection. The journal is published in open-access mode under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license (detail available here: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/). Articles published in the journal may be freely distributed, stored, printed and utilized for academic and teaching purposes without restrictions.
They should not be, however, used for any commercial purposes or be reconstructed into derivative creations. Access to the journal may not be limited or offered for a fee by any third party.
Prospective authors are obliged to fill in, sign and send back the publishing contract compliant with the CC licencing. [PL.pdf, PL.doc, EN.pdf,EN.doc].
According to this contract, authors grant the journal a non-exclusive right to publish their work under the creative commons license (CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0) without any financial obligation on both sides of the contract.
Before submission authors should make sure that derivative materials they use are not protected by copyright preventing their non-commercial publication. Authors are responsible for any respective copyright violations.