Abstract
The findings of the micro-level analysis – interpreted through the lenses of tokenism and the category of the ‘honorary man’ – reveal women’s complex and nuanced struggle to fit and find acceptance in the military culture of hypermasculinity. They also re-engage with the ideas of tokenism by demonstrating that various acts of proving, reflecting women’s token status, may concurrently and paradoxically be a means to earn honorary man status.
References
Antaki, Charles, Michael Billig, Derek Edwards & Jonathan Potter. 2003. Discourse analysis means doing analysis: A critique of six analytic shortcomings, Discourse Analysis Online 1(1).
Archer, Emerald M. 2012. The power of gendered stereotypes in the US Marine Corps. Armed Forces & Society 39(2). 359–391. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X12446924
Berdahl, Jennifer L., Marianne Cooper, Peter Glick, Robert W. Livingston & Joan C. Williams 2018. Work as a masculinity contest. Journal of Social Issues 74(3). 422–448. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12289
Bonnes, Stephanie 2017. The bureaucratic harassment of U.S. servicewomen. Gender & Society 31(6). 804–829. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243217736006
Britton, Dana M. 2017. Beyond the chilly climate. The salience of gender in women’s academic careers. Gender & Society 31(1). 5–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243216681494
Brownson, Connie. 2014. The battle for equivalency: Female US Marines discuss sexuality, physical fitness, and military leadership. Armed Forces & Society 40(4). 765–788. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X14523957
Carreiras, Helen. 2006. Gender and the military: Women in the armed forces of Western democracies. Routledge.
Collins Hill, Patricia. 2000. Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment (2nd edn.). Routledge.
Connell, Robert W. 1987. Gender and power: Society, the person, and sexual politics. Stanford University Press.
Connell, Raewyn. 2002. Gender. Polity Press.
Crowley, Kacy & Michelle Sandhoff. 2017. Just a girl in the Army: U.S. Iraq war veterans negotiating femininity in a culture of masculinity. Armed Forces & Society 43(2). 221–237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X16682045
Denzin, Norman K. & Yvonna S. Lincoln. 2000. Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In Norman K. Denzin & Yvonna S. Lincoln (eds.), Handbook of qualitative research, Sage. 1–32.
Disler, Edith A. 2008. Language and gender in the military: Honorifics, narrative, and ideology in Air Force talk. Cambria Press.
Drew, Paul & Elizabeth Holt. 1988. Complainable matters: The use of idiomatic expressions in making complaints. Social Problems 35(4). 398–417. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/800594
Dunivin, Karen O. 1991. Adapting to a man’s world: United States Air Force female officers. Defense Analysis 7(1). 97–103, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07430179108405487
Eckert, Penelope & Sally McConnell-Ginet. 2003. Language and gender. Cambridge University Press.
Enloe, Cynthia. 2010. Nimo’s war, Emma’s war: Making feminist sense of the Iraq war. University of California Press.
Enloe, Cynthia. 2017. On feminist international relations, patriarchy, women’s transnational organizing and on militarization. Interview by Mila O’Sullivan. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eDsX2dl9hn0
Epstein, Cynthia. 1981. Women in the law. Anchor.
Foley, Meraiah, Sarah Oxenbridge, Rae Cooper & Marian Baird. 2020. ‘I’ll never be one of the boys’: Gender harassment of women working as pilots and automotive tradespeople. Gender, Work & Organization. AOP. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12443
Gardner, Rod. 2004. Conversation analysis. In Alan Davies & Catherine Elder (eds.), The handbook of applied linguistics, 262–284, Blackwell. DOI: 10.1002/9780470757000.ch10
Goffman, Erving. 1959. The presentation of self in everyday life. Doubleday.
Heinecken, Lindy. 2017. Conceptualizing the tensions evoked by gender integration in the military: The South African case. Armed Forces & Society 43(2). 202–220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X16670692
Herbert, Melissa S. 1998. Camouflage isn’t only for combat. Gender, sexuality, and women in the military. New York University Press.
Heritage, John. 2010. Questioning in medicine. In Alice Freed & Susan Ehrlich (eds.), Why do you ask? The function of questions in institutional discourse, Oxford University Press. 42–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195306897.003.0003
Herring, Susan C. 2004. Computer-mediated discourse analysis: An approach to researching online behavior. In Sasha A. Barab, Rob Kling & James H. Gray (eds.), Learining in doing. Designing for virtual communities in the service learning, Cambridge University Press. 338–376.
Howard, John W. III & Laura C. Prividera. 2004. Rescuing patriarchy or saving “Jessica Lynch”: The rhetorical construction of the American woman soldier. Women & Language 27(2). 89–97.
Howard, John W. III & Laura C. Prividera. 2008. The fallen woman archetype: Media representations of Lynndie England, gender, and the (ab)uses of U.S. female soldiers. Women’s Studies in Communication 31(3). 287–311. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2008.10162544
Jefferson, Gail. 2004. Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In Gene H. Lerner (ed.), Conversation Analysis: Studies from the first generation, John Benjamins. 13–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef
Kanter, Rosabeth M. 1977a. Men and women of the corporation. Basic Books.
Kanter, Rosabeth M. 1977b. Some effects of proportions on group life: Skewed sex ratios and responses to token women. American Journal of Sociology 82(5). 965–990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/226425
Kendall, Shari & Deborah Tannen. 1997. Gender and language in the workplace. In Ruth Wodak (ed.), Sage studies in discourse. Gender and discourse, Sage. 81–105.
King, Anthony C. 2013. The female soldier. Parameters 43(2). 13–25.
King, Anthony C. 2015. Women warriors: Female accession to ground combat. Armed Forces & Society 41(2). 379–387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X14532913
King, Anthony C. 2016. The female combat soldier. European Journal of International Relations 22(1). 122–143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066115581909
King, Anthony C. 2017. Gender and close combat roles. In Rachel Woodward & Claire Duncanson (eds.), The Palgrave international handbook of gender and the military, Palgrave Macmillan. 305–317. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51677-0_19
Kitzinger, Celia. 2000. How to resist an idiom. Research on Language and Social Interaction 33(2). 121-154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327973RLSI3302_1
Lazar, Michelle M. 2014. Feminist critical discourse analysis: Relevance for current gender and language research. In Susan Ehrlich, Miriam Meyerhoff & Janet Holmes (eds.), Handbook of language, gender, and sexuality (2nd edn.), Wiley. 180–199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584248.ch9
Lester, Jessica N. & Michelle O’Reilly. 2016. The history and landscape of conversation and discourse analysis. In Jessica N. Lester & Michelle O’Reilly (eds.), The Palgrave handbook of adult mental health, Palgrave Macmillan. 23–44. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1057/9781137496850_2
Mackenzie, Megan. 2015. Beyond the band of brothers. The US military and the myth that women can’t fight. Cambridge University Press.
Moore, Brenda L. 1991. African American women in the U.S. military. Armed Forces & Society 17(3). 363–384. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X9101700303
Ostermann, Ana C. 2017. ‘No mam. You are heterosexual’: Whose language? Whose sexuality? Journal of Sociolinguistics 21(3). 348–370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12240
Pawelczyk, Joanna. 2011. Talk as therapy. Psychotherapy in a linguistic perspective. De Gruyter Mouton. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781934078679
Pawelczyk, Joanna. 2017. ‘It wasn’t because a woman couldn’t do a man’s job’: Uncovering gender ideologies in the context of interviews with American female and male war veterans. Gender and Language 11(1). 121–150.
Perez, Alycia L.U. & Tatiana V. Strizhko. 2018. Minority representation, tokenism, and well-being in army units. Military Psychology 30(5). 449–463. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08995605.2018.1482184
Pomerantz, Anita. 1986. Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims. Human Studies 9. 219–229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00148128
Potter, Jonathan. 1996. Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction. Sage. DOI: 10.4135/9781446222119
Prividera, Laura C. & John W. Howard III. 2014. Repealing the direct combat exclusion rule: Examining the ongoing “invisible war’” against women soldiers. Women & Language 37(1). 115–120.
Reinharz, Shulamit & Susan E. Chase. 2001. Interviewing women. In Jaber F. Gubrium & James A. Holstein (eds.), Handbook of interview research. Context and method, Sage. 221–238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412973588.n15
Rustad, Michael. 1982. Women in khaki: The American enlisted woman. Praeger.
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff & Gail Jefferson. 1974. A simplest systematic for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. Language 50(4). 696–735. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/412243
Sasson-Levy, Orna. 2003. Feminism and military gender practices: Israeli women soldiers in “masculine” roles. Sociological Inquiry 73(3). 440–465. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-682X.00064
Shaw, Sylvia. 2006. Governed by the rules? The female voice in parliamentary debates. In Judith Baxter (ed.), Speaking out. The female voice in public context, Palgrave. 81–102.
Silverman, David. 2001. The construction of ‘delicate’ objects in counselling. In Margaret Wetherell, Stephanie Taylor & Simeon J. Yates (eds.), Discourse theory and practice: A reader, Sage. 119–137.
Sjoberg, Laura. 2010. Women fighters and the ‘beautiful soul’ narrative. International Review of the Red Cross 92(887). 53–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S181638311000010X
Sjoberg, Laura, Grace Cooke & Stacy Reiter Neal. 2011. Introduction. Women, gender and terrorism. In Laura Sjoberg & Caron E. Gentry (eds.), Women, gender, and terrorism, University of Georgia Press. 1–27.
Stokoe, Elizabeth. 2010. ‘I’m not gonna hit a lady’: Conversation analysis, membership categorization and men’s denials of violence towards women. Discourse and Society 21(1). 59–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926509345072
Stokoe, Elizabeth. 2012. Moving forward with membership categorization analysis: Methods for systematic analysis. Discourse Studies 14(3). 277–303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445612441534
Sue, Derald Wing. 2010. Microaggressions in everyday life. Race, gender, and sexual orientation. Wiley.
SWAN = Service Women’s Action Network. 2019. Women in the military: Where they stand (10th edn.). SWAN.
Trobaugh, Elizabeth M. 2018. Women, regardless. Understanding gender bias in U.S. military integration. Joint Force Quarterly 88: 46–53.
Walsh, Claire. 2001. Gender and discourse: Language and power in politics, the church and organizations. Longman.
Weatherall, Ann, Maria Stubbe, Jane Sunderland & Judith Baxter. 2010. Conversation analysis and critical discourse analysis in language and gender research: Approaches in dialogue. In Janet Holmes & Meredith Marra (eds.), Femininity, feminism and gendered discourse, Cambridge Scholars. 213–243.
Yoder, Janice D. 1991. Rethinking tokenism: Looking beyond numbers. Gender & Society 5(2). 178–192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/089124391005002003
Yoder, Janice D. 2002. 2001 Division 35 Presidential Address: Context matters: Understanding tokenism processes and their impact on women’s work. Psychology of Women Quarterly 26(1). 1–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-6402.00038
Yoder, Janice D. & Alycia L. U. Perez. 2013. Tokenism. In Vicky Smith (ed.), Sociology of work: An encyclopaedia, Sage. 884–886.