Keywords
secularisation
Giorgio Agamben
Hans Blumenberg
Alberto Toscano
How to Cite
Abstract
Many critics accuse Giorgio Agamben of an ahistoricism inherent to his thought. Recently, such criticism was put forward by Alberto Toscano, who formulated it referring to Hans Blumenberg’s refusal of the secularisation thesis and his theory of epochal shifts. According to Toscano, due to the acceptance of the Schmittian notion of secularisation, based on a historical substantialism, Agamben is not only unfaithful to the Foucaultian methodology which he declaratively assumes, but he also tends to acknowledge the domination of theological notions as a source of the whole Western philosophical tradition and political institutions up until now. I am going to demonstrate that even somewhat superficial claims made by Agamben about secularisation find their compensation in his double effort. Firstly, even if he concedes the gravity of the theological legacy, at the same time he rebuts the primacy of religion as an indispensable grounding of ethics and politics. What is more, through his meticulous and condense studies on Christian theology he has already placed himself in the position of the most incisive contemporary critic of the Catholic church and any theological-political hybrids established on the abuse of power.References
Agamben, Giorgio. 1991. Language and Death: the Place of Negativity. Trans. Karen E. Pinkus, Michael Hardt. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Agamben, Giorgio. 1998. Homo sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Trans. Daniel Heller-Roazen. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Agamben, Giorgio. 1999. Potentialities: Collected Essays in Philosophy. Trans. and introduction Daniel Heller-Roazen. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Agamben, Giorgio. 2000. Means without End: Notes on Politics. Trans. Vincenzo Binetti, Cesare Casarino. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Agamben, Giorgio. 2004. The Open: Man and Animal. Trans. Kevin Attell. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Agamben, Giorgio. 2007a. Il regno e la gloria: Per una genealogia teologica dell’economia e del governo. Homo sacer II, 2. Vicenza: Neri Pozza.
Agamben, Giorgio. 2007b. Profanations. Trans. Jeff Fort. New York: Zone Books.
Agamben, Giorgio. 2009a. The Signature of all Things: On Method. Trans. Luca D’Isanto, Kevin Attell. New York: Zone Books.
Agamben, Giorgio. 2011a. The Kingdom and the Glory: For a Theological Genealogy of Economy and Government (Homo sacer II, 2). Trans. Lorenzo Chiesa, Matteo Mandarini. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Agamben, Giorgio. 2011b. The Sacrament of Language: An Archaeology of the Oath (Homo sacer II, 3). Trans. Adam Kotsko. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Agamben, Giorgio. 2012. The Church and the Kingdom. Trans. Leland de la Durantaye. London–New York: Seagull Books.
Agamben, Giorgio. 2013a. Opus Dei: An Archeology of Duty. Trans. Adam Kotsko. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Agamben, Giorgio. 2014. Uso dei corpi. Vicenza: Neri Pozza Editore.
Bielik-Robson, Agata. 2010. “The Broken Constellation: Agamben’s Theology between Tragedy and Messianism.” Telos 152: 103–126.
Bielik-Robson, Agata. 2011a. “Messiah without Resentment, Or What Remains of Messianism in Giorgio Agamben’s Remnants of Auschwitz.” Bamidbar: Journal of Jewish Thought & Philosophy 1: 67–78.
Bielik-Robson, Agata. 2011b. The Saving Lie: Harold Bloom and Deconstruction. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Bielik-Robson, Agata. 2012. Erros: Mesjański witalizm i filozofia. Kraków: Universitas.
Blumenberg, Hans. 1983. The Legitimacy of the Modern Age. Trans. and introduction Robert M. Wallace. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Blumenberg, Hans. 1985. The Work on Myth. Trans. and introduction Robert M. Wallace. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Blumenberg, Hans. 2010. Paradigms for a Metaphorology. Trans. and afterword Robert Savage. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Depoortere, Frederiek. 2011. “Reading Giorgio Agamben’s Homo Sacer with René Girard.” Philosophy Today 56(2): 108–17.
Dickinson, Colby. 2011a. Agamben and Theology. London–New York: T.&T. Clark.
Dickinson, Colby. 2011b. “Beyond Violence, Beyond the Text: The Role of Gesture in Walter Benjamin and Giorgio Agamben, and its Affinity with the Work of René Girard.” Heythrop Journal 52(6): 952–61.
Galindo Hervás, Alfonso. 2010. “La gloria y el concepto de lo político en Giorgio Agamben.” Revista de estudios sociales 35: 66–77.
Geréby, György. 2008. “Political Theology versus Theological Politics: Erik Peterson and Carl Schmitt.” New German Critique 35(3/105): 7–33.
Girard, René. 1977. Violence and the Sacred. Trans. Patrick Gregory. Baltimore–London: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Fox, Christopher A. 2007. “Sacrificial Pasts and Messianic Futures: Religion as a Political Prospect in René Girard and Giorgio Agamben.” Philosophy and Social Criticism 33(5): 563–95.
Majewski, Tomasz. 2011. Dialektyczne feerie: Szkoła frankfurcka i kultura popularna [Dialectical Féeries: The Frankfurt School and Popular Culture]. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Officyna.
Palti, Elías José. 2010. “From Ideas to Concepts to Metaphors: The German Tradition of Intellectual History and the Complex Fabric of Language.” History and Theory 49(2): 194–211.
Schmitt, Carl. 1985. Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty. Trans. George Schwab. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Sharpe, Matthew. 2009. “Only Agamben Can Save us? Against the Messianic Turn Recently Adopted in Critical Theory.” Bible and Critical Theory 5(3): 40.1–40.20.
Sudlow, Brian. 2012. “Agamben, Girard and the Life that Does Not Live.” In Intensities: Philosophy, Religion and the Affirmation of Life, eds. Steven Shakespeare, Katharine S. Moody. Farnham–Burlington: Ashgate.
Toscano, Alberto. 2011. “Divine Management: Critical Remarks on Giorgio Agamben’s The Kingdom and the Glory.” Angelaki 16(3): 125–136.
Ulicka, Danuta. 2007. Literaturoznawcze dyskursy możliwe: Studia z dziejów nowoczesnej teorii literatury w Europie Środkowo-Wschodniej [Possible Discourses of Literaturwissenschaft: Studies on the History of Modern Literary Theory in the Central-Eastern Europe]. Kraków: Universitas.
Ulicka, Danuta. 2013. Słowa i ludzie: 10 szkiców z antropologii filologicznej [Words and People: Ten Essays from the Perspective of Philological Anthropology]. Warszawa: Fundacja Akademia Humanistyczna; Instytut Badań Literackich PAN – Wydawnictwo.
Zawisza, Rafał. 2012. “Ocalić to, co się da: Witalistyczna interpretacja rozprawy doktorskiej Hanny Arendt pt. ‘O pojęciu miłości u Augustyna’.” Praktyka Teoretyczna 6: 327–345.
License
“Theoretical Practice” seeks to put into practice the idea of open access to knowledge and broadening the domain of the commons. It serves the development of science, thinking and critical reflection. The journal is published in open-access mode under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license (detail available here: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/). Articles published in the journal may be freely distributed, stored, printed and utilized for academic and teaching purposes without restrictions.
They should not be, however, used for any commercial purposes or be reconstructed into derivative creations. Access to the journal may not be limited or offered for a fee by any third party.
Prospective authors are obliged to fill in, sign and send back the publishing contract compliant with the CC licencing. [PL.pdf, PL.doc, EN.pdf,EN.doc].
According to this contract, authors grant the journal a non-exclusive right to publish their work under the creative commons license (CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0) without any financial obligation on both sides of the contract.
Before submission authors should make sure that derivative materials they use are not protected by copyright preventing their non-commercial publication. Authors are responsible for any respective copyright violations.