Abstract
This article surveys the diversity and dynamics of the peasant economy in seventeenth-century England, arguing against any single, unified model of English rural society. The author identifies twelve distinct farming systems shaped by soils, topography, and centuries of communal adaptation, ranging from mixed corn-and-sheep farming on chalk downlands to pastoral dairying in wood-pasture regions and market gardening around London. This regional variety, rather than being an obstacle to analysis, is presented as the key to understanding how agricultural specialization created mutual dependencies between regions and sustained the momentum of economic change.
The article draws on local studies, probate records, estate documents, and case histories of specific agricultural innovations to reconstruct the conditions under which new crops and farming methods spread across different peasant communities. The case of tobacco-growing in Gloucestershire illustrates how innovations typically originated with gentry or yeomen who had access to merchants and market information, capital to take risks, and social relationships with tenants that could be either cooperative or coercive depending on local conditions.
In corn-growing regions with hierarchical social structures, the seventeenth century brought the consolidation of large farms, the decline of small peasant holdings, and growing impoverishment of agricultural labourers. In pastoral regions, by contrast, peasant-craftsmen who combined farming with rural industries such as cloth weaving, metal-working, and coalmining enjoyed a more equitable distribution of wealth and a degree of personal independence.
The dual economy of pastoral areas, rooted in complementary agricultural and industrial livelihoods, proved remarkably resilient and laid important foundations for later industrialization. The article concludes that the prosperity and social character of peasant communities depended less on national trends than on local farming type, tenurial conditions, and access to markets.
References
Bythell, D. (1969) The Handloom Weavers. A Study in the English Cotton Industry during the Industrial Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511895999
Cobbett, W. (1957) Rural Rides. London: J.M. Dent and Sons.
Harvey, J. (1972) Early Gardening Catalogues. With complete reprints of lists and accounts of the 16th–19th centuries. London: Phillimore.
Harvey, J. (1973) Early Horticultural Catalogues. A checklist of trade catalogues issued by firms of nurserymen and seedsmen in Great Britain and Ireland down to the year 1850. Bath: University of Bath Library.
Hey, D. (1969) ‘A Dual Economy in South Yorkshire’, Agricultural History Review, 17(2), pp. 108–119.
Hey, D. (1972) The Rural Metalworkers of the Sheffield Region. A Study of Rural Industry before the Industrial Revolution. 2nd ser., no. 5. Leicester: Leicester University Press.
Hunt, C.J. (1970) The Lead Miners of the Northern Pennines in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Kerridge, E. (1967) The Agricultural Revolution. London: Allen and Unwin.
Rowlands, M. (1967–1968) ‘Industry and Social Change in Staffordshire, 1660–1760’, Transactions of the Lichfield and South Staffordshire Archaeological and Historical Society, 9, pp. 37–58.
Thirsk, J. (ed.) (1967) The Agrarian History of England and Wales. Vol. IV: 1500–1640. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Thirsk, J. (1970) ‘Seventeenth-century Agriculture and Social Change’, in Thirsk, J. (ed.) Land, Church and People. Essays Presented to Professor H.P.R. Finberg. Series Agricultural History Review, Supplement, 18. Reading: British Agricultural History Society, pp. 148–177.
Thirsk, J. (in press) ‘New Crops and their Diffusion. Tobacco-growing in Seventeenth-century England’, in Chalklin, C.W. and Havinden, M.A. (eds) Rural Change and Urban Growth, 1500–1800. Essays in English Regional History in Honour of W.G. Hoskins. London: Longman.
Webber, R. (1968) The Early Horticulturists. Newton Abbot: David and Charles.