Keywords
Britain
conceptual history
democracy
suffrage
How to Cite
Abstract
From 1904 to 1914, the British debate on women’s suffrage was at its height. Suffragism has been the subject of numerous studies, however, few have paid attention to its opponent, “antisuffragism”. This article focuses on antisuffragists’ speeches, pamphlets and books to examine their uses of “democracy” and grasp the conceptual struggles at play. Most “Antis” painted women’s suffrage as a step towards a degenerate democratic society. However, more surprisingly, some also mobilised the democratic vocabulary positively, as a reason to disallow women the vote. Several authors considered that “democracy” rested on the capacity of the majority to impose its decisions through physical force–thus rendering a government elected by women impotent. Politicians also opposed granting women suffrage on a censorial basis since it went against the “democratic spirit of the time”. These findings demonstrate the increased importance of “democracy” in Britain and how a “conservative subversion” of the concept was attempted.
References
Barnes, Joel. 2018. “The British Women’s Suffrage Movement and the Ancient Constitution, 1867–1909.” Historical Research 91(253): 505–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2281.12234.
Bax, Ernest Belfort. 1889. The Ethics of Socialism: Being Further Essays in Modern Socialist Criticism, &c. London: Swan Sonnenschein.
Bax, Ernest Belfort. (1896) 1908. The Legal Subjection of Men. London: New Age Press.
Bax, Ernest Belfort. 1907. Essays in Socialism: New & Old. London: Grant Richards.
Bax, Ernest Belfort. 1912. Problems of Man, Mind, and Morals. London: Grant Richards.
Bax, Ernest Belfort. 1913. The Fraud of Feminism. London: Grant Richards.
Bax, Ernest Belfort, and Harry Quelch. 1903. A New Catechism of Socialism. London: The Twentieth Century Press.
Béliard, Yann. 2014. “Introduction: Revisiting the Great Labour Unrest, 1911–1914.” Labour History Review 79(1): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3828/lhr.2014.1.
Binard, Florence. 2014. “‘The Injustice of the Woman’s Vote’: Opposition to Female Suffrage after World War I.” Women’s History Review 23(3): 381–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/09612025.2013.820601.
Blease, Walter Lyon. 1910. The Emancipation of English Women. London: Constable & Company.
Bonin, Hugo. 2020. “From Antagonist to Protagonist: ‘Democracy’ and ‘People’ in British Parliamentary Debates, 1775–1885.” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 35(4): 759–75. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqz082.
Bush, Julia. 2002. “British Women’s Anti-Suffragism and the Forward Policy, 1908‒14.” Women’s History Review 11(3): 431–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/09612020200200330.
Bush, Julia. 2007. Women Against the Vote: Female Anti-Suffragism in Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Colquhoun, Ethel Maud Cookson. 1913. The Vocation of Woman. London: Macmillan.
Crozier-De Rosa, Sharon. 2013. “The National and the Transnational in British Anti-Suffragists’ Views of Australian Women Voters.”
History Australia 10(3): 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/14490854.2013.11668479.
Delap, Lucy. 2005. “Feminist and Anti-Feminist Encounters in Edwardian Britain.” Historical Research 78(201): 377–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2281.2005.00235.x.
Dicey, Albert Venn. 1909. Letters to a Friend on Votes for Women. London: John Murray.
Faraut, Martine. 2003. “Women Resisting the Vote: A Case of Anti Feminism?” Women’s History Review 12(4): 605–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/09612020300200376.
Fawcett, Millicent Garrett. 1911. Women’s Suffrage: A Short History of a Great Movement. London: T.C. & E.C. Jack.
Fletcher, Ian Christopher, Laura E. Nym Mayhall, and Philippa Levine, eds. 2000. Women’s Suffrage in the British Empire: Citizenship, Nation and Race. London: Routledge.
Griffin, Ben. 2012. The Politics of Gender in Victorian Britain: Masculinity, Political Culture and the Struggle for Women’s Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gurney, Peter J. 2014. “The Democratic Idiom: Languages of Democracy in the Chartist Movement.” The Journal of Modern History 86(3): 566–602. https://doi.org/10.1086/676730.
Harrison, Brian. (1978) 2013. Separate Spheres: The Opposition to Women’s Suffrage in Britain. London: Routledge.
Harrison, Frederic. 1908. Realities and Ideals: Social, Political, Literary and Artistic. London: Macmillan and Co.
Hart, Heber L. 1889. Women’s Suffrage and National Danger: A Plea for the Ascendency of Men. London: Alexander & Shepheard.
Hart, Heber L. 1908. Nature’s Reason Against Woman Suffrage. London: Women’s National Anti-Suffrage League.
Hart, Heber L. 1912. Women’s Suffrage: A National Danger. London: P. S. King and Son.
Holton, Sandra Stanley. (1986) 2002. Feminism and Democracy: Women’s Suffrage and Reform Politics in Britain, 1900–1918. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ihalainen, Pasi. 2017. The Springs of Democracy: National and Transnational Debates on Constitutional Reform in the British, German, Swedish and Finnish Parliaments, 1917–1919. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.
Innes, Joanna, and Mark Philp, eds. 2013. Re-Imagining Democracy in the Age of Revolutions: America, France, Britain, Ireland 1750–1850. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Joannou, Maroula. 2005. “Mary Augusta Ward (Mrs. Humphry) and the Opposition to Women’s Suffrage.” Women’s History Review 14(3‒4): 561–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/09612020500200439.
Jorgensen-Earp, Cheryl R., and Darwin D. Jorgensen. 2016. “Physiology and Physical Force: The Effect of Edwardian Science on Women’s Suffrage.” Southern Communication Journal 81(3): 136–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/1041794X.2015.1124914.
Kaplan-Tuckel, Barbara. 1983. “A Rhetorical Analysis of Four Parliamentary Debates on Women’s Suffrage in Great Britain, 1870–1897.” PhD diss., Pennsylvania State University.
Kent, Susan Kingsley. (1987) 2005. Sex and Suffrage in Britain, 1860–1914. London: Routledge.
Kurunmäki, Jussi, Jeppe Nevers, and Henk te Velde, eds. 2018. Democracy in Modern Europe: A Conceptual History. New York: Berghahn Books.
Laity, Paul. 2002. The British Peace Movement, 1870–1914. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Markham, Violet Rosa. 1912. Woman’s Sphere: Miss Violet Markham’s Great Speech at the Albert Hall, February 28th, 1912. London: National League for Opposing Woman Suffrage.
Markoff, John. 2003. “Margins, Centers, and Democracy: The Paradigmatic History of Women’s Suffrage.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 29(1): 85–116. https://doi.org/10.1086/375678.
Marshall, Susan E. 1997. Splintered Sisterhood: Gender and Class in the Campaign against Woman Suffrage. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Mayhall, Laura E. Nym. 2003. The Militant Suffrage Movement: Citizenship and Resistance in Britain, 1860–1930. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
National League for Opposing Woman Suffrage. 1912. The Anti-Suffrage Handbook of Facts, Statistics and Quotations for the Use of Speakers. London: National Press Agency.
National Union of Women’s Suffrage Societies (NUWSS). 1911a. All or Some or Some or None? London: National Union of Women’s Suffrage Societies.
National Union of Women’s Suffrage Societies (NUWSS). 1911b. The Conciliation Bill of Women’s Suffrage. London: National Union of Women’s Suffrage Societies. Accessed March 29, 2021. https://digital.library.lse.ac.uk/objects/lse:soy666pik.
Owen, Harold. 1912. Woman Adrift: The Menace of Suffragism. London: Stanley Paul.
Pankhurst, E. Sylvia. 1911. The Suffragette: The History of the Women’s Militant Suffrage Movement, 1905–1910. New York: Sturgis & Walton Company.
Parkman, Francis. 1880. “The Woman Question Again.” The North American Review 130(278): 16–30. Accessed March 29, 2021. www.jstor.org/stable/25100823.
Parkman, Francis. 1890. Some of the Reasons Against Woman Suffrage. [Great Britain]: Printed at the request of an Association of Women.
Pateman, Carole. 1988. The Sexual Contract. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Pugh, Martin. 2002. The March of the Women: A Revisionist Analysis of the Campaign for Women’s Suffrage, 1866–1914. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Purvis, June, and Sandra Stanley Holton, eds. 2000. Votes for Women. London: Routledge.
Quelch, Harry. 1910. “Social-Democracy and Ladies’ Suffrage.” The Social Democrat 14(7): 291‒294. Accessed March 29, 2021. https://www.marxists.org/archive/quelch/1910/07/15.htm.
Riedi, Eliza. 2000. “Options for an Imperialist Woman: The Case of Violet Markham, 1899–1914.” Albion 32(1): 59–84. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0095139000064218.
Rosanvallon, Pierre. 1992. Le Sacre Du Citoyen: Histoire Du Suffrage Universel En France. Paris: Gallimard.
Royden, Agnes Maude. 1912. Physical Force and Democracy. London: National Union of Women’s Suffrage Societies.
Rupp, Leila J. 2011. “Transnational Women’s Movements.” European History Online. Accessed March 29, 2021. http://ieg-ego.eu/en/threads/transnational-movements-and-organisations/international-social-movements/leila-j-rupp-transnational-womens-movements.
Ruthchild, Rochelle Goldberg. 2010. Equality and Revolution: Women’s Rights in the Russian Empire, 1905–1917. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Sanders, Valerie, and Lucy Delap. 2010. “Introduction.” In Victorian and Edwardian Anti-Feminism, edited by Valerie Sanders and Lucy Delap, 1: XXXIII–LII. London: Routledge.
Saunders, Robert. 2013a. “Democracy.” In Languages of Politics in Nineteenth- Century Britain, edited by David Craig and James Thompson, 142–67. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Saunders, Robert. 2013b. “Tory Rebels and Tory Democracy: The Ulster Crisis, 1900‒1914.” In The Foundations of the British Conservative Party: Essays on Conservatism from Lord Salisbury to David Cameron, edited by Bradley W. Hart and Richard Carr, 65–83. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
Scott, Alexander MacCallum. 1912. The Physical Force Argument Against Woman Suffrage. London: National League for Opposing Woman Suffrage.
Simon, Emily Maud. 1908. The Latest Phase of the Women’s Suffrage Movement: A Reply to Mrs. Henry Fawcett Lld. London: Women’s National Anti-Suffrage League.
Thompson, James. 2014. “The Great Labour Unrest and Political Thought in Britain, 1911–1914.” Labour History Review 79(1): 37–54. https://doi.org/10.3828/lhr.2014.3.
Ward, Mary Augusta. 1889. “An Appeal Against Female Suffrage.” The Nineteenth Century, June 1889.
Wingerden, Sophia A. van. 1999. The Women’s Suffrage Movement in Britain, 1866–1928. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Wright, Almroth Edward. 1913. The Unexpurgated Case Against Woman Suffrage. London: Constable.
License
“Theoretical Practice” seeks to put into practice the idea of open access to knowledge and broadening the domain of the commons. It serves the development of science, thinking and critical reflection. The journal is published in open-access mode under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license (detail available here: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/). Articles published in the journal may be freely distributed, stored, printed and utilized for academic and teaching purposes without restrictions.
They should not be, however, used for any commercial purposes or be reconstructed into derivative creations. Access to the journal may not be limited or offered for a fee by any third party.
Prospective authors are obliged to fill in, sign and send back the publishing contract compliant with the CC licencing. [PL.pdf, PL.doc, EN.pdf,EN.doc].
According to this contract, authors grant the journal a non-exclusive right to publish their work under the creative commons license (CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0) without any financial obligation on both sides of the contract.
Before submission authors should make sure that derivative materials they use are not protected by copyright preventing their non-commercial publication. Authors are responsible for any respective copyright violations.