Abstract
The paper concerns the way how Giorgio Agamben deals with the paradigm of political theology in his Homo sacer project. The author compares Agamben’s ideas with those presented by Roberto Esposito – a thinker who apparently seems to have a lot in common with Agamben. In fact choosing different intellectual strategy Esposito’ ideas could be used as a critical tool against some parts of Agamben’s project (e.g. the concept of profanations). In spite of Agamben’s declarations and (or rather: precisely because of) unprecedented scope and deepness of his studies, he is not able to provide the way out of the political theology regime. The author tries to prove abovementioned thesis by examining the terminological level of Agamben’s ideas, the direction in which his thought is developed or the way how he conducts his genealogies. Consequently Homo sacer project seems to remind the silent language of the Impolitical.References
Agamben, Giorgio. 2011. The Kingdom and the Glory: For a Theological Genealogy of Economy and Government (Homo Sacer II, 2). Trans. Lorenzo Chiesa (with Matteo Mandarini). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Agamben, Giorgio. 1993. The Coming Community. Trans. Michael Hardt. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Agamben, Giorgio. 1998. Homo sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Trans. Daniel Heller-Roazen. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Agamben, Giorgio. 2005. State of Exception. Trans. Kevin Attel. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Agamben, Giorgio. 2005a. “Movement.” Uni.Nomade: Seminar ‘War and Democracy.’ Trans. Arianna Bove.
http://www.egs.edu/faculty/giorgio-agamben/articles/movement/.
Agamben, Giorgio. 2005b. The Time That Remains: A Commentary on the Letter to the Romans. Trans. Patricia Dailey. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Agamben, Giorgio. 2007. Profanations. Trans. Jeff Fort. New York: Zone Books.
Agamben, Giorgio. 2009. “What is an Apparatus?” and Other Essays. Trans. David Kishik, Stefan Padatella. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Agamben, Giorgio. 2010a. Nudities. Trans. David Kishik, Stefan Pedatella, Standford: Stanford University Press.
Agamben, Giorgio. 2010b. Od teologii politycznej do teologii ekonomicznej: Rozmawia Gianluca Sacco. Trans. Paweł Mościcki. In Agamben: Przewodnik Krytyki Politycznej, eds. Mikołaj Ratajczak, Krystian Szadkowski. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Krytyki Politycznej.
Agamben, Giorgio. 2013. The Highest Poverty. Monastic Rules and the Form-of-Life. Trans. Adam Kotsko. Stanford: Stanford UP.
Agamben, Giorgio. 2014. Thought is the Courage of Hopelessness: An Interview with Juliette Cerf. http://www.versobooks.com/blogs/1612-thought-is-the-courage-of-hopelessness-an-interview-with-philosopher-giorgio-agamben?utm_content=bufferbaa66&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=buffer.
Agamben, Giorgio. no date. Papież jest świeckim kapłanem: Interview with Abu Bakr Rieger (“Literaturen”), trans. Mikołaj Ratajczak. Praktyka Teoretyczna. http://www.praktykateoretyczna.pl/agamben-papiez-jest-swieckim-kaplanem/.
Benjamin, Walter. 1996. Capitalism as Religion. Trans. Rodney Livingstone. In Selected Writings: 1913-1926. Vol. 1, eds. Marcus Bullock, Michael W. Jennings. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
de la Durantaye, Leland. 2009. Giorgio Agamben: A Critical Introduction. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Esposito, Robert. 2013b. “Nowa filozofia wspólnoty, nowa polityka życia.” An interview with Mateusz Burzyk and Mikołaj Ratajczak. Przegląd Polityczny 121/122: 54–60.
Esposito, Roberto. 2005. Catégories de l’impolitique. Trans. Nathalie le Lirzin. Paris: Seuil.
Esposito, Roberto. 2010. Communitas: The Origin and the Destiny of Community. Trans. Timothy Campbell. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Esposito, Roberto. 2012a. Living Thought: The Origin and Actuality of Italian Philosophy. Trans. Zakiya Hanafi. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Esposito, Roberto. 2012b. Third Person: Politics of Life and Philosophy of the Impersonal. Trans. Zakiya Hanafi. Cambridge–Malden: Polity.
Esposito, Roberto. 2013a. Due: La macchina della teologia politica e il posto del pensiero. Torino: Einaudi.
Esposito, Roberto. 2014. “La structure métapolitique de l’occident.” Les Études philosophiques 4(111): 497–505.
Foucault, Michel. 1984. “Nietzsche, Genealogy, History.” In The Foucault Reader, ed. Paul Rabinow. New York: Pantheon Books.
Mościcki, Paweł. 2012. Idea potencjalności: Możliwość filozofii według Giorgio Agambena. Warszawa: Instytut Badań Literackich.
Scattola, Mario. 2011. Teologia polityczna. Trans. Paweł Borkowski. Warszawa: Państwowy Instytut Wydawniczy.
Schmitt, Carl. 2008. Political Theology II: The Myth of the Closure of Any Political Theology. Trans. Michael Hoelzl, Graham Ward. Cambridge: Polity.
Toscano, Alberto. 2011. “Divine Management: Critical Remarks on Giorgio Agamben’s The Kingdom and the Glory.” Angelaki 16(3): 125–136.
License
“Theoretical Practice” seeks to put into practice the idea of open access to knowledge and broadening the domain of the commons. It serves the development of science, thinking and critical reflection. The journal is published in open-access mode under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license (detail available here: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/). Articles published in the journal may be freely distributed, stored, printed and utilized for academic and teaching purposes without restrictions.
They should not be, however, used for any commercial purposes or be reconstructed into derivative creations. Access to the journal may not be limited or offered for a fee by any third party.
Prospective authors are obliged to fill in, sign and send back the publishing contract compliant with the CC licencing. [PL.pdf, PL.doc, EN.pdf,EN.doc].
According to this contract, authors grant the journal a non-exclusive right to publish their work under the creative commons license (CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0) without any financial obligation on both sides of the contract.
Before submission authors should make sure that derivative materials they use are not protected by copyright preventing their non-commercial publication. Authors are responsible for any respective copyright violations.