Keywords
posthumanism
new materialism
technology
inorganic matter
cybernetics
Bernard Stiegler
Yuk
Hui
Gilbert Simondon
How to Cite
Abstract
The article offers a new model of materialist philosophical critique (general technocritique or digital critique) as a critical response to new materialism(s). Drawing on the reinterpretation of the legacy of European philosophies and works by Bernard Stiegler, the article strives to elaborate authentically new theoretical account of matter, notably in relation to the techno-logical mode of its organisation. The critique of new materialism(s) is positioned within the unprecedented crisis of the theoretical model of knowledge. What it is possible to discover by the end of the second decade of the 21st century is that humanities scholars have not managed to confront the central issue for their viable future: the whole theoretical and methodological model, which has so far provided fuel for the contemporary humanities and shaped our social class, postcolonial, gender, queer and other sensibilities, is plunging into a deep epistemological crisis, for having lost its efficient and final cause. In a nutshell, the model
of “doing theory,” is no longer valid, inasmuch as “theory” strangely misrecognized the revolutionary developments in cybernetics, which occurred in the 1950s and radically changed the very nature of knowledge. Therefore, a new epistēmē has to be formed in this new digital condition. However, the formation of this new epistēmē requires for us to radically transform what is referred to as “theory” or “critical theory” and to take into account the developments in the sciences and technology (not necessarily in the methodological framework offered by what is defined as STS) in order to lay the foundations under a new critique of political economy in the hyper-material era.
References
Anderson, Chris. 2008. “The End of Theory: the Data Deluge Makes the Scientific Method Obsolete.” Wired 2008 (June 23). https://www.wired.com/2008/06/pb-theory/.
Apter, Emily. 2010. “Preface.” In Dictionary of Untranslatables. A Philosophical Lexicon, edited by Barbara Cassin. Trans. Emily Apter, Jacques Lezra, and Michael Wood. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Barad, Karen. 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway. Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
Barad, Karen. 2012. “On Touching—the Inhuman That Therefore I Am.” differences 23 (3).
Barad, Karen. 2014. “Diffracting Diffraction: Cutting Together-Apart.” parallax 20 (3).
Bataille, Georges. 1988. Guilty. Trans. Bruce Boone. Venice, CA: The Lapis Press.
Bergson, Henri. 1990. Matter and Memory. Trans. Nancy Margaret Paul and W. Scott Palmer. New York: Zone Books.
Berns, Thomas and Antoinette Rouvroy. 2013. “Gouvernementalité algorithmique et perspectives d’émancipation.” Réseaux 1 (177).
Berque, Augustin. 1987. Écoumène. Introduction à l’étude des milieu humains. Paris: Belin. Bonneuil, Christophe and Jean-Baptiste Fressoz. 2016. The Shock of the Anthropocene. The Earth, History and Us. Trans. David Fernbach. New York: Verso Books.
Braidotti, Rosi. 2013. The Posthuman. Cambridge, UK, Malden, MA: Polity.
Braidotti, Rossi and Maria Hlavajova. 2018. Posthuman Glossary. London, Oxford, New York, New Delhi, Sydney: Bloomsbury.
Butler, Judith. 1999. Gender Trouble. Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. London and New York: Routledge.
Cassin, Barbara (ed.). 2010. Dictionary of Untranslatables. A Philosophical Lexicon. Trans. Emily Apter, Jacques Lezra, and Michael Wood. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Cassin, Barbara 2014. “Traduire les intraduisibles, un état des lieux.” Cliniques méditerranéennes 90 (2).
Chakrabarty, Provincializing Europe. Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Cusset, François 2008. French Theory. How Foucault, Derrida, Deleuze, & Co. Transformed the Intellectual Life of the United States. Trans. Jeff Fort. Minnesota: Minnesota University Press.
Culler, Jonathan. 1997. Literary Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
Deleuze, Gilles. 1991. Bergsonism. Trans. Hugh Tomlinson and Barbara Habberiam. New York: Zone Books.
Deleuze, Gilles. 2003. Deux régimes de fous: Textes et entretiens, 1975– 1995. Paris: Minuit.
Derrida, Jacques. 2009. The Beast & the Sovereign. Volume I. Trans. Geoffrey Bennington. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
Dolphijn, Rick and Iris van der Tuin. 2012. New Materialism: Interviews & Cartographies. Open Humanities Press.
Durkheim, Émile. 1982. The Rules of Sociological Method and Selected Texts on Sociology and its Method. Trans. W. D. Halls. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Eagleton, Therry. 2004. After Theory. New York: Basic Books.
Ellul, Jacques. 1980. The Technological System. Trans. Joachim Neugroschel. London: Continuum.
Foucault, Michel. 1984. “What Is Enlightenment?” In Foucault Reader, edited by Paul Rabinow. New York: Pantheon Books.
Foucault, Michel. 1989. The Order of Things An archaeology of the human sciences. New York and London: Routledge.
Foucault, Michel. 1990. In Politics, Philosophy, Culture. Interviews and Other Writings. 1977-1984. Trans. Alan Sheridan et al. New York and London: Routledge.
Georgescu-Roegen, Nicholas. 1971. The Entropy Law and the Economic Process. Cambridge, Massachusetts and London: Harvard University Press.
Georgescu-Roegen, Nicholas. 1976. Institutional and Analytical Economic Essays, New York: Pergamon, 1976.
Gorz, André. 1982. Farewell to the Working Class. An Essay on Post-Industrial Socialism. Trans. Michael Sonenscher. London and Sydney: Pluto Press.
Gorz, André. 1989. Critique of Economic Reason. Trans. Gillian Handyside and Chris Turner. London, New York: Verso.
Horkheimer, Max and Theodor W. Adorno. 2002. Dialectic of Enlightenment. Philosophical Fragments. Trans. Edmund Jephcott. Stanford, CA: California University Press.
Hui, Yuk. 2016. On the Existence of Digital Objects. Minnesota: Minnesota University Press.
Hui, Yuk. 2019. Recursivity and Contingency. London and New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
Kaplan, Frédéric. 2014. “Linguistic Capitalism and Algorithmic Mediation.” Representations, vol. 127, no. 1. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/rep.2014.127.1.57.
Kaplan, Frédéric. 2014a “La question de la langue à l’époque de Google.” Digital Studies. Organologie des savoirs et technologies de la connaissance, edited by Bernard Stiegler, editor. Paris: FYP éditions.
Latour, Bruno 1993. We Have Never Been Modern. Trans. Catherine Porter. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Latour, Bruno 2004. “Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern.” Critical Inquiry 30.
Lecourt, Dominique. 2011. Contre la peur. Paris: PUF.
Levit, Georg S. 2001. Biogeochemistry – Biosphere – Noosphere. The Growth of the Theoretical System of Vladimir Ivanovich Vernardsky. Berlin: VWB.
Lindberg, Susanna. 2010. “Technics of Space, Place and Displace.” Azimuth 10.
Lindberg Susanna, Mika Ojakangas, and Sergei Prozorov. 2014. Europe Beyond Universalism and Particularism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Longo, Giuseppe, Maël Montévil 2018. „Big Data, Knowledge and Biology.” In Life Sciences, Information Sciences, edited by Thierry Gaudin et al. London, Hoboken: Iste, Wiley.
Lotka, Alfred. 1945. “The Law of Evolution As a Maximal Principle.” Human Biology 17 (3).
Lyotard, Jean François. 1984. The Postmodern Condition. A Report on Knowledge. Tran. Geoff Bennington and Brian Massumi. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Malabou, Catherine. 2017. Métamorphoses de l’intelligence. Que faire de leur cerveau bleu? Paris: PUF.
Marx, Karl and Frederic Engels. 1848. “Manifesto of the Communist Party.” In Selected Works. Vol. 1. Moscow: Progress Publishers. https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/pdf/Manifesto.pdf.
Mbembe, Achille. 2017. Critique of Black Reason. Trans. Laurent Dubois, Durham, London: Duke University Press.
Miłkowski, Marcin 2013. Explaining the Computational Mind. Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England: The MIT Press.
Montévil, Maël. 2019. “Which first principles for mathematical modelling in biology?” Rendiconti di Matematica e delle sue Applicazioni. Accepted for publication.
Moulier Boutang, Yann. 2011. Cognitive Capitalism. Trans. Ed Emery. Cambridge, UK, Malden, MA: Polity.
Patočka, Jan. 2002. Plato and Europe. Trans. Petr Lom. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
Patočka, Jan 2007. L’Europe après l’Europe. Trans. Erika Abrams. Lagrasse: Verdier.
Rekret, Paul 2016. “A critique of new materialism: ethics and ontology.” Subjectivity, 9/3, 225–245.
Rekret, Paul. 2018. “The Head, the Hand, and Matter: New Materialism and the Politics of Knowledge.” Theory, Culture & Society, 35(7–8), 49–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276418806369
Simondon, Gilbert. 2009. “The Position of the Problem of Ontogenesis.” Trans. Gregory Flanders. Parrhesia 7.
Simondon, Gilbert. 2017. On the Mode of Existence of Technical Objects. Trans. Cecile Malaspina and John Rogove. Washington: Univocal Publishing.
Simondon, Gilbert. 2017a. L’individuation à la lumière des notions de forme et d’information. Grenoble: Éditions Jérôme Millon.
Srnicek, Nick and Alex Williams. 2015. Inventing the Future. Postcapitalism and a World Without Work. New York: Verso Books.
Stiegler, Bernard. 1998. Technics and Time 1. The Fault of Epimetheus. Trans. Richard Beardsworth and George Collins. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
Stiegler, Bernard. 2006. “La peau de chagrin ou l’accident franco-européen de la philosophie d’après Jacques Derrida.” Rue Descartes 52 (2).
Stiegler, Bernard. 2008. Économie de l’hypermatériel et psychopouvoir. Entretiens avec Philippe Petit et Vincent Bontems. Paris: Mille et une nuits.
Stiegler, Bernard. 2010. Taking Care of Youth and the Generations. Trans.
Stephen Barker. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
Stiegler, Bernard 2011. Technics and Time 3. Cinematic Time and the Question of Malaise. Trans. Stephen Barker. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
Stiegler, Bernard 2011a. The Decadence of Industrial Democracies. Disbelief and Discredit, Volume 1. Trans. Daniel Ross and Suzanne Arnold. Cambridge, UK, Malden, MA: Polity.
Stiegler, Bernard 2013. What Makes Life Worth Living. On Pharmacology. Trans. Dan Ross. Cambridge, UK, Malden, MA: Polity.
Stiegler, Bernard 2014. “Pharmacologie de l’épistémè numérique.” In Digital Studies. Organologie des savoirs et technologies de la connaissance, edited by Bernard Stiegler. Paris: FYP éditions.
Stiegler, Bernard 2014a. Symbolic Misery 1. The Hyper-industrial Epoch. Trans. Barnaby Norman. Cambridge, UK, Malden, MA: Polity.
Stiegler, Bernard. 2015. States of Shock. Stupidity and Knowledge at the 21st Century. Trans. Dan Ross. Cambridge, UK, Malden, MA: Polity.
Stiegler, Bernard. 2016. Automatic Society 1. The Future of Work. Trans. Dan Ross. Cambridge, UK, Malden, MA: Polity.
Stiegler, Bernard. 2017. Philosophising by Accident. Interviews with Élie During. Trans. Benoît Dillet. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press Stiegler, Bernard 2018. Qu’appelle-t-on panser? 1. L’immense regression. Paris: Les Liens Qui Libèrent.
Stiegler, Bernard 2018a. The Neganthropocene. Trans. Dan Ross. Open Humanities Press.
Stiegler, Bernard 2019. The Age of Disruption: Technology and Madness in Computational Capitalism. Trans. Dan Ross. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2019.
Teilhard de Chardin, Pierre. 2014. The Future of Man. Translated by Norman Denny. New York: Image Books.
Trubetskova, Irina L. 2010. From Biosphere to Noosphere: Vladimir Vernadsky’s Theoretical System As a Conceptual Framework For Universal Sustainability Education. University of New Hampshire Scholars’ Repository. https://scholars.unh.edu/dissertation/612/.
Valéry, Paul. 1962. “The Crisis of the Mind.” In The Outlook for Intelligence. Trans. Denise Folliot and Jackson Mathews. New York, Evanston: Harper Torchbooks
Valéry, Paul. 1964. Aesthetics. Trans. Ralph Manheim. New York: Pantheon Books.
Vernadsky, Vladimir. 1945. “The Biosphere and the Noosphere.” Scientific American 33 (1), 1–12.
Vernadsky, Vladimir. 1997. The Biosphere. Trans. David B. Langmuir. New York: Copernicus.
Watsuji, Tetsuro. 2011. Fūdo le milieu humain. Trans. Augustin Berque. Paris: CNRS.
License
“Theoretical Practice” seeks to put into practice the idea of open access to knowledge and broadening the domain of the commons. It serves the development of science, thinking and critical reflection. The journal is published in open-access mode under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license (detail available here: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/). Articles published in the journal may be freely distributed, stored, printed and utilized for academic and teaching purposes without restrictions.
They should not be, however, used for any commercial purposes or be reconstructed into derivative creations. Access to the journal may not be limited or offered for a fee by any third party.
Prospective authors are obliged to fill in, sign and send back the publishing contract compliant with the CC licencing. [PL.pdf, PL.doc, EN.pdf,EN.doc].
According to this contract, authors grant the journal a non-exclusive right to publish their work under the creative commons license (CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0) without any financial obligation on both sides of the contract.
Before submission authors should make sure that derivative materials they use are not protected by copyright preventing their non-commercial publication. Authors are responsible for any respective copyright violations.