Abstract
Middle English second person pronouns thou and you (T/V) are considered to be among the means employed by medieval speakers to express their attitudes towards each other. Along with face-threatening acts, the use of these pronouns could indicate power relations or solidarity/distance between the interactants (Taavitsainen & Jucker 2003; Jucker 2010; Mazzon 2010; Bax & Kádár 2011, 2012; Jucker 2012). Using the tools available in pragmatic research, this paper attempts to provide an analysis of selected fragments from The Works of Sir Thomas Malory (Vinaver 1948 [1947]), analysed through the lens of Searle’s speech act theory (1969, 1976). The aim of this paper is to investigate whether the usage of T/V pronouns in polite or impolite contexts depends on the speech act in which they appear or not. Secondly, it looks at the presence of face-threatening acts (FTAs) and their potential influence on polite or impolite pronoun usage. Lastly, the analysis looks at the usage of FTAs within specific speech acts. The fragments used in this article were chosen from five chapters of Malory’s text: The Tale of King Arthur, Lancelot and Guinevere, The Morte Arthur, The Noble Tale, and Tristram de Lyones.
References
Austin, John L. 1962. How to do things with words. Clarendon Press.
Bax, Marcel & Dániel Z. Kádár. 2011. The historical understanding of historical (im)politeness: Introductory notes. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 12(1–2). 1–24. DOI: 10.1075/jhp.12.1-2.01bax
Bax, Marcel & Dániel Z. Kádár (eds). 2012. Understanding historical (im)politeness. John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/bct.41
Bernstein, Basil. 1972. Social class, language and socialization. In Pier Paolo Giglioli (ed.), Language and social context. Penguin. 157–178.
Blanco Salgueiro, Antonio. 2010. Promises, threats, and the foundations of speech act theory. Pragmatics 20(2). 213–228.
Bock, Martin. 1938. Der stilistische Gebrauch des englischen Personalpronomens der 2. Person im volkstümlichen Dialog der älteren englischen Komödie. PhD dissertation, University of Innsbruck.
Bradbrook, Muriel. 1958. Sir Thomas Malory. Longmans, Green & Co..
Braun, Friederike. 1988. Terms of address: Problems of patterns and usage in various languages and cultures. Mouton de Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/9783110848113
Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.
Brown, Roger & Albert Gilman. 1972 [1960]. The pronouns of power and solidarity. In Pier Paolo Giglioli (ed.). Language and social context. Penguin. 252–282.
Brown, Roger & Albert Gilman. 1989. Politeness theory and Shakespeare’s four major tragedies. Language in Society 18(2). 159–212. DOI: 10.1017/S0047404500013464
Bukowska, Joanna. 2002. Theatricality of the chivalric world in Thomas Malory’s Le Morte D’Arthur. International Journal of Arabic-English Studies 3. 33–44.
Busse, Ulrich. 2002. Linguistic variation in the Shakespeare Corpus: Morpho-syntactic variability of second person pronouns. John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/pbns.106
Burnley, David. 2003. The T/V pronouns in later Middle English literature. In Irma Taavitsainen & Andreas H. Jucker (eds.), Diachronic perspectives on address term systems. John Benjamins. 27–45. DOI: 10.1075/pbns.107
Byrne, St. Geraldine. 1936. Shakespeare’s use of the pronoun of address. The Catholic University of America.
Culpeper, Jonathan. 2009. Historical sociopragmatics: An introduction. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 10(2). 179–186. DOI: 10.1075/jhp.10.2.02cul
Culpeper, Jonathan. 2010. Conventionalized impoliteness formulae. Journal of Pragmatics 42(12). 3232–3245. DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.05.007
Culpeper, Jonathan. 2011. Impoliteness: Using language to cause offence. Cambridge University Press.
Culpeper, Jonathan. 2012. (Im)politeness: Three issues. Journal of Pragmatics 44(9). 1128–1133.
Culpeper, Jonathan & Daniel Z. Kádár (eds.). 2010. Historical (im)politeness. Peter Lang. DOI: 10.3726/978-3-0351-0025-9
Culpeper, Jonathan & Minna Nevala. 2012. Sociocultural processes and the history of English. In Terttu Nevalainen & Elizabeth C. Traugott (eds.), The Oxford handbook of the history of English. Oxford University Press. 365–391. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199922765.013.0032
Del Lungo Camiciotti, Gabriella. 2008. Two polite speech acts from a diachronic perspective: Aspects of the realisation of requesting and undertaking commitments in the nineteenth-century commercial community. In Andreas H. Jucker & Irma Taavitsainen (eds). 2008. Speech acts in the history of English. John Benjamins. 115–131. DOI: 10.1075/pbns.176.07del
Field, Peter (ed.). 2013. Sir Thomas Malory: Le Morte Darthur. 2 vols. D. S. Brewer.
Fukada, Atsushi & Noriko Asato. 2004. Universal politeness theory: Application to the use of Japanese honorifics. Journal of Pragmatics 36(11). 1991–2002. DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2003.11.006
Goffman Erving. 1967. Interaction ritual: Essays in face-to-face behavior. Anchor Books.
Goffman Erving. 1972 [1964]. The neglected situation. In Pier Paolo Giglioli (ed.), Language and social context. Penguin. 61–66.
Goffman Erving. 1974. Frame analysis: An essay on the organisation of experience. Harper and Row.
Honegger, Thomas. 2003. “And if ye wol nat so, my lady sweete, thanne preye I thee, [...]”. Forms of address in Chaucer’s Knight’s Tale. In Irma Taavitsainen & Andreas H. Jucker (eds.), Diachronic perspectives on address term systems. John Benjamins. 61–84. DOI: 10.1075/pbns.107.05hon
Jacobs, Andreas & Andreas H. Jucker. 1995. The historical perspective in pragmatics. In Andreas H. Jucker (ed.), Historical pragmatics. Pragmatic developments in the history of English. John Benjamins. 3–33. DOI: 10.1075/pbns.35.04jac
Jucker, Andreas H. 2006. ʽThou art so loothly and so oold also’: The use of ye and thou in Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales. Anglistik 17(2). 57–72.
Jucker, Andreas H. 2008. Historical pragmatics. Language and Linguistics Compass 2(5). 894–906. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-818x.2008.00087.x
Jucker, Andreas H. 2009. Speech act research between armchair, field and laboratory: The case of compliments. Journal of Pragmatics 41(8). 1611–1535. DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.02.004
Jucker, Andreas H. 2010. ʽIn curteisie was set ful muchel hir lest’: Politeness in Middle English. In Jonathan Culpeper & Daniel Z. Kádár (eds.), Historical (im)politeness. Peter Lang. 175-200.
Jucker, Andreas H. 2012. Changes in politeness cultures. In Terttu Nevalainen & Elizabeth Traugott (eds.), The Oxford handbook of the history of English. Oxford University Press. 422–433. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199922765.013.0036
Jucker, Andreas H. 2014. Courtesy and politeness in Sir Gawain and the Green Knight. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 49(3). 5–28. DOI: 10.1515/stap-2015-0007
Jucker, Andreas H. & Irma Taavitsainen. 2000. Diachronic speech act analysis: Insults from flyting to flaming. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 1(1). 67–95. DOI: 10.1075/jhp.1.1.07juc
Jucker, Andreas H. & Irma Taavitsainen. 2008. Speech acts now and then: Towards a pragmatic history of English. In Andreas H. Jucker & Irma Taavitsainen (eds.), Speech acts in the history of English. John Benjamins. 1–23. DOI: 10.1075/pbns.176.02taa
Kádár, Daniel Z. & Marcel Bax. 2013. In-group ritual and relational work. Journal of Pragmatics 58. 73–86. DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.03.011
Kaeuper, Richard & Montgomery Bohna. 2009. War and chivalry. In Peter Brown (ed.), A companion to medieval English literature and culture, c. 1350–c. 1500. Wiley-Blackwell. 273–291.
Kohnen, Thomas. 2000. Explicit performatives in Old English: A corpus-based study of directives. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 1(2). 301–321. DOI: 10.1075/jhp.1.2.07koh
Kohnen, Thomas. 2002. Towards a history of English directives. In Andreas Fischer, Gunnel Tottie & Peter Schneider (eds), Text types and corpora. Studies in honour of Udo Fries. Gunter Narr. 165–175.
Kohnen, Thomas. 2004. “Let mee bee so bold to request you”: Constructions with let me and the history of English directives. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 5(1). 159–173. DOI: 10.1075/jhp.5.1.08koh
Kohnen, Thomas. 2008. Directives in Old English: Beyond politeness?. In Irma Taavitsainen & Andreas H. Jucker (eds), Speech acts in the history of English. John Benjamins Publishing Co. 27–44. DOI: 10.1075/pbns.176.04koh
Leech, Geoffrey. 1983. Principles of pragmatics. Longman.
Mahowald, Kyle. 2012. A Naïve Bayes classifier for Shakespeare’s second-person pronoun. Literary and Linguistic Computing 27(1). 17–23. DOI: 10.1093/llc/fqr045
Mazzon, Gabriella. 1995. Pronouns and terms of address in Shakespeare’s English: A socio-affective marking system in transition. VIEWS - Vienna English Working Papers 4. 20–42.
Mazzon, Gabriella. 2009. Interactive dialogue sequence in Middle English drama. John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/pbns.185
Mazzon, Gabriella. 2010. Terms of address. In Andreas H. Jucker & Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Historical pragmatics. De Gruyter Mouton. 351–378. DOI: 10.1515/9783110214284.5.351
Mustanoja, Tauno. 2016 [1960]. A Middle English syntax: Parts of speech. John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/z.207
Nevala, Minna. 2004. Accessing politeness axes: Forms of address and terms of reference in early English correspondence. Journal of Pragmatics 36(12). 2125–2160. DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2004.02.001
Nakayasu, Minako. 2013. Spatio-temporal system in A treatise on the Astrolabe. Paper presented at ICOME 8, Murcia, Spain.
Nurmi, Arja & Päivi Pahta. 2010. Preacher, scholar, brother, friend: Social roles and code-switching in the writings of Thomas Twining. In Päivi Pahta, Minna Nevala, Arja Nurmi & Minna Palander-Collin (eds), Social roles and language practices in Late Modern English. John Benjamins. 135–162. DOI: 10.1075/pbns.195.07nur
Riddy, Felicity. 1987. Sir Thomas Malory. Brill.
Schnurr, Stephanie & Angela Chan. 2009. Politeness and leadership discourse in New Zealand and Hong Kong: A cross-cultural case study of workplace talk. Journal of Politeness Research 5(2). 131–157. DOI: 10.1515/JPLR.2009.009
Searle, John R. 1969. Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press.
Searle, John R. 1976. A classification of illocutionary speech acts. Language and Society 5(1). 1–23. DOI: 10.1017/S0047404500006837
Spencer-Oatey, Helen. 2000. Rapport management: A framework for analysis. In Helen Spencer-Oatey (ed.), Culturally speaking. Managing rapport through talk across cultures. Continuum. 11–46.
Taavitsainen, Irma & Andreas H. Jucker 2008. Speech acts now and then. Towards a pragmatic history of English. In Irma Taavitsainen & Andreas H. Jucker (eds.), Speech acts in the history of English. John Benjamins. 1–23. DOI: 10.1075/pbns.176.02taa
Taavitsainen, Irma & Andreas H. Jucker (eds). 2003. Diachronic perspectives on address term systems. John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/pbns.107
Taavitsainen, Irma & Andreas H. Jucker (eds). 2008. Speech acts in the history of English. John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/pbns.176
Vinaver, Eugene (ed.). 1948 [1947]. The works of Sir Thomas Malory. Clarendon Press.
Walker, Terry. 2003. You and thou in Early Modern English dialogues: Patterns of usage. In Irma Taavitsainen & Andreas H. Jucker (eds.), Diachronic perspectives on address term systems. John Benjamins. 309–342. DOI: 10.1075/pbns.107.13wal
Walker, Terry. 2007. Thou and you in Early Modern English dialogues. John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/pbns.158
Watts, Richard J. 1989. Relevance and relational work: Linguistic politeness as politic behavior. Multilingua 8(2–3). 131–166. DOI: 10.1515/mult.1989.8.2-3.131
Watts, Richard J. 1992. Linguistic politeness and politic verbal behaviour: Reconsidering claims for universality. In Richard J. Watts, Sachiko Ide & Konrad Ehlich (eds), Politeness in language: Studies in its history, theory and practice. Mouton de Gruyter. 43–70. DOI: 10.1515/9783110886542-005
Watts, Richard J. 2003. Politeness. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511615184
Watts, Richard J. 2005. Linguistic politeness research: Quo vadis? In Richard J. Watts, Sachiko Ide & Konrad Ehlich (eds), Politeness in language: Studies in its history, theory and practice (2nd edn). Mouton de Gruyter. xi–xlvii.
Włodarczyk, Matylda. 2016. Genre and literacies: Historical (socio)pragmatics of the 1820 settler petition. Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.
Yule, George. 1996. Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.