Abstract
This paper examines 17th-century descriptions of Algonquian and Iroquoian languages by French and British missionaries as well as their subsequent reinterpretations. Focusing on such representative studies as Paul Le Jeune’s (1592–1664) sketch of Montagnais, John Eliot’s (1604–1690) grammar of Massachusett, and the accounts of Huron by Jean de Brébeuf (1593–1649) and Gabriel Sagard-Théodat (c.1600–1650), I discuss their analysis of the sound systems, morphology, syntax, and lexicon. In addition, I examine the reception of early missionary accounts in European scholarship, focusing on the role they played in the shaping of the notion of ‘primitive’ languages and their speakers in the 18th and 19th centuries. I also discuss the impressionistic nature of evaluations of phonetic, lexical, and grammatical properties in terms of complexity and richness. Based on examples of the early accounts of the lexicon and structure of Algonquian and Iroquoian languages, I show that even though these accounts were preliminary in their character, they frequently provided detailed and insightful representations of unfamiliar languages. The reception and subsequent transmission of the linguistic examples they illustrated was however influenced by the changing theoretical and ideological context, resulting in interpretations that were often contradictory to those intended in the original descriptions.
References
Andresen, Julie T. 1990. Linguistics in America, 1769–1924: Critical history. London: Routledge.
Barany, Michael J. 2014. Savage numbers and the evolution of civilization in Victorian prehistory. The British Journal for the History of Science 47(2). 239–255. DOI: 10.1017/S0007087413000356
Boas, Franz. 1911. Introduction. In Franz Boas (ed.), Handbook of American Indian languages. Vol. 1, 1–83. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution.
Chafe, Wallace L. 2013. Caddoan, Iroquoian, and Siouan languages. Tübingen: De Gruyter Mouton.
Charlevoix, P[ierre François Xavier] de. 1744. Histoire et description generale de la Nouvelle France, avec le journal historique d’un voyage fait par ordre du roi dans l’Amérique septentrionnale. Vol. 3. Paris: Chez Rolin Fils, Libraire.
Cowan, William. 1984. John Eliot’s Indian grammar. In Sylvain Auroux, Michel Glatigny, André Joly, Anne Nicolas & Irène Rosier (eds.), Matériaux pour une histoire des théories linguistiques, 293–299. Lille: Université de Lille III.
Crosby, Alfred W. 1972. The Columbian exchange: Biological and cultural consequences of 1492. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
Du Ponceau, Peter Stephen. 1819. Corresponding secretary’s report to the Committee, on the languages of the American Indians. Transactions of the Historical and Literary Committee of the American Philosophical Society 1. xvii–xlvi.
Edwards, Jonathan. 1788. Observations on the language of the Muhhekaneew Indians: In which the extent of that language in North-America is shewn, its genius is grammatically traced, some of its peculiarities, and some instances of analogy between that and the Hebrew are pointed out. New Haven, CT: Printed by Josiah Meigs.
Eliot, John. 1663. The Holy Bible containing the Old Testament and the New. Cambridge, MA: Printed by Samuel Green and Marmaduke Johnson.
Eliot, John. 1666. The Indian grammar begun. Cambridge, MA: Marmaduke Johnson.
Farrar, Frederic W. 1870. Families of speech: Four lectures delivered before the Royal Institution of Great Britain in March, 1869. London: Longmans & Green.
Firpo, Luigi (ed.). 1954. Tutte le opere di Tommaso Campanella. Milano: Arnoldo Mondadori.
Goddard, Ives. 1978a. Eastern Algonquian languages. In Bruce G. Trigger (ed.), Northeast, 70–77. (Handbook of North American Indians 15.) Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution.
Goddard, Ives. 1978b. Central Algonquian languages. In Bruce G. Trigger (ed.), Northeast, 583–587.(Handbook of North American Indians 15.) Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution.
Goddard, Ives. 1996. The description of the native languages of North America before Boas. In Ives Goddard (ed.), Languages, 17–42. (Handbook of North American Indians 17.) Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution.
Gray, Russell. 2016. The big, bright future of linguistics. (Paper presented at the 46th Poznań Linguistic Meeting, Poznań, 16 September 2016.).
Hanzeli, Victor Egon. 1969. Missionary linguistics in New France. A study of seventeenth- and eighteenth-century descriptions of American Indian languages. The Hague: Mouton.
Herder, Johann Gottfried. 1986 [1772]. Essay on the origin of language. In John H. Moran & Alexander Gode, On the origin of language: Jean-Jacques Rousseau “Essay on the origin of languages”, Johann Gottfried Herder “Essay on the origin of language”, 85– 166. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press. [Originally published as Abhandlung über den Ursprung der Sprache, 1772. Berlin: Christian Friedrich Voß].
Kilarski, Marcin. 2007. Algonquian and Indo-European gender in a historiographic perspective. Historiographia Linguistica 34(2–3). 333–349. DOI: 10.1075/hl.34.2.06kil
Kilarski, Marcin. 2009. Cherokee classificatory verbs: Their place in the study of American Indian languages. Historiographia Linguistica 36(1). 39–73. DOI: 10.1075/hl.36.1.03kil
Kilarski, Marcin. 2013. Nominal classification: A history of its study from the classical period to the present. (Studies in the History of the Language Sciences 121.) Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/sihols.121
Kilarski, Marcin. 2016. Gender asymmetries in Iroquoian languages and their cultural correlates. Historiographia Linguistica 43(3). 363–391. DOI: 10.1075/hl.43.3.05kil
Kilarski, Marcin & Katarzyna Dziubalska-Kołaczyk. 2012. On extremes in linguistic complexity: Phonetic accounts of Iroquoian, Polynesian and Khoesan. Historiographia Linguistica 39(2/3). 279–303. DOI: 10.1075/hl.39.2-3.05kil
Koerner, E. F. K. 2004. Missionary linguistics in the Americas: The ‘heroic period’. In E. F. K. Koerner, Essays in the history of linguistics, 103–144. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Lahontan, Louis Armand. 1703. New voyages to North-America. Giving a full account of the customs, commerce, religion, and strange opinions of the savages of that country with political remarks upon the courts of Portugal and Denmark and the present state of the commerce of those countries. Vol. 2. London: Printed for H. Bonwicke etc.
Lefèvre, André. 1894. Race and language. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner.
Liberman, Mark. 2009. No words, or too many. Language Log. (https://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=1088) (date of access: 15 July 2016).
Lounsbury, Floyd G. 1978. Iroquoian languages. In Bruce G. Trigger (ed.), Northeast, 334–343. (Handbook of North American Indians 15.) Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution.
Lubbock, John. 1865. Pre-historic times, as illustrated by ancient remains, and the manners and customs of modern savages. London: Williams & Norgate.
Milligan, Joseph. 1859. On the dialects and language of the Aboriginal tribes of Tasmania, and on their manners and customs. Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania 3(2). 275–282.
Miner, Kenneth L. 1974. John Eliot of Massachusetts and the beginning of American linguistics. Historiographia Linguistica 1(2). 169–183. DOI: 10.1075/hl.1.2.04min
Mithun, Marianne. 1982. The synchronic and diachronic behavior of plops, squeaks, croaks, and moans. International Journal of American Linguistics 48(1). 49–58. DOI: 10.1086/465712
Mithun, Marianne. 1996. Overview of general characteristics. In Ives Goddard (ed.), Languages, 137–158. (Handbook of North American Indians 17.) Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution.
Mithun, Marianne. 1999. The languages of native North America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mithun, Marianne. 2012. Iroquoian: Mohawk. In Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding, 564–583. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199695720.013.0031
Mithun, Marianne. 2015. Morphological complexity and language contact in languages indigenous to North America. Linguistic Discovery 13(2). 37–59. DOI: 10.1349/PS1.1537-0852.A.466
Monboddo, James Burnett. 1774 [1773]. Of the origin and progress of language. Vol. 1. (2nd edn.) Edinburgh: Printed for J. Balfour.
Pickering, John. 1820. Review of A discourse on the religion of the Indian tribes of North America. Delivered before the New-York Historical Society, December 20, 1819 by Samuel F. Jarvis. The North American Review 11(28). 103–113.
Pickering, John. 1823. Notes by the editor. In Jonathan Edwards, Observations on the language of the Muhhekaneew Indians. (Ed. by John Pickering.), 20–82. Boston, MA: Phelps and Farnham.
Sagard[-Théodat], Gabriel. 1998 [1632]. Le grand voyage du pays des Hurons; suivi du Dictionnaire de la langue huronne. (Ed. by Jack Warwick.) Montréal: Presses de l’Université de Montréal [Originally published, 1632, as Le grand voyage dv pays des Hvrons, situé en l’Amérique vers la mer douce, Paris: chez Denys Moreav].
Schreyer, Rüdiger. 1996. Take your pen and write. Learning Huron: A documented historical sketch. In Even Hovdhaugen (ed.), ... and the Word was God: Missionary linguistics and missionary grammar, 77–121. Münster: Nodus.
Spencer, Herbert. 1884 [1876]. The principles of sociology. Vol. 1. New York, NY: D. Appleton & Company.
Swiggers, Pierre. 2007. “Bones and ribs”: The treatment of morphosyntax in John Eliot’s grammar of the Massachusett language (1666). In Otto Zwartjes, Gregory James & Emilio Ridruejo (eds.), Missionary linguistics III / Lingüística misionera III: Morphology and syntax, 41–58. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/sihols.111.05swi
Thwaites, Reuben Gold (ed.). 1896–1901. The Jesuit relations and allied documents: Travels and explorations of the Jesuit missionaries in New France, 1610–1791. The original French, Latin, and Italian texts, with English translations and notes. 73 vols. Cleveland, OH: Burrows Brothers.
Wolfart, H. Christoph. 1967. Notes on the early history of American Indian linguistics. Folia Linguistica 1. 153–171. DOI: 10.1515/flin.1967.1.3-4.153
Zwartjes, Otto. 2012. The historiography of missionary linguistics: Present state and further research opportunities. Historiographia Linguistica 39(2/2). 185–242. DOI: 10.1075/hl.39.2-3.01zwa