Marx the Fichtean
PDF

Keywords

Marx’s relation to Fichte
Marx as not philosophy-escapist
Hegel
Engels
Feuerbach
Classical German Philosophy
Lukács

How to Cite

Rockmore, T. . (2021). Marx the Fichtean . ETHICS IN PROGRESS, 12(2), 124–137. https://doi.org/10.14746/eip.2021.2.9

Abstract

We ignore the history of philosophy at our peril. Engels, who typically conflates Marx and Marxism, points to the relation of Marxism to the tradition while also denying it. In his little book on Feuerbach, Engels depicts Feuerbach as leading Marx away from Hegel, away from classical German philosophy, away from philosophy and towards materialism and science. This view suggests that Marx is at best negatively related to Classical German philosophy, including Hegel. Yet Engels elsewhere suggests that Marx belongs to the classical German philosophical tradition. In the preface to Socialism, Utopian and Scientific, Engels wrote: “We German socialists are proud that we trace our descent not only from Saint Simon, Fourier and Owen, but also from Kant, Fichte and Hegel” (Marx & Engels, Collected Works). In this paper I will focus on Marx’s relation to Fichte. This relation is rarely mentioned in the Marxist debate, but I will argue, it is crucial for the formulation of Marx’s position, and hence for assessing his contribution accurately. One of the results of this study will be to indicate that Marx, in reacting against Hegel, did not, as is often suggested, ‘leave’ philosophy, but in fact made a crucial philosophical contribution.

https://doi.org/10.14746/eip.2021.2.9
PDF

References

Cornu A. 1955-1970. Karl Marx et Friedrich Engels, 2 vols. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.

Descartes R. 1970. The Philosophical Works of Descartes, trans. E. Haldane & G. R. T. Ross, 2 vols. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Engels F. 1941. Ludwig Feuerbach and the End of Classical German Philosophy (1886), ed. C. P. Dutt. New York: International Publishers.

Feuerbach L. 1986. Principles of the Philosophy of the Future. Indianapolis: Hackett.

Fichte J. G. 1982. “First Introduction to the Science of Knowledge,” in idem, The Science of Knowledge, ed. and trans. P. Heath & J. Lachs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Korsch K. 2012. Marxism and Philosophy, trans. F. Halliday. London: Verso.

Leibniz G. W. 1875-1890. Die philosophischen Schriften, ed. C. I. Gerhardt. Berlin: Weidmann.

Lukács G. 1971. History and Class Consciousness, trans. R. Livingstone. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Lukács G. 1984. Zur Ontologie des gesellschaftlichen Seins. Lukács-Werke, Bd. 14, hg. von F. Benseler. Neuwied: Luchterhand Verlag.

Marx K., Engels F. 2010. Collected Works [abbr. CW], full ed. London: Lawrence and Wishart.

Moore G. E. 1902/1958. “The Refutation of Idealism,” Philosophical Studies, reprinted in idem, Philosophical Studies. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Rockmore T. 2007. Kant and Idealism. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...