A few notes on the contemporary common reader
PDF

Keywords

common reader
Situationist International
Spectacle
everyday life
literary criticism

How to Cite

Kaczmarski, P. (2014). A few notes on the contemporary common reader. Praktyka Teoretyczna, 11(1), 85–106. https://doi.org/10.14746/pt.2014.1.4

Abstract

In my paper I attempt to establish a starting point for a critique of the idea of the „common reader” as it is used in contemporary literary criticism. The „common reader” was famously developed as a separate theoretical construct by Samuel Johnson and popularized by Virginia Woolf. Today, this idea is being further popularized and simplified – though largely unconsciously – by both literary critics and mainstream journalists as a means of erasing the possibility of a genuine political conflict/debate. The „common reader” is perceived as a reader without a class, identity or any social background. I argue that in order to undertake a credible and deliberate critique of the „common reader” one has to go beyond the Johnson-Woolf paradigm and into the territory of the so-called everyday life studies – a Situationist-influenced tradition combining culture studies, literary theory and political philosophy.

https://doi.org/10.14746/pt.2014.1.4
PDF

References

Altick, Richard. 1957. The English Common Reader: A Social History of the Mass Reading Public 1800–1900. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Bloom, Harold 1991. „The Art of Criticism”. By Antonio Weiss. The Paris Review No. 118. http://www.theparisreview.org/interviews/2225/the-art-of-criticism-no-1-harold-bloom

Bloom, Harold. 1995. The Western Canon: the Books and School of the Ages. London: Macmillan.

Bloom, Harold. 1996. „An Interview with Harold Bloom”. By José Antonio Gurpegui. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses 9: 165-181.

Bloom, Harold. 2011. „An Interview with Harold Bloom on Literary Criticism”. http://fivebooks.com/interviews/harold-bloom-on-literary-criticism

Bloom, Harold. 2002. Lęk przed wpływem. Teoria poezji. Trans. A. Bielik-Robson, M. Szuster. Kraków: Universitas.

Bryndal, Rafał. 2012. „Legalna kultura to sposób myślenia”. By Tomasz Kin. http://legalnakultura.pl/pl/czytelnia-kulturalna/rozmowy/news/498,legalna-kultura-to-sposob-myslenia

Czapliński, Przemysław. 2007. Powrót centrali. Literatura w nowej rzeczywistości. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Literackie.

Dąbrowski, Tadeusz. 2009. „Stała Enzensbergera” By Aleksandra Kozłowska. http://www.wysokieobcasy.pl/wysokie-obcasy/1,96856,7225405,Stala_Enzensbergera.html

Daly, Macdonald. 2000. „Nipping Bloom in the Bud: a Critique of the Western Canon”. Revista Brasil de Literatura [Literaturas de Língua Inglesa], vol. 3. http://lfilipe.tripod.com/ingles/bloom3.htm#fn0

Eagleton, Terry. 2009. „Jameson and Form”. New Left Review 59 (September-October).

Fadiman, Anne. 2000. Ex Libris: Confessions of a Common Reader. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Gałkowska, Magdalena. 2014. „Nagrody i koszmary” http://silesius.wroclaw.pl/?p=1153

Highmore, Ben. 2011. The Everyday Life Reader, London: Routledge.

Highmore, Ben. 2014. The Great Indoors: At home in the modern British house. London: Profile Books.

Jappe, Anselm. 1999. „The Situationist Critique in Historical Context”. In Guy Debord. Trans. Donald Nicholson-Smith. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Jarniewicz, Jerzy and Maciej Świerkocki. 2013. „Twarze kontrkultury” http://www.officyna.com.pl/seria-10

Kermode, Frank. 1983. „The Common Reader”. Daedalus, Vol. 112, No. 1, Winter.

Kopyt, Szczepan. 2013. „Uderzenie” In Kir. Poznań: WBPiCAK.

Łebkowska, Anna, Pochłódka, Anna, Uniłowski Krzysztof, Wilkoszewska Krystyna. 2010. „Literatura a nowe media”. Dekada Literacka 1-2(239-240)

Markowski, Michał Paweł. 2009. Życie na miarę literatury. Kraków: Homini 2009;

Markowski, Michał Paweł 2010. Słońce, możliwość, radość. Warszawa: Czarne 2010.

Olson, Liesl. 2011. „Everyday Life Studies: A Review”, Modernism/modernity, Vol. 18, No.1.

Riesel, René. 2006. „Preliminaries on Councils and Councilist Organization”. In Situationist International: Anthology. Trans. Ken Knabb. Berkeley: Bureau of Public Secrets.

Roberts, John. 2006. „The Situationist and the Philosophy of Praxis”. In Philosophizing the Everyday. Revolutionary Praxis and the Fate of Cultural Theory. London: Pluto Press.

SI. 2006a. „Definitions”. In Situationist International: Anthology. Trans. Ken Knabb. Berkeley: Bureau of Public Secrets.

SI. 2006b. „Preliminary Problems in Constructing a Situation”. In Situationist International: Anthology. Trans. Ken Knabb. Berkeley: Bureau of Public Secrets.

Sosnowski, Jerzy. 2011. „W obronie metafizyki”. Więź nr 5-6.

Sosnowski, Jerzy. 2012. „O B. Prusie z Jerzym Sosnowskim”. By Krzysztof Lubczyński http://pisarze.pl/publicystyka/2587-krzysztof-lubczynski-o-b-prusie-z-jerzym-sosnowskim-.html

Śliwiński, Piotr. 1998. „Inna krytyka?”. Znak nr 7. http://www.opoka.org.pl/biblioteka/I/IL/inna_krytyka.html

Śliwiński, Piotr. 2004. “Inna krytyka”. In Wyka, Marta, Biedrzycki, Krzysztof. Kartografowie dziwnych podróży. Kraków: Universitas.

Uniłowski, Krzysztof. 2002. „Wojna Stasińskiej” http://www.fa-art.pl/archiwum/wersja1/12027.php

Uniłowski, Krzysztof. 2005. „A nas przy tym wszystkim nie było” https://www.fa-art.pl/artykul.php?id_artykulu=338&szablon=autorzy_artyk_felieton

Uniłowski, Krzysztof. 2008. „Mit powieści mieszczańskiej” W Kup pan książkę!. Katowice: Wydawnictwo FA-art.

Wark, McKenzie. 2011. „Permanent play”. In The Beach Beneath the Street. New York: Verso.

Wark, McKenzie. 2013. „Widening gyres”. In The Spectacle of Disintegration. New York: Verso.

Woolf, Virginia. 2013. „The Common Reader”. In Woolf, Virginia, The Common Reader: First Series. New York: Sullivan Press.

Wójtowicz, Stanisław. 2007. „Służąc dwóm panom”. Podteksty 3 (9).

Wójtowicz, Stanisław. 2011. „Kryzys legitymizacji literaturoznawstwa”. Teksty Drugie No. 6.