Keywords
structure
discourse
empty signifier
How to Cite
Abstract
This article makes a comparative study of American and Polish rightist populisms and their ways of operating using structural analysis of their discourses as a main tool of examination. It aims to prove that those are indeed structural similarities that are responsible for the success of populisms in diverse environments. While examining examples of populist rhetorics and noticing the surprising efficacy of similar discourse in different political and social conditions, I expose internal structure of populism(s). I state that populism(s) is constructed mostly by and on empty signifiers. Those signifiers can then be matched in broader structures, of which the most fundamental one is the opposition: “We”—“Them”. Such mythological structures are flexible enough so that any subject or object can be inscribed into them. They are also flexible enough to transgress the borders of one domain and to transgress state borders: to “wander” around the global world.
References
Adorno, Theodor. 1981. “Freudian Theory and the Pattern of Fascist Propaganda.” In The Culture Industry: Selected Essays on Mass Culture, edited by Theodor Adorno and Jay M. Bernstein. London: Routledge.
Ansart, Pierre. 1977. Idéologies, conflits et pouvoir. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Appadurai, Arjun. 2006. Fear of Small Numbers: An Essay on the Geography of Anger. Durham: Duke University Press.
Augustin, Óscar Garcia. 2019. “Emotions and the Left in Denmark: Towards Left-Wing and Mainstream Populism.” In Populism and Passions: Democratic Legitimacy after Austerity, edited by Paolo Cossarini and Fernando Vallespin. New York: Routledge.
Bauman, Zygmunt. 2017. Retrotopia. London: Polity Press.
Benvenuto, Sergio. 2012. “On Populist Reason by Ernesto Laclau.” https://www.researchgate.net/publication/291092189_On_Populist_Reason_by_Ernesto_Laclau.
Betz, Hans-Georg. 2002. “Conditions Favoring the Success and Failure of Radical Right-Wing Populist Parties in Contemporary Democracies.” In Democracies and the Populist Challenge, edited by Yves Mény and Yves Surel. New York: Palgrave.
Bhabha, Homi K. 1994. The Location of Culture. London: Routledge.
Bjerre-Poulsen, Niels. 1986. “Populism: A Brief Introduction to a Baffling Notion.” American Studies in Scandinavia 18(1): 27–36. https://doi.org/10.22439/asca.v18i1.1190
Bryant, Nick. 2019. “How Will History Judge President Trump?” BBC News, January 17. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-46895634.
Buchowski, Michał. 2016. “Making Anthropology Matter in the Heyday of Islamophobia and the ‘Refugee Crisis’: The Case of Poland.” Český lid: Etnologický časopis 103(1): 51–67. https://doi.org/10.21104/CL.2016.1.03.
Canovan, Margaret. 1981. Populism. London: Junction Books.
Canovan, Margaret. 1999. “Trust the People! Populism and the Two Faces of Democracy.” Political Studies 47(1): 2–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00184.
Chaumont, Jean-Michel. 2017. La concurrence des victimes: Génocide, identité, reconnaissance. Paris: La Découverte.
Chimombo, Moira P.F., and Robert L. Roseberry. 1998. The Power of Discourse: An Introduction to Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge.
Collins, Patricia Hill. 1993. “Toward a New Vision: Race, Class, and Gender as Categories of Analysis and Connection.” Race, Sex & Class 1(1): 25–45.
Cossarini, Paolo. 2019. “Filling the Vaccum? Passion, ‘The People,’ and Affective Communities.” In Populism and Passions: Democratic Legitimacy after Austerity, edited by Paolo Cossarini and Fernando Vallespin. New York: Routledge.
Deiwiks, Christa. 2009. “Populism.” Living Reviews in Democracy.
Demertzis, Nicolas. 2006. “Emotions and Populism.” In Emotion, Politics and Society, edited by Simon Clarke, Paul Hoggett and Simon Thompson. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
D’Eramo, Marco. 2013. “Populism and the New Oligarchy.” Translated by Gregory Elliott. New Left Review 82: 5–28.
Dunn, Elisabeth. 2019. Predatory Humanitarianism: Refugees, Asylum Seekers, and the Manhunt. Reflection on migration on the US-Mexico border. Lecture in IEiAK UW, Warszawa, October 26.
Eklundh, Emmy. 2019. “Our Damned Weakeness: Tensjions Between Reason and Emotions in Podemos.” In Populism and Passions: Democratic Legitimacy after Austerity, edited by Paolo Cossarini and Fernando Vallespin. New York: Routledge.
Forchtner, Bernhard, Michał Krzyżanowski, and Ruth Wodak. 2013. “Mediatization, Right-Wing Populism and Political Campaigning: The Case of the Austrian Freedom Party.” In Media Talk and Political Elections in Europe and America, edited by Mats Ekström and Andrew Tolson. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Fuchs, Dieter, and Hans-Dieter Klingemann. 2019. “Globalization, Populism and Legitimacy in Contemporary Democracy.” In Democracy under Threat: A Crisis of Legitimacy?, edited by Ursula van Beek. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Gdula, Maciej. 2017. Dobra zmiana w miastku. Neoautorytaryzm w Polskiej Polityce z Perspektywy Małego Miasta. With collaboration of Katarzyna Dębska and Kamil Trepka. Warszawa: Instytut Studiów Zaawansowanych.
Glynos, Jason, and Aurelien Mondon. 2019. “The Political Logic of Populist Hype: The Case of Right-Wing Populism’s ‘Meteoric Rise’ and Its Relation to the Status Quo.” In: Populism and Passions: Democratic Legitimacy after Austerity, edited by Paolo Cossarini and Fernando Vallespin. New York: Routledge.
Gordon, Peter E. 2017. “The Authoritarian Personality Revisited: Reading Adorno in the Age of Trump.” Boundary 2 44(2): 31–56. https://doi.org/10.1215/01903659-3826618.
Gounari, Panayota. 2018. “Authoritarianism, Discourse and Social Media: Trump as the ‘American Agitator.’” In Critical Theory and Authoritarian Populism, edited by Jeremiah Morelock, 207–227. London: University of Westminster Press.
Janion, Maria. 2000. Czy będziesz wiedział, co przeżyłeś. Gdańsk: Sic!
Kaczyński, Jarosław. 2018. Enunciation during electoral convent in Olsztyn. September 21. youtube.com, bit.ly/2Jo8xv4.
Kantorowicz, Ernst. 2016. The King's Two Bodies: A Study in Medieval Political Theology. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Kitschelt, Herbert. 2002. “Popular Dissatisfaction with Democracy: Populism and Party Systems.” In Democracies and the Populist Challenge, edited by Yves Mény and Yves Surel. New York: Palgrave.
Kokutani, Michiko. 2018. “The Death of Truth: How We Gave Up on Facts and Ended Up with Trump.” The Guardian, June 14. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2018/jul/14/the-death-of-truth-how-we-gave-up-on-facts-and-ended-up-with-trump.
Krastev, Ivan, and Stephen Holmes. 2019. The Light that Failed: A Reckoning. London: Penguin Books.
Kristeva, Julia. 1980. Pouvoirs de l’horreur: Essai sur l’abjection. Paris: Le Seuil.
Krzyżanowska, Natalia, and Michał Krzyżanowski. 2018. “‘Crisis’ and Migration in Poland: Discursive Shifts, Anti-Pluralism and the Politicisation of Exclusion.” Sociology 52(3): 612–618. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038518757952.
Laclau, Ernesto. 2005. On Populist Reason. New York: Verso.
Lakoff, George. 2004. Don’t Think of An Elephant! Know Your Values and Frame the Debate. Carlton North: Scribe Publications.
Leder, Andrzej. 2014. Prześniona rewolucja. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Krytyki Politycznej.
Mair, Peter. 2013. Ruling the Void: The Hollowing-out of Western Democracy. London: Verso.
Marx, Karl, and Frederick Engels. 2001. The German Ideology Part One, with Selections from Parts Two and Three, together with Marx's “Introduction to a Critique of Political Economy”, edited by C.J. Arthur. New York: International Publishers.
Matyja, Rafał. 2018. Wyjście awaryjne: O zmianie wyobraźni politycznej. Kraków: Karakter.
Moffitt, Benjamin. 2019. “Populism versus Technocracy: Performance, Passions, and Aesthetics.” In Populism and Passions: Democratic Legitimacy after Austerity, edited by Paolo Cossarini and Fernando Vallespin. New York: Routledge.
Mouffe, Chantal. 2018. For a Left Populism. London: Verso.
Mouffe, Chantal. 2020. “The Controversy over Left-Wing Populism.” Le Monde Diplomatique, May. https://mondediplo.com/2020/05/14populism.
Napiórkowski, Marcin. 2014. Władza wyobraźni. Warszawa: WUW.
Napiórkowski, Marcin. 2019. Turbopatriotyzm. Wołowiec: Wydawnictwo Czarne.
Oesch, Daniel. 2008. “Explaining Workers' Support for Right-Wing Populist Parties in Western Europe: Evidence from Austria, Belgium, France, Norway, and Switzerland.” International Political Science Review 29(3): 349–373. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512107088390.
Richardson, John E. 2007. Analysing Newspapers: An Approach from Critical Discourse Analysis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Said, Edward. 1978. Orientalism. New York: Pantheon Books.
Schick, Irvin C. 1999. The Erotic Margin: Sexuality and Spatiality in Alteristic Discourse. New York: Verso.
Scruton, Roger. 1993. “Oikophobia.” Journal of Education 175(2): 93–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205749317500207.
Simonis, Yvan. 2010. “A Way of Comparing Levi-Strauss and Lacan.” Konturen 3(1): 149–161. http://dx.doi.org/10.5399/uo/konturen.3.1.1406.
Snyder, Timothy. 2017. On Tyranny: Twenty Lessons from the Twentieth Century. New York: The Duggan Books.
Taggart, Paul. 2002. "Populism and the Pathology of Representative Politics." In Democracies and the Populist Challenge, edited by Yves Mény and Yves Surel. New York: Palgrave.
Tambakaki, Paulina. 2019. “Populism and the Use of Tropes.” In Populism and Passions: Democratic Legitimacy after Austerity, edited by Paolo Cossarini and Fernando Vallespin. New York: Routledge.
Thomlinson, Harvey. 2018. “After Burroughs and Beckett: Opening up Experimental Fiction Beyond Old White Men.” The Guardian, October 8.
Tormey, Simon. 2019. “Passion, Excess, and Fear of the Mob: Populism as Ideology.” In Populism and Passions: Democratic Legitimacy after Austerity, edited by Paolo Cossarini and Fernando Vallespin. New York: Routledge.
Vallespin, Fernando, and Máriam M. Bascuñán. 2019. “Populism and the Restructuring of the Public Sphere.” In Populism and Passions: Democratic Legitimacy after Austerity, edited by Paolo Cossarini and Fernando Vallespin. New York: Rutledge.
Van Dijk, Teun A. 1993. Elite Discourse and Racism. Newbury Park: Sage.
Weyland, Kurt. 1999. “Neoliberal Populism in Latin America and Eastern Europe.” Comparative Politics 31(4): 379–401.
Wiles, Peter. 1969. “Syndrome, Not a Doctrine: Some Elementary Theses on populism.” In Populism: Its Meaning and National Characteristics, edited by Ghița Ionescu and Ernest Gellner. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
Wodak, Ruth. 2015. The Politics of Fear: What Right-Wing Populist Discourses Mean. London: Sage.
Wodak, Ruth, and Michał Krzyżanowski, eds. 2017. Journal of Language and Politics 16(4).
License
“Theoretical Practice” seeks to put into practice the idea of open access to knowledge and broadening the domain of the commons. It serves the development of science, thinking and critical reflection. The journal is published in open-access mode under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license (detail available here: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/). Articles published in the journal may be freely distributed, stored, printed and utilized for academic and teaching purposes without restrictions.
They should not be, however, used for any commercial purposes or be reconstructed into derivative creations. Access to the journal may not be limited or offered for a fee by any third party.
Prospective authors are obliged to fill in, sign and send back the publishing contract compliant with the CC licencing. [PL.pdf, PL.doc, EN.pdf,EN.doc].
According to this contract, authors grant the journal a non-exclusive right to publish their work under the creative commons license (CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0) without any financial obligation on both sides of the contract.
Before submission authors should make sure that derivative materials they use are not protected by copyright preventing their non-commercial publication. Authors are responsible for any respective copyright violations.