The Middle English Suffix -Ish: Reasons for Decline in Productivity
PDF

How to Cite

Ciszek, E. (2013). The Middle English Suffix -Ish: Reasons for Decline in Productivity. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia, 47(2-3), 27–39. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10121-012-0002-z

Abstract

The aim of the present paper is to investigate the reasons for the significant decline in both the frequency and productivity of the suffix -ish in Middle English. The major factors responsible seem to be the growing popularity of the of + Noun phrases as well as the competition among -ish and other suffixes. The analysis will be preceded with the introduction of some essential facts concerning the semantic development and productivity of the OE suffix -isc in Middle English.

https://doi.org/10.2478/v10121-012-0002-z
PDF

References

Bosworth, Joseph - T. Northcote Toller 1898-1921 [1964] An Anglo-Saxon dictionary. Glasgow - New York - Toronto: Oxford University Press.

Cameron, Angus - Ashley Crandell Amos - Antonette diPaolo Healey 2003 The Dictionary of Old English: A to F on CD-ROM. Toronto: University of Toronto.

Ciszek, Ewa 2002 “ME -lich(e)/-ly”, Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 38:105-129.

Ciszek, Ewa 2008 Word derivation in Early Middle English. Frankfurt/M: Peter Lang.

Ciszek, Ewa 2008 “On competition between OE -estre and OF -esse in Early Middle English”, KwartalnikNeofilolgiczny 55: 23-31.

in press “The semantic development and productivity of the OE suffix -isc in Middle English”, Proceedings of The Sixth International Conference on Middle English (ICOME6), Cambridge, 24 - 26 July 2008.

Dalton-Puffer, Christiane 1996 The French influence on Middle English morphology: A corpus-based study of derivation. Berlin - New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Dalton-Puffer, Christiane - Claire Cowie 2000 “Diachronic word-formation and studying changes in productivity over time: Theoretical and methodological considerations”, in: Javier E. Diaz Vera (ed.), 410-437.

Diaz Vera, Javier E. (ed.) 2000 A changing world of words. Studies in English historical lexicography, lexicologyand semantics. Amsterdam - New York: Rodopi.

Fisiak, Jacek 1965 Morphemic structure of Chaucer’s English. University, Alabama: University of Alabama Press. 1968 [2004] A short grammar of Middle English. (6th edition.) Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.

Hogg, Richard (ed.) 1992 The Cambridge history of the English language. Vol. 1: The beginnings to 1066. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Horobin, Simon in press “Traditional English? Chaucerian methods of word-formation?”, NeuphilologischeMitteilungen 110/2: 141-157.

Jespersen, Otto 1942 A modern English grammar on historical principles. Vol. 6: Morphology. London: Allen & Unwin.

Kastovsky Dieter 1992 “Semantics and vocabulary”, in: Richard Hogg (ed.), 290-408.

Kurath, Hans et al. (eds.) 1954- 2001 Middle English dictionary. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Marchand, Hans 1969 Categories and types of Present-day English word formation: A synchronicdiachronicapproach. München: C.H. Beck’sche Verlagsbuch-handlung.

MED Online = Middle English dictionary. <http://ets.umdl.umich.edu/m/med/>

Murray, J.A.H. - Henry Bradley - W.A. Craigie - C.T. Onions. 1928 [1989] The Oxford English dictionary. (2nd edition.) Oxford: Clarendon.

OED online = The Oxford English dictionary.<http://lib.amu.edu.pl/bazy/filologia.php>

Wright, Joseph - Elizabeth Mary Wright 1914 Old English grammar. London - Edinburgh: Oxford University Press.