Abstract
In my paper I attempt to establish a starting point for a critique of the idea of the „common reader” as it is used in contemporary literary criticism. The „common reader” was famously developed as a separate theoretical construct by Samuel Johnson and popularized by Virginia Woolf. Today, this idea is being further popularized and simplified – though largely unconsciously – by both literary critics and mainstream journalists as a means of erasing the possibility of a genuine political conflict/debate. The „common reader” is perceived as a reader without a class, identity or any social background. I argue that in order to undertake a credible and deliberate critique of the „common reader” one has to go beyond the Johnson-Woolf paradigm and into the territory of the so-called everyday life studies – a Situationist-influenced tradition combining culture studies, literary theory and political philosophy.
References
Altick, Richard. 1957. The English Common Reader: A Social History of the Mass Reading Public 1800–1900. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bloom, Harold 1991. „The Art of Criticism”. By Antonio Weiss. The Paris Review No. 118. http://www.theparisreview.org/interviews/2225/the-art-of-criticism-no-1-harold-bloom
Bloom, Harold. 1995. The Western Canon: the Books and School of the Ages. London: Macmillan.
Bloom, Harold. 1996. „An Interview with Harold Bloom”. By José Antonio Gurpegui. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses 9: 165-181.
Bloom, Harold. 2011. „An Interview with Harold Bloom on Literary Criticism”. http://fivebooks.com/interviews/harold-bloom-on-literary-criticism
Bloom, Harold. 2002. Lęk przed wpływem. Teoria poezji. Trans. A. Bielik-Robson, M. Szuster. Kraków: Universitas.
Bryndal, Rafał. 2012. „Legalna kultura to sposób myślenia”. By Tomasz Kin. http://legalnakultura.pl/pl/czytelnia-kulturalna/rozmowy/news/498,legalna-kultura-to-sposob-myslenia
Czapliński, Przemysław. 2007. Powrót centrali. Literatura w nowej rzeczywistości. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Literackie.
Dąbrowski, Tadeusz. 2009. „Stała Enzensbergera” By Aleksandra Kozłowska. http://www.wysokieobcasy.pl/wysokie-obcasy/1,96856,7225405,Stala_Enzensbergera.html
Daly, Macdonald. 2000. „Nipping Bloom in the Bud: a Critique of the Western Canon”. Revista Brasil de Literatura [Literaturas de Língua Inglesa], vol. 3. http://lfilipe.tripod.com/ingles/bloom3.htm#fn0
Eagleton, Terry. 2009. „Jameson and Form”. New Left Review 59 (September-October).
Fadiman, Anne. 2000. Ex Libris: Confessions of a Common Reader. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Gałkowska, Magdalena. 2014. „Nagrody i koszmary” http://silesius.wroclaw.pl/?p=1153
Highmore, Ben. 2011. The Everyday Life Reader, London: Routledge.
Highmore, Ben. 2014. The Great Indoors: At home in the modern British house. London: Profile Books.
Jappe, Anselm. 1999. „The Situationist Critique in Historical Context”. In Guy Debord. Trans. Donald Nicholson-Smith. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Jarniewicz, Jerzy and Maciej Świerkocki. 2013. „Twarze kontrkultury” http://www.officyna.com.pl/seria-10
Kermode, Frank. 1983. „The Common Reader”. Daedalus, Vol. 112, No. 1, Winter.
Kopyt, Szczepan. 2013. „Uderzenie” In Kir. Poznań: WBPiCAK.
Łebkowska, Anna, Pochłódka, Anna, Uniłowski Krzysztof, Wilkoszewska Krystyna. 2010. „Literatura a nowe media”. Dekada Literacka 1-2(239-240)
Markowski, Michał Paweł. 2009. Życie na miarę literatury. Kraków: Homini 2009;
Markowski, Michał Paweł 2010. Słońce, możliwość, radość. Warszawa: Czarne 2010.
Olson, Liesl. 2011. „Everyday Life Studies: A Review”, Modernism/modernity, Vol. 18, No.1.
Riesel, René. 2006. „Preliminaries on Councils and Councilist Organization”. In Situationist International: Anthology. Trans. Ken Knabb. Berkeley: Bureau of Public Secrets.
Roberts, John. 2006. „The Situationist and the Philosophy of Praxis”. In Philosophizing the Everyday. Revolutionary Praxis and the Fate of Cultural Theory. London: Pluto Press.
SI. 2006a. „Definitions”. In Situationist International: Anthology. Trans. Ken Knabb. Berkeley: Bureau of Public Secrets.
SI. 2006b. „Preliminary Problems in Constructing a Situation”. In Situationist International: Anthology. Trans. Ken Knabb. Berkeley: Bureau of Public Secrets.
Sosnowski, Jerzy. 2011. „W obronie metafizyki”. Więź nr 5-6.
Sosnowski, Jerzy. 2012. „O B. Prusie z Jerzym Sosnowskim”. By Krzysztof Lubczyński http://pisarze.pl/publicystyka/2587-krzysztof-lubczynski-o-b-prusie-z-jerzym-sosnowskim-.html
Śliwiński, Piotr. 1998. „Inna krytyka?”. Znak nr 7. http://www.opoka.org.pl/biblioteka/I/IL/inna_krytyka.html
Śliwiński, Piotr. 2004. “Inna krytyka”. In Wyka, Marta, Biedrzycki, Krzysztof. Kartografowie dziwnych podróży. Kraków: Universitas.
Uniłowski, Krzysztof. 2002. „Wojna Stasińskiej” http://www.fa-art.pl/archiwum/wersja1/12027.php
Uniłowski, Krzysztof. 2005. „A nas przy tym wszystkim nie było” https://www.fa-art.pl/artykul.php?id_artykulu=338&szablon=autorzy_artyk_felieton
Uniłowski, Krzysztof. 2008. „Mit powieści mieszczańskiej” W Kup pan książkę!. Katowice: Wydawnictwo FA-art.
Wark, McKenzie. 2011. „Permanent play”. In The Beach Beneath the Street. New York: Verso.
Wark, McKenzie. 2013. „Widening gyres”. In The Spectacle of Disintegration. New York: Verso.
Woolf, Virginia. 2013. „The Common Reader”. In Woolf, Virginia, The Common Reader: First Series. New York: Sullivan Press.
Wójtowicz, Stanisław. 2007. „Służąc dwóm panom”. Podteksty 3 (9).
Wójtowicz, Stanisław. 2011. „Kryzys legitymizacji literaturoznawstwa”. Teksty Drugie No. 6.
License
“Theoretical Practice” seeks to put into practice the idea of open access to knowledge and broadening the domain of the commons. It serves the development of science, thinking and critical reflection. The journal is published in open-access mode under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license (detail available here: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/). Articles published in the journal may be freely distributed, stored, printed and utilized for academic and teaching purposes without restrictions.
They should not be, however, used for any commercial purposes or be reconstructed into derivative creations. Access to the journal may not be limited or offered for a fee by any third party.
Prospective authors are obliged to fill in, sign and send back the publishing contract compliant with the CC licencing. [PL.pdf, PL.doc, EN.pdf,EN.doc].
According to this contract, authors grant the journal a non-exclusive right to publish their work under the creative commons license (CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0) without any financial obligation on both sides of the contract.
Before submission authors should make sure that derivative materials they use are not protected by copyright preventing their non-commercial publication. Authors are responsible for any respective copyright violations.