Keywords
minimum
social philosophy
How to Cite
Abstract
Poverty is the primary focus of this paper; more particularly, the critique of poverty and not its mere description. It would not be an overstatement to say that one of the common grounds for poverty theories is that they describe the poor as those who systematically experience their lives in privation, namely around having the minimum when it comes to needs such as housing, food, health, education, free time, etc. There is, therefore, a theoretical and socially accepted orientation that promotes the sedimentation of a deep affinity between poverty and the minimum. Based on this reasoning, what is set on the horizon is a kind of non-explicit acceptance that the overcoming of poverty can be achieved by granting the poor something beyond the minimum, however elementary that “something extra” may be. Thus, if the experience of poverty involves some sort of lack or privation, and if this condition can be fully filled by something that has already been socially produced, then what would justify the fact that some people are able to fully fill it while others (the poor) can only secure the bare minimum? In light of this, perhaps it would be better not to question the acceptable “minimum” but, rather, to ask: Why would the notion of poverty be guided by this normative criterion? Therefore, a way of describing my broader hypothesis on poverty would be to understand that it should be measured based on the level of denial of access to what has been socially produced. The further one is from accessing social wealth, the poorer one is. Finally, this tendency toward assimilation between poverty and the minimum engenders a depressive effect on demands for social change.
References
CEC-Commission of the European Communities. 1981. Final Report from the Commission to the Council on the First Programme of Pilot Schemes and Studies to Combat Poverty. Brussels.
Crédit Suisse. 2020. Global Wealth Report 2019. Zurich: Switzerland.
Coupland, Douglas. 1994. Geração X: Contos para uma Cultura Acelerada. Lisboa: Teorema.
Dardot, Pierre, and Christian Laval. 2016. Comum: Ensaio sobre a revolução no século XXI. Translated by Mariana Echalar. São Paulo: Boitempo.
Dardot, Pierre, and Christian Laval. 2013. The new way of the world : on neoliberal society. Translated by Gregory Elliott. New York: Verso.
Deaton, Angus. 2017. A grande saída: saúde, riqueza e as origens da desigualdade. Translated by Marcelo Levy. Rio de Janeiro: Intrínseca.
Douglass, Bruce, ed. 1990. Liberalism and the Good. New York: Routledge.
Douglass, Bruce, ed. 1998. “Capacidades humanas y justicia social: Una defensa del esencialismo aristotélico.” In Necesitar, desear, vivir. Sobre necesidades, desarrollo humano, crecimiento económico y sustentabilidad, edited by Jorge Riechman. Madrid: Los Libros de la Catarata.
Douglass, Bruce, ed. 2000. Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dufour, Éric, Franck Fischbach, and Emmanuel Renault. 2012. Histoires et définitions de la philosophie sociale. Grenoble: Recherches sur la philosophie et le langage.
Edward, Peter. 2006. « The Ethical Poverty Line: A Moral Quantification of Absolute Poverty.” Third World Quarterly 27(2): 377–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590500432739.
Fischbach, Franck. 2009. Manifeste pour une philosophie sociale. Paris: Éditions La Découverte.
Geremek, Bronisław. 1997. Poverty: A History. Translated by Agnieszka Kołakowska. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hagenaars, Aldi, and Bernard van Praag. 1985. “A Synthesis of Poverty Line Definitions.” Review of Income and Wealth 31(2): 139–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.1985.tb00504.x.
Harvey, David. 2013. “A liberdade da cidade.” In Cidades rebeldes: passe livre e as manifestações que tomaram as ruas do Brasil, edited by Carlos Vainer. São Paulo: Boitempo.
Hickel, Jason. 2017. The Divide: A Brief Guide to Global Inequality and Its Solutions. New York: W.W. Norton.
Hickel, Jason. 1993. “The Present Situation of Social Philosophy and the Tasks of an Institute for Social Research.” In Between Philosophy and Social Science: Selected Early Writings Studies in Contemporary German Social Thought. Translated by G. Frederick Hunter, Matthew S. Kramer and John Torpey. London: MIT Press.
Horkheimer, Max. 2002. “Traditional and Critical Theory.” In Critical Theory: Selected Essays. Translated by Matthew J. O’Connell and others. New York: Continuum Publishing Corporation.
Jesus, Carolina Maria. 2015. Child of the Dark: The diary of Carolina Maria de Jesus. Translated by David St. Clair. London: Penguin.
Kerstenetzky, Celia Lessa. 2000. “Desigualdade e pobreza: lições de Sen.” Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais 15(42): 113–122.
Lipton, Michael. 1988. The Poor and the Poorest: Some Interim Findings. Washington: World Bank.
Marx, Karl. 1982. Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. Volume One. Translated by Ben Fowkes. New York: Penguin Books.
Marx, Karl. 1988. The Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844. Translated by Martin Milligan. New York: Prometheus Books.
Novak, Mojca. 1996. “Concepts of Poverty.” In Poverty: A Global Review. Handbook on International Poverty Research, edited by Else Øyen, S.M. Miller and Syed Abdus Samad. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
Nussbaum, Martha. 1990. “Aristotelian Social Democracy.” In Liberalism and the Good, edited by Bruce Douglass and Gerald Mara. London: Routledge.
Øyen, Else. 1996. “Poverty Research Rethought.” In Poverty: A Global Review. Handbook on International Poverty Research, edited by Else Øyen, S.M. Miller and Syed Abdus Samad. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
Paugam, Serge. 2013. Les formes élémentaires de la pauvreté. Paris: PUF.
Piketty, Thomas. 2020. Capital and Ideology. Translated by Arthur Goldhammer. London: Cambridge.
Pinzani, Alessandro. 2017. “Vai trabalhar, vagabundo: retórica anti-pobre e aspectos normativos de uma teoria da pobreza.” In Sob os olhos da crítica: reflexões sobre democracia, capitalismo e movimentos sociais, edited by Hélio Alexandre Silva. Macapá: Unifap.
Pogge, Thomas. 2002. World Poverty and Human Rights: Cosmopolitan Responsibilities and Reforms. Polity Press: Cambridge.
Pogge, Thomas. 2006. “Reconhecidos e violados pela lei internacional: os direitos humanos dos pobres do mundo.” Ethic@: An International Journal for Moral Philosophy 5(1): 33–65.
Reddy, Sanjay G., and Rahul Lahoti. 2015. “$1.90 per day: What does it say?” https://reddytoread.files.wordpress.com/2015/10/wbpovblogoct6final1.pdf.
Rego, Walquiria Leão, and Alessandro Pinzani. 2013. Vozes do Bolsa Família. São Paulo: São Paulo State University Press.
Sen, Amartya. 2000. Development as Freedom. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Silva, Helio Alexandre. 2020. “‘Capital et ideólogie’ de Thomas Piketty: ainda é mais fácil pensar no fim do mundo que no fim do capitalismo?” Ethic@: An International Journal for Moral Philosophy 19(2): 464–480.
Spicker, Paul, Sonia Alvarez Leguizamon, and David Gordon. 2007. The International Glossary on Poverty. London: Zed Books.
Srinivasan, Thirukodikaval Nilakanta. 1977. Poverty: Some Measurements Problems. New Delhi: World Bank.
Townsend, Peter. 1970. The Concept of Poverty: Working Papers on Methods of Investigation and Life-Styles of the Poor in Different Countries. London: Heinemann.
Townsend, Peter. 1979. Poverty in the United Kingdom: A Survey of Household Resources and Standards of Living. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
Townsend, Peter. 1987. “Deprivation.” Journal of Social Policy 16(2): 125–146. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279400020341.
Ugá, Vivian Domíngues. 2004. “A categoria pobreza nas formulações de política social do Banco mundial.” Revista de Sociologia e Política 23(2): 55–62.
Townsend, Peter. 2011. A questão social como pobreza: crítica à conceituação neoliberal. Curitiba: Appris.
World Bank. 1980. World Development Report. Washington: World Bank.
License
“Theoretical Practice” seeks to put into practice the idea of open access to knowledge and broadening the domain of the commons. It serves the development of science, thinking and critical reflection. The journal is published in open-access mode under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license (detail available here: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/). Articles published in the journal may be freely distributed, stored, printed and utilized for academic and teaching purposes without restrictions.
They should not be, however, used for any commercial purposes or be reconstructed into derivative creations. Access to the journal may not be limited or offered for a fee by any third party.
Prospective authors are obliged to fill in, sign and send back the publishing contract compliant with the CC licencing. [PL.pdf, PL.doc, EN.pdf,EN.doc].
According to this contract, authors grant the journal a non-exclusive right to publish their work under the creative commons license (CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0) without any financial obligation on both sides of the contract.
Before submission authors should make sure that derivative materials they use are not protected by copyright preventing their non-commercial publication. Authors are responsible for any respective copyright violations.