Keywords
healthcare
student attitudes
bioethics
Mediterranean
How to Cite
Number of views: 70
Number of downloads: 58
Abstract
Human reproduction has traditionally been an important issue in medical ethics. Advances in medical technology and the development of medically assisted reproduction (MAR) procedures are creating new bioethical dilemmas. This study is based on a quantitative approach using the survey method on a convenience sample of students (N=1097) from five universities from four fields of study – Medicine, Law, Theology and Philosophy – in Croatia, Greece and Italy. The aim of this study was to investigate students’ attitudes towards various aspects of medically assisted reproduction. Three hypotheses were tested using t-tests and ANOVA to examine differences in attitudes based on variables such as country, field of study, gender, year of study, religiosity, political orientation, financial status and size of their place of residence. Despite sharing a common Mediterranean cultural heritage, students from Italy showed a greater disapproval of MAR, but due to the small effect size, this difference should be interpreted with caution and the hypothesis could not be fully confirmed. In addition, Theology students had statistically significantly more negative attitudes toward MAR. Regarding differences in students’ socio-demographic characteristics, women, older students, individuals who are not religious and those who are politically left-oriented tended to have more liberal attitudes toward MAR. The results enable further reflection on the concept of Mediterranean Bioethics. These findings highlight how disciplinary background and religiosity shape ethical attitudes toward MAR within the Mediterranean context.
References
Alon I., Chebance Z., Massucci F. A., Bounartzi T., & Ravitsky V. 2023. “Mapping Ethical, Legal, & Social Implications (ELSI) of Assisted Reproductive Technologies,” Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 40:2045–2062. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-023-02854-4
Aristotle. 1985. Nicomachean Ethics. Translated by Terence Irwin. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.
Baltzersen E. 2022. “Attitudes towards Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) and Abortion Evidence from Europe.” URL: https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/95927/8/BALTZERSEN_2022.pdf (retrieved 1 October 2024).
Bartolomé-Peral E. & Coromina L. 2020. “Attitudes towards Life and Death in Europe: A Comparative Analysis”, Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 56(6):835–862. https://doi.org/10.13060/csr.2020.052
Bielińska K., Chowaniec A., Doričić R., Nowak M., Orzechowski M., Ramšak M., Łuków P., Muzur A., Zupanič-Slavec Z., & Steger F. 2022. “Equal Access to Healthcare in National Legislations: How Do Croatia, Germany, Poland, and Slovenia Counteract Discrimination in Healthcare?” BMC Health Services Research 22:1–11. https://bmchealthservres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12913-021-07453-6
Bulletti C. & Bulletti F. M. 2024. “The Italian Law on Assisted Reproductive Technologies. Twenty Years Later,” Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research 54(4):46218–46230. https://dx.doi.org/10.26717/BJSTR.2024.54.008593
Caenazzo L. & Borovečki A. 2022. “Perspectives on ‘Mediterranean Bioethics’,” in R. Pegoraro, L. Caenazzo, & L. Mariani (Eds.), Introduction to Medical Humanities: Medicine and the Italian Artistic Heritage (pp. 31–37). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04919-4
Calhaz-Jorge C., De Geyter C., Kupka M. S., Wyns C., Mocanu E., Motrenko T., Scaravelli G., Smeenk J., Vidaković S., & Goossens V. 2020. “Survey on ART and IUI: Legislation, Regulation, Funding and Registries in European Countries: The European IVF-monitoring Consortium (EIM) for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE),” Human Reproduction Open 1:hoz044. https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoz044
Christoforidis C., Anastasiadou S., Masouras A., & Papademetriou C. 2023. “Classification and Conceptualization of Health and Reproductive Tourism Concepts: Greece as an Example,” in Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Tourism Research (pp. 67–73). ICTR.
Cifrić I. 2005. “Odgovornost za život u kontekstu bioetičkih pitanja”, Socijalna ekologija 14(4):295–326.
Cioffi A., Cecannecchia C., Santurro A., Cipolloni L., & Cioffi F. 2023. “Attitudes of Italian Infertile Women Toward Ethical and Regulatory Limits of Medically Assisted Procreation (MAP),” La Clinica Terapeutica 174(3):251–256. https://doi.org/10.7417/CT.2023.2530
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith 1987. Donum Vitae. URL: https://www.vatican.va (retrieved 2 December 2024).
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith 2008. Instruction Dignitas Personae. URL: https://www.vatican.va (retrieved 2 December 2024).
Cook R. J., Dickens B. M., & Fathalla M. F. 2003. Reproductive Health and Human Rights. Integrating Medicine, Ethics, and Law. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
Corea G. 1985. The Mother Machine. New York: Harper & Row.
Croatian Parliament 2012. “Zakon o medicinski pomognutoj oplodnji” [Law on medically assisted fertilization], Official Gazette 86/12. URL: https://www.zakon.hr/z/248/Zakon-o-medicinski-pomognutoj-oplodnji (retrieved 6 December 2024).
D’agostino F. & Palazzani L. 2013. Bioetica. Nozioni fondamentali. Brescia: La Scuola.
Engelhardt H. T. 1996. The Foundations of Bioethics. Oxford University Press.
Fauser B. C. J. M., Boivin J., Barri P. N., Tarlatzis B. C., Schmidt L., & Levy-Toledano R. 2019. “Beliefs, Attitudes and Funding of Assisted Reproductive Technology: Public Perception of over 6,000 Respondents from 6 European Countries,” PLoS ONE 14(1):e0211150. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211150
Fertility Europe 2024. European Atlas of Fertility. URL: European Atlas of Fertility Treatment Policies 2024 – Fertility Europe (retrieved 6 December 2024).
Firestone S. 2003. The Dialectic of Sex: The Case for Feminist Revolution. New York: Farrar, Straus, & Giroux.
Gensabella Furnari M. 2018. Il corpo della madre. Per una bioetica della maternità. Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino.
Gracia D. 2001. “Un Modello Mediterraneo De Bioetica?” Bioetica e Cultura 11(1):13–24.
Herzfeld M. 1984. “The Horns of the Mediterraneanist Dilemma,” American Ethnologist 11(3):439–454.
Jain M. & Singh M. 2023. Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) Techniques. URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK576409/ (retrieved 6 December 2024).
Jolliffe I. T. 2002. Principal Component Analysis. New York: Springer.
Leon, G., Papetta, A. & Spiliopoulou, C. 2011. “Overview of the Greek Legislation Regarding Assisted Reproduction and Comparison with the EU Legal Framework,” Reproductive BioMedicine Online 23(7):820–823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.07.024
Lund A. & Lund M. 2018. Principal Components Analysis (PCA) using SPSS Statistics. URL: https://statistics.laerd.com/spss-tutorials/principal-components-analysis-pca-using-spss-statistics.php (retrieved 19 January 2025).
Matulić T. 2007. “Researching the Roots of Mediterranean Bioethics. The Ethics of Virtue and Happiness as conditio sine qua non,” Filozofska istraživanja 27(3):529–550.
Patrizio P. & Caplan A. L. 2014. “In Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer”, in B. Jennings (Ed.), Bioethics. Vol. V, 4th Ed. (pp. 2769–2775). Farmington Hills, Mich.: Macmillan Reference USA, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning.
Pessina A. 2020. Bioetica. L’uomo sperimentale. Pearson: MyLab.
Präg P. & Mills M. C. 2015. “Assisted Reproductive Technology in Europe. Usage and Regulation in the Context of Cross-border Reproductive Care” (Families and Societies Working Paper Series). URL: WP43PragMills2015.pdf (familiesandsocieties.eu), retrieved 6 December 2024).
Präg P. & Mills M. C. 2017. “Cultural Determinants Influence Assisted Reproduction Usage in Europe More Than Economic and Demographic Factors,” Human Reproduction 32(11):2305–2314. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dex298
Privitera S. 1994. “I valore simbolico del Dizionario,” in S. Leone & S. Privitera (Eds.), Dizionario di bioetica, XXXVII–XXXVIII. Bologna: Centro Editoriale Dehoniano.
Protopapadakis E. 2019. From Dawn till Dusk: Bioethical Insights into the Beginning and the End of Life. Berlin: Logos Verlag.
Riezzo I., Neri M., Bello S., Pomara C., & Turillazzi E. 2016. “Italian Law on Medically Assisted Reproduction: Do Women’s Autonomy and Health Matter?” BMC Women’s Health 16:2–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-016-0324-4
Rinčić I., Buterin T., Doričić R., Eterović I., Gensabella M., & Muzur A. 2021. “The Right to Exit the Footnote: A Story of Rediscovery and Revival of Fritz Jahr’s Bioethics (with Special Regard to Italy),” Medicina e Morale 70(1):11–24. https://doi.org/10.4081/mem.2021.926
Seiz M., Eremenko T., & Salazar L. 2023. “Socioeconomic Differences in Access to and Use of Medically Assisted Reproduction (MAR) in a Context of Increasing Childlessness,” JRC Working Papers Series on Social Classes in the Digital Age 2023/03. Seville: European Commission.
Sgreccia E. 2012. Manuale di bioetica, Vol. II. Milano: Vita & Pensiero.
Singer P. 1995. Rethinking Life and Death: The Collapse of Our Traditional Ethics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Szalma I. & Djundeva M. 2019. “What Shapes Public Attitudes towards Assisted Reproduction Technologies in Europe?” Demografia 62(5):45–75. https://doi.org/10.21543/DEE.2019.2
Tutić Grokša I. & Muzur A. 2023. “EUROBIOMED – Od različitosti tradicija do zajedničke euromediteranske bioetičke platforme – stvaranje alata za dijalog i djelovanje (IP-2020-02-7450) – Plan upravljanja istraživačkim podacima”. URL: https://repository.medri.uniri.hr/islandora/object/medri:7512 (retrieved 1 February 2025).
Vayena E., Rowe P. J., & Griffin P. D. 2002. Current Practices and Controversies in Assisted Reproduction: Report of a Meeting on “Medical, Ethical and Social Aspects of Assisted Reproduction” held at WHO Headquarters in Geneva, Switzerland, 17–21 September 2001. Geneva: World Health Organization.
Zegers-Hochschild F., Adamson G. D., De Mouzon J., Ishihara O., Mansour R., Nygren K., Sullivan E., Vanderpoel S., International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology, & World Health Organization 2009. “International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) and the World Health Organization (WHO) Revised Glossary of ART Terminology, 2009,” Fertility and Sterility 108(3):393–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.09.009
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ivana Tutić Grokša, Ana Depope, Tijana Trako Poljak, Toni Buterin, Robert Doričić, Iva Rinčić, Marianna Gensabella, Ivana Zagorac, Igor Eterović, Eleni Kalokairinou, Željko Kaluđerović, Josip Guć, Miltiadis Vantsos, Maria Laura Giacobello, Amir Muzur
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.