Keywords
hegemony
Marxism
public policy production and implementation
post-Marxism
How to Cite
Abstract
Marksizm był i wciąż zdaje się być dominującą perspektywą teoretyczną w obrębie krytycznej analizy polityki edukacyjnej. Autor opisuje zróżnicowane „obrazy” szkoły obecne w teorii marksistowskiej, a krytykowane za determinizm ekonomiczny i redukcjonizm klasowy. Odwołując się do prac Ernesto Laclaua, prezentuje alternatywne dla marksizmu ramy teoretyczne, które można wykorzystać w krytycznych badaniach produkcji i implementacji polityki edukacyjnej. Z tej perspektywy, szkoła oraz polityka edukacyjna postrzegane są jako przestrzenie politycznej kontestacji i walki o hegemonię.
References
Althusser, L. 1971. 'Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses', L. Althusser, Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays. London: New Left Books.
Apple, M.W. 1979. Ideology and Curriculum. London: Routledge.
Apple, M.W. 1982. Education and Power. Boston: Ark.
Apple M.W. 1999. Official Knowledge: Democratic Education in a Conservative Age. London: Routledge.
Ball, S.J. 2006. Education Policy and Social Class: The selected works of Stephen J. Ball. London: Routledge.
Ball, S.J. 2008. The Education Debate: Policy and Politics in the Twenty-First Century. Bristol: The Policy Press.
Ball, S.J. 2010. ,,New class inequalities in education: Why education policy may be looking in the worng place! Education policy, civil society and social class”. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 30 (3/4).
Becker, H.S. 1971. Social-class variations in the teacher-pupil Relationship. In School and society, ed. B.R. Cosin, I.R. Dale, G.M. Esland and D.F. Swift. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Bernstein, B. 1973. Class, Codes and Control: Vol. II: Applied studies towards a sociology of language. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Bourdieu, P. 1971. Systems of education and systems of thought. In Knowledge and Control, ed. M. Young. London: Collier-Macmillan.
Bourdieu, P. 1974.The school as a conservative force: scholastic and cultural inequalities. In Contemporary research in the sociology of education. London: Methuen.
Bowles, S., H. Gintis. 1976. Schooling in Capitalist America: Educational Reform and the Contradictions of Economic Life. New York: Basic Books.
Cole, M., D. Hill. 1995. ,,Games of Despair and Rhetorics of Resistance: Postmodernism, Education and Reaction.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 16 (2).
Dale, R. 1989. The State and Education Policy. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Daly, G. 1991. ,,The discursive construction of economic space: logics of organization and disorganization.” Economy and Society 20: 1.
Foucault, M. 1974. The Archaeology of Knowledge. London: Tavistock.
Geras, N. 1987. ,,Post Marxism?” New Left Review 163.
Giroux, H.A. 1981. Ideology, Culture&the Process of Schooling. London: The Falmer Press.
Glynos, J., and D. Howarth 2007. Logics of Critical Explanation in Social and Political Theory. London: Routledge.
Glynos, J., R.P Klimecki, and H. Willmott 2012. ,,Cooling out the marks.” Journal of cultural economy 5.
Gramsci, A. 1971. Selections from the Prison Notebooks. London: Lawrence&Wishart.
Hall, S. 1998. ,,The great moving nowhere show.” Marxism Today, November/December 9-14.
Hill, D. 2001. ,,State Theory and the Neo-Liberal Reconstruction of Schooling and Teacher Education: a structuralist neo-Marxist critique of postmodernist, quasi-postmodernist, and culturalist neo-Marxist theory”. British Journal of Sociology of Education 22: 1.
Hill, D. 2004. ,,Books, Banks and Bullets: controlling our minds – the global project of imperialistic and militaristic neo-liberalism and its effect on education policy”. Policy Futures in Education 2: ¾
Howarth, D. 2005. Discourse. New Delhi: Viva Books.
Jessop, B. 1990. State Theory: Putting Capitalist States in their Place. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Laclau, E. 1996. ,,The death and resurrection of the theory of ideology.” Journal of Political Ideologies 1.
Laclau, E., C. Mouffe 1987. ,,Post-Marxism without Apologies.” New Left Review 166.
Laclau, E., C. Mouffe 2001 [1985]. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.
Liston, D. P. 1988. Capitalist schools: Explanation and ethics in radical studies of Schooling. New York: Routledge.
Mouzelis, N. 1990. Post-Marxist Alternatives: The Construction of Social Orders. Basingstoke: MacMillan.
Olssen, M., J. Codd, A. O’Neill 2004. Education Policy: Globalization, Citizenship and Democracy. London: Sage.
Parsons, T. 1951. The social system. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Poulantzas, N. 1969. ,,The Problem of the Capitalist State.” New Left Review 78.
Rikowski, G. 1997. ,,Scorched Earth: prelude to rebuilding Marxist educational Theory”. British Journal of Sociology of Education 18: 4.
Rikowski, G. 2007. Marxist Educational Theory Unplugged. Presented at the Fourth Historical Materialism Annual Conference 9-11 Nov 2007. SOAS. University of London.
Sarup, M. 1978. Marxism and Education. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Torfing, J. 1999. New Theories of Discourse: Laclau, Mouffe and Žižek. Oxford: Blackwell.
Willis, P. 1977. Learning to Labour. Westmead: Saxon House.
Wright, A.J. 2012. ,,Fantasies of Empowerment: mapping neoliberal discourse in the coalition government’s schools policy.” Journal of Education Policy 26 (6).
Wright, A.J., T. Leśniak 2011. ,,Consuming in British Education: Adam Wright in conversation with Tomek Leśniak.” Krytyka Polityczna. http://www.krytykapolityczna.pl/English/ConsuminginBritisheducation/menuid-34.html/.
Žižek, S. 1989. The Sublime Object of Ideology. London: Verso.
License
“Theoretical Practice” seeks to put into practice the idea of open access to knowledge and broadening the domain of the commons. It serves the development of science, thinking and critical reflection. The journal is published in open-access mode under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license (detail available here: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/). Articles published in the journal may be freely distributed, stored, printed and utilized for academic and teaching purposes without restrictions.
They should not be, however, used for any commercial purposes or be reconstructed into derivative creations. Access to the journal may not be limited or offered for a fee by any third party.
Prospective authors are obliged to fill in, sign and send back the publishing contract compliant with the CC licencing. [PL.pdf, PL.doc, EN.pdf,EN.doc].
According to this contract, authors grant the journal a non-exclusive right to publish their work under the creative commons license (CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0) without any financial obligation on both sides of the contract.
Before submission authors should make sure that derivative materials they use are not protected by copyright preventing their non-commercial publication. Authors are responsible for any respective copyright violations.