The Problem with Longtermism
Ethics in Progress, Volume 14, Number 2, cover page
PDF

Keywords

Effective altruism
longtermism
historiosophy
ethical calculus
existential risk
future
William MacAskill

How to Cite

Hyde, B. (2023). The Problem with Longtermism. ETHICS IN PROGRESS, 14(2), 130–152. https://doi.org/10.14746/eip.2023.2.9

Abstract

Moral circle expansion has been occurring faster than ever before in the last forty years, with moral agency fully extended to all humans regardless of their ethnicity, and regardless of their geographical location, as well as to animals, plants, ecosystems and even artificial intelligence. This process has made even more headway in recent years with the establishment of moral obligations towards future generations. Responsible for this development is the moral theory – and its associated movement – of longtermism, the bible of which is What We Owe the Future (London: Oneworld, 2022) by William MacAskill, whose book Doing Good Better (London: Guardian Faber, 2015) set the cornerstone of the effective altruist movement of which longtermism forms a part. With its novelty comes great excitement, but longtermism and the arguments on its behalf are not yet well thought out, suffering from various problems and entailing various uncomfortable positions on population axiology and the philosophy of history. This essay advances a number of novel criticisms of longtermism; its aim is to identify further avenues for research required by longtermists, and to establish a standard for the future development of the movement if it is to ever be widely considered as sound. Some of the issues raised here are about the arguments for the moral value of the future; the quantification of that value with the longtermist ethical calculus – or the conjunction of expected value theory with the ‘significance, persistence, contingency’ (SPC) framework; the moral value of making happy people; and our ability to affect the future and the fragility of history. Perhaps the most significant finding of this study is that longtermism currently constitutes a shorterm view on the longterm future, and that a properly longterm view reduces to absurdity.

https://doi.org/10.14746/eip.2023.2.9
PDF

References

Adams M. McCord & S. Sutherland 1989. “Horrendous Evils and the Goodness of God,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 63:297-323. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/aristoteliansupp/63.1.297

Barrat J. 2013. Our Final Invention. New York: Thomas Dunne Books.

Bentham J. 1789. Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. London: T. Payne and Son. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oseo/instance.00077240

Berlin I. 1969. Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bostrom N. 2013. “Existential Risk Prevention as Global Priority,” Global Policy 4(1):15-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12002

Bostrom N. 2014. Superintelligence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Brickman P. 1978. “Lottery Winners and Accident Victims: Is Happiness Relative?” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 36(8):917-927. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.36.8.917

Broome J. 2004. Weighing Lives. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/019924376X.001.0001

Carlyle T. 1841. On Heroes, Hero-Worship, & the Heroic in History. London: James Fraser.

Carter B. 1983. “The Anthropic Principle and its Implications for Biological Evolution,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 310(1512):347-363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1983.0096

Caviola L., D. Althaus, A. L. Mogensen, & G. P. Goodwin. 2022. “Population Ethical Intuitions,” Cognition 218, art. 104941. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104941

Diamond J. 1987. “The Worst Mistake in the History of the Human Race,” Discover Magazine, May 1987, pp. 95-98.

Dostoyevsky F. 1880. Brothers Karamazov. St. Petersburg: A. F. Marks.

Easterlin R. A. 1974. “Does Economic Growth Improve the Human Lot? Some Empirical Evidence,” in P. A. David & M. W. Reder (Eds.), Nations and Households in Economic Growth. New York: Academic Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-205050-3.50008-7

Easterlin R. A. & K. J. O’Connor. 2022. “The Easterlin Paradox,” in K. F. Zimmermann (Ed.), Handbook of Labor, Human Resources and Population Economics. Cham: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57365-6_184-2

Fukuyama F. 1992. The End of History and the Last Man. New York: Free Press.

Godwin W. 1793. Enquiry Concerning Political Justice. London: G.G.J. and J. Robinson.

Good I. J. 1966. “Speculations Concerning the First Ultraintelligent Machine,” Advances in Computers 6:31-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2458(08)60418-0

Gott III, J. Richard 1993. “Implications of the Copernican Principle for Our Future Prospects,” Nature 363(6427):315-319. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/363315a0

Harari Yuval N. 2015. Sapiens. New York: Harper.

Hancock G. 2015. Magicians of the Gods. New York: Thomas Dunne Books.

Hegel G. W. F. 1807. Phenomenology of Spirit. Bamberg – Würzburg: Joseph Anton Goebhardt.

Heidegger M. 1954. Lectures and Essays. Pfullingen: Günther Neske.

Hobbes Th. 1651. De Cive. London: R. Royston.

Hume D. 1739. A Treatise of Human Nature. London: John Noon. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oseo/instance.00046221

Hutcheson F. 1725. Inquiry into the Original of our Ideas and Beauty and Virtue. London: J. & J. Knapton and Co.

Kaku M. 2011. Physics of the Future. New York: Doubleday.

Kant I. 1781. Critique of Pure Reason. Riga: Johann Friedrich Hartknoch.

Kant I. 1785. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Riga: Johann Friedrich Hartknoch.

Kuhn T. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Lecky W. E. H. 1869. History of European Morals from Augustus to Charlemagne. London: Longmans, Green, and Co. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/12256-000

MacAskill W. 2014. “Replaceability, Career Choice, and Making a Difference,” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17(2):269-283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-013-9433-4

MacAskill W. 2015. Doing Good Better. London: Guardian Faber.

MacAskill W. 2022. What We Owe the Future. London: Oneworld.

MacAskill W. & H. Greaves 2021. “The Case for Strong Longtermism,” Global Priorities Institute Working Papers Series 5-2021.

MacAskill W., T. Ord, & K. Bykvist. 2020. Normative Uncertainty. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198722274.001.0001

Mackie J. L. 1977. Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong. New York: Penguin Books.

Malthus T. 1798. Essay on the Principle of Population. London: J. Johnson.

Marx K. 1932. The German Ideology. Moscow: Marx-Engels Institute.

Narveson J. 1973. “Moral Problems of Population,” Monist 57(1):62-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/monist197357134

Noske B. 1989. Humans and Other Animals. London: Pluto Press.

O’Lemmon M. 2022. “The Worst Mistake 2.0? The Digital Revolution and the Consequences of Innovation,” AI & Society [online first]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01599-5

Ord T. 2020. The Precipice. London: Bloomsbury.

Oswald A. & R. Winkelmann 2019. “Lottery Wins and Satisfaction: Overturning Brickman in Modern Longitudinal Data on Germany,” in M. Rojas (Ed.), The Economics of Happiness: How the Easterlin Paradox Transformed Our Understanding of Well-Being and Progress. Cham: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15835-4_3

Pareto V. 1916. Treaty of General Sociology. Florence: G. Barbéra.

Parfit D. 1984. Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Parfit D. 2011. On What Matters. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199572816.001.0001

Paul II, John. 1994. Letter to Families. Vatican City: Libreria Editrice Vaticana.

Perkins M. A. 2004. Christendom and European Identity. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110914610

Rowe W. L. 1979. “The Problem of Evil and Some Varieties of Atheism,” American Philosophical Quarterly 16(4):335-341.

Russell S. J. 2019. Human Compatible. New York: Viking.

Sahlins M. 1972. Stone Age Economics. New York: Routledge.

Shermer M. 2017. “Romance of the Vanished Past,” Scientific American 316(6):75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0617-75

Singer P. 1972. “Famine, Affluence, and Morality,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 1(3):229-243.

Singer P. 1975. Animal Liberation. New York: HarperCollins.

Singer P. 1981. The Expanding Circle. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Singer P. 2009. The Life You Can Save. New York: Random House.

Singer P. 2015. The Most Good You Can Do. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Skutch A. 1948. “Life’s Greatest Evil,” Scientific Monthly 66(6):514-518.

Stevenson B. & J. Wolfers. 2008. “Economic Growth and Subjective Well-Being: Reassessing the Easterlin Paradox,” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1:1-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/eca.0.0001

Spinoza Benedictus de 1677. Ethics. Amsterdam: Jan Rieuwertsz.

Tennyson A. 1850. In Memoriam. London: Edward Moxon. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oseo/instance.00106579

Tillich P. 1948. The Protestant Era. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Todd B., S. Farquhar, & P. Mills 2012. “The Ethical Careers Debate,” Oxford Left Review 7:4-9.

Tu Weiming, M. Hejtmanek, & A. Wachman 1992. The Confucian World Observed. Honolulu: East-West Center.

Turing A. 1950. “Computing Machinery and Intelligence,” Mind 59(236):433-460. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/LIX.236.433

Unger P. 1993. Living High and Letting Die. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Woods Jr., T. E. 2012. How the Catholic Church Built Western Civilization. Washington: Regnery.

Wright R. 2004. A Short History of Progress. Toronto: House of Anansi Press.

Zhang Shanruo Ning. 2016. Confucianism in Contemporary Chinese Politics. Lanham: Lexington Books.

Zuber S., N. Venkatesh, T. Tännsjö, Ch. Tarsney, H. Orri Stefánsson, K. Steele, D. Spears, J. Sebo, M. Pivato, T. Ord, Yew-Kwang Ng, M. Masny, W. MacAskill, N. Lawson, K. Kuruc, M. Hutchinson, J. E. Gustafsson, H. Greaves, L. Forsberg, M. Fleurbaey, D. Coffey, Susumu Cato, C. Castro, T. Campbell, M. Budolfson, J. Broome, A. Berger, N. Beckstead, & G. B. Asheim 2021. “What Should We Agree on about the Repugnant Conclusion?” Utilitas 33(4):379-383. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S095382082100011X