Abstract
The paper is an attempt to reconstruct the notion of multitude which appears in the work of Antonio Negri, Michael Hardt and Paolo Virno. Multitude refers to the emergence of a new social subject, substantially different from the known historical formulations (nation, people, class). The notion is analyzed both in the context of the classical political philosophy and the changes in the modes of production occuring in the western societies - transition from the material to immaterial labor, which consists of producing relations between social singularities. The genealogical perspective will be therefore supplemented by the analysis of the biopolitical constituion of the multitude and both perspectives will show the exigency to deconstruct numerous notions of the traditional philosophy.References
Agamben G. 2000. Marginal Notes on „Commentaries on the Society of the Spectacle”. In Means without End: Notes on Politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Agamben. G. 2008. Homo sacer: suwerenna władza i nagie życie. Warszawa: Prószyński i S-ka.
Alighieri D. 1957. On World-Government. New York.
Althusser L. 2009. Sprzeczność i naddeterminacja: notatki do przyszłych badań. W W imię Marksa. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Krytyki Politycznej.
Baudrillard J. 2006. Wojny w Zatoce nie było. Warszawa: Sic!
Bowring F. 2004. „From the Mass Worker to the Multitude: a Theoretical Contextualization of Hardt and Negri’s Empire”. Capital & Class 28 (2) : 101-132.
Braidotti R. 2003. “Les Sujets Nomades Féministes Comme Figure des Multitudes”. Multitudes 12 (2) : 27-38.
Castells M., Himanen P. 2009. Społeczeństwo informacyjne i państwo dobrobytu: model fiński. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Krytyki Politycznej.
Christofolini P. 2008. “Populus. Plebs. Multitudo: Nota Lessicale su Alcuni interscambi e Fluttuazioni di Significato da Livio e Macchiavelli a Spinoza”. Laboratorio dell’ISPF. 5 (1) : 28-31.
Cyceron M. 1999. O państwie. O prawach. Kęty: Wydawnictwo Marek Derewiecki.
Deleuze G. 2007. Postscriptum o społeczeństwie kontroli. W Negocjacje: 1972-1990. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Dolnośląskiej Szkoły Wyższej Edukacji TWP.
E. Bendyk. 2009. Miłość. wojna. rewolucja: szkice na czas kryzysu. Warszawa: W.A.B..
Foucault M. 1995. Wola wiedzy. W Historia seksualności. Warszawa: Czytelnik.
Foucault M. 1998. Trzeba bronić społeczeństwa: wykłady w Collège de France 1976. Warszawa: Aletheia.
Foucault M. 2000. Rządomyślność. W Filozofia. historia. polityka: wybór pism. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Foucault M. 2004. The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France 1979. New York: Picador.
Hardt M., Negri A. 1994. Labor of Dionysus: a Critique of the State-Form. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Hardt M., Negri A. 2005. Imperium. Warszawa: W.A.B..
Hardt M., Negri A. 2005. Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire. London: Penguin Books.
Herer M. 2006. Gilles Deleuze: struktury-maszyny-kreacje. Kraków: Universitats.
Lazzarato M. 1996. Immaterial Labor. W Radical Thought in Italy: a Potential Politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Lemke T. 2008. Gouvernmentalität und Biopolitik. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Lotringer S. 2004. We, the Multitude. W A Grammar of the Multitude. New York: Semiotext(e).
Macchiavelli N. 1993. Discorsi Sopra la Prima Deca di Tito Livio. Torino.
Mentinis M. 2006. Zapatistas: The Chiapas Revolt and What It Meant for Radical Politics London Pluto Press.
Negri A. 1992. Il potere constituente: Saggio Sulle Alterntive del Moderne. Carnago.
Negri A. 2006. Powrót: alfabet biopolityczny. Warszawa: Sic!.
Negri A. 2007. Zur Gesellschaftlichen Ontologie: Materielle Arbeit. Immaterielle Arbeit und Biopolitik. W Empire und die Biopolitische Wende: die Internationale Disskusion im Anschluss an Hardt und Negri. Frankfurt-New York.
Preciado B. 2003. “Multitudes Queer: Notes pour Une Politique des Aanormaux”. Multitudes 12 (2) : 17-25.
Tronti M. 2005. The Strategy of Refusal. http://libcom.org/library/strategy-refusalmario-Tronti.
Virno P. 1996. Virtuosity and Revolution: the Political Theory of Exodus. W Radical Thought in Italy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
License
“Theoretical Practice” seeks to put into practice the idea of open access to knowledge and broadening the domain of the commons. It serves the development of science, thinking and critical reflection. The journal is published in open-access mode under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license (detail available here: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/). Articles published in the journal may be freely distributed, stored, printed and utilized for academic and teaching purposes without restrictions.
They should not be, however, used for any commercial purposes or be reconstructed into derivative creations. Access to the journal may not be limited or offered for a fee by any third party.
Prospective authors are obliged to fill in, sign and send back the publishing contract compliant with the CC licencing. [PL.pdf, PL.doc, EN.pdf,EN.doc].
According to this contract, authors grant the journal a non-exclusive right to publish their work under the creative commons license (CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0) without any financial obligation on both sides of the contract.
Before submission authors should make sure that derivative materials they use are not protected by copyright preventing their non-commercial publication. Authors are responsible for any respective copyright violations.