Abstract
The proposal advanced in the paper is confronted with three earlier accounts dealing with copular-to clauses, and is shown to avoid some empirical and conceptual problems they have posed. It is shown how the derivation of copular-to clauses proceeds through a sequence of minimal and well-defined steps starting from the formation of an array of two nominal phrases, through a Small Clause stage to a Specification Predicative Phrase. Couched in the recent minimalist framework, the analysis specifically dwells on the theoretical advancements determining the nature of syntactic derivations, such as Hornstein’s (2009) distinctions between operations Concatenate, Merge and Label, Moro’s (2000, 2008) idea of Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking or Chomsky’s (2013) view of Labeling.
References
Adger, David. 2007. Stress and phasal syntax. Linguistic Analysis 33(3–4). 238–266.
Armstrong, Lilias E. & Ida C. Ward. 1926. A handbook of English intonation. Cambridge: Heffer.
Balazs, Julie Elizabeth. 2012. The syntax of small clauses. Unpublished M.A. thesis. Cornell University.
Boeckx, Cedric. 2008. Bare syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bondaruk, Anna. 2013. Copular clauses in English and Polish: Structure, derivation, and interpretation. Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.
Bošković, Željko. 2008. What will you have, DP or NP? In Emily Elfner & Martin Walkow (eds.), Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 37: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 101–114. Amherst, MA: GLSA.
Bošković, Željko. 2012. On NPs and clauses. In Günther Grewendorf & Thomas E. Zimmermann (eds.), Discourse and grammar: From sentence types to lexical categories (Studies in Generative Grammar 112), Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 179-242.
Bošković, Željko & Jon Gajewski. 2011. Semantic correlates of the NP/DP parameter. In Suzi Lima, Kevin Mullin & Brian Smith (eds.), Proceedings of the 39th annual meeting of the North East Linguistic Society: Cornell University, 121–134. Amherst, MA: GLSA.
Bowers, John. 1993. The syntax of predication. Linguistic Inquiry 24(4). 591–656.
Bowers, John. 2003. Predication. In Mark Baltin & Chris Collins (eds.), Handbook of contemporary syntactic theory (Blackwell Handbooks in Linguistics), 299–333. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Bresnan, Joan. 1971. Sentence stress and syntactic transformations. Language 47(2). 257–281.
Campbell, Richard. 1996. Specificity operators in SpecDP. Studia Linguistica 50(2). 161–188.
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program (Current Studies in Linguistics 28). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 2004. Beyond explanatory adequacy. In Adriana Belletti (ed.), Structures and beyond: The cartography of syntactic structure. Vol. 3 (Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax), 104–131. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 2008. On phases. In Robert Freidin, Carlos P. Otero & Maria Luisa Zubizaretta (eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory: Essays in honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, 133–166. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 2013. Problems of projection. Lingua 130. 33–49.
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1993. A null theory of phrase and compound stress. Linguistic Inquiry 24(2). 239–297.
Citko, Barbara. 2008. Small clauses reconsidered: Not so small and not all alike. Lingua 118(3). 261–295.
Citko, Barbara. 2011. Symmetry in syntax: Merge, move, and labels (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 129). Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.
Dikken, Marcel den. 2006. Relators and linkers: The syntax of predication, predicate inversion, and copulas (Linguistic Inquiry Monographs 47). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Donati, Caterina. 2006. On wh-head movement. In Lisa Lai Shen Cheng & Norbert Corver (eds.), Wh-movement: Moving on (Current Studies in Linguistics 42), 21–46. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Enç, Mürvet. 1991. The semantics of specificity. Linguistic Inquiry, 22(1). 1–25.
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt. 1993. A grammar of Mupun (Sprache und Oralität in Afrika 14). Berlin: Dietrich Reimer.
Frampton, John & Sam Gutmann. 2002. Crash-proof syntax. In Samuel David Epstein & T. Daniel Seely (eds.), Derivation and explanation in the minimalist program (Generative Syntax 6). 90–105. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
Geist, Ljudmila. 2007. Predication and equation in copular sentences in Russian vs. English. In Ileana Comorowski & Klaus von Heusinger (eds.), Existence: Semantics and syntax (Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy 84), 79–105. Dordrecht: Springer.
Green, Melanie. 2007. Focus in Hausa (Publications of the Philological Society 40). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Hale, Kenneth L. & Jay Keyser. 2002. Prolegomenon to a theory of argument structure (Linguistic Inquiry Monographs 39). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Halle, Morris & Jean-Roger Vergnaud. 1987. An essay on stress (Current Studies in Linguistics 15). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Heggie, Lorie, A. 1988. The syntax of copular clauses. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of South California.
Heusinger, Klaus von. 2002. Specificity and definiteness in sentence and discourse structure. Journal of Semantics 19(3). 254–274.
Heycock, Caroline & Anthony Kroch. 1999. Pseudocleft connectedness: Implications for the LF interface level. Linguistic Inquiry 30(3). 365–397.
Higgins, Roger. 1973. The pseudo-cleft construction in English. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Higgins, Roger. 1979. The pseudo-cleft construction in English (Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics). New York: Garland.
Hornstein, Norbert. 2009. A theory of syntax: Minimal operations and Universal Grammar. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.
Huber, Christian. 1999. Issues in syntax and interpretation of Sumerian clauses. In Jeremy Black & Gábor Zólyomi (eds.), Proceedings of Workshop on Diachronic and Synchronic Variations in the Phonology, Morphology, and Syntax of Sumerian, (no pages). Oxford: Oriental Institute.
Huber, Stefan. 2002. Es-Clefts und det-Clefts: Zur Syntax, Semantik und Informationsstruktur von Spaltsätzen im Deutschen und Schwedischen (Lunder Germanistische Forschungen 64). Stockholm: Almquist & Wiksell International.
Kiss, Katalin É. 2006. Focussing as predication. In Valéria Molnár & Susanne Winkler (eds.), The architecture of focus (Studies in Generative Grammar 82), 193–193. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Kiss, Katalin É. 2010. Structural focus and exhaustivity. In Malte Zimmermann & Caroline Féry (eds.), Information structure: Theoretical, typological and, experimental perspectives, 64–88. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kohler, Klaus J. 2006. What is emphasis and how is it coded? In Rüdiger Hoffmann & Hansjörg Mixdorff (eds.), Speech prosody: 3rd International Conference, Dresden, May 2-5, 2006, 748–751. Dresden: TUDpress.
Koopman, Hilda & Dominique Sportiche. 1991. The position of subjects. Lingua 85(2-3). 211–258.
Linde-Usiekniewicz, Jadwiga. 2007. Small clauses reconsidered revisited: Not so small and not all alike, and far fewer. Lingua Posnaniensis 49. 83–91.
Linde-Usiekniewicz, Jadwiga & Paweł Rutkowski. 2006. NP coordination as a new argument in the debate on the DP-analysis of Polish. In Blake H. Rodgers (ed.), Proceedings of WIGL 2006 (LSO Working Papers in Linguistics 6), 103–117.
Mikkelsen, Line. 2005a. Copular clauses: Specification, predication and equation (Linguistik Aktuell 85). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Mikkelsen, Line. 2005b. Subject choice in copular clauses. Unpublished MS, UC Berkeley.
Moro, Andrea. 1997. The raising of predicates: Predicative noun phrases and the theory of clause structure (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 80). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Moro, Andrea. 2000. Dynamic antisymmetry (Linguistic Inquiry Monographs 38). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Moro, Andrea. 2008. The boundaries of Babel: The brain and the enigma of impossible languages (Current Studies in Linguistics 46). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Pereltsvaig, Asya. 2001. On the nature of intra-clausal relations. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, McGill University.
Pereltsvaig, Asya. 2007. Copular sentences in Russian. A theory of intra-clausal relations (Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 70). Dordrecht: Springer.
Prince, Ellen F. 1981. On the inferencing of indefinite-this NPs. In Aravind K. Joshi, Bonnie L. Weber & Ivan A. Sag (eds.), Elements of discourse understanding, 231–250. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.
Progovac, Ljiljana. 2010. Syntax: Its evolution and its representation in the brain. Biolinguistics. 4.(2-3). 234–254.
Rappaport, Gilbert C. 2001. Extraction from nominal phrases and the theory of determiners. In Ewa Willim & Piotr Bański (eds.), Formal approaches to Polish syntax, 159–198. Bloomington, IN; Slavica Publishers.
Reinhart, Tanya. 2006. Interface strategies. Optimal and costly computation (Linguistic Inquiry Monographs 46). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Rizzi, Luigi. 2006.“On the form of chains: Criterial positions and ECP effects. In Lisa Lai Shen Cheng & Norbert Corver (eds.), Wh-movement: Moving on (Current Studies in Linguistics 42), 97–134. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Roberts, Ian. 2011. Head movement and the Minimalist Program. In Cedric Boeckx (ed.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic Minimalism (Oxford Handbooks in Linguistics), 195–219. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Roy, Isabelle. 2006. Non-verbal predication: A syntactic analysis of predicational copular sentences. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Southern California.
Rutkowski, Paweł. 2006. From demonstratives to copulas: A cross-linguistic perspective and the case of Polish. Journal of Universal Language 7. 147–173.
Selkirk, Elizabeth O. 1984. Phonology and syntax: The relation between sound and structure (Current Studies in Linguistics 10). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Sharvit, Yael. 1999. Connectivity in specificational sentences. Natural Language Semantics 7(3). 299–339.
Stowell, Tim. 1981. Origins of phrase structure. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, MIT.
Tajsner, Przemysław. 2008. Aspects of the grammar of focus: A minimalist view (Polish Studies in English Language and Literature 24). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Tajsner, Przemysław. forthcoming. On focus marking and predication. Evidence from Polish with some notes on Hausa. Lingua Posnaniensis.
Wedgwood, Dan. 2003. Predication and information structure. A dynamic account of the Hungarian pre-verbal system. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis: University of Edinburgh.
Wedgwood, Dan. 2006. Predication, focus and the positions of negation in Hungarian. Lingua 116(3). 351–376.
Williams, Edwin. 1983. Semantic vs. syntactic categories. Linguistics and Philosophy 6(3). 423–446.
Willim, Ewa. 2000. On the grammar of Polish nominals. In Roger Martin, David Michaels, & Juan Uriagereka (eds.), Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, 319–346. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Witkoś, Jacek. 1998. The syntax of clitics. Steps towards a minimalist account. Poznań. Motivex.
Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa. 1998. Prosody, focus, and word order (Linguistic Inquiry Monographs 33). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa & Jean-Roger Vergnaud. 2005. Phrasal stress, focus, and syntax. In Martin Everaert & Henk C. van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Blackwell companion to syntax. Vol. 3 (Blackwell Handbooks in Linguistics 19), 522–568. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishing.