Abstract
This article examines how the contributions of feminist moral philosophy and the ethic of care can advance an understanding of precarious work through an empirical analysis of migrant and minority ethnic workers’ experiences in private older-age care. This article analyses care workers’ bodily and emotional labour and provides insights into processes of work intensification. The ‘epistemic privilege’ of migrant and minority ethnic care workers’ voices reveals furthermore the vulnerabilities that characterize patterns of social reproduction that rely on an unequal distribution of care responsibilities within society. The findings presented rely on doctoral research, which drew upon 81 interviews with migrant and minority ethnic care workers in London, Paris, and Madrid.References
Anderson, Bridget i Isabel Shutes. 2014. Migration and care labour: theory, policy, and politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Anderson, Bridget. 2010. „Migration, immigration controls and the fashioning of precarious workers”. Work, employment & society 24 (2): 300–317.
Anderson, Bridget. 2000. Doing the dirty work? The global politics of domestic labour. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bettio, Francesca, Annamaria Simonazzi i Paola Villa. 2006. „Change in care regimes and female migration: the »care drain« in the Mediterranean”. Journal of European Social Policy 16 (3): 271–285.
Butler, Judith P. 2011. Ramy wojny: kiedy życie godne jest opłakiwania? Tłum. Agata Czarnacka. Warszawa: Instytut Wydawniczy Książka i Prasa.
Federici, Silvia. 2012. Revolution at Point Zero: Housework, Reproduction, and Feminist Struggle. New York: PM Press.
Folbre, Nancy. 2012. For love and money: care provision in the United States. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Fraser Nancy. 2016. „Contradictions of capital and care”. New Left Review (100): 99–117.
Gilligan, Carol. 1982/2003. In a different voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Gilligan, Carol, Arlie Russel Hochschild, Joan C. Tronto, Patricia Paperman i Pascale Molinier. 2013. Contre l'indifference des privilegies: a quoi sert le care. Paris: Payot.
Harvey, David. 2014. Seventeen Contradictions and the End of Capitalism. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hochschild, Arlie Russell. 2007. The commercialization of intimate life: notes from home and work. Berkeley, California: University of California Press.
Hochschild, Arlie Russell. 2000. „Global care chains and emotional surplus value”. W On the edge: Living with global capitalism, red. Anthony Giddens i Will Hutton. London: Jonathan Cape.
Jayaweera, Hiranthi i Bridget Anderson. 2008. Migrant workers and vulnerable employment: a review of existing data. Oxford: Centre on Migration, Policy and Society.
Kittay, Eva. 1999. Love’s labour: essay on women, equality, and dependency. New York: Routledge.
Kofman, Eleonore i Parvati Raghuram. 2015. Gendered migrations and global social reproduction. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Laslett, Barbara i Johanna Brenner. 1989. „Gender and Social Reproduction: Historical Perspectives”. Annual Review of Sociology 15: 381–404.
Lorey, Isabell. 2015. State of Insecurity. Governement of the Precarious. London: Verso.
Lorey, Isabell. 2010. „ Becoming Common: Precarization as Political Constituting”. E-flux 17. http://www.e-flux.com/journal/17/67385/becoming-common-precarization-as-political-constituting/.
Lutz, Helma, rred. 2008. Migration and Domestic Work: A European Perspective on a Global Theme, Aldershot: Ashgate.
Mahon, Rianne i Fiona Robinson. 2014. Feminist Ethics and Social Politics: Toward a New Global Political Economy of Care. Vancouver: UBC Press.
McCall, Leslie. 2005. „The Complexity of Intersectionality”. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 30 (3): 1771–1800.
Molinier, Pascale. 2013. Le travail du care. Paris: La Dispute.
OECD. 2013. International Migration Outlook. OECD Publishing.
Paugam, Serge. 2009. Le salarie de la precarite: les nouvelles formes de l'integration professionnelle. Paris: PUF.
Perez Orozco, Amaia. 2014. Subversion feminista de la economia: aportes para un debate sobre el conflicto capital-vida. Madrid: Traficantes de Suenos.
Rodriquez, Jason. 2014. Labors of love: nursing homes and the structures of care work. New York, N.Y., London: New York University Press. Isabel Shutes i Carlos Chiatti. 2012. „Migrant labour and the marketisation of care for older people: The employment of migrant care workers by families and service providers”. Journal of European Social Policy 22 (4): 392–405.
Smith, Dorothy E. 2005. Institutional Ethnography: a Sociology for People. Lanham: AltaMira Press.
Simonazzi, Annamaria. 2009. „Care regimes and national employment models”. Cambridge Journal of Economics 33(2): 211–232.
Tronto, Joan C. 2013. Caring democracy: markets, equality, and justice. New York: New York University Press.
Ungerson, Clare. 2003. „Commodified care work in European Labour Markets”. European Societies 5 (4): 377–396.
License
“Theoretical Practice” seeks to put into practice the idea of open access to knowledge and broadening the domain of the commons. It serves the development of science, thinking and critical reflection. The journal is published in open-access mode under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license (detail available here: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/). Articles published in the journal may be freely distributed, stored, printed and utilized for academic and teaching purposes without restrictions.
They should not be, however, used for any commercial purposes or be reconstructed into derivative creations. Access to the journal may not be limited or offered for a fee by any third party.
Prospective authors are obliged to fill in, sign and send back the publishing contract compliant with the CC licencing. [PL.pdf, PL.doc, EN.pdf,EN.doc].
According to this contract, authors grant the journal a non-exclusive right to publish their work under the creative commons license (CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0) without any financial obligation on both sides of the contract.
Before submission authors should make sure that derivative materials they use are not protected by copyright preventing their non-commercial publication. Authors are responsible for any respective copyright violations.