Abstract
The hero of this essay by Calro Ginzburg is XVII-th century clown and distiller Costantino Saccardino, who also was active in the field of medical art. Accused together with his companions of secretly defiling city saint painting with excrements, Saccardino preached that religion – particularly its approach towards hell – was pure fiction and that first people were not created by God but were born out of mud. Ginzburg draws attention to the affinity between Saccardino’s heretical views (marked by the awareness of crisis and the anticipation of political, religious and cultural revolution) and the diagnoses made by Galileo, Bacon, Campanella, Rosicrusarians or even Descartes. At the same time Sccardino’s sensibility is that of a professional comedian – not a great intellectual – and this is what makes his case exceptional. The case of Saccardino, who – as is demontrated by Ginzburg – had a good knowledge of libertine literature while rejecting libertine elitism, shows that in this period the relations between the high culture and the culture of the subordinated classes could include an exchange that went through a detour, mediated in various, sometimes opposing codes.References
Bachtin, Michaił. 1975. Twórczość Franciszka Rabelais’go a kultura ludowa średniowiecza i renesansu. Tłum. Anna i Andrzej Goreniowie. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Literackie.
Bercé, Yves-Marie. 1976. Fête et révolte. Des mentalités populaires du XVIème au XVIIIème siècles. Paris: Hachette Livre.
Biblioteca Comunale (Biblioteka Miejska). Bolonia.
Campeggi, Ridolfo. 1623. Racconto de gli heretici iconomiasti giustiziati in Bologna. Bologna.
Camporesi, Piero. 1976. La maschera di Bertoldo. G.C. Croce e la letteratura carnevalesca. Torino: Giulio Einaudi Editore.
Camporesi, Piero. 1981. „Cultura popolare e cultura d’élite fra Medioevo e età moderna”. W Storia d’Italia. Annali, red. Corrado Vivanti. Torino: Einaudi. t. 4.
Cinelli Calvoli, Giovanni. 1747. Biblioteca volante di Gio. Cinelli Calvoli continuata dal dottor Dionigi Andrea Sancassani. Venezia.
Corvaglia, Luigi (red.). 1934. Le opere di Giulio Cesare Vanini e le loro fonti. Roma: Albrighi, Segati e C. t. 2.
Davis, Natalie Zemon. 1975. „Printing and the People”. W Davis, Natalie Zemon. Society and Culture in Early Modern France. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Diodoro Siculo [Diodor Sycylijski]. 1575. Historia overo libraria historica. T. 1. Venezia.
Ferguson, John. 1959. Bibliographical Notes on Histories of Inventions and Books of Secrets. London: Holland Press.
Ferrari, Marco i Ginzburg, Carlo. 1978. „La colombara ha aperto gli occhi”. Quaderni storici 38.
Ferrari, Marco. 1982. „Alcune vie di diffusione in Italia di idee e di testi di Paracelso”. W Scienza, credenze occulte, livelli di cultura. Firenze: Olschki.
Fioravanti, Leonardo. 1565. Del reggimento della peste. Venezia.
Fioravanti, Leonardo. 1572. Dello specchio di scientia universale. Venezia.
Fioravanti, Leonardo. 1582. Della fisica. Venezia.
Galluzzi, Paolo. 1982. „Motivi paracelsiani nella Toscana di Cosimo II e di Don Antonio dei Medici: alchimia, medicina »chimica« e riforma del sapere”. W Scienze, credenze occulte, livelli di cultura. Firenze: Olschki.
Garzoni, Tommaso. 1588. La piazza universale di tutte le profesioni del mondo. Venezia.
Ginzburg, Carlo. 1976. „High and Low: The Theme of Forbidden Knowledge in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries”. Past and Present 73.
Ginzburg, Carlo. 1986. „The Dovecote Has Opened Its Eyes: Popular Conspiracy in Seventeenth-Century Italy”. W The Inquisition in Early Modern Europe. Studies on Sources and Methods, red. Gustav Henningsen i John Tedeschi. DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press.
Ginzburg, Carlo. 1989. Ser i robaki. Wizja świata pewnego młynarza z XVI wieku. Tłum. Radosław Kłos. Warszawa: PIW.
Ginzburg, Carlo. 2000. „L’alto e il basso. Il tema della conoscenza proibita nel Cinquecento e Seicento”. W Miti, emblemi, spie. Morfologia e storia. Turyn: Einaudi.
Giorgi, Francesco. 1929. Un buffone degli Anziani di Bologna nel secolo XV. Bologna.
Montanari, Luigi. 1974. „Contestatori d’altri tempi”. Strenna storica bolognese 24.
Pintard, René. 1943. Le libertinage érudit dans la première moitié du XVIIème siècle. Paris: Slatkine.
Prosperi, Adriano. 1974. La storia moderna attraverso i documenti. Bologna: Zanichelli.
Saccardino, Costantino. 1609. Sonetto in morte del Serenissimo Ferdinando Medici, Gr. Duca di Toscana, dedicato al suo Serenissimo Figliuolo Cosimo Medici, Gran Duca di Toscana, dall’umilissimo servitore di S.A. Costantino Saccardini detto il dottore. Firenze [dzieło zaginione].
Saccardino, Costantino. 1621. Libro nominato la verità di diverse cose, quale minutamente tratta di molte salutifere operationi spagiriche et chimiche. Bologna.
Spini, Giorgio. 1976. „Noterelle libertine”. Rivista storica italiana 78.
Yates, Frances Amelia. 1972. The Rosicrucian Enlightenment. London: Routledge.
License
“Theoretical Practice” seeks to put into practice the idea of open access to knowledge and broadening the domain of the commons. It serves the development of science, thinking and critical reflection. The journal is published in open-access mode under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license (detail available here: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/). Articles published in the journal may be freely distributed, stored, printed and utilized for academic and teaching purposes without restrictions.
They should not be, however, used for any commercial purposes or be reconstructed into derivative creations. Access to the journal may not be limited or offered for a fee by any third party.
Prospective authors are obliged to fill in, sign and send back the publishing contract compliant with the CC licencing. [PL.pdf, PL.doc, EN.pdf,EN.doc].
According to this contract, authors grant the journal a non-exclusive right to publish their work under the creative commons license (CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0) without any financial obligation on both sides of the contract.
Before submission authors should make sure that derivative materials they use are not protected by copyright preventing their non-commercial publication. Authors are responsible for any respective copyright violations.