Abstract
Unconditionality is the main feature of the idea of basic income. What we saw in last decades is development of conditional cash transfers in developed and especially in developing countries. The tension between expansive conditionality and proposals of unconditional basic income is the main interest of this article. First, author develops understanding of conditionality distinguishing three types of it with the consideration of the definition, role and effectiveness of social sanctions. The context for presentation of this topics is the classical construct of social security system with main social insurance pillar dependent on labour market participation and supplemental social assistance one for those without social insurance entitlements and poor. Against this background author assess some weaknesses of the case for the basic income supported by Guy Standing and some possibilities of making them less persuasive.References
Arni, Patrick, Rafael Lalive i Jan C. van Ours. 2013. „How effective are unemployment benefit sanctions?: Looking beyond unemployment exit.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 7.
Baird, Sarah, Francisco H.G. Ferreira, Berk Özler i Michael Woolcock. 2013. „Relative effectiveness of conditional and unconditional cash transfers for schooling outcomes in developing countries: A Systematic review.” Campbell Systematic Reviews 8. http://www.campbellcollaboration.org/lib/project/218/
Behrendt, Christina. 2002. At the Margins of the Welfare State: Social Assistance and the Alleviation of Poverty in Germany, Sweden and the United Kingdom. London: Ashgate.
Bergh, Andreas. 2004. Basic Income – With or Without Bismarckian Social Insurance? Working paper. BIEN Congress.
BIP Poznań. 2014. „Jednorazowa zapomoga z tytułu urodzenia się dziecka (Becikowe).” Poznań: Urząd Miasta Poznania. http://bip.poznan.pl/bip/sprawy/jednorazowa-zapomoga-z-tytulu-urodzenia-sie-dziecka-becikowe,105792/
Duffy, Simon. 2010. „Constitutional Social Justice.” Sheffield: Centre for Welfare Reform. http://www.centreforwelfarereform.org/library/type/pdfs/constitutional-social-justice.html
EMIN. 2013. „Analysis of Minimum Income Schemes in 5 Selected EU Member States: A Synthesis Report.” http://eminnetwork.files.wordpress.com/2013/12/emin-analysis-of-mi-schemes-in-5-countries-synthesis-report-november-2013.pdf
Esping-Andersen, Gosta. 2011. Społeczne podstawy gospodarki postindustrialnej. Tłum. Renata Włoch. Warszawa: WSP TWP.
Eurofound. 2013. Employment Polarisation and Job Quality in the Crisis: European Jobs Monitor 2013. Dublin: Eurofound.
Fiszbein, Ariel et al. 2009. Conditional Cash Transfers: Reducing Present and Future Poverty. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Forget, Evelyn L. 2011. The Town with no Poverty: Using Health Administration Data to Revisit Outcomes of a Canadian Guaranteed Annual Income Field Experiment. Working paper. Manitoba: University of Manitoba.
Geremek, Bronisław. 1989. Litość i szubienica: Dzieje nędzy i miłosierdzia. Warszawa: Czytelnik.
Gilbert, Neil i Rebecca A. van Voorhis (red.). 2001. Activating the Unemployed: A Comparative Appraisal of Work-Oriented Policies. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.
Inoue, Tomohiro. 2012. Economic Sustainability of Basic Income Under a Citizen-centered Monetary Regime. Working paper. BIEN Congress.
Knotz, Mario i Moira Nelson. 2013. Quantifying „Conditionality”: A New Database on Conditions and Sanctions for Unemployment Benefit Claimants. Working paper. Poznań: ESPAnet Conference.
Lavinas, Lena. 2013. „Brazil: The lost road to citizen’s income.” W Citizen’s Income and Welfare Regimes in Latin America: From Cash Transfers to Rights, red. Rubén Lo Vuolo. London: Palgrave.
Muszalski, Wojciech. 2006. Prawo socjalne. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Peck, Jamie. 2001. Workfare States. London: Guilford Press.
Rothstein, Jesse. 2009. Is the EITC Equivalent to an NIT?: Conditional Cash Transfers and Tax Incidence. Working paper 14966. Cambridge: NBER.
Saavedra, Juan i Sandra Garcia. 2013. Educational Impacts and Cost-Effectiveness of Conditional Cash Transfer Programs in Developing Countries: A Meta-analysis. Working Paper. Los Angeles: Center for Economic and Social Research.
Shaver, Sheila. 1997. Universality and Selectivity in Income Support: An Assessment of the Issues. London: Ashgate.
Soares, Sergiei. 2012. Bolsa Família, Its Design, Its Impacts and Possibilities for the Future. Working Paper nr 89. Brasilia: International Policy Centre for Inclusvie Growth.
Stampini, Marco i Leopoldo Tornarolli. 2012. The Growth of Conditional Cash Transfers in Latin America and the Caribbean: Did They Go too Far? Policy Brief. Washington DC: Inter-American Development Bank.
Standing, Guy i Renana Jhabvala. 2014. Basic Income: The Indian Transformation. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Standing, Guy. 2002. Beyong the New Paternalism: Basic Security as a Right. London: Verso.
Standing, Guy. 2011. The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Standing, Guy. 2014. „Najwyższy czas: Prawo do podstawowego bezpieczeństwa dochodu.” Tłum. Maciej Szlinder. www.dochodpodstawowy.pl
Szarfenberg, Ryszard. 2005. „Prawo do podstawowego bezpieczeństwa dochodowego na podstawie artykułów Guy Standinga i nie tylko.” www.dochodpodstawowy.pl
Szarfenberg, Ryszard. 2007. „Reformy rynku pracy – wiele dróg do sukcesu.” Dialog: Pismo dialogu społecznego 2.
Szarfenberg, Ryszard. 2012. „Kierunki rozwoju polityki społecznej.” W Biedni i bogaci – problemy rozwoju społeczeństwa polskiego, red. Zdzisław Sadowski. Warszawa: PAN.
Szumlicz, Tadeusz. 2005. Ubezpieczenie społeczne: Teoria dla praktyki. Warszawa: Branta.
Uścińska, Gertruda. 2002. Zabezpieczenie społeczne na wypadek bezrobocia w państwach UE: Analiza porównawcza. Warszawa: Instytut Pracy i Spraw Socjalnych.
Van Der Klaauw, Bas i Jan C. van Ours. 2013. „Carrot and stick: How re-employment bonuses and benefit sanctions affect exit rates from welfare.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 2.
Van Parijs, Philippe. 2008. „Dochód podstawowy dla wszystkich.” Tłum. Ryszard Szarfenberg. Problemy polityki społecznej 11.
Widerquist, Karl. 2005. „A failure to communicate: The labour market findings of negative income tax experiments and their effects on policy and public opinion.” W Promoting Income Security as a Right: Europe and North America, red. Guy Standing. London: Anthem Press.
World Bank. 2014. Conditional Cash Transfers in LAC. http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/COUNTRIES/LACEXT/EXTLACREGTOPLABSOCPRO/0,,contentMDK:21133047~pagePK:34004173~piPK:34003707~theSitePK:503655,00.html
Yashine, Iliana i Monica E. Orozco. 2010. „The evolving anti-poverty agenda in Mexico: The political economy of Progresa and Oportunidades.” W Conditional Cash Transfers in Latin America, red. Michelle Adato i John Hoddinnott. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
License
“Theoretical Practice” seeks to put into practice the idea of open access to knowledge and broadening the domain of the commons. It serves the development of science, thinking and critical reflection. The journal is published in open-access mode under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license (detail available here: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/). Articles published in the journal may be freely distributed, stored, printed and utilized for academic and teaching purposes without restrictions.
They should not be, however, used for any commercial purposes or be reconstructed into derivative creations. Access to the journal may not be limited or offered for a fee by any third party.
Prospective authors are obliged to fill in, sign and send back the publishing contract compliant with the CC licencing. [PL.pdf, PL.doc, EN.pdf,EN.doc].
According to this contract, authors grant the journal a non-exclusive right to publish their work under the creative commons license (CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0) without any financial obligation on both sides of the contract.
Before submission authors should make sure that derivative materials they use are not protected by copyright preventing their non-commercial publication. Authors are responsible for any respective copyright violations.