Abstract
The development of dare in the history of English has played an important role in the literature on grammatical change and (de)grammaticalization. This paper aims to clarify two issues regarding the syntax and semantics of dare in earlier English: when it is first attested with to-infinitives, and to what extent it can be said to have been semantically ‘bleached’ in a number of Old English attestations. The conclusions are, firstly, that dare is not attested with to-infinitives in Old English (pace Tomaszewska 2014), and that a number of Middle English attestations that have been suggested in the literature are not convincing (pace Visser 1963–73; Beths 1999; Molencki 2005). Secondly, it is argued that the co-occurrence of dare and verbs like gedyrstlæcan ‘venture, be bold, presume’ in Old English is not an indication of semantic ‘bleaching’ of dare, and that the verb was not more ‘auxiliarized’ in Old English than it is today.
References
Beer, Frances (ed.). 1978. Julian of Norwich’s Revelations of Divine Love: The Shorter Version. (Middle English Texts 8.) Heidelberg: Winter.
Bosworth, Joseph & T. Northcote Toller. 1898. An Anglo-Saxon dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon.
Cockayne, Oswald (ed.). 1865. Leechdoms, wortcunning, and starcraft of early England, vol. 2. London: Longman, Green, Longmans, Roberts and Green.
DOE = Dictionary of Old English: A to H online, edited by Angus Cameron, Ashley Crandell Amos, Antonette diPaolo Healey et al. Toronto: Dictionary of Old English Project (http://tapor.library.utoronto.ca/doe/) [accessed 20 April 2017].
DOE Web Corpus = Dictionary of Old English Web Corpus, compiled by Antonette diPaolo Healey with John Price Wilkin and Xin Xiang. Toronto: Dictionary of Old English Project (http://tapor.library.utoronto.ca/doecorpus/) [accessed 20 April 2017].
Kluge, Friedrich & Elmar Seebold. 2011. Etymologisches Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache. (25th edn.) Berlin: De Gruyter.
Korpus DK. Copenhagen: Det Danske Sprog- og Litteraturselskab (http://ordnet.dk/korpusdk) [accessed 20 Apr 2017].
Liebermann, Felix (ed.). 1903–16. Die Gesetze der Angelsachsen. (3 vols.) Halle a.S.: Niemeyer.
MED = Middle English Dictionary, online edn. University of Michigan (http://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/med/) [accessed 20 April 2017].
Nichols, John Gough (ed.). 1860. The boke of noblesse. New York, NY: Burt Franklin. Online version published by Project Gutenberg (http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/33953) [accessed 20 April 2017].
ODS = Ordbog over det danske Sprog, online edn. Copenhagen: Det Danske Sprog-og Litteraturselskab (http://ordnet.dk/ods) [accessed 20 April 2017].
OED = Oxford English dictionary, online edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press (http://www.oed.com) [accessed 20 April 2017].
Rix, Helmut. 2001. Lexicon der indogermanischen Verben. (2nd edn.) Wiesbaden: Reichert.
Schröer, Arnold (ed.). 1885–88. Die angelsächsischen Prosabearbeitungen der Benediktinerregel. (2 vols.). Kassel; Wigand. [Repr. with appendix by Helmut Gneuss (Darmstadt 1964).]
Toller, T. Northcote. 1921. An Anglo-Saxon dictionary: Supplement. Oxford: Clarendon.
Beths, Frank. 1999. The history of dare and the status of unidirectionality. Linguistics 37(6). 1069–1110. DOI: 10.1515/ling.37.6.1069
Cristofaro, Sonia. 2003. Subordination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dixon, R. M. W. 2005. A semantic approach to English grammar. (2nd edn.) Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Duffley, Patrick J. 1994. Need and dare: The black sheep of the modal family. Lingua 94(4). 213–243. DOI: 10.1016/0024-3841(94)90010-8
Fischer, Olga. 2000. Grammaticalisation: Unidirectional, non-reversable? The case of to before the infinitive in English. In Olga Fischer, Anette Rosenbach & Dieter Stein (eds.), Pathways of change: Grammaticalization in English, 149–169. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/slcs.53.08fis
Gregersen, Sune. 2017. ‘To dare larks’ in Early Modern English. Notes and Queries 64(4). 537–540. DOI: 10.1093/notesj/gjx152
Hogg, Richard M. & Robert D. Fulk. 2011. A grammar of Old English. Vol. 2: Morphology. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Krug, Manfred. 2000. Emerging English modals: A corpus-based study of grammaticalization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Leipzig Glossing Rules. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology (https://www.eva.mpg.de/lingua/resources/glossing-rules.php) [accessed 20 April 2017].
Loureiro-Porto, Lucía. 2009. The semantic predecessors of need in the history of English (c750–1710). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Los, Bettelou. 2015. A historical syntax of English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Mitchell, Bruce. 1985. Old English syntax. (2 vols.) Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Molencki, Rafał. 2002. The status of dearr and þearf in Old English. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 38. 363–380.
Molencki, Rafał. 2005. The confusion between thurven and durren in Middle English. In Nikolaus Ritt & Herbert Schendl (eds.), Rethinking Middle English: Linguistic and literary approaches, 147–160. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Mustanoja, Tauno F. 1960. A Middle English syntax. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.
Norde, Muriel. 2009. Degrammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ohlander, Urban. 1941. A study on the use of the infinitive sign in Middle English. Studia Neophilologica 14(1–2). 58–66. DOI: 10.1080/00393274108586871
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
Schlüter, Julia. 2010. To dare to or not to: Is auxiliarization reversible? In An Van linden, Jean-Christophe Verstraete & Kristin Davidse (eds.), Formal evidence in grammaticalization research, 289–326. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/tsl.94.11sch
Taeymans, Martine. 2004. An investigation into the marginal modals dare and need in British present-day English. In Olga Fischer, Muriel Norde & Harry Perridon (eds.), Up and down the cline – The nature of grammaticalization, 97–114. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/tsl.59.06tae
Tomaszewska, Magdalena. 2014. On the auxiliary status of dare in Old English. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 49(3). 63–77. DOI: 10.1515/stap-2015-0003
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2001. Legitimate counterexamples to unidirectionality. Paper presented at Freiburg University, 17 October 2001 (http://www.stanford.edu/~traugott/papers/Freiburg.Unidirect.pdf) [accessed 20 April 2017].
Visser, Fredericus Theodorus. 1963–73. An historical syntax of the English language. (3 vols.) Leiden: Brill.
Warner, Anthony R. 1993. English auxiliaries: Structure and history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.