Abstract
This paper deals with the phenomenon of V-to-T movement, which is one of the major parameters differentiating Romance from the majority of modern Germanic languages, and it defends the idea that rich morphology is the cause or trigger of V-to-T: in Romance, in a modern Germanic language like Icelandic, and very particularly in Old English, the precursor of the modern English language. More generally, the discussion endorses the idea that all Germanic languages used to be V-to-T languages in their old periods. I begin by arguing that verbal forms in Spanish contain a specific kind of segment, namely the stem or thematic vowel, which gives rise to morphological variations or asymmetries across tenses in the language. Such a productive system of stem verb classes is also shown to be the case in Icelandic, though not in German (which is therefore rendered as non-V-to-T), and ultimately it is acknowledged for a language like OE. The hypothesis is that the syntactic computation of (OE) verbal forms demands it that the speaker first identifies the verb class that the form in question belongs to before tackling the processing of tense morphology and agreement morphology. In pure syntactic terms, the stem or thematic vowel segment is identified in the present account with a v-feature that T must value, which valuation is realised by means of the displacement of the verb to the T head, that is, by means of V-to-T movement. After the valuation of T’s v-feature comes the valuation of τ-features and φ-features, respectively.
References
Adger, David. 2004. Core syntax: A Minimalist approach. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.
Alexiadou, Artemis & Elena Anagnostopoulou. 1998. Parameterizing Agr: Word order, verb movement and EPP-checking. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 16: 491-539.
Axel, Katrin. 2007. Studies on Old High German syntax: Left sentence periphery, verb placement and Verb-Second. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Bentzen, Kristine, Ϸorbjörg Hróarsdóttir, Gunnar Hrafn Hrafnbjargarson & Anna-Lena Wiklund. 2007a. Embedded V2 in Scandinavian: Empirical observations. Reykyavík: NORMS Verb Placement Workshop.
Bentzen, Kristine, Gunnar Hrafn Hrafnbjargarson, Ϸorbjörg Hróarsdóttir & Anna-Lena Wiklund. 2007b. Extracting from V2. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax: 79: 119-128.
Biberauer, Theresa, Anders Holmberg & Ian Roberts. 2008. Structure and linearization in disharmonic word orders. In Charles B. Chang & Hannah J. Haynie (eds.), The proceedings of the 26th Western Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 96-104. Somerville, MA : Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Biberauer, Theresa & Ans van Kemenade. 2011. Subject positions and information-structural diversification in the history of English. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 10: 17-69.
Biberauer, Theresa & Ian Roberts. 2005/2008. Subjects, Tense and verb movement in Germanic and Romance. Cambridge Occasional Papers in Linguistics 3: 24-43.
Biberauer, Theresa & Ian Roberts. 2008. Cascading parameter changes: Internally-driven change in Middle and Early Modern English. In Thorhallur Eythórsson (ed.), Grammatical change and linguistic theory: The Rosendal Papers, 79-113. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bobaljik, Jonathan D. 2002. Realizing Germanic inflection: Why morphology does not drive syntax. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 6: 129-167.
Bobaljik, Jonathan D. & Hoskuldur Thráinsson. 1998. Two heads aren’t always better than one. Syntax 1: 37-71.
Campbell, Alistair. 1959. Old English grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds.), Step by step: Essays on Minimalist syntax in honour of Howard Lasnik, 89-156. Cambridge. MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language, 1-52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Danckaert, Lieven. 2012. Latin embedded clauses: The left periphery. John Benjamins Publishing: Amsterdam/Philadelphia.
Emonds, Joseph. 1978. The verbal complex V-V in French. Linguistic Inquiry 9, 151-175.
Eythórsson, Thorhallur. 1995. Verbal syntax in the Early Germanic languages. PhD dissertation, Cornell University.
Faarlund, Jan Terje. 2004. The syntax of Old Norse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fischer, Olga. 2007. Morphosyntactic change: Functional and formal perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fischer, Olga, Ans van Kemenade, Willem Koopman & Wim van der Wurff. 2000. The syntax of Early English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Haeberli, Eric. 2002a. Inflectional morphology and the loss of V2 in English. In David Lightfoot (ed.), Syntactic effects of morphological change, 88-106. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Haeberli, Eric. 2002b. Observations on the loss of Verb Second in the History of English. In C. Jan-Wouter Zwart & Werner Abraham (eds.), Studies in comparative Germanic syntax. Proceedings from the 15th Workshop on comparative Germanic syntax, 245-272. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Haeberli, Eric. 2005. Clause type asymmetries in Old English and the syntax of verb movement. In Montserrat Batllori, M. Lluïsa Hernanz, Carme Picallo & Francesc Roca (eds.), Grammaticalization and parametric variation, 267-283. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Haider, Hubner. 2010. The syntax of German. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Haider, Hubner. 2012. The VO-OV split of Germanic languages. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 8: 1-53.
Han, Chung-hye. 2000. The evolution of do-support in English imperatives. In Susan Pintzuk, George Tsoulas & Anthony Warner (eds.), Diachronic syntax: Models and mechanisms, 275-295. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Heycock, Caroline & Antonella Sorace. 2006. Verb movement in Faroese. New perspectives on an old question. Nordlyd 35: 1-16.
Hogg, Richard. 1992. Phonology and morphology. In Richard Hogg (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language, vol. 1, 67-167. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Holmberg, Anders & Christer Platzack. 1988. On the role of inflection in Scandinavian syntax. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 42: 25-42.
Kemenade, Ans van. 1987. Syntactic Case and morphological Case in the history of English. Dordrecht: Foris.
Kemenade, Ans van. 1997. V2 and embedded topicalization in Old and Middle English. In Ans van Kemenade & Nigel Vincent (eds.), Parameters of morphosyntactic change, 326-352. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Klima, Edward S. 1964. Negation in English. In Jerry A. Fodor & Jerrold J. Katz (eds.). The structure of language, 246-323. New York: Prentice Hall.
Koeneman, Olaf & Hedde Zeijlstra. 2014. The Rich Agreement Hypothesis rehabilitated. Linguistic Inquiry 45: 571-615.
Kosmeijer, Wim 1986. The status of the finite inflection in Icelandic and Swedish. Working Pa pers in Scandinavian Syntax 26: 1-41.
Kroch, Anthony & Ann Taylor. 1997. Verb movement in Old and Middle English: Dialect variation and language contact. In Ans van Kemenade & Nigel Vincent (eds.), Parameters of morphosyntactic change, 297-325. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kroch, Anthony & Ann Taylor. 2000. Verb-object order in early Middle English. In Susan Pintzuk, George Tsoulas & Anthony Warner (eds.), Diachronic syntax: Models and mechanisms, 132-163. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lass, Roger. 1992. Phonology and morphology. In Norman Blake (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language, vol. 2, 23-155. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ledgeway, Adam. 2012. From Latin to Romance: Morphosyntactic typology and change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lightfoot, David. 1979. Principles of diachronic syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lightfoot, David. 1991. How to set paremeters: Arguments from language change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lightfoot, David. 1997. Shifting triggers and diachronic reanalyses. In Ans van Kemenade, & Nigel Vincent (eds.), Parameters of morphosyntactic change, 253-272. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lightfoot, David. 2006. How new languages emerge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mitchell, Bruce. 1968. A guide to Old English. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Moore, Samuel & Thomas A. Knott. 1971. The elements of Old English. Ann Arbor, Michigan: The George Wahr Publishing Co.
Panagiotidis, Phoevos. 2014. Categorial features: A generative theory of word class categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pesetsky, David & Esther Torrego. 2204/2007. The syntax of valuation and the interpretability of features. In Simin Karimi, Vida Samiian & Wendy K. Wilkins (eds.), Phrasal and clausal architecture: Syntactic derivation and interpretation. In honor of Joseph E. Emonds, 262-294. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Pintzuk, Susan. 1991. Phrase structures in competition: Variation and change in Old English word order. Dissertation: University of Pennsylvania.
Pintzuk, Susan. 1993. Verb seconding in Old English: Verb movement to Infl. The Linguistic Review 10. 5-35.
Pintzuk, Susan. 1999. Phrase structures in competition: Variation and change in Old English word order. New York: Garland.
Platzack, Christer. 1988. The emergence of a word order difference in Scandinavian subordinate clauses. McGill Working Papers in Linguistics, Special Issue on Comparative Germanic Syntax, 215-238.
Platzack, Christer & Anders Holmberg. 1989. The role of AGR and finiteness. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 43: 51-76.
Pollock, Jean-Ives. 1989. Verb movement, Universal Grammar, and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 365-424.
RAE = Real Academia Española. 2009. Nueva gramática de la lengua española. Morfología- Sintaxis, vol.1. Madrid: Espasa Libros.
Roberts, Ian. 1985. Agreement parameters and the development of English modal auxiliaries. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3: 21-58.
Roberts, Ian. 1993. Verbs and diachronic syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Roberts, Ian. 2007. Diachronic syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Roberts, Ian. 2011. Head movement and the Minimalist Program. In Cedric Boecx (ed.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic Minimalism 195-219. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rohrbacher, Bernhard W. 1994. The Germanic languages and the full paradigm: A theory of V to I raising. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts dissertation.
Rohrbacher, Bernhard W. 1999. Morphology-driven syntax: A theory of V to I raising and prodrop. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Ross, John. 1969. Auxiliaries as main verbs. Studies in Philosophical Linguistics 1: 77-102.
Taylor, Ann & Susan Pintzuk. 2012. Verb order, object position and information statu in Old English. York Papers in Linguistics Series 2: 29-51.
Thráinsson, Hoskuldur. 2010. Predictable and unpredictable sources of variable verb and adverb placement in Scandinavian. Lingua 120: 1062-1088.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1992. Syntax. In Richard Hogg (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language, vol. 1, 168-289. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vikner, Sten. 1995. Verb movement and expletive subjects in the Germanic languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Vikner, Sten. 1997. V-to-I movement and inflection for person in all tenses. In Liliane Haegeman (ed.), The new comparative syntax, 189-213. London: Longman.
Vikner, Sten. 2001. Verb movement variation in Germanic and Optimality Theory. Ms., University of Tübingen.
Vikner, Sten. 2005. Immobile complex verbs in Germanic. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 8: 83-115.
Warner, Anthony. 1993. English auxiliaries: Structure and history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Warner, Anthony. 1997. The structure of parametric change and V movement in the history of English. In Ans van Kemenade &Nigel Vincent (eds.), Parameters of morphosyntactic change, 380-393. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wiklund, Anna-Lena, Gunnar H. Hrafnbjargarson, Kristine Bentzen & Þorbjörg Hroarsdottir. 2007. Rethinking Scandinavian verb movement. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 10: 203-233.
Wood, Jim. 2015. Icelandic morphosyntax and argument structure. Heidelberg, Switzerland: Springer Publishing Company.
Wright, Joseph. 1906. An Old High German primer. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Wright, Joseph & Elizabeth M. Wright. 1925. Old English grammar. Third edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.