Property and Its Role as Interpreted by Polish Agrarianists, 1933-1946
Journal cover Studia Historiae Oeconomicae, title Vol. 28-29 (2010-2011) PROPERTY
PDF

Keywords

agrarianism
third way
socialisation of ownership

How to Cite

Janicki, T. (2011). Property and Its Role as Interpreted by Polish Agrarianists, 1933-1946. Studia Historiae Oeconomicae, 33–52. Retrieved from https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/sho/article/view/29221

Number of views: 144


Number of downloads: 71

No Related Submission Found

Google Scholar Citation

WszystkieOd 2020
Cytowania201209321
h-indeks6137
i10-indeks470225
0
2000
1000
500
1500
199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025545564681181201641902242683693753013903654334045616526838579031276127614511816172419791928348

Abstract

In the conception of ownership formulated by Polish agrarianists the creation of a new socio-economic system, pluralistic with regard to the forms of ownership, based on small private ownership in agriculture, crafts and retail trade as well as co-operative, self-government and state ownership in the remaining branches of the economy was assumed. Opting for maintenance and popularisation of individual ownership (agrarianists did not treat it) however, as the absolute (sacred) right, but as an institution subjected to social control. They did not condemn differences in material status, though at the same time, they definitely rejected both far-fetched disproportions in ownership (characteristic of capitalism) as well as equality in the field postulated by communists. Apart from the socio-economic functions, the agrarianists assigned an important political role to ownership. In their opinion, it constituted the protection of a citizen's property, the guarantee of their freedom and the way to a truly democratic political system. Relatedly, they put great emphasis on the popularisation and protection of individual, co-operative and self-governed ownership and referred to state ownership, characteristic of totalitarianism, with great caution.

PDF