Abstract
This paper is a case study examining the choice and interaction of stylistic devices employed in The Schoole of Vertue, Francis Segar and Robert Crowley’s manual of good manners for children issued between 1582 and 1687. It was designed to convince its readers that particular patterns of behaviour were socially beneficial and worth following. In order to enhance the attractiveness, persuasiveness, and mnemonic qualities of the text, several stylistic devices are employed in the manual, including, for example, rhymes, acronyms, as well as binomials. It is generally agreed that repetitive patterns (especially binomials) are typical of formal registers, and particularly plentiful in legal and literary texts in Early Modern English, but the present study shows that similar rhetorical devices were also readily employed in the less formal and elevated style of manuals of good behaviour. Another rhetorical device frequently used in the manual under consideration consists in addressing the reader directly with the second person singular pronoun, especially in imperative constructions, thus creating an ambiance of emotional closeness, characterising the relationship between the master and the pupil.
References
Early English Books Online. Available at: http://wwwlib.umi.com/eebo/ (last accessed on 23 February 2015).
Seager (Segar) [Francis]. 1557. The schoole of Uertue, and booke of good Nourture for chyldren, and youth to learne theyr dutie by. Newely perused, corrected, and augmented by the fyrst Auctour. F. S With a briefe declaration of the dutie of eche degree. London: Wyllyam Seares.
Seager (Segar) [Francis] & Robert Crowley. 1582. The Schoole of Vertue and booke of good nurture, teaching children and youth their duties. Newlie pervsed, corrected, and augmented. Herevnto is added a briefe declaration of the dutie of ech degree: Also certaine Praiers and Graces compiled by R. C. London: H. Denham.
Seager (Segar) [Francis] & Robert Crowley. 1593. The Schoole of Vertue, & Booke of good Nurture, teaching children & youth their duties. Newly perused, corrected and augmented… London: [John Charlewood for] Richard Iones.
Seager (Segar) [Francis] & Robert Crowley. 1621. The Schoole of Vertue, and Booke of good Nurture teaching Children and Youth their duties. Newly perused, corrected and amended… London: G. E. for T. P. and I. W.
Seager (Segar) [Francis] & Robert Crowley. [1626]. The Schoole of Vertue, and Booke of good Nurture, teaching Children and Youth their duties. Newly perused, corrected, and amended… London: M. Flesher for Robert Bird.
Seager (Segar) [Francis] & Robert Crowley. [c. 1660]. The Schoole of Vertue, and Booke of good Nurture, teaching Children and Youth their duties. Newly perused, corrected, and amended… London: M. Flesher for Iohn Wright.
Seager (Segar) [Francis] & Robert Crowley. [1670]. The School of Vertue, and Book of good Nurture, teaching Children and Youth their Duties. Newly perused, corrected and amended… London: E. Crowch for J. Wright.
Seager (Segar) [Francis] & Robert Crowley. 1677. The School of Vertue. And Book of Good Nurture; teaching Children and Youth their Duties. Newly perused, corrected and amended… London: for J. Wright.
Seager (Segar) [Francis] & Robert Crowley. 1687. The School of Vertue. And Book of Good Nurture; teaching Children and Youth their Duties. Newly perused, corrected and amended… London: for M. W. and George Conyers.
Adamson, Sylvia. 1999. Literary language. In Roger Lass (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language. Volume III: 1476–1776, 539–653. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bhatia, Vijai. 1994. Cognitive structuring in legislative provisions. In John Gibbons (ed.), Language and the law, 136–155. London: Longman.
Bringhurst, Robert. 2008. The elements of typographic style. Vancouver: Hartley and Marks.
Claridge, Claudia 2012. Linguistic levels: Styles, registers, genres, text types. In Alexander Bergs & Laurel J. Brinton (eds.), English historical linguistics: An international handbook, 237–253. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Diller, Hans-Jürgen. 1998. Stylistics: Linguistic and textual. European Journal of English Studies 2.2. 155–174.
Diller, Hans-Jürgen. 2001. Genre in linguistic and related discourses. In Hans-Jürgen Diller & Manfred Görlach (eds.), Towards a history of English as a history of genres, 3–43. Heidelberg: Winter.
Griffith, Mark. 2016. The language and meaning of the College motto. Available at: https://www.new.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/1NCN1%20Griffith-Manners.pdf (last accessed on 12 March 2016).
Gustafsson, Marita. 1984. The syntactic features of binomial expression in legal English. Text 4.1–3. 123–141.
Kopaczyk, Joanna. 2009. (Multi-word) units of meaning in 16th-century legal Scots. In R.W. McConchie, Jukka Tyrkkö & Alpo Honkapohja (eds.), Selected proceedings of the 2008 Symposium on New Approaches in English Historical Lexis (Hel-Lex 2), 88–95. Sommerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Kopaczyk, Joanna. 2013. The legal language of Scottish burghs. Standardization and lexical bundles (1380–1560). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kopaczyk, Joanna & Hans Sauer. Forthcoming. Introduction: Defining and exploring binomials. In Joanna Kopaczyk & Hans Sauer (eds.), Binomials in the history of English: Fixed and flexible. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kristjánsson, Kristján. 2007. Aristotle, emotions, and education. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.
Leece, Jonathan. 2011. An unexpected audience: Manner manuals in Renaissance Europe. The Forum: Cal Poly's Journal of History. 3.1, article 11. Available at: http://digitalcommons.calpoly.edu/forum/vol3/iss1/11 (last accessed on 24 February 2015).
Lutz, Angelika. 1998. The interplay of external and internal factors in morphological restructuring: The case of you. In Jacek Fisiak & Marcin Krygier (eds.), Advances in English historical linguistics, 189–210. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Malkiel, Yakov. 1959. Studies in irreversible binomials. Lingua 8: 113–160.
Moessner, Lilo. 2012. Early Modern English: Standardization. In Alexander Bergs & Laurel J. Brinton (eds.), English historical linguistics: An international handbook, 698–714. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Mollin, Sandra. 2012. Revisiting binomial order in English: Ordering constraints and reversibility. English Language and Linguistics 16.1. 81–103.
Mollin, Sandra. 2013. Pathways of change in the diachronic development of binomial reversibility in Late American English. Journal of English Linguistics 41. 168–203.
Nevalainen, Terttu. 1999. Early Modern English lexis and semantics. In Roger Lass (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language. Volume III: 1476–1776, 332–458. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rissanen, Matti. 1999. Syntax. In Roger Lass (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language. Volume III: 1476–1776, 187–331. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rutkowska, Hanna. 2013. Orthographic systems in thirteen editions of the Kalender of Shepherdes (1506–1656). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Rutkowska, Hanna. 2016. Orthographic regularization in Early Modern English printed books: Grapheme distribution and vowel length indication. In Cinzia Russi (ed.), Current trends in historical sociolinguistics, 165–193. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Rutkowska, Hanna. Forthcoming. Binomials in several editions of the Kalender of Shepherdes, an Early Modern English almanac. In Joanna Kopaczyk & Hans Sauer (eds.), Binomials in the history of English: Fixed and flexible. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stribley, Miriam. 1987. The calligraphy source book: The essential reference for all calligraphers. London: Quarto Publishing.