Abstract
For decades, economic theories have been changing due to historical events and economic turbulences, yet each time they have had an actual impact on the lives of societies. Today, when neo-liberal theories are no longer appreciated, the divide between the richest and the poorest members of society is growing almost exponentially, and technological development drastically changes working conditions, new visions of a future economy are needed – ones in which everyone can find their place and live a life worth living. My suggestion is that this economy should be based on the ethics of care – a line of argument presented in this article. It opens with an outline of the ongoing economic changes. There then follows an explanation of the importance of ethics of care, as well as of the care necessary for the development and reproduction of societies, as the main framework for further consideration of job guarantee and unconditional basic income, to which the subsequent sections of the article are devoted. The analysis of these theories from a feminist perspective will also be enriched with proposals for additional solutions that go beyond the current paradigm of growth.References
Albert, Michael. 2007. Ekonomia uczestnicząca. Życie po kapitalizmie. Tłum. Iwo Czyż. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Bractwa Trojka.
Alexander, Samuel. 2015. “Basic and Maximum Income.” W Degrowth. A Vocabulary for a New Era. Red. Giacomo D’Alisa, Federico Demaria i Giorgos Kallis. New York: Routledge.
Appadurai, Arjun. 2016. Banking on Words: The Failure of Language in the Age of Derivative Finance. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Barad, Karen. 2003. “Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter.” Signs 28(3): 801–831.
Benería, Lourdes. 2003. Gender, Development, and Globalization: Economics as if People Mattered. London: Routledge.
Braidotti, Rosi. 2006. “The Ethics of Becoming Imperceptible.” W Deleuze and Philosophy. Red. Constantin V. Boundas. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Braidotti, Rosi. 2014. Po człowieku. Tłum. Joanna Bednarek, Agnieszka Kowalczyk. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Brown Hamilton, Tracy. 2016. “The Netherlands’ Upcoming Money-for-Nothing Experiment.” The Atlantic. June 21. https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2016/06/netherlands-utrecht-universal-basic-income-experiment/487883/. [dostęp: 15.05.2017].
Budlender, Debbie i Rhonda Sharp. 1998. How to do a Gender-Sensitive Budget Analysis: Contemporary Research and Practice. Canaberra: Commonwealth Secretariat and Australian Agency for International Development.
Cantillon, Sara. 2013. “Measuring Differences in Living Standards Within Households.” Journal of Marriage and Family 75(3): 598–610.
Cornish, Flora, Jan Haaken, Liora Moskovitz i Sharon Jackson. 2016. “Rethinking Prefigurative Politics: Introduction to the Special Thematic Section.” Journal of Social and Political Psychology 4(1): 114–127.
D’Alisa, Giacomo, Federico Demaria i Giorgos Kallis [red.]. 2015. Degrowth. A Vocabulary for a New Era. New York: Routledge.
De Henau, Jerome, Susan Himmelweit, Zofia Łapniewska i Diane Perrons. 2016. Investing in the Care Economy – Simulating Employment Effects by Gender in Seven OECD Countries. A Report by the Women’s Budget Group. Brussels: International Trade Union Confederation.
[Dutch News] 2017. “Utrecht Hopes to Launch Welfare Experiment with Carrot but no Stick.” Dutch News. April 28. http://www.dutchnews.nl/news/archives/2017/04/utrecht-hopes-to-launch-welfare-experiment-with-carrot-but-no-stick/. [dostęp: 15.05.2017].
Ehrenreich, Barbara i Arlie R. Hochschild [red.]. 2004. Global Woman: Nannies, Maids, and Sex Workers in the New Economy. New York: Holt Paperbacks.
Elson, Diane. 1998. “Integrating Gender Issues into National Budgetary Policies and Procedures: Some Policy Options.” Journal of International Development 10: 929–941.
Epstein, Barbara. 2002. “The Politics of Prefigurative Community.” W Cultural Resistance Reader. Red. Stephen Duncombe. London: Verso.
Esplen, Emily. 2009. Gender And Care Cutting Edge Pack – Overview Report. BRIDGE. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.
Fisher, Berenice i Joan C. Tronto. 1990. “Toward a Feminist Theory of Caring.” W Circles of Care: Work and Identity in Women’s Lives. Red. Emily K. Abel i Margaret K. Nelson. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Fraser, Nancy. 1990. “Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy.” Social Text 25/26: 56–80.
Fraser, Nancy. 1994. “After the Family Wage: Gender Equity and the Welfare State.” Political Theory 22(4): 591–618.
Fraser, Nancy. 2014. Drogi feminizmu. Od kapitalizmu państwowego do neoliberalnego kryzysu. Tłum. Agnieszka Weseli. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Krytyki Politycznej.
Gheaus, Anca. 2008. “Basic Income, Gender Justice and the Costs of Gender-Symmetrical Lifestyles.” Basic Income Studies 3(3): 1–8.
Gilligan, Carol. 1977. “In a Different Voice: Women's Conceptions of Self and of Morality.” Harvard Educational Review 47(4): 481–517.
GUS. 2015. Budżet czasu ludności. Warszawa: Główny Urząd Statystyczny.
Hartmann, Heidi. 1976. “Capitalism, Patriarchy, and Job Segregation by Sex.” Signs 1(3): 137–169.
Haug, Frigga. 2011. „Perspektywa cztery w jednym. Manifest na rzecz bardziej sprawiedliwego życia”. Tłum. Miram Boyer, Maria Skóra. Biblioteka Online Think Tanku Feministycznego. http://www.ekologiasztuka.pl/pdf/f0107haug.pdf. [dostęp: 15.04.2017].
Held, Virginia. 2006. The Ethics of Care: Personal, Political, and Global. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jaczek, Helena. 2017. “Canada’s Basic Income Experiment – Will it Work?” World Economic Forum. February 2. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2017/02/canadas-basic-income-experiment-will-it-work. [dostęp: 15.05.2017].
Levine, Judith. 2013. Ain’t No Trust How Bosses, Boyfriends, and Bureaucrats Fail Low-Income Mothers and Why It Matters. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Lister, Ruth. 1995. “Dilemmas in Engendering Citizenship.” Economy and Society 24(1): 35–40.
Manjarin, Edgar i Maciej Szlinder. 2016. “A Marxist Argumentative Scheme on Basic Income and Wage Share in an Anti-Capitalist Agenda.” Basic Income Studies 11(1): 49–60.
Marcuse, Herbert. 1991. Człowiek jednowymiarowy. Badania nad ideologią rozwiniętego społeczeństwa przemysłowego. Tłum. Stanisław Konopacki. Warszawa: PWN.
McFarland, Kate. 2017. “Glasgow, Scotland: Basic Income Pilot Feasibility Study Approved by City Council.” Basic Income Earth Network. February 21. http://basicincome.org/news/2017/02/glasgow-scotland-basic-income-pilot-feasibility-studyapproved-city-council/. [dostęp: 15.05.2017].
McGoogan, Cara. 2016. “This Sewing Robot Could Put Sweatshops out of Business.” The Telegraph. September 22.
McKie, Linda, Susan Gregory i Sophia Bowlby. 2002. “Shadow Times: The Temporal and Spatial Frameworks and Experiences of Caring and Working.” Sociology 36(4): 897–924.
McLean, Caitlin. 2015. “Beyond Care: Expanding the Feminist Debate on Universal Basic Income.” WiSE Working Paper Series 1, September.
Mika, Bartosz. 2014. „Dochód podstawowy i jego konsekwencje dla świata pracy”. Praktyka Teoretyczna 2(12): 145–170.
NEF. 2010. “21 Hours. The Case for a Shorter Working Week.” New Economics Foundation. February 13. http://neweconomics.org/2010/02/21-hours/. [dostęp: 15.04.2017].
Nelson, Julie A. i Neva Goodwin. 2005. “Teaching Ecological and Feminist Economics in the Principles Course”. GDAE Working Paper 05-05. Medford: Global Development and Environment Institute, Tufts University.
OECD. 2017. “Productivity and ULC by Main Economic Activity (ISIC Rev.4).” Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. April 2. http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=PDBI_I4. [dostęp: 15.04.2017].
OPZZ. 2017. „Ryzyka i trendy 2017”. Biuro Prasowe Ogólnopolskiego Porozumienia Związków Zawodowych. 30 stycznia. http://www.opzz.org.pl/-/ryzyka-i-trendy-2017. [dostęp: 20.04.2017].
Peck, Jamie i Nik Theodore. 2007. “Variegated Capitalism.” Progress in Human Geography 31(6): 731–772
Phillips, Judith. 2007. Care. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Piketty, Thomas. 2015. Kapitał w XXI wieku. Tłum. Andrzej Bilik. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Krytyki Politycznej.
Polanyi, Karl. 2010. Wielka transformacja. Polityczne i ekonomiczne źródła naszych czasów. Tłum. Maria Zawadzka. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Power, Marilyn. 2004. “Social Provisioning as a Starting Point for Feminist Economics.” Feminist Economics 10(3): 3–19.
Rakowski, Tomasz. 2016. „Lokalne formy rozwoju, samoorganizacja i potencjał sprawczy”. Kultura i Rozwój 1(1): 89–108.
Robertson, James. 1999. The New Economics of Sustainable Development. A Briefing for Policy Makers. London: Kogan Page.
Robeyns, Ingrid. 2014. „Ingrid Robeyns – Czy dochód podstawowy odda sprawiedliwość kobietom?” Tłum. Maciej Szlinder. Praktyka Teoretyczna. 10 lutego. http://www.praktykateoretyczna.pl/?s=Robeyns. [dostęp: 05.06.2017].
Schulmeister, Stephan. 2008. “A General Financial Transaction Tax Motives, Revenues, Feasibility and Effects.” WIFO. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1714395. [dostęp: 15.04.2017].
Sen, Amartya K. 1993. “Capability and Well-Being.” W The Quality of Life. Red. Martha C. Nussbaum i Amartya K. Sen. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Standing, Guy. 2005. “Why Basic Income Is Needed for a Right to Work.” Rutgers Journal of Law & Urban Policy 2(1): 91–102.
Szlinder, Maciej. 2017. „Dochód podstawowy – instrukcja obsługi”. Wywiad Jakuba Dymka. Krytyka Polityczna. 21 lutego. http://krytykapolityczna.pl/gospodarka/dochod-podstawowy-instrukcja-szlinder/. [dostęp: 05.06.2017].
Szlinder, Maciej. 2017a. „Mity w debacie o dochodzie podstawowym”. Bez Dogmatu. Kwartalnik Kulturalno-Polityczny 111(I/2017): 27-31.
Tcherneva, Pavlina R. i L. Randall Wray. 2005. “Common Goals – Different Solutions: Can Basic Income And Job Guarantees Deliver Their Own Promises.” Rutgers Journal of Law & Urban Policy 2(1): 125–166.
[The Telegraph] 2017. „Finland’s unemployed to be given basic income of €560 per month in first such experiment in Europe.” The Telegraph January 3. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/01/03/finlands-unemployed-given-basic-income-560euros-per-month-first/. [dostęp: 15.05.2017].
Tronto, Joan C. 1987. “Beyond Gender Difference to a Theory of Care.” Journal of Women in Culture and Society 12(4): 644–663.
Tronto, Joan C. 1995. “Care as a Basis for Radical Political Judgements.” Hypatia 10(2): 141–149.
Ungerson, Clare. 1990. “The Language of Care: Crossing the Boundaries.” W Gender and Caring: Work and Welfare in Britain and Scandinavia. Red. Claire Ungerson. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Ungerson, Clare. 1995. “Gender, Cash and Informal Care: European Perspectives and Dilemmas.” Journal of Social Policy 24(1): 31–52.
Walby, Sylvia. 2015. Crisis. Cambridge: Polity Press.
License
“Theoretical Practice” seeks to put into practice the idea of open access to knowledge and broadening the domain of the commons. It serves the development of science, thinking and critical reflection. The journal is published in open-access mode under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license (detail available here: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/). Articles published in the journal may be freely distributed, stored, printed and utilized for academic and teaching purposes without restrictions.
They should not be, however, used for any commercial purposes or be reconstructed into derivative creations. Access to the journal may not be limited or offered for a fee by any third party.
Prospective authors are obliged to fill in, sign and send back the publishing contract compliant with the CC licencing. [PL.pdf, PL.doc, EN.pdf,EN.doc].
According to this contract, authors grant the journal a non-exclusive right to publish their work under the creative commons license (CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0) without any financial obligation on both sides of the contract.
Before submission authors should make sure that derivative materials they use are not protected by copyright preventing their non-commercial publication. Authors are responsible for any respective copyright violations.